Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:40:31.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between Ideology and Desire: Rhetoric of the Self in the Works of Nikolai Chernyshevskii and Nikolai Dobroliubov

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Konstantine Klioutchkine
Konstantine Klioutchkine*
Affiliation:
Pomona College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Departing from the familiar scholarly focus on the ideological content of works by intelligentsia forerunners, this article examines the record of everyday life in their private and public writing. Konstantine Klioutch kine argues that their obsessive focus on ordinary experience indicated that articulating mundane desires was as important to the two writers as expressing progressive views. As professional journalists, Nikolai Chernyshevskii and Nikolai Dobroliubov organized their experience primarily by way of writing. Accordingly, the article explores rhetorical procedures accommodating both ideology and desire in their influential account of themselves as prototypical new men.

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , Summer 2009 , pp. 335 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Malia, Martin, Alexander Herzen and the Birth of Russian Socialism, 1812-1855 (Cambridge, Mass., 1961), 5–8, 13-18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Berlin, Isaiah, “Introduction,” in Venturi, Franco, Roots of Revolution: A History of the Populist and Socialist Movements in Nineteenth Century Russia (New York, 1960), xix–xxv Google Scholar; Mathewson, Rufus W., The Positive Hero in Russian Literature (Stanford, 1975), 48–57, 74-80Google Scholar.

2. Woehrlin, William F., Chernyshevskii: The Man and the Journalist (Cambridge, Mass., 1971), 132 Google Scholar.

3. Ginzburg, Lydia, On Psychological Prose, trans, and ed. Judson, Rosengrant (Princeton, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Paperno, Irina, Chernyshevsky and the Age of Realism: A Study in the Semiotics of Behavior (Stanford, 1988)Google Scholar.

4. Chernyshevskii, N. G., Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v piatnadtsati tomakh (Moscow, 1939-1953), 1:34–37, 67, 179, 193, 425, 503Google Scholar.

5. Some of my theoretical reference points include, in philosophy, Taylor, Charles, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, Mass., 1989), 32–37 Google Scholar, and Taylor, , Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers (Cambridge, Eng., 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; in critical theory Lacan, Jacques, The Language of the Self: The Function of Language in Psychoanalysis, trans. Wilden, Anthony (Baltimore, 1968)Google Scholar, Man, Paul De, Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism (Oxford, 1971)Google Scholar, Butler, Judith, The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection (Stanford, 1997)Google Scholar; in cultural history, Greenblatt, Stephen, Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare (Chicago, 1980)Google Scholar, and Boyle, Marjorie O'Rourke, Loyola's Acts: The Rhetoric of the Self (Berkeley, 1997)Google Scholar.

6. Man, Paul De, Blindness and Insight, 39 Google Scholar.

7. Ginzburg, , On Psychological Prose, 60–61 Google Scholar; Paperno, , Chernyshevsky and the Age of Realism, 43 Google Scholar.

8. Belinskii, V. G., Polnoesobraniesochinenii, 13 vols. (Moscow, 1953-1959), 11:160-81Google Scholar (dolgi, grivenniki, avoshchnaia lavochka, shtany, prodazhnyezhenshchiny). Belinskii's discussion of masturbation was edited out by Soviet publishers and restored to scholarly knowledge in Sazhin, V., “Ruka pobeditelia: Vybrannye mesta iz perepiski V Belinskogo i M. Bakunina,“ Literaturnoe obozrenie, 1991, no. 11:39 Google Scholar.

9. For a recent discussion of the arguments between Belinskii and Bakunin, see Randolph, John, The House in the Garden: The Bakunin Family and the Romance of Russian Idealism (Ithaca, 2007), 251-71Google Scholar. Randolph's book recontextualizes Russian intellectual history of the 1830s and 1840s by locating its actors on the stage of private life.

10. Chernyshevskii, N. G., Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 1:153-54Google Scholar. All translations are mine.

