Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:56:45.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seed dormancy in Asteraceae: a global vegetation zone and taxonomic/phylogenetic assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2023

Carol C. Baskin*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0312, USA
Jerry M. Baskin
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA
*
*Author for Correspondence: Carol C. Baskin, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Asteraceae with up to 30,000 species occurs on all continents except Antarctica and in all major vegetation zones on earth. Our primary aim was to consider cypselae dormancy-break and germination of Asteraceae in relation to ecology, vegetation zones and evolution. Cypselae are desiccation-tolerant and in various tribes, genera, species and life forms of Asteraceae are either non-dormant (ND) or have non-deep physiological dormancy (PD) at maturity. All six types of non-deep PD are found among the Asteraceae, and dormancy is broken by cold or warm stratification or by afterripening. Soil cypselae banks may be formed but mostly are short-lived. Much within-species variation in dormancy-break and germination has been found. Using data compiled for 1192 species in 373 genera and 35 tribes of Asteraceae, we considered ND and PD in relation to life form, vegetation zone and tribe. Senecioneae and Astereae had the best representation across the vegetation zones on earth. In evergreen and semi-evergreen rainforests, more species have ND than PD, but in all other vegetation zones, except alpine/high-latitude tundra (where ND and PD are equal), more species have PD than ND. Tribes in the basal and central grades and those in the Heliantheae Alliance have both ND and PD. The high diversity and lability of non-deep PD may have enhanced the rate of species diversification by promoting the survival of new species and/or species in new habitats that became available following globally disruptive events since the origin of the Asteraceae in the Late Cretaceous.

Type
Review Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The Asteraceae is a monophyletic family (Mandel et al., Reference Mandel, Dikow, Siniscalchi, Thapa, Watson and Funk2019) that has been estimated to have 1100 genera and 20,000 species (Gleason and Cronquist, Reference Gleason and Cronquist1991), 1600–1700 genera and 24,000–30,000 species (Funk et al., Reference Funk, Bayer, Keeley, Chan, Watson, Gemeinholzer, Schilling, Panero, Baldwin, Garcia-Jacas, Susanna and Jansen2005), 1600 genera and 23,000 species (Anderberg et al., Reference Anderberg, Baldwin, Bayer, Breitwieser, Jeffrey, Dillon, Eldenäs, Funk, Garcia-Jacas, Hind, Karis, Lack, Nesom, Nordenstam, Oberprieler, Panero, Puttock, Robinson, Stuessy, Susanna, Urtubey, Vogt, Ward, Watson, Kadereit and Jeffrey2007), 1568 genera and 25,000 species (Mabberley, Reference Mabberley2017) and 1700 genera and 25,000–30,000 species (Mandel et al., Reference Mandel, Dikow, Siniscalchi, Thapa, Watson and Funk2019). Furthermore, the number of subfamilies and tribes varies, with Mabberley (Reference Mabberley2017) listing 3 subfamilies and 43 tribes. A remarkable feature of the Asteraceae is that it has a global distribution, with species occurring ‘everywhere but Antarctica’ (Funk et al., Reference Funk, Bayer, Keeley, Chan, Watson, Gemeinholzer, Schilling, Panero, Baldwin, Garcia-Jacas, Susanna and Jansen2005). However, two species of Asteraceae (four plants of Nassauvia gellanica and one plant of Gamochaeta nivalis) were observed on Deception Island (West Antarctica) in 2009 (Lewis Smith and Richardson, Reference Lewis Smith and Richardson2011). Three plants of N. gellancia and the plant of G. nivalis disappeared due to natural events. The plant of N. gellanica was deemed to be an alien and was removed before the species became invasive.

Molecular studies suggest that the family originated in South America (Jansen and Palmer, Reference Jansen and Palmer1987, Reference Jansen and Palmer1988; Panero and Funk, Reference Panero and Funk2008) in the Late Cretaceous about 83 Ma (Mandel et al., Reference Mandel, Dikow, Siniscalchi, Thapa, Watson and Funk2019). Fossil pollen of Asteraceae has been found in the Late Cretaceous (ca. 76–66 Ma) deposits of Antarctica (Barreda et al., Reference Barreda, Palazzesi, Katinas, Crisci, Tellería, Bremer, Passalia, Bechis and Corsolini2012, Reference Barreda, Palazzesi, Tellería, Olivero, Raine and Forest2015), and fossil flowers of the family have been found in Eocene (47.5 Ma) deposits in Patagonia (Barreda et al., Reference Barreda, Palazzesi, Tellería, Katinas, Crisci, Bremer, Passalia, Corsolini, Brizuela and Bechis2010). Some tribes such as the Barnadesieae, which is the basal tribe of the family based on the absence of a 22 kb cpDNA inversion (Bremer and Jansen, Reference Bremer and Jansen1992), Eupatorieae, Heliantheae, Liabeae and Mutisieae originated in the montane zone of the Andes Mountains in South America (Funk et al., Reference Funk, Robinson, McKee, Pruski, Churchill, Balslev, Forero and Luteyn1995; Mandel et al., Reference Mandel, Dikow, Siniscalchi, Thapa, Watson and Funk2019). Following its origin in South America, Mandel et al. (Reference Mandel, Dikow, Siniscalchi, Thapa, Watson and Funk2019) proposed that the Asteraceae dispersed to North America and then to Asia and Africa, with rapid radiation of tribes and species occurring in the Eocene and Oligocene.

