No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2020
A century has passed since the demise of the Habsburg Empire and the birth of Yugoslavia, and for the last hundred years, historians have tried to make sense of this change. I strive to answer the question, what are the loudest silences of the two states’ historiographies? I employ a mountain metaphor, and argue that although a mountain looks different from various positions, every mountain still has only one shape. I analyze how the turbulent history of the last hundred years pushed historians toward different “truths” and watchtowers, and demonstrate how both historiographies were shrouded around notions of loss and creation, in the case of both Hapsburg and Yugoslav historiographies, respectively. This essay argues that the loudest silence of both historiographies is the fact that historiography itself constitutes, at least in part, the “mountain” of both Yugoslav and Habsburg history.
1 Furet, François, Interpreting the French Revolution (Cambridge, Eng., 1981 [1978]), 1Google Scholar.
2 Breisach, Ernst, Historiography: Ancient, Medeival, and Modern (Chicago, 2007), 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Magris, Claudio, Danube: A Sentimental Journey from the Source to the Black Sea (New York, 2008), 20Google Scholar.
4 Sarajevski atentat: Izvorne stenografske beleške sa glavne rasprave protiv Gavrila Principa i drugova, ed., Bogićević, Vojislav (Sarajevo, 1954), 9Google Scholar.
5 Collini, Stefan, “The Identity of Intellectual History,” in A Companion to Intellectual History, ed. Whatmore, Richard and Young, Brian, (Chichester, Eng., 2016), 16Google Scholar.
6 Peter Judson raised a question of how to write a history if we hold the belief that something is “destined” to collapse. Judson, Pieter M., Exclusive Revolutionaries: Liberal Politics, Social Experience, and National Identity in the Austrian Empire 1848–1914 (Ann Arbor, 1996), 7Google Scholar; Bakić, Jovo, Jugoslavija: razaranje i njegovi tumači (Belgrade, 2011), 160–79Google Scholar; Jović, Dejan, Yugoslavia: A State That Withered Away (West Lafayette, 2008), 18–19Google Scholar.
7 Hartog, François, Regimes of Historicity: Presentism and Experiences of Time, trans. Brown, Saskia (New York, 2016), xvGoogle Scholar.
8 Deak, John, “The Great War and the Forgotten Realm: The Habsburg Monarchy and the First World War,” The Journal of Modern History 86, no. 2 (June 2014): 336–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Heinrich Friedjung, “Osterreich-Ungarn und Serbien,” Neue Freie Presse, March 25, 1909, 2.
10 Tartaglia, Oscar, Veleizdajnik: Moje uspomene iz borbe protiv crno-žutog orla (Zagreb, 1928), 77Google Scholar.
11 Williamson, Samuel R., Austria—Hungary and the Origins of the First World War (New York, 1991), 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Johnston, William M., The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History 1848–1938 (Berkeley, 1983 [1972]), 49Google Scholar.
12 Professor of Friedrich-Wilhelms University of Berlin and founder of Eastern European History Seminar at the University of Vienna.
13 Übersberger, Hans, “Das entscheidende Aktenstück zur Kriegsschuldfrage 1914,” Auswärtige Politik 10, no. 7, (July 1943), 435Google Scholar.
14 For comparison of the original documents and Übersberger’s publication see: Gavrilović, Stojan, “New Evidence on the Sarajevo Assassination,” The Journal of Modern History 27, no. 4 (December 1955), 412CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Fifteen years later Übersberger himself admitted what he did, albeit in a convoluted way. Übersberger, Hans, Österreich Zwischen Russland und Serbien: Zur Südslawischen Frage und der Entstehung des Ersten Weltkrieges (Cologne, 1958), 289, note 3Google Scholar.
15 Pfeffer, Leo, Istraga u Sarajevskom atentatu (Zagreb, 1938), 75Google Scholar.
16 The book was published for the first time in 1992. The English translation was published in 2018 in a collaborative effort of the The Hoover Institution, The Archives of Yugoslavia and The Institute for Balkan Studies from Belgrade. See: Ćorović, Vladimir, The Relations between Serbia and Austria-Hungary in the XX Century, eds. Terzić, Milan and Pavlović, Vojislav G., trans. Bakić, Dragan and Gavrilović, Stojan (Belgrade and Stanford, 2018)Google Scholar.