11. Belinskii's discussions of the “harmonious temperament” became standard in the intelligentsia's discussions of personality, influencing such writers as Lavrov, Petr L., Ocherki voprosov prakticheskoi filosofii: Lichnost’ (St. Petersburg, 1861)Google Scholar, and Mikhailovskii, Nikolai K, “Bor'ba za individual'nost',” Izbrannye trudy po sotsiologii v dvukh tomakh (St. Petersburg, 1998), 2:229-67Google Scholar (originally in Otechestvennyezapiski, 1875-1876).

12. Dobroliubov, N. A., Sobranie sochinenii v deviati tomakh (Moscow, 1961-1964), 8:466 Google Scholar.

13. Chernyshevskii, , Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 3:11–14 Google Scholar; Belinskii, , “Vsgliad na russkuiu literaturu 1847 goda,” Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 10:290-93Google Scholar.

14. In the cultural code of the early intelligentsia, love and marriage were key symbolic acts by which a progressive person turned words into deeds, translating ideological aspirations into social engagement. Paperno, , Chernyshevsky and the Age of Realism, 89–91 Google Scholar.

15. Chernyshevskii used the word stremleniia to designate both progressive aspirations and base desires, occasionally qualifying the latter with the adjective poshlye.

16. Chernyshevskii, , Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 5:163 Google Scholar.

17. Dobroliubov, , Dnevnik 1856 goda, in Sobranie sochinenii, 8:507 Google Scholar.

18. Chernyshevskii, , Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 1:222-23Google Scholar.

19. Reiser, S. A., Letopis1zhizni i deiatel'nosti N. A. Dobroliubova (Moscow, 1953), 139 Google Scholar.

20. Dobroliubov, , Sobranie sochinenii, 8:567 Google Scholar.

21. Ibid., 8:557-59.

22. Ibid.

23. Belinskii, , Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 11:170 Google Scholar.

24. Chernyshevskii, , Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 1:502-3Google Scholar.

25. Dobroliubov, , Sobranie sochinenii, 8:568 Google Scholar. Commenting on his relationship with Griinwaldt, Dobroliubov wrote: “she is so intelligent that she will immediately understand my weakness, and then it will be bad for me to live with her.“

26. Chernyshevskii, , Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 1:433, 451, 453, 486-89, 512-13Google Scholar.

27. Ibid., 1:545-46.

28. Dobroliubov, , Sobranie sochinenii, 9:344-46 (letter to 1.1. Bordiugov of 18 January 1858)Google Scholar.

29. Chernyshevskii, , Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 14:359-60 (letter to Dobroliubov of 11 August 1858)Google Scholar.

30. Rousseau, J.-J., Ispoved', trans. Ustrialov, F. N. (St. Petersburg, 1865), 4 Google Scholar.

31. Ibid., 12.

32. Kuhn, Alfred, “Dobroliubov's Cridque of Oblomov: Polemics and Psychology,“ Slavic Review 30, no. 1 (March 1971): 93–109.Google Scholar “Chto takoe oblomovshchina?” is a companion piece to Chernyshevskii's essay “Russkii chelovek na rendez-vous” (1858) written several months earlier.

33. Dobroliubov, Sobranie sochinenii, 4:321. For a discussion of Aleksandr Herzen's objections to Dobroliubov's view of the Oblomov type, see Kuhn, “Dobroliubov's Critique of Oblomov,” 103.Google Scholar

34. Dobroliubov, Sobranie sochinenii, 4:334-37.

35. See, e.g., ibid., 8:403, 546 and 9:351, 364. Kuhn, “Dobroliubov's Critique of Oblomov,“ 103-4,106-7. Lermontov's ironic metaphor of the ardent heart under a rough coat (inwardly passionate yet outwardly reserved) served Dobroliubov as a model; he trained himself to shape his behavior accordingly. See, e.g., Chernyshevskii's testimony supported by citations from Dobroliubov's diary. Chernyshevskii, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 10:55.