According to Funk et al. (Reference Funk, Bayer, Keeley, Chan, Watson, Gemeinholzer, Schilling, Panero, Baldwin, Garcia-Jacas, Susanna and Jansen2005), the Asteraceae ‘is the most diverse of all plant families,’ and Palazzesi et al. (Reference Palazzesi, Pellicer, Barreda, Loeuille, Mandel, Pokorny, Siniscalchi, Tellería, Leitch and Hidalgo2022) considered it to be ‘a model system for evolutionary studies’. Species of Asteraceae grow in a range of habitats from tropical evergreen rainforest to tundra, and some grow in wetlands, saline habitats and on sand dunes (see tables in chapters 9, 10 and 11 of Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). Asteraceae includes trees, shrubs, vines and herbs, and they may be aquatics, succulents or epiphytes (Anderberg et al., Reference Anderberg, Baldwin, Bayer, Breitwieser, Jeffrey, Dillon, Eldenäs, Funk, Garcia-Jacas, Hind, Karis, Lack, Nesom, Nordenstam, Oberprieler, Panero, Puttock, Robinson, Stuessy, Susanna, Urtubey, Vogt, Ward, Watson, Kadereit and Jeffrey2007; Moreira-Muñoz, Reference Moreira-Muñoz2011). Kress (Reference Kress1986) reported 20 species of Asteraceae in 8 genera that are epiphytes. Large caulescent rosettes of some Asteraceae grow at high elevations in the Andes (Fagua and Gonzalez, Reference Fagua and Gonzalez2007), the mountains of East and Central Africa (Smith and Young, Reference Smith and Young1982, Reference Smith and Young1987; Beck, Reference Beck1986; Pérez, Reference Pérez1992, Reference Pérez1995) and on the summit of Haleakala (a mountain) on the island of Maui in Hawaii (USA) (Pérez, Reference Pérez2001). On the other hand, cushion plants of at least 50 genera of Asteraceae grow in arctic/subantarctic/alpine regions (Aubert et al., Reference Aubert, Boucher, Lavergne, Renaud and Choler2014). In the subantarctic islands of New Zealand, megaherbs of Asteraceae (e.g. Pleurophyllum spp.) have a somewhat flat rosette of giant (15–45 × 10–25 cm) corrugated (ribbed) leaves and deeply pigmented flowers (Fraser, Reference Fraser1986). On Campbell Island, leaf and flower temperatures of P. speciosum were 8 and 11°C higher than the temperature of the surrounding air, respectively (Little et al., Reference Little, Eidesen, Müller, Dickinson and Lord2016). Among the Asteraceae, there are species that behave as winter annuals, summer annuals, biennials, long-lived monocarpic perennials and polycarpic perennials (e.g. Zedler et al., Reference Zedler, Guehlstorff, Scheidlinger and Gautier1983; de Jong et al., Reference de Jong, Klinkhamer and de Heiden2000; Law and Salick, Reference Law and Salick2005; Anderberg et al., Reference Anderberg, Baldwin, Bayer, Breitwieser, Jeffrey, Dillon, Eldenäs, Funk, Garcia-Jacas, Hind, Karis, Lack, Nesom, Nordenstam, Oberprieler, Panero, Puttock, Robinson, Stuessy, Susanna, Urtubey, Vogt, Ward, Watson, Kadereit and Jeffrey2007; Denisiuk et al., Reference Denisiuk, Chmura and Adamski2009; Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014; Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin, Hu and Zhang2022).

Various kinds of studies have been conducted in an attempt to help explain the diversity of species, habitats, life forms and life cycles of the Asteraceae. The ideas/studies about the reasons for the high diversification rates of Asteraceae include whole-genome duplication (polyploidization) (WGD; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Huang, Liu, Hu, Panera, Luebert, Gao and Ma2021a), genetic diversity (Pascual-Díaz et al., Reference Pascual-Díaz, Garcia and Vitales2021), interaction with insects that serve as pollinators (Panero et al., Reference Panero, Freire, Espinar, Crozier, Barboza and Cantero2014) and production of secondary metabolites that deter predators especially insects (Seaman, Reference Seaman1982; Vanderplanck et al., Reference Vanderplanck, Gilles, Nonclercq, Duez and Gerbaux2020). An inflorescence compressed into a head or capitulum is viewed as a pseudanthia or false flower (Zhang and Elomaa, Reference Zhang and Elomaa2021). The capitulum, rather than the flower, is highly variable throughout the family, and it is also considered to be an important characteristic related to the evolutionary success of the Asteraceae (Burtt, Reference Burtt, Heywood and Harborne1977; Panero and Funk, Reference Panero and Funk2008). It seems that pollen presentation via the capitulum has evolved in response to herbivory, insect-flower interactions and/or seed/fruit dispersal (Leppik, Reference Leppik, Heywood, Harborne and Turner1977; Panero and Funk, Reference Panero and Funk2008).

Although numerous studies have been conducted on cypsela (diaspore) dormancy-breaking and germination requirements of Asteraceae (see references in Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014), no attempt has been made to review cypsela dormancy in this huge family in relation to ecology, biogeography and evolution. In this review, we address several general questions. (1) What kind of dormancy is found in cypselae of Asteraceae? (2) What is the distribution of cypsela non-dormancy and dormancy among life forms of Asteraceae and in the various vegetation zones on earth? (3) What is the distribution of cypsela non-dormancy and dormancy in tribes of Asteraceae in relation to life form and vegetation zone?

The dispersal/germination unit

The dispersal unit of Asteraceae is a single-seeded cypsela (Gleason and Cronquist, Reference Gleason and Cronquist1991), except it is reported to be a drupe in Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera from South America (Reynolds et al., Reference Reynolds, Long, Flematti, Cherry and Turner2013). However, the dispersal unit of Asteraceae is often referred to as an achene, which is not botanically correct. A cypsela is a dry indehiscent fruit originating from an inferior ovary with two carpels and one locule that produces only one seed. In contrast, an achene is a single-seeded dry indehiscent fruit that originates from a superior ovary (Marzinek et al., Reference Marzinek, De-Paula and Oliveira2008). In this paper, we use only ‘cypsela’. The pericarp of Asteraceae cypselae is not adnate to the seed (Frangiote-Pallone and Souza, Reference Frangiote-Pallone and Souza2014), and it is water permeable (e.g. Kagaya et al., Reference Kagaya, Tani and Kachi2005; Genna and Pérez, Reference Genna and Pérez2016; Yuan and Wen, Reference Yuan and Wen2018; Sarmento et al., Reference Sarmento, Pereira, Oliveira, Leal, Torres and Dutra2019; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Yao, Zhang and Tao2019). Furthermore, the large well-developed embryo is spatulate in shape, and endosperm is not present in mature cypselae (Martin, Reference Martin1946; Lubbock, Reference Lubbock1892[1978]). In the Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2014) classification scheme for variation in position, size, mass and morphology of plant diaspores on individual plants, most Asteraceae fit under Division I. Monomorphic (but see below). Furthermore, diaspores fit under Group A (diaspores are produced only from chasmogamous flowers) of Supergroup 1 (Monomorphic aerial). However, Asteriscus pygmaeus and Arctotheca populifolia fit under Supergroup 2 (Monomorphic basal or subterranean). More specifically A. pygmaeus fits under Group A (Basicarpy) and A. populifolia under Group B (Geocarpy. Subgroup e. Passive geocarpy).

