Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:53:39.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed quality as cause for differences in longevity behaviour after seed pretreatment in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

P. Hofmann  and
A. M. Steiner
P. Hofmann
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
A. M. Steiner*
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
*
* Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hydration-dehydration seed pretreatments are well-known to improve germination rate, germination and vigour. However, contradictory results have been reported concerning the effect of a pretreatment on longevity. The present paper shows that the effect of a seed pretreatment on longevity is largely dependent on the quality of the seed at the time of pretreatment. Pretreating wheat seeds of high quality increased the rate of viability loss during subsequent storage. On the other hand, pretreating wheat seeds of relatively low quality decreased the rate of seed deterioration during subsequent storage. In the light of these findings, hitherto contradictory results in the literature could be explained.

Keywords

hydration-dehydration treatmentlongevitypre-soakingpretreatmentseedstoragewheat
Type
Research Papers
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 323 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akers, S.W., Berkowitz, G.A. and Rabin, J. (1987) Germination of parsley seed primed in aerated solutions of polyethylene glycol. HortScience,22, 250–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarado, A.D. and Bradford, K.J. (1988a) Priming and storage of tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) seeds. I. Effects of storage temperature on germination rate and viability. Seed Science and Technology 16, 601–612.Google Scholar
Alvarado, A.D. and Bradford, K.J. (1988b) Priming and storage of tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) seeds. II. Influence of a second treatment after storage on germination and field emergence. Seed Science and Technology 16, 613–623.Google Scholar
Argerich, C.A. and Bradford, K.J. (1989) The effects of priming and ageing on seed vigour in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany 40, 599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argerich, C.A., Bradford, K.J. and Tarquis, A.M. (1989) The effects of priming and ageing on resistance to deterioration of tomato seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 40, 593–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschermann-Koch, C., Hofmann, P. and Steiner, A.M. (1992) Presowing treatment for improving seed quality in cereals. I. Germination and vigour. Seed Science and Technology 20, 435–440.Google Scholar
Brocklehurst, P.A. and Dearman, J. (1983a) Interactions between seed priming treatments and nine seed lots of carrot, celery and onion. I. Laboratory germination. Annals of Applied Biology 102, 577–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocklehurst, P.A. and Dearman, J. (1983b) Interactions between seed priming treatments and nine seed lots of carrot, celery and onion. II. Seedling emergence and plant growth. Annals of Applied Biology 102, 585–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, W.J. (1989) Salvia splendens seed pregermination and priming for rapid and uniform plant emergence. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 114, 247–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, W.J. (1990) Priming dusty miller seeds: role of aeration, temperature, and relative humidity. HortScience 25, 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, M., Basu, P. and Basu, R.N. (1976) Seed treatment for vigour, viability and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Agriculturist 20, 265–273.Google Scholar
Dearman, J., Brocklehurst, P.A. and Drew, R.L.K. (1986) Effects of osmotic priming and ageing on onion seed germination. Annals of Applied Biology 108, 639–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearman, J., Brocklehurst, P.A. and Drew, R.L.K. (1987a) Effects of osmotic priming and ageing on the germination and emergence of carrot and leek seed. Annals of Applied Biology 111, 717–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearman, J., Drew, R.L.K. and Brocklehurst, P.A. (1987b) Effect of osmotic priming, rinsing and storage on the germination and emergence of carrot seed. Annals of Applied Biology 111, 723–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dey, G. and Mukherjee, R.K. (1986) Deteriorative change in seeds during storage and its control by hydration-dehydration pretreatments. Seed Research 14, 49–59.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.H. and Roberts, E.H. (1981) The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Science and Technology 9, 373–409.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, G. and Steiner, A.M. (1984) Förderung und Minderung von Triebkraft, Lagerfähigkeit, Feldaufgang und Ertrag durch Auswuchs (Vorkeimung) bei Weizen (Triticum aestivum L.) [Promotion and reduction of vigour, storability, field emergence and yield by sprouting (pre-germination) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)] Landwirtschaftliche Forschung 37, 539–549.Google Scholar
