Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2017
1. See Bloom, Harold, A Map of Misreading (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975 Google Scholar, especially 85 ff.See Pratt, Sarah, “'Antithesis and Completion': Zabolockij Responds to Tjutćev,” SEEJ, 27 (1983), 2: 211–227.Google Scholar
2. See Riffaterre, Michael, Semiotics of Poetry (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978, pp. 19–22 Google Scholar and passim.
3. See Ronen, Omry, An Approach to MandeVshtam (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1983 Google Scholar; see also Boris Gasparov'sreview of Ronen's work in Slavic Review 44 (Winter 1985): 770–773, and mine in SEEJ 31, no. 1 (1987): 115–117.
4. For example, as sketched out in my article “Zamiatin, Orvell i Khvorob'iev,” Grani 140 (1986): 202–203.
5. Beginning with his “O vzaimootnoshenii ritma i tematiki,” in American Contributions to the FifthInternational Congress ofSlavists, Sofia 1963 (The Hague, 1963) pp. 288–322, and “Pchely i osy v poeziiMandel'shtama,” in To Honor Roman Jakobson (The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 1967), pp. 1973–1995.
6. He teaches at the University of Constance (which boasts of such names as Hans Robert Jauss andWolfgang Iser) in the Slavic department, headed by Renate Lachmann, whose recent interests are in thesphere of intertextuality.
7. See especially Smirnov, I. P., Khudozhestvennyi smysl i evoliutsiia poeticheskikh sistem (Moscow, 1977)Google Scholar and Dohring-Smirnova, I. R., Smirnov, I. P., Ocherki po istoricheskoi tipologii kul'tury (Salzburg, 1982)Google Scholar.
8. See Culler, Jonathan, Structuralist Poetics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1975) p. 174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.