Cypselae of Asteraceae are desiccation-tolerant and thus have orthodox storage behaviour (Dickie and Pritchard, Reference Dickie, Pritchard, Black and Pritchard2002). Hong et al. (Reference Hong, Linington and Ellis1998) list 434 species of Asteraceae: 377 with orthodox cypselae, 55 probable orthodox? and 2 undecided. In their global list of species whose seeds are recalcitrant (desiccation-sensitive), Subbiah et al. (Reference Subbiah, Ramdhani, Pammenter, Macdonald and Sershen2019) do not list any species of Asteraceae. According to Pence et al. (Reference Pence, Bruns, Meyer, Pritchard, Westwood, Linsky, Gratzfeld, Helm-Wallace, Liu, Rivers and Beech2022) ‘exceptional species’ in terms of ex-situ seed storage for conservation may have seeds that are desiccation-sensitive, short-lived under conventional seed banking conditions or deeply dormant. However, these authors listed 187 species of Asteraceae as ‘non-exceptional’ and 151 species of this family as ‘probably non-exceptional’. Cypselae of 18 species in 10 genera of Asteraceae stored dry at −18°C for 24–26 years were predicted to have a P 50 (number of years before 50% of the cypselae lose viability) of 13 (Guizotia abyssinica) to 124 (Zinnia sp.) years (Walters et al., Reference Walters, Wheeler and Grotenhuis2005).

Venable and Levin (Reference Venable and Levin1983) surveyed published floras from Asia, Australia, Africa, North America, Pacific Islands and South America for information on dispersal-related structures on cypselae of Asteraceae. They recorded information for 5893 species, including annuals, biennials, perennials, shrubs and trees, and 71.0, 87.6, 81.2, 86.2 and 83.0%, respectively, had structures on the cypselae that would facilitate dispersal. In all life forms, the rank order of dispersal-facilitating structures was plumes > barb-like > scales, except for annuals in which it was plumes > scales > barb-like structures.

Capitula and breeding systems

A capitulum may consist of both disc and ray flowers, only disc flowers or only ray flowers. A disc flower has three to five corolla lobes, depending on the species, and is actinomorphic, while the corolla lobes of a ray flower are fused into a single strap-shaped (ligulate) structure that is zygomorphic (Jeffrey, Reference Jeffrey, Heywood, Harborne and Turner1977; Leppik, Reference Leppik, Heywood, Harborne and Turner1977; Bremer, Reference Bremer1994). Various types of capitula (and breeding systems) can be distinguished in Asteraceae (Jeffrey, Reference Jeffrey, Funk, Susanna, Stuessy and Bayer2009; Elomaa et al., Reference Elomaa, Zhao and Zhang2018): (1) both disc and ray flowers are perfect (monocliny), for example, Cotula spp. (Lloyd, Reference Lloyd1972a); (2) disc perfect and ray pistillate (gynomonoecy), for example, Aster s.l. (Bertin and Kerwin, Reference Bertin and Kerwin1998) and Solidago (Bertin and Gwisc, Reference Bertin and Gwisc2002); (3) disc staminate and ray pistillate (monoecy), for example, Lecocarpus pinnatifidus (Philipp et al., Reference Philipp, Hansen, Adsersen and Siegismund2004); (4) disc perfect and ray sterile, for example, Helianthus annuus (Elomaa et al., Reference Elomaa, Zhao and Zhang2018) and (5) rarely androdioecy with some perfect flowers and some that are functionally staminate.

Some species of Asteraceae produce two kinds of capitula (Jeffrey, Reference Jeffrey, Funk, Susanna, Stuessy and Bayer2009): (1) pistillate and staminate capitula on different plants (dioecy); (2) pistillate and perfect capitula on different plants (gynodioecy), for example, Bidens sandvicensis (Schultz and Ganders, Reference Schultz and Ganders1996) and Cirsium arvense (Lloyd and Myall, Reference Lloyd and Mayall1976; Kay, Reference Kay1985); (3) perfect and staminate capitula on different plants (androdioecy); and (4) pistillate and staminate capitula on the same plant (monoecy). It should be noted that in some sexually dimorphic plant species, the strictness of malenesss and/or femaleness in individuals in a population may be constant [invariable (strictly unisexual) sexual expression] or inconstant (continuously variable) sex expression, with inconstant males being more common than inconstant females (Lloyd, Reference Lloyd1976; Webb, Reference Webb, Geber, Dawson and Delph1999). Examples of inconstant males and females in sex expression in the Asteraceae include dioecious species of Cotula (Lloyd, Reference Lloyd1972b, Reference Lloyd1975). Also, see Yampolsky and Yampolsky (Reference Yampolsky and Yampolsky1922) and Renner (Reference Renner2014) for information on kinds of sexual systems in Asteraceae.