Georghiou, K., Thanos, C.A. and Passam, H.C. (1987) Osmoconditioning as a means of counteracting the ageing of pepper seeds during high-temperature storage. Annals of Botany 60, 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, T.W. (1970) The possibility of increasing field establishment by seed hardening. Horticultural Research 10, 59–64.Google Scholar
Hofmann, P. (1992) Untersuchungen zum Einfluss einer Vorsaatbehandlung auf Lagerfähigkeit, Keimfähigkeit, Triebkraft, Feldaufgang und Ertrag von Weizensaatgut (Triticum aestivum L.) [Studies on the influence of a pretreatment on longevity, germination, vigour, field emergence and yield of wheat seed (Triticum aestivum L.)]. PhD Thesis, University of Hohenheim.Google Scholar
Hofmann, P., Aschermann-Koch, C. and Steiner, A.M. (1992) Presowing treatment for improving seed quality in cereals. II. Field emergence and yield. Seed Science and Technology 20, 441–446.Google Scholar
ISTA (1985) International Rules for Seed Testing. Rules and Annexes 1985. Seed Science and Technology 13, 299–513.Google Scholar
Mandal, A.K. and Basu, R.N. (1983) Maintenance of vigour, viability and yield potential of stored wheat seed. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 53, 905–912.Google Scholar
Mandal, A.K. and Basu, R.N. (1987) Midterm and presowing hydration-dehydration treatments for improved field performance of wheat. Field Crops Research 15, 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, R. and Basu, R.N. (1979) Seed treatment for viability, vigour and productivity of tomato. Scientia Horticulturae 11, 365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nath, S., Coolbear, P. and Hampton, J.G. (1991) Hydrationdehydration treatments to protect or repair stored ‘Karamu‘ wheat seeds. Crop Science 31, 822–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J.M., Jenkins, A. and Sharpies, G.C. (1984) Soaking and other seed pretreatment effects on germination and emergence of sugarbeets at high temperature. Journal of Seed Technology 9, 79–86.Google Scholar
Odell, G.B. and Cantliffe, D.J. (1986) Seed priming procedures and the effect of subsequent storage on the germination of fresh market tomato seeds. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 99, 303–306.Google Scholar
Probert, R.J., Bogh, S.V., Smith, A.J. and Wechsberg, G.E. (1991) The effects of priming on seed longevity in Ranunculus sceleratus L. Seed Science Research 1, 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, N.K., Roberts, E.H. and Ellis, R.H. (1987) The influence of pre and post-storage hydration treatments on chromosomal aberrations, seedling abnormalities, and viability of lettuce seeds. Annals of Botany 60, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, S.K. (1982) Maintenance of vigour, viability and yield potential of stored wheat seed. Seed Research 10, 139–142.Google Scholar
Roberts, E.H. (1981) Physiology of ageing and its application to drying and storage. Seed Science and Technology 9, 359–372.Google Scholar
Savino, G., Haigh, P.M. and de Leo, P. (1979) Effects of presoaking upon seed vigour and viability during storage. Seed Science and Technology 7, 57–64.Google Scholar
Saxena, O.P. and Pakeeraiah, T. (1986) Studies on viability in barley as influenced by RH and seed treatments. 21st ISTA Congress, Brisbane, July 10–19, 1986. Preprint No. 59.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics—a biometrical approach. Second edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
Tarquis, A.M. and Bradford, K.J. (1992) Prehydration and priming treatments that advance germination also increase the rate of deterioration of lettuce seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 43, 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thanos, C.A., Georghiou, K. and Passam, H.C. (1989) Osmoconditioning and ageing of pepper seeds during storage. Annals of Botany 63, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdes, V.M. and Bradford, K.J. (1987) Effects of seed coating and osmotic priming on the germination of lettuce seeds. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 112, 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar