Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-6tpvb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T01:19:28.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Academician Bromlei Replies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comment
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , Winter 1982 , pp. 698 - 699
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. T. Dragadze, “The Place of ‘Ethnos’ Theory in Soviet Anthropology,” in Soviet and Western Anthropology, ed. Ernest Gellner (London, 1980), p. 161.

2. Bromlei, Iulian V., Sovremennye problemy etnografii (Moscow, 1981), p. 100 Google Scholar

3. Bromlei, p. I l l ; Keesing, Roger M. and Keesing, Felix M., New Perspectives in Cultural Anthropology (New York, 1971), p. 1971 Google Scholar; Levi-Strauss, Claude, “Anthropology: Its Achievements and Future,” Current Anthropology, 7 (1968): 124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.