Species of Asteraceae may be self-incompatible (SI) (Hiscock, Reference Hiscock2000; Stephens, Reference Stephens2008; Allen et al., Reference Allen, Thorogood, Hegarty, Lexer and Hiscock2011), self-compatible (SC) (Carr et al., Reference Carr, Powell and Kyhos1986; Grombone-Guaratini et al., Reference Grombone-Guaratini, Solferini and Semir2004; Picó et al., Reference Picó, Ouborg and van Groenendael2004; Soto-Trejo et al., Reference Soto-Trejo, Kelly, Archibald, Mort, Santos-Guerra and Crawford2013) or partially self-incompatible (PSI) (Ortiz et al., Reference Ortiz, Talavera, García-Castaño, Tremetsberger, Stuessy, Balao and Casimiro-Soriguer2006; Nielsen et al., Reference Nielsen, Siegismund and Hansen2007). Furthermore, populations of some Asteraceae have a mixture of breeding systems (Sun and Ganders, Reference Sun and Ganders1988; Arista et al., Reference Arista, Berjano, Viruel, Ortiz, Talavera and Ortiz2017). In a survey of the breeding system in 571 taxa of Asteraceae, Ferrer and Good-Avila (Reference Ferrer and Good-Avila2007) found that 65, 10 and 25% of the taxa had SI, PSI and SC, respectively. These authors were not able to resolve the ancestral kind of breeding system in Asteraceae, but they did find that SI can be gained and lost. Thus, neither SC nor PSI is a ‘terminal state’. Not surprisingly, a relatively higher percentage of SC than of SI has been found for invasive species of Asteraceae, for example, in China (Hao et al., Reference Hao, Qiang, Chrobock, van Kleunen and Liu2011) and for species on islands (Grossenbacher et al., Reference Grossenbacher, Brandvain, Auld, Burd, Cheptou, Conner, Grant, Hovick, Pannell, Pauw, Petanidou, Randle, Rubio de Casas, Vamosi, Winn, Igic, Busch, Kalisz and Goldberg2017). The latter authors found that 143 of 519 (28.0%) of mainland Asteraceae species had SC, while 162 of 273 (59.3%) of island species had SC.

Some species of Asteraceae produce a low number of cypselae due to a lack of compatible pollen being deposited on the stigma (i.e. pollen limitation); this is especially important for some SI species (Larson and Barrett, Reference Larson and Barrett2000). Pollen limitation has been documented in various Asteraceae species (Totland, Reference Totland1997; Colling et al., Reference Colling, Reckinger and Matthies2004; Muñoz and Arroyo, Reference Muñoz and Arroyo2006; Campbell and Husband, Reference Campbell and Husband2007; Muñoz and Cavieres, Reference Muñoz and Cavieres2008; Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, Good-Avila, Montaña, Domínguez and Eguiarte2009; Law et al., Reference Law, Salick and Knight2010; Shabir et al., Reference Shabir, Nawchoo, Wani and Banday2015). In general, pollen limitation decreases cypsela production, and in Scorzonera humilis, it reduces the germination percentage of the cypselae that were produced. In the SI species Achillea ptarmica, there was a significant relationship between pollen viability and the seed/ovule ratio, but ovule abortion did not result in offspring with increased vigour, suggesting that genetic load results in female sterility (Andersson, Reference Andersson1993). The fruit set ratio (number of cypselae/number of female flowers), a measure of female reproductive success, ranged from 0.242 to 0.630 for monoecious and dioecious species of Cotula, respectively (Sutherland, Reference Sutherland1986).

It is well documented that the maternal parent has more influence on seed dormancy/germination than the paternal parent, and this is especially true in the F1 (seed) progeny. However, the father sometimes has an effect on variation in these traits (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2019). The paternal parent had a positive influence on germination percentage and/or rate for Aster kantoensis (Kagaya et al., Reference Kagaya, Tani and Kachi2011), Crepis tectorum subsp. pumila (Andersson, Reference Andersson1990), Lactuca sativa (Rideau et al., Reference Rideau, Monin, Dommergues and Cornu1976) and Solidago altissima (Schmid and Dolt, Reference Schmid and Dolt1994).

Breeding between closely related organisms may result in the expression of recessive deleterious genes (if purging has not occurred) that have negative effects on the offspring, that is, inbreeding depression (ID). The negative effects of ID on plants may include seed germination (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2015). In the Asteraceae, ID for cypsela germination has been found in several species including Acourtia runcinata (Cabrera and Dieringer, Reference Cabrera and Dieringer1992), Cotula minor (Lloyd, Reference Lloyd1972b) Crepis sancta (Cheptou et al., Reference Cheptou, Lepart and Escarré2001), Fluorensia cernua (Ferrer et al., Reference Ferrer, Good-Avila, Montaña, Domínguez and Eguiarte2009), Hypochaeris radicata (Becker et al., Reference Becker, Colling, Dostal, Jakobsson and Matthies2006), Leontodon autumnalis (Picó and Koubek, Reference Picó and Koubek2003), Olearia adenocarpa (Heenan et al., Reference Heenan, Smissen and Dawson2005), Scorzonera humilis (Colling et al., Reference Colling, Reckinger and Matthies2004), Scalesia affinis (Nielsen et al., Reference Nielsen, Siegismund and Hansen2007), Senecio integrifolius (Widén, Reference Widén1993) and S. pterophorus (Caño et al., Reference Caño, Escarré, Blanco-Moreno and Sans2008). However, inbreeding and outbreeding did not result in significant differences in germination of Arnica montana (Luijten et al., Reference Luijten, Oostermeijer, van Leeuwen and den Nijs1996), Aster amellus (Raabová et al., Reference Raabová, Münzbergová and Fischer2009), Carduus pycnocephalus, C. defloratus subsp. glaucus (Olivieri et al., Reference Olivieri, Swan and Gouyon1983), Crepis sancta (Cheptou et al., Reference Cheptou, Imbert, Lepart and Escarré2000), Eupatorium resinosum (Byers, Reference Byers1998), Gaillardia pulchella (Heywood, Reference Heywood1993), Senecio squalidus (Brennan et al., Reference Brennan, Harris and Hiscock2005), Tetraneuris herbacea (Moran-Palma and Snow, Reference Moran-Palma and Snow1997) or Tragopogon pratensis (Picó et al., Reference Picó, Ouborg and van Groenendael2003). In Cotula pectinata (Lloyd, Reference Lloyd1972b) and Eupatorium perfoliatum (Byers, Reference Byers1998), outbreeding led to a decrease in germination. Although Helianthus verticillatus is a rare diploid SI perennial known from only four locations in southeastern USA, Ellis and McCauley (Reference Ellis and McCauley2009) did not find any evidence for outbreeding depression for germination percentages of F1 or F2 cypselae from interpopulation crosses.

As an extension of the concern about effects of ID on germination of cypselae, attention has been given to germination of cypselae produced by Asteraceae species growing in small versus large populations. That is, do small populations have ID that could decrease germination? Germination percentages were significantly lower for cypselae produced in small than in large populations of Arnica montana in Germany (Kahmen and Poschlod, Reference Kahmen and Poschlod2000), Cheirolophus uliginosus (Vitales et al., Reference Vitales, Pellicer, Vallés and Garnatje2013), Centaurea jacea, Cirsium dissectum, Hypochaeris radicata (Soons and Heil, Reference Soons and Heil2002), Lamyropsis microcephala (Mattana et al., Reference Mattana, Fenu and Bacchetta2012), Senecio paludosus (Winter et al., Reference Winter, Lehmann and Diekmann2008) and Solidago albopilosa (Albrecht et al., Reference Albrecht, Dell and Long2020). On the other hand, the size of population was not significantly related to germination percentages for cypselae of Arnica montana in The Netherlands (Luijten et al., Reference Luijten, Dierick, Gerard, Oostermeijer, Raijmann and den Nijs2000), Carduus defloratus (Vaupel and Matthies, Reference Vaupel and Matthies2012), Cirsium dissectum (de Vere et al., Reference de Vere, Jongejans, Plowman and Williams2009), Leucochrysum albicans var. tricolor (Costin et al., Reference Costin, Morgan and Young2001), Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides (Morgan, Reference Morgan1999) and Tragopogon pratensis (Mölken et al., Reference Mölken, Jorritsma-Wienk, van Hoek and de Kroon2005). However, in a later paper, Morgan et al. (Reference Morgan, Meyer and Young2013) concluded that there was a significant positive relationship between population size and mean percentage of cypsela germination for R. leptorrhynchoides.

Kinds of dormancy in Asteraceae

Non-dormancy

We found that when freshly matured cypselae of Amphiachyris dracunculoides, Arctium minus, Coreopsis tinctoria, Erigeron philadelphicus, Helenium amarum, Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium and Senecio sylvaticus were tested over a range of temperatures, 95–100% of them germinated in light with relatively low germination percentages in darkness. Treatments such as cold stratification, however, did not increase germination in darkness in H. amarum (e.g. Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1973). Thus, we concluded that cypselae of these Asteraceae are not dormant. As discussed below, non-dormancy has been found in the cypselae of many species of Asteraceae.

Two suggestions have been made as to how timing of germination is controlled in species whose freshly matured cypselae are non-dormant (ND) (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998). (1) Environmental conditions are not favourable for germination (e.g. too cold) when cypselae mature, which delays germination until temperatures increase. (2) Cypselae mature at the time when conditions are favourable for germination and seedling establishment. In Asteraceae, we find species with ND cypselae that fit both suggestions, for example, Helenium amarum. This temperate zone species has a long season of cypsela maturation and dispersal, and in Tennessee (USA) cypselae are dispersed from July to late November. Cypselae dispersed from July to early November germinate immediately (if the soil is moist), and the resulting plants behave as winter annuals. However, cypselae dispersed in late November do not germinate because the temperatures in the habitat are below those required for germination. The cypselae overwinter on/in the soil and germinate in spring, with the resulting plants behaving as summer annuals (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1973). In some Asteraceae with ND cypselae, for example, Ageratina havanensis (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Van Auken1998), Brickellia dentata (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Van Auken1998), Erigeron strigosus (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1988), Gymnosperma glutinosum (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Van Auken1998) and Heterotheca villosa (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998), cypselae mature when temperature and soil moisture conditions are favourable for germination and seedling establishment.

Pre-dispersal germination of non-dormant cypselae

One consequence of cypselae being ND at maturity is that they might germinate on the mother plant prior to dispersal, if moisture levels in the capitulum are high. Pre-dispersal germination of cypselae has been reported in Abrotanella linearis var. apiculata (Simpson, Reference Simpson1979), Ageratina adenophora (Karmakar and Hazra, Reference Karmakar and Hazra2016), Bidens pilosa (Karmakar et al., Reference Karmakar, Hazra and Das2019), Grindelia squarrosa (Pliszko and Górecki, Reference Pliszko and Górecki2021), Pachystegias insignis var. minor (Simpson, Reference Simpson1979), Saussurea lappa (Chauhan et al., Reference Chauhan, Bahuguna, Nautiyal and Cota-Sánchez2018) and Tagetes erecta (Anand and Mathur, Reference Anand and Mathur2012). Germination of cypselae of A. linearis var. apiculata and P. insignis var. minor while still in the capitulum on the mother plant was attributed to ‘lack of dormancy’ by Simpson (Reference Simpson1979). Interestingly, other authors (e.g. Farnsworth, Reference Farnsworth2000; Leck and Outred, Reference Leck, Outred, Leck, Parker and Simpson2008) cite Simpson's paper as an example of viviparous germination in the Asteraceae (but see below). For the other five species listed above, except A. adenophora, which was reported to have pseudo-viviparous germination, the authors said that the species had viviparous germination. Pseudo-vivipary means asexually produced propagules such as bulbils, which replace sexual reproduction in whole or in part, are formed on the shoot of the plant (e.g. Lee and Harmer, Reference Lee and Harmer1980; Lo Medico et al., Reference Lo Medico, Rua, Bonasora and Vega2018). However, Karmakar and Hazra (Reference Karmakar and Hazra2016) stated that cypselae germinated while still attached to the mother plant, indicating that they are not talking about asexual propagules.

However, these seven Asteraceae taxa reported to have pre-dispersal germination do not have sexually based true vivipary or cryptovivpary as shown by mangroves, which are the model for these kinds of germination. Seeds of mangroves are desiccation-intolerant (recalcitrant), and the embryo grows continuously after fertilization of the egg, with no rest period prior to germination and seedling establishment (Goebel, Reference Goebel1905; Guppy, Reference Guppy1906, Reference Guppy1912; Tomlinson, Reference Tomlinson1986; Elmqvist and Cox, Reference Elmqvist and Cox1996). In contrast to mangroves, cypselae of Asteraceae are desiccation-tolerant (orthodox), thus ND cypselae could dry to a low moisture content and survive. For example, both fresh and dried ND cypselae of Saussurea lappa germinated to 65–70% (Chauhan et al., Reference Chauhan, Bahuguna, Nautiyal and Cota-Sánchez2018). If ND cypselae are exposed to high moisture conditions before they are dispersed, it is expected that they would germinate on the mother plant, somewhat similar to pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) in cereal crops (e.g. Singh et al., Reference Singh, Kamble, Gupta, Singh, Sheoran, Gupta, Tyagi, Kumar, Mishra, Krishannapa, Bishnoi, Sharma, Kumar and Singh2021; Sohn et al., Reference Sohn, Pandian, Kumar, Zoclanclounon, Muthuramalingam, Shilpha, Satish and Ramesh2021). Tuttle et al. (Reference Tuttle, Martinez, Schramm, Takebayashi, Seo and Steber2015) define PHS as ‘ … as the germination of mature seeds on the mother plant when rain occurs prior to harvest’. For the seven species of Asteraceae listed above with pre-dispersal germination, the authors mention a prolonged period of rainfall, heavy monsoon or high humidity when discussing their observations of seedlings with a radicle and cotyledons attached to the mother plants. On the other hand, if ND cypselae are dispersed before onset of the wet season, they would germinate on the soil when the rains begin, that is, germination is regulated by timing of dispersal and beginning of the rainy season and not by dormancy.

Physiological dormancy

Freshly matured cypselae of many species of Asteraceae exhibit little or no germination at any test condition, or they germinate to relatively high or high percentages only over a limited range of conditions, for example, either high (25/15, 30/15, 35/20°C) or low (15/6, 20/10°C) temperature regimes, but not at both. Since cypselae of Asteraceae are water-permeable, the lack of germination is not due to physical or combinational dormancy. Furthermore, since cypselae have a fully developed spatulate embryo lack of germination is not due to morphological or morphophysiological dormancy, in which a small, underdeveloped embryo needs to grow inside the seed prior to radicle emergence. Failure of Asteraceae cypselae to germinate means the embryo has a germination-inhibiting mechanism, that is, physiological dormancy (PD) (Nikolaeva, Reference Nikolaeva1969). The embryo does not have enough growth potential to overcome the mechanical restriction of the pericarp, which in some species of Asteraceae can be strong and thick (e.g. Sun et al., Reference Sun, Lu, Tan, Baskin and Baskin2009; Lu et al., Reference Lu, Dong, Tan, Baskin and Baskin2020). Consequently, mechanical or acid scarification, which removes the mechanical restraint of the pericarp on the Asteraceae embryo, may promote germination (e.g. Rout et al., Reference Rout, Das, Prusti and Sahoo2009; Aguado et al., Reference Aguado, Martínez-Sánchez, Reig-Armiñana, García-Breojp, Franco and Vicente2011; Gandy et al., Reference Gandy, Persans and Summy2015). Also, treatment with GA3 may promote germination by increasing the growth potential of the embryo (Afolayan et al., Reference Afolayan, Meyer and Leeuwner1997; Dissanayake et al., Reference Dissanayake, George and Gupta2010; Duarte et al., Reference Duarte, dos Santos, Peixoto and Santos2012; Aiello et al., Reference Aiello, Lombardo, Gianni, Scartezzini and Fusani2017; Guo et al., Reference Guo, Noh, Li, Xiao and Jeong2021). Scarifiction followed by treatment with GA3 of the perennials Helianthus angustifolia, H. glaucophyllus and H. pumilus promoted cypsela germination (Castillo-Lorenzo et al., Reference Castillo-Lorenzo, Pritchard, Finch-Savage and Seal2019).

Cypselae of Asteraceae have regular PD as opposed to epicotyl PD. In regular PD, the shoot emerges within a few days after the radicle emerges, but in epicotyl PD emergence of the shoot is delayed 1–3 mo or longer after radicle emergence (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2021). The three levels of regular PD (hereafter PD) are non-deep, intermediate and deep, and they are distinguished based on temperature requirements for dormancy break, response to the plant growth regulators gibberellins and ability (or not) of excised embryos to develop into normal plants (Nikolaeva, Reference Nikolaeva1969).

Dormancy in seeds with non-deep PD is broken by moist-warm (≥15°C) or moist-cold (ca. 0–10°C) stratification, depending on the species (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2022a). Also, dormancy-break can occur during dry storage, especially at room temperatures, that is, afterripening (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2020), and germination is promoted by gibberellins. Furthermore, embryos excised from seeds give rise to normal plants (Nikolaeva, Reference Nikolaeva1969). PD is the most common kind of seed dormancy on earth, and most seeds with PD have non-deep PD (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). The characteristics of seeds with non-deep PD fit those of dormant cypselae of Asteraceae very well (see breaking dormancy in cypselae of Asteraceae, below).

Seeds with intermediate PD require an extended period of cold stratification (12–16 weeks) for dormancy break to occur; however, a period of warm stratification prior to cold stratification will decrease the length of the cold stratification period required to break dormancy. Gibberellins may, or may not, promote germination, depending on the species, and excised embryos grow into normal plants. Only about 20 species in 13 angiosperm families are known to have intermediate PD, but none of them belongs to the Asteraceae (Nikolaeva, Reference Nikolaeva1969; Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). However, see trimorphic cypselae of Asteraceae below.

Seeds with deep PD in the temperate zone require 12–24 weeks of cold stratification for dormancy break. About 20 species in the Balsaminaceae, Celastraceae, Rosaceae and Sapindaceae have this level of PD. Seeds with deep PD do not germinate when treated with gibberellins, and excised embryos either do not germinate or give rise to abnormal plants (Nikolaeva, Reference Nikolaeva1969; Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014, Reference Baskin and Baskin2021). It should be noted that seeds of the tropical montane shrub Leptecophylla tameiamiae (Ericaceae) have deep PD. Seeds of this species required 4–16 (or more) months of warm stratification for dormancy-break and germination and did not respond to gibberellins, and excised embryos did not grow (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin, Yoshinaga and Thompson2005). We are not aware of any species of Asteraceae whose cypselae have deep PD.

Breaking dormancy in cypselae of Asteraceae

Cold stratification

A cold stratification requirement for dormancy-break occurs only in species of Asteraceae growing in habitats with a cold winter. However, in many temperate/arctic-zone plant communities, species of Asteraceae whose cypselae require cold stratification grow next to those whose dormant cypselae require exposure to warm temperatures (afterripening) during summer for dormancy break. The length of the cold stratification period required to break PD varies with the species and ranges from 30 d in Coreopsis tripteris (Diboll, Reference Diboll2004) to 120 d in Rudbeckia subtomentosa (Greene and Curtis, Reference Greene and Curtis1950). Species whose cypselae become ND via cold stratification can germinate as soon as temperatures increase in spring (Mattana et al., Reference Mattana, Fenu and Bacchetta2012), and this includes Asteraceae species that behave as summer annuals as well as many short-lived monocarpic perennials and polycarpic perennials (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1979a,Reference Baskin and Baskinb, Reference Baskin and Baskin2022b; Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin, Hu and Zhang2022).

After PD has been broken by cold stratification, germination may not occur at the beginning of the growing season if light-requiring cypselae are buried and thus in darkness. For example, if buried cypselae of the summer annual Asteraceae Ambrosia artemisiifolia are exposed to natural temperate-zone seasonal temperature changes, most of them fail to germinate in spring (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1980). The increase in habitat temperatures in late spring induces the buried cypselae into secondary dormancy, and PD is broken again by cold stratification the following winter. Dormancy-break in winter and dormancy induction in late spring result in an annual dormancy/non-dormancy cycle of temperate-zone Asteraceae such as A. artemisiifolia (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1980), Bidens cernua (Brändel, Reference Brändel2004b) and Bidens polylepis (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Chester1995a). In the case of A. artemisiifolia, buried cypselae have the potential to persist in the soil for at least 40 years (see Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1977). Cypselae of Senecio aquaticus, S. jacobaea and S. erucifolius germinated to ca. 75, 95 and 45%, respectively after 3 months of cold stratification at 4°C, but dry storage for 5 months after cold stratification decreased germination to ca. 35, 30 and 25%, respectively (Otzen and Doornbos, Reference Otzen and Doornbos1980).

Freshly matured cypselae of Erechtites hieraciifolius germinated to 51% in light at 35/20°C in autumn (September) but to 0–15% in light at 15/6, 20/10, 25/15 and 30/15°C; only 1% of the cypselae germinated in darkness (at 35/20°C) (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1996). When cypselae were buried in soil and exposed to natural seasonal temperatures in Kentucky (USA), they became ND. In spring (April), they germinated to 98–100% in light and in darkness at the five temperature regimes. These increases in germination in spring indicate that the freshly matured cypselae were conditionally dormancy (i.e. germinated at some of the test conditions but not at all conditions possible after dormancy was broken). However, during summer cypselae lost their ability to germinate to high percentages in light at 15/6, 20/10 and 25/15°C but not at 30/15 and 35/20°C, and by October they germinated to 0, 23, 91, 100 and 100%, respectively, in light and to 0, 0, 6, 27 and 26%, respectively in the dark. Thus, the cypselae had entered conditional PD, that is, they could germinate at some temperatures but not at all of them. When tested in October of eight consecutive years, cypselae were in conditional dormancy. It is assumed that during winter of each year cypselae became ND and that in summer they entered conditional dormancy, that is, cypselae of this species have an annual conditional dormancy/non-dormancy cycle (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1996). An annual conditional dormancy/non-dormancy cycle has been reported in cypselae of the summer annuals Bidens tripartita (Brändel, Reference Brändel2004b) and Coreopsis tinctoria (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014) and the polycarpic perennials Eupatorium cannabinum (Brändel and Jensen, Reference Brändel and Jensen2005), Solidago altissima, S. nemoralis and S. shortii (Walck et al., Reference Walck, Baskin and Baskin1997b).

Warm stratification and/or afterripening

In tropical and subtropical regions on earth and for various species in temperate regions, the breaking of PD occurs during exposure to high summer temperatures. The high-temperature dormancy-breaking treatment may be warm (moist) stratification or dry afterripening, and in various habitats that receive intermittent rainfall during the dormancy-breaking period both warm stratification and afterripening occur. Warm stratification is a more effective dormancy-breaking treatment than dry afterripening for some species of Asteraceae, while dry afterripening is more effective than warm stratification for other species of Asteraceae (Karlsson et al., Reference Karlsson, Tamado and Milberg2008). The cypselae of Senecio morisii collected in 2007 and stored for 10 years −25°C germinated to higher percentages over a range of temperatures than fresh cypselae collected and tested in 2017 (Cuena-Lombraña et al., Reference Cuena-Lombraña, Sanna, Porceddu and Bacchetta2020). Thus, it appears that cypselae underwent considerable afterripening at −25°C, assuming that fresh cypselae collected in 2007 would have germinated to similar percentages as those collected in 2017.

In tropical rainforests of Malaysia, seeds of forest trees (no Asteraceae included) incubated on moist soil at natural temperatures required from about 12 to 22–36 weeks to begin germinating, showing that dormancy-break via warm stratification may require 12 or more weeks (Kiew, Reference Kiew1982; Ng, Reference Ng1991, Reference Ng1992). On the other hand, the cypselae of the winter annual Asteraceae Gaillardia pulchella, Krigia cespitosa, Pyrrhopappus pauciflorus and Tetraneuris linearifolia from Texas (USA) exposed to simulated Texas summer temperatures and a wet (1 d)/dry (14 d) cycle for 0–4 months were ND after 4 months (i.e. in October). ND cypselae of the four species germinated to 86–99% at the Texas simulated October temperature (28/15°C) (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Van Auken1992b). Thus, the time required for dormancy break via mostly dry afterripening may be about the same as that required for dormancy break via warm stratification.

Afterripening in dry storage is an effective dormancy-breaking treatment for various species of Asteraceae, for example Ambrosia trifida (Ruziev et al., Reference Ruziev, Pakr, Umurzokov, Khaitov, Bo, Jia, Hien, Choi and Park2020), Anthemis cotula (Rashid et al., Reference Rashid, Reshi, Allaie and Wafai2007), Artemisia spp. (Ali and Hamed, Reference Ali and Hamed2012; Lombardi et al., Reference Lombardi, Bedini and Bertacchi2019), Coreopsis lanceolata (Banovetz and Scheiner, Reference Banovetz and Scheiner1994), Hyoseris scabra (Gresta et al., Reference Gresta, Cristaudo, Onofri, Restuccia and Avola2010), Lychnophora ericoides (Melo et al., Reference Melo, Oliveira, Pinto, Castro, Vieira and Evangelista2007), Scorzoneroides spp. (Cruz-Mazo et al., Reference Cruz-Mazo, Narbona and Buide2010) and Silybum marianum (Monemizadeh et al., Reference Monemizadeh, Ghaderi-Far, Sadeghipour, Siahmarguee, Soltani, Torabi and Baskin2021).

