Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2017
A great many available statistics describe the population history of Russia, but explanations for these statistics are limited or nonexistent. The useful studies of fertility and migration that have appeared are primarily accurate reports of what happened. Studies of Russian mortality are wholly lacking, an understandable situation, since as late as 1913 only thirteen out of fifty provinces of European Russia had medical statistical bureaus. Despite all past efforts the history of Russia's health remains obscure.
While the health of the Russian people today is comparable to that of other Europeans, before the Revolution of 1917 it was extremely poor. In 1897, the year of the first national Russian census, the infant mortality rate for European Russia was 260 for each 1,000 births, compared to 222 for Germany, 164 for France, 156 for Italy, 156 for England and Wales, and 109 for Ireland.
1. For fertility see Coale, Ansley J., Anderson, Barbara A., Härm, Erna, Human Fertility in Russia since the Nineteenth Century (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; for migration see Anderson, Barbara A., Internal Migration during Modernization in Late Nineteenth Century Russia (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2. Kaminskii, L. S., Meditsinskaia i demograficheskaia statistika (Moscow: Statistika, 1974, p. 102 Google Scholar.
3. Mitchell, Brian R., European Historical Statistics, 2d ed. (New York: Facts on File, 1980, pp. 138–139 Google Scholar.
4. Russia, Tsentral'nyi statisticheskii komitet. Obshchii svod po Imperii resul'tatov razrabotki dannykh Pervoi vseobshchei perepisi naseleniia 28 ianvaria 1897 goda (St. Petersburg, 1905) l: iii.
5. Czap, Peter Jr., “ ‘A large family: the peasant's wealth': serf households in Mishino, Russia, 1814–1858,” in Family Forms in Historic Europe, ed. Wall, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp. 105–150 Google Scholar; Hoch, Steven L., “Serfs in Imperial Russia: Demographic Insights,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 13 (Autumn 1982): 221–246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hajnal, John, “European Marriage Patterns in Perspective,” Population in History, ed. Glass, David V. and Eversley, D. E. C. (Chicago: Aldine, 1965, pp. 101–143 Google Scholar; and idem, “Two kinds of pre-industrial household formation systems,” Family Forms in Historic Europe, ed. Wall, pp. 65–104.
6. V I. Grebenshchikov, “Plodovitost’ zhenshchin v 26 guberniiakh evropeiskoi Rossii po sravneniius plodovitost'iu v zapadno-evropeiskikh gosudarstvakh,” Vestnik obshchestvennoi gigieny 1904, pp. 1, 283–1, 303 and 1, 449–1, 463.
7. Leriden, Henri and Menken, Jane, eds., Natural Fertility: Patterns and Determinants (Liege: Ordina, 1979), pp. 99 and 217–251Google Scholar; Menken, Jane, Trussell, James, and Watkins, Susan, “The Nutrition Fertility Link: An Evaluation of the Evidence,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 11 (Winter 1981): 425–444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Watkins, Susan Cotts and van der Walle, E., “Nutrition, Mortality, and Population Size: Malthus’ Court of Last Resort,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 14 (Autumn 1983): 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hoch, Steven L., “Serf Diet in Nineteenth Century Russia,” Agricultural History 56 (April 1982), pp. 391–414 Google ScholarPubMed; Oddy, D. J., “Working Class Diets in Late Nineteenth Century Britain,” Economic History Review 23 (August 1970), pp. 314–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Matossian, Mary K., “Death in London, 1750–1909,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 16(Autumn 1985): 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kolosov, G. A., “Ob epidemiiakh zloi korchi (ergotizma) i bor'be s nimi v prezhnee vremiai v poslednie gody,” Russkii vrach 10 (1911), pp. 1, 842–1, 843.Google Scholar
11. Malkin, Z. I., ed., Septicheskaia angina i ee lechenie (Kazan', 1945), pp. 61–63 Google Scholar; Chilikin, B. and Geminov, N., “Epidemiologiia alimentarno-toksicheskoi aleikii,” Alimentarno-toksicheskaia aleikiia (Kuibyshev, 1945), p. 4 Google Scholar.
12. Russia, Glavnaia fizicheskaia observatoriia. Letopisi (Annalen), St. Petersburg, 1882–1898Google Scholar.
13. Russia, Tsentral'nyi statisticheskii komitet, Résultats généraux de la récolte en Russie, 1890–1903 (St. Petersburg, 1909)Google Scholar, and Résultats généraux de la récolte en Russie en 1909 (St. Petersburg, 1910); Rashin, A. G., Naselenie Rossii za 100 let (Moscow, 1956), pp. 165–166, 184–185, and 195–196Google Scholar; Russia, Glavnaia fizicheskaia observatoriia, Klimatologicheskii spravochnik po SSSR, Vol. I: Evropeiskaia chast’ SSSR (Leningrad, 1932).
14. Anderson, Internal Migration during Modernization, pp. 220–201. The migration index equals the difference between male and female migration to Moscow plus the difference betweenmale and female migration to St. Petersburg. On “Turco-Tatars” see Glebovskii, S., “Statistika (poperepisi 1897g.) i etnografiia v voprose o smertnosti v Rossii detei do odnogo goda,” Vestnik obshchestvennoi gigieny 199 (1904): 193–194 and 201Google Scholar (here after called Glebovskii (1904)). Included were “Turco-Tatars” in Astrakhan', Kazan', Ufa, Orenburg, Penza, and Saratov gubernias whowere described as having distinctive customs of infant feeding.
15. Lorenz, Klaus, “Ergot on cereal grains,” C.R.C. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 11 (1979): 311–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Glebovskii (1904), pp. 193–194 and 205.
17. Russia, Tsentral'nyi statisticheskii komitet, Dvizhenie naseleniia v Evropeiskoi Rossii za 1885 god (St. Petersburg, 1896, 1897, 1898)Google Scholar.
18. Barger, George, Ergot and Ergotism (Longon, 1931), p. 39 Google Scholar.
19. Glebovskii (1904), pp. 198–199 and 205.
20. Russia, Glavnoe upravlenie zemleustroistva i zemledeliia, Svod statisticheskiikh svedenii po sel'skomu khoziaistvu Rossii k kontsu XIX veka, v. 3 (St. Petersburg, 1906), pp. 89–128 Google Scholar.
21. Arnol'dov, A.. “Ob izmeneniiakh rzhanoi muki pri roste v nei nekotorykh plesnevykh gribov,” Vestnik obshchestvennoi gigieny (October 1905): 1, 499–1, 521.Google Scholar
22. Mayer, C. F., “Endemic panmyelotoxicosis in the Russian grain belt,” Military Surgeon 113(1953): 173–189 and 195–315.Google ScholarPubMed
23. Rukhliada, V V., “Biosintez T-2 toksina gribom Fusarium sporotrichiella Bilai na razlichnykhrastitel'nykh substratakh,” Mikologiia i fitopatologiia 18, no. 1 (1984): 73–75.Google Scholar
24. Smalley, E. B. et al., “Mycotoxicoses associated with moldy corn,” Toxic Microorganisms: Mycotoxins, Botulism (Washington, D.C., 1970), pp. 163–173 Google Scholar; Joffe, A. Z., “Environmental conditionsfavorable to Fusarium toxin formation causing serious outbreaks in animals and man,” Veterinary Research Communications 7 (1983): 187–193 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; McCrea, A., “The reactions of Claviceps purpureato variations of environment,” American Journal of Botany 18 (1931): 50–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Borisov, A. A., Climates of the U.S.S.R. (Chicago: Aldine, 1965, p. 36 Google Scholar.
26. Coale, Anderson, and Härm, Human Fertility in Russia, pp. 22–23.
27. Russell, A. J., A Memorandum on the Epidemiology of Cholera (Geneva: League of Nations, 1925, p. 25 Google Scholar.
28. Matossian, “Death in London, 1750–1909. “
29. Karal'nik, B. V., Nurkina, N. M., and Kruglaia, T. E., “Analiz sezonnosti ostrykh kishechnykhzabolevanii s uchetom vyiavleniia dizenterii po indikatsii antigena,” Zhurnal mikrobiologii, epidemiologii i immunobiologii 8 (1984): 37–40.Google Scholar
30. Mitchell, European Historical Statistics, pp. 114–119.
31. Lamb, H. H., Climate: Past, Present and Future (London: Methuen 1977) 2: 594 Google Scholar.
32. Spoof, A. R., Om Forgiftningar med secale cornutum (Helsinki: J. C. Frenckell, 1872)Google Scholar.
33. Sarkisova, M. A., Shain, S. S., and Britvenko, L. I., “Poisk novykh shtammov sporyn'i—produtsentov peptidnykh ergoalkaloidov,” Mikologiia i fitopatologiia 17, no. 3 (1983): 202–205.Google Scholar
34. Kosir, B., Smole, P. and Povsić, Z. [ “Factors affecting the yield and quantity of sclerotiafrom Claviceps purpurea “] Farmacevtski Vestnik 32 (1981): 21–25.Google Scholar
35. Ostrovskii, N. I. et al., “Alkaloidnost’ i rasprostranenie sporyn'i v SSSR,” Aptechnoe delo 1 (1959): 29–34 Google Scholar; idem, “Polevaia kul'tura sporyn'ia v SSSR,” Meditsinskaia promyshlennost’ SSSR 12 (1959): 11–15; idem, “Sporyn'ia dikorastushchikh zlakov i gibridnykh rastenii kak vozmozhnyimaterial dlia selektsii shtammov Claviceps purpurea Tulasne,” Meditsinskaia promyshlennost’ SSSR 9 (1964): 46–48; idem, “Resursy sporyn'i v SSSR,” Rastitei'nye resursy 4 (1968): 162–172 and 468–477.
36. Zabolotnaia, E. S., “Soderzhanie alkaloidov v dikorastushchei sporyn'e v zavisimosti otraionov proizrastaniia,” Trudy Vsesoiuznogo nauchno-issledovatel'skago instituta lekarstvennykh i aromaticheskikh rastenii 11 (1959): 254–266 Google Scholar; Vladimirskii, S. V., “Geograficheskoe rasprostranenie izony vredonosnogo znacheniia sporyn'i na rzhi v SSSR,” Sovetskaia botanika 5 (1939): 77–87.Google Scholar
37. Kurmanov, I. A., “Griby roda Fusarium po kormam nekotorylch zon SSSR,” Problemy veterinamoi sanitarii (Moscow, 1971), pp. 53–56 Google Scholar.