Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:27:53.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Toward a Russian Geopoetics, or Some Ways of Relating Russia to the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Anindita Banerjee  and
Jenifer Presto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Geopoetics is concerned, fundamentally, with a relationship to the earth and with the opening of a world.

—Kenneth White, Geopoetics: Place, Culture, World (2004)

The thread that links these convergences is the question of landscape, the poetics and iconology of space and place, and all their relations to social and political life, to experience, to history.

—W. J. T. Mitchell, “Geopoetics: Space, Place, Landscape,” Introduction to a special issue of Critical Inquiry (2000)

“Geopoetics” may be a novel concept for Russian studies, but the term is by no means new. The Scottish poet and critic Kenneth White coined it in 1978, inaugurating an international intellectual and creative movement of the same name that has gained particular momentum in the new millennium. Its urgency in a world that has grown exponentially more connected and networked yet, paradoxically, remains deeply bound to the “iconology of space and place” is evident from the way in which the cultural theorist W. J. T. Mitchell, in conversation with Edward Said and others in the symbolically freighted location of Birzeit University in the West Bank, recouped the term as the organizing principle of a special issue of Critical Inquiry in 2000. If anything, geopoetics as an animating force as well an analytical framework for what Mitchell identifies as “social and political life,” “experience,” and “history” appears in even starker relief against the myriad transnational conflicts that define the globe in 2016 within which, in turn, the region we study has been rapidly redefining itself vis-à-vis the world.

Type
Russian Geopoetics
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , Summer 2016 , pp. 247 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies, Inc. 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kenneth White’s foundational texts can be found on the website of the International Institute of Geopoetics at http://institut-geopoetique.org/en (last accessed March 12, 2016). The site is fully operative in Chinese, English, French, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, and Vietnamese, which shows the truly international orientation of the institute.

2. Mitchell, W. J. T., “Geopoetics: Space, Place, and Landscape,” Critical Inquiry 26, no. 2 (2000): 173 Google Scholar.

3. Vladimir Putin, “Poslanie federal nomu sobraniiu rossnskoi federatsn”, 2005, at http://archive.kremlin.ru/text/appears/2005/04/87049/shtml (last accessed March 12, 2016).

4. For an early exploration of how new media landscapes reconfigure spatial affiliations and allegiances, see Morley, David and Robbins, Kevin, Spaces of Identity: Global Media, Electronic Landscapes, and Cultural Boundaries (London, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The recent volume, Digital Russia: The Language, Culture, and Politics of New Media Communication, eds., Gorham, Michael, Lunde, Ingunn, and Paulsen, Martin (London, 2014)Google Scholar, offers several in-depth studies of transmedial constructions of space and history on post-Soviet networks and their interactions with the politics of identity in real life.

5. Harvey, David, “From Space to Place and Back Again: Reflections on the Condition of Postmodernity,” in Bird, Jon, Curtis, Barry, Putnam, Tim, Robertson, George, and Tickner, Lisa, eds., Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change (London, 1993), 29 Google Scholar; and Moisi, Dominique, The Geopolitics of Emotion: How Cultures of Fear, Humiliation, and Hope are Reshaping the World (London, 2009)Google Scholar.

6. Said, Edward W., “Invention, Memory, and Place,” Critical Inquiry 26, no. 2 (2000): 175-92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. On geopoetics as ontology and epistemology, see White, “An Outline of Geopoetics,” at http://www.institut-geopoetique.org/en/articles-en/37-an-outline-of-geopoetics (last accessed March 12, 2016); Italiano, Federico, “Defining Geopoetics,” Trans-.Écriture et chaos 6 (2008): 2–10 Google Scholar; and Malpas, Jeff, ed., The Intelligence of Place: Topographies and Poetics (London, 2015)Google Scholar.

8. Kamenskii, Vasilii, Burliuk, David, and Burliuk, Vladimir, Tango s korovami: zhelezobetonnye poemy (Moscow, 1914)Google Scholar. Daniel Mellis and Eugene Ostashevsky are currently completing the first English translation of the book.

9. Palmer, Scott W., Dictatorship of the Air: Aviation Culture and the Fate of Modern Russia (Cambridge, 2006), 27–29 Google Scholar.

10. Markov, Vladimir, Russian Futurism: A History (Berkeley, 1968), 197 Google Scholar; and Janecek, Gerald, The Look of Russian Literature: Avant-Garde Visual Experiments, 1900-1930 (Princeton, 1984), 125–27Google Scholar.

11. Markov, Russian Futurism, 198; and Janecek, The Look of Russian Literature, 128-29.

12. Belyi, Andrei, Peterburg: Roman v vos’mi glavakh s prologom i epilogom, ed. Dolgopolov, L. K. (Moscow, 1981), 9 Google Scholar; and Bely, Andrei, Petersburg, trans, and ed. Maguire, Robert A. and Malmstad, John E. (Bloomington, 1978), 1 Google Scholar. For an in-depth consideration of Belyi’s uses of the prefix pro-, see Bethea, David M., The Shape of Apocalypse in Modern Russian Fiction (Princeton, 1989), 131–34Google Scholar.

13. Belyi, Peterburg, 10; and Bely, Petersburg, 2.

14. Matich, Olga’s edited volume, Petersburg/Petersburg: Novel and City, 1900-1921 (Madison, 2010)Google Scholar, produces a very different reading of the interplay between the novel and city.

15. On nation and empire, see, for example, Hosking, Geoffrey A., Russia: People and Empire, 1522-1917 (Boston, 1997)Google Scholar; Ram, Harsha, The Imperial Sublime: A Russian Poetics of Empire (Madison, 2003)Google Scholar; and Condee, Nancy, The Imperial Trace: Recent Russian Cinema (Oxford, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the metropolis and the periphery, see, for instance, Suny, Ronald Grigor, The Soviet Experiment: Russia, the USSR, and the Successor States (New York, 1998)Google Scholar; and Khalid, Adeeb, Islam after Communism: Religion and Politics in Central Asia (Berkeley, 2007)Google Scholar. On the hemispheric divide, see Bassin, Mark, Imperial Visions: Nationalist Imagination and Geographical Expansion in the Russian Far East, 1840-1865 (Cambridge, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Laruelle, Mariene, Russian Eurasianism: An Ideology of Empire (Baltimore, 2008)Google Scholar; van der Oye, David Schimmelpennick, Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to Emigration (New Haven, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clowes, Edith W., Russia on the Edge: Imagined Geographies and Post-Soviet Identity (Ithaca, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Lim, Susanna Soojung, China and Japan in the Russian Imagination, 1685-1922: To the Ends of the Orient (London, 2013)Google Scholar.

16. On Russia’s contiguous territories, see Layton, Susan, Russian Literature and Empire: Conquest of the Caucasus from Pushkin to Tolstoy (Cambridge, 1994)Google Scholar; Bojanowska, Edyta M., Nikolai Gogol: Between Ukrainian and Russian Nationalism (Cambridge, MA, 2007)Google Scholar; and Hokanson, Katya, Writing at Russia’s Border (Toronto, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For some recent studies of Russia and Western metropolitan centers, see Livak, Leonid, How It Was Done in Paris: Russian Emigre Literature and French Modernism (Madison, 2003)Google Scholar; Frajlich, Anna, The Legacy of Ancient Rome in the Russian Silver Age (Amsterdam, 2007)Google Scholar; and Kalb, Judith E., Russia’s Rome: Imperial Visions, Messianic Dreams, 1890-1940 (Madison, 2008)Google Scholar.

17. See, for example, Clark, Katerina, Petersburg, Crucible of Cultural Revolution (Cambridge, MA, 1995)Google Scholar; Buckler, Julie, Mapping St. Petersburg: Imperial Text and Cityshape (Princeton, 2005)Google Scholar; Johnson, Emily D., How St. Petersburg Learned to Study Itself: The Russian Idea of Kraevedenie (University Park, 2006)Google Scholar; Steinberg, Mark D., Petersburg Fin de Siècle (New Haven, 2011)Google Scholar; Matich, ed., Petersburg/Petersburg; and Clark, Katerina, Moscow, the Fourth Rome: Stalinism, Cosmopolitanism, and the Evolution of Soviet Culture, 1931-1941 (Cambridge, MA, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18. For two particularly bold recent interventions in the geographies of modernism and modernity, see Doyle, Laura and Winkiel, Laura A., eds., Geomodernisms: Race, Modernism, Modernity (Bloomington, 2005)Google Scholar; and Friedman, Susan Stanford, Planetary Modernisms: Provocations on Modernity Across Time (New York, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19. Kenneth White, “An Outline of Geopoetics,” at http://institut-geopoetique.org/en/articles-en/37-an-outline-of-geopoetics (last accessed March 12, 2016).

20. de Certeau, Michel, The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Rendali, Steven (Berkeley, 1984), 118-22Google Scholar.