Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2017
One of the “Great Debates” among Soviet specialists in the social sciences today concerns the applicability of interest group theory to the study of Soviet politics. Though a large number of specialists have accepted the notion that interest groups do indeed play a certain kind of role in the Soviet system, there are still those who hold to the opinion, once taken for granted but in recent years challenged, that interest group theory simply does not apply to the Soviet Union. The strength of the latter argument lies in the fact that in the USSR interest groups do not operate publicly and openly, as they do in the United States; therefore, interest group theory as developed to fit the American context cannot describe or explain the dynamic processes of policymaking in Russia.
1. Bentley, Arthur F., The Process of Government (Chicago, 1908), p. 216.Google Scholar
2. Langsam, David E., “Pressure Group Politics in NEP Russia: The Case of the Trade Unions,” Ph.D. diss. (Princeton, 1971).Google Scholar
3. See H. Gordon Skilling, “Interest Groups and Communist Politics: An Introduction,” chap. 1 in Skilling, H. Gordon and Griffiths, Franklyn, eds., Interest Groups in Soviet Politics (Princeton, 1971), pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
4. Conquest, Robert, Power and Policy in the USSR (New York, 1967), pp. 79–227.Google Scholar
5. Sidney I. Ploss, “Interest Groups,” chap. 4 in Kassof, Allen, ed., Prospects for Soviet Society (New York, 1968).Google Scholar
6. Aspaturian, Vernon V., “Internal Politics and Foreign Policy in the Soviet System,” in Farrell, R. Barry, ed., Approaches to Comparative and International Politics (Evanston, III., 1966), pp. 212-87.Google Scholar
7. Angell, R. C., Dunham, Vera S., and Singer, J. David, “Social Values and Foreign Policy Attitudes of Soviet and American Elites,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 8 (December 1964)Google Scholar; Lodge, Milton C., Soviet Elite Attitudes Since Stalin (Columbus, 1969)Google Scholar; Paul, David W., “Soviet Foreign Policy and the Invasion of Czechoslovakia: A Theory and a Case Study,” International Studies Quarterly, 15 (June 1971): 159–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kolkowicz, Roman, The Soviet Military and the Communist Party (Princeton, 1971).Google Scholar
9. H. Gordon Skilling, “Groups in Soviet Politics: Some Hypotheses,” chap. 2 in Interest Groups in Soviet Politics; Franklyn Griffiths, “A Tendency Analysis of Soviet Policy-Making,” chap. 10 in Interest Groups in Soviet Politics.
10. Peter H. Juviler, “Family Reforms on the Road to Communism,” in Juviler, Peter H. and Morton, Henry W., eds., Soviet Policy-Making (New York, 1967), pp. 29–60.Google Scholar
11. Monks, Alfred L., “Evolution of Soviet Military Thinking,” Military Review, 51 (March 1971): 78–93.Google Scholar
12. For example, Azrael, Jeremy, Managerial Power and Soviet Politics (Cambridge, Mass., 1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Tatu, Michel, Power in the Kremlin (New York, 1969)Google Scholar, and Linden, Carl A., Khrushchev and the Soviet Leadership, 1957-1964 (Baltimore, 1966)Google Scholar.
13. Joel Schwartz and William Keech, “Group Influence and the Policy Process in the Soviet Union,” in Fleron, Frederic J., ed., Communist Studies and the Social Sciences (Chicago, 1969), pp. 298–317 Google Scholar; Lodge, Soviet Elite Attitudes; Skilling, “Interest Groups and Communist Politics” and “Groups in Soviet Politics”; Griffiths, “A Tendency Analysis“; also Stewart, Philip D., Political Power in the Soviet Union (New York, 1968).Google Scholar
14. Key, V. O., Jr., Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 5th ed. (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
15. For an exception to this generalization about Americanists see David B. Truman’s introduction to the paperback edition of The Governmental Process (forthcoming), pp. 10 and 13.