36. Dobroliubov's repeatedly identified with Chulkaturin in his diary and letters. In the entry for 8 January 1857, he wrote: “Kakoe neveroiatnoe skhodstvo nashel ia v sebe s Chulkaturinym … mne kazalos', chto so mnoi rano ili pozdno sluchitsia takaia istoriia“ (Sobranie sochinenii, 8:517). Indeed, a story highly similar to Chulkaturin's took place in Dobroliubov's own life some three years after the above identification; ibid., 9:402-6 (letter to 1.1. Bodriugov of 22 February 1860).

37. Dobroliubov, Sobranie sochinenii, 6:100, 107. Dobroliubov refers to Chulkaturin (lishnii chelovek, 6:100) as the primary example of the type but does not mention his name directly.

38. Ibid., 6:500.

39. Ibid., 6:500, 503.

40. Ibid., 6:490-503.

41. Ibid., 6:117-18.

42. Ibid., 6:129-33.

43. Ibid., 6:153. For a comparison with standard portraits of masturbators, see Laqueur, Thomas Walter, Solitary Sex: A Cultural History of Masturbation (New York, 2003), 64–66 Google Scholar.

44. Chernyshevskii had previously made these points in a brief obituary of Dobroliubov published in the November 1861 issue of Sovremennik. Chernyshevskii, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 7:849-55.

45. Chernyshevskii, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 10:55.

46. Ibid., 10:57.

47. Ibid., 10:59. Chernyshevskii does not mention Griinwaldt by name. The noble lady is E. A. Kurakina, in whose house Dobroliubov served as a tutor. Dobroliubov's role remained unknown to the reader, though, and Chernyshevskii implied that Dobroliubov was a social equal in the house.

48. Ibid., 10:59. For Dobroliubov's original, unedited text, see Dobroliubov, Sobranie sochinenii, 9:507-8, 514-17, 553-56 (diary entries for January-February 1857).

49. See, e.g., Randolph, House in the Garden, 161-65.

50. Paperno, Chernyshevsky and the Age of Realism, 173-79.

51. Ibid., 218-21.

52. Quoted ibid., 212. For a reading similar to Herzen's, see Fedor Dostoevskii's parody of What Is to Be Done? in his Crime and Punishment (1866), especially in Lebeziatnikov's visions of communal life and of women within it. Dostoevskii, Fedor, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v tridtsati tomakh (Leningrad, 1972-1988), vol. 6, pt. 5, chap. 1 Google Scholar.

53. For an explication of the figure of turning in the formation of subjectivity, see Butler, Psychic Life of Power.

54. Dobroliubov, Sobranie sochinenii, 7:251.

55. Ibid., 7:248-54.

56. Ibid., 9:344, 351, 359-61, 383-85.

57. Klioutchkine, Konstantine, “Between Sacrifice and Indulgence: Nikolai Nekrasov as a Model for the Intelligentsia,” Slavic Review 66, no. 1 (Spring 2007): 45–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58. Skabichevskii, A. M., Literaturnye vospominaniia (Moscow, 2001), 292 Google Scholar.

59. Turgenev, I. S., Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v dvadtsati vos'mi tomakh (Moscow, 1960-1967), 12:53 Google Scholar. Nadezhdin's life closely approximated that of Dobroliubov. Both wrote diaries and poetry. Both had a close friend with whom they seldom met but to whom they wrote their most intimate letters; in Dobroliubov's case, this was Ivan Bordiugov. The language of Nadezhdin's intimate letters closely resembled diat of Dobroliubov's.

60. Ibid., 12:214.

61. Staniukovich, K. M.,/Wwo«sobraniesochinenii, 12 vols. (St. Petersburg, 1906-1907), 2:91, 127 Google Scholar.

62. Ovsianiko-Kulikovskii, D. N., ed., htoriia russkoi literatury XIX v., 5 vols. (Moscow, 1908-1910), 4:137Google Scholar.

63. For the role of the melodramatic mode in nineteenth-century literature, see its benchmark analysis by Brooks, Peter, The Melodramatic Imagination: Balzac, Henry James, Melodrama, and the Mode of Excess (New Haven, 1976)Google Scholar.