17 Matan, Branko, “Note,” in Horvat, Josip, Pobuna Omladine 1911—1914 (Zagreb, 2006), 333Google Scholar. Matan, literary critic and a researcher, is the expert on Josip Horvat. Thanks to Matan the manuscript of the Youth Rebellion was published for the first time in 2006.
18 Budak, Neven, Strecha, Mario, Krušelj, Željko, Habzburzi i Hrvati (Zagreb, 2003), 199–201Google Scholar; Horvat, Pobuna omladine, 151.
19 Young Bosnia is the name given to loosely connected, secret student organizations based in Bosnia and Herzegovina on the eve of the First World War. Heterogeneous groups and individuals were amalgamated by a shared resentment of Austria-Hungary, a will to create a state of South Slavs and similar intellectual role models, which included theorists of nationalism, socialism, and anarchism. From its ranks emerged Gavrilo Princip, who assassinated Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo on June 28, 1914.
20 Masleša, Veselin, Mlada Bosna (Sarajevo, 1990 [1945]), 174–175, 165, 181Google Scholar. Masleša’s book was published posthumously in 1945. His manuscript was finished in 1940.
21 Dedijer, Vladimir, Sarajevo 1914 (Belgrade, 1966), 292, 417–428, here 393Google Scholar.
22 See chapter “Library of Young Bosnia,” in Vojinović, Miloš, Političke ideje Mlade Bosne (Belgrade, 2015), 209–57Google Scholar.
23 Đilas, Aleksa, The Contested Country: Yugoslav Unity and Communist Revolution, 1919–1953 (Cambridge, Mass., 1991), 168–70Google Scholar.
24 Đilas, Contested Country, 248.
25 Gligorijević, Milo, Rat i mir Vladimira Dedijera: Sećanja i razgovori (Belgrade, 1986), 186Google Scholar.
26 Popović, Cvetko, Sarajevski Vidovdan 1914: doživljali i sećanja (Belgrade, 1969), 33Google Scholar.
27 Sked, Alan, “Historians, the Nationality Question, and the Downfall of the Habsburg Empire,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 31, (December 1981): 175–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
28 See, for example, Péter, László, “R. W. Seton-Watson’s Changing Views on the National Question of the Habsburg Monarchy and the European Balance of Power,” The Slavonic and East European Review 82, no. 3 (July 2004): 655–79Google Scholar.
29 Mayers, David, George Kennan and Dilemmas of US Foreign Policy (New York, 1988), 69Google Scholar; Kissinger, Henry, Diplomacy (New York, 1994), 235Google Scholar.
30 Kennan, Goerge, The Decline of Bismarck’s European Order: Franco Russian Relations 1875–1890 (Princeton, 1979), 423Google Scholar.
31 Sked, Alan, The Decline and Fall of Habsburg Empire 1815–1918 (London, 1989), 274Google Scholar.
32 Rath, R. John, “Three Score and Fifteen Years of Habsburg and Austrian Historiography and a Quarter-Century of Editing the Austrian History Yearbook,” Austrian History Yearbook 22 (January 1991): 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
33 Kann, Robert A., The Multinational Empire: Nationalism and National Reform in the Habsburg Monarchy 1848–1918, vol. 2 (New York, 1977 [1950]), 288Google Scholar.
34 Kożuchowski, Аdam, The Afterlife of Austria—Hungary: The Image of The Habsburg Monarchy in Interwar Europe (Pittsburgh, 2013), 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
35 Judt, Tony, “The Rediscovery of Central Europe,” in Graubard, Stephen, ed., Eastern Europe . . . Central Europe . . . Europe (Boulder, 1991), 48Google Scholar.
36 Hastings, Adrian, The Construction of Nationhood: Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism (Cambridge, Eng., 1997), 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
37 Beller, Steven, The Habsburg Monarchy 1815–1918 (Cambridge, Eng., 2018), 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
38 Đorđević, Dušan. J., “Clio amid the Ruins: Yugoslavia and its Predecessors in Recent Historiography,” in Case, Holly and Naimark, Norman, eds., Yugoslavia and its Historians: Understanding the Balkan Wars of the 1990s (Stanford, 2003)Google Scholar; Bakić, Jugoslavija, 386–412.
39 Stern, Fritz, Five Germanys I Have Known (New York, 2006), 90Google Scholar.