In Kentucky (USA), buried cypselae of the winter annual Krigia cespitosa exposed to natural summer temperatures and simulated rainfall regimes from May to October were ND in October (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Chester1991). Dormancy-break during the hot dry weather of summer means that cypselae can germinate when soil moisture becomes non-limiting in autumn, at which time temperatures are decreasing. In the Chihuahuan Desert of North America, germination of annual species occurs only after an about 10-mm rainfall event (Freas and Kemp, Reference Freas and Kemp1983). In the case of K. cespitosa, light is required for germination in autumn, and if cypselae are buried they cannot germinate. During winter, the buried cypselae of K. cespitosa were induced into secondary dormancy, which was broken the following summer. Dormancy-break in summer and dormancy induction in winter result in an annual dormancy/non-dormancy cycle of the buried cypselae (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Chester1991). Based on results from only one test temperature, cypselae of Carthamus lanatus (Grace et al., Reference Grace, Sheppard, Whalley and Sindel2002) appear to have an annual dormancy/non-dormancy cycle and those of Centaurea solstitialis (Joley et al., Reference Joley, Maddox, Schoenig and Mackey2003) an annual conditional dormancy/non-dormancy cycle. Cypselae of Coreopsis lanceolata stored dry at room temperature were ND after 6–8 months (Banovetz and Scheiner, Reference Banovetz and Scheiner1994). When ND cypselae of this species were incubated on a moist substrate at 5°C, they entered secondary dormancy. It is not known if cypselae of C. lanceolata undergo an annual dormancy cycle.

Types of non-deep physiological dormancy in Asteraceae

Six types of non-deep PD have been distinguished based on temperature requirements for seed germination as dormancy-break occurs (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014, Reference Baskin and Baskin2021; Nur et al., Reference Nur, Baskin, Lu, Tan and Baskin2014; see Figure 3 in Soltani et al., Reference Soltani, Baskin and Baskin2017). In Types 1, 2 and 3, the temperature range over which seeds will germinate widens during dormancy-break. In Type 1, the maximum temperature at which seeds can germinate increases, and in Type 2, the minimum temperature at which seeds can germinate decreases. In Type 3, the maximum temperature for germination increases and the minimum temperate decreases. In Types 4, 5 and 6, the temperature range for germination does not widen during dormancy-break. Seeds with Type 4 gain the ability to germinate only at high temperatures, and those with Type 5 gain the ability to germinate only at low temperatures. Seeds with Type 6 germinate to low percentages over a range of low to high temperatures in the early stages of dormancy-break, and the germination percentage increases at all temperatures as dormancy-break progresses. In addition to changes in the temperature range for germination during dormancy-break of seeds, particularly those with Types 1 and 2 non-deep PD, there is a gradual increase in germination rate (speed) and synchrony and in sensitivity to germination-promoting factors such as GA and light. Furthermore, like temperatures, sensitivity to these factors decreases as ND seeds are induced into secondary dormancy [see Table 4.3 in Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2014) and Maleki et al. (Reference Maleki, Baskin, Baskin, Kiani, Alahdadi and Soltani2022)].

Information about the type of non-deep PD in cypselae of Asteraceae is available for 103 species in 75 genera and 18 tribes (Table 1). Types 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 occur in 10, 13, 7, 3, 3 and 7 tribes of Asteraceae, respectively. The Heliantheae has the most types (1, 2, 3, 4 and 6). Five genera (one genus in each of five tribes) have species with two or three types, and Silybum mariarum has two types (1 and 6) (Monemizadeh et al., Reference Monemizadeh, Ghaderi-Far, Sadeghipour, Siahmarguee, Soltani, Torabi and Baskin2021). The information for types of non-deep PD in tribes of Asteraceae was plotted on the tribe-level phylogeny of Mandel et al. (Reference Mandel, Dikow, Siniscalchi, Thapa, Watson and Funk2019) (supplementary Fig. S1). No clear pattern about relationships between types and tribes was revealed, except that the occurrence of Types 1 and 2 or of Types 1, 2 and 3 in a tribe is fairly common. When plotted on the figure showing the proposed evolutionary history of Asteraceae by Huang et al. (Reference Huang, Zhang, Liu, Hu, Gao, Qi and Ma2016), types of non-deep PD occurred from the Mutisieae to the Heliantheae Alliance (supplementary Fig. S2). Although information about the types of non-deep PD in Asteraceae is rather limited in terms of the number of species studied in detail, the results provide some insight into the great flexibility of cypsela dormancy and germination in the Asteraceae in relation to plant life cycle and environmental conditions in the habitat.

Table 1. Types (1–6) of non-deep physiological dormancy in Asteraceae species

a Arguably, this could be Type 6 because fresh cypselae germinated over the entire range of test temperatures, although to a very low percentage at 15/5°C (the lowest test temperature regime).

In temperate regions with generally hot and relatively dry summers and cold moist winters, Type 1 is found in cypselae of winter annual (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Van Auken1995b; Schütz et al., Reference Schütz and Milberg P2002) and some perennial (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Van Auken1994) species of Asteraceae. High temperatures during summer promote dormancy-break, and by the time the soil is moist in autumn the maximum temperature at which cypselae can germinate overlaps with temperatures in the habitat. Type 2 occurs in summer annual and many perennial species of Asteraceae (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1988; Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Leck1993, Reference Baskin, Baskin and Chester1995a, Reference Baskin, Baskin and Van Auken1998). Low temperatures and moist soil during winter promote dormancy-break, that is, lowering the minimum temperature at which cypselae can germinate, and germination usually occurs in early to mid-spring. Type 3 occurs in species of Asteraceae that behave as winter annuals (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Chester1991, Reference Baskin, Baskin and Van Auken1992b) and as perennials (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1988; Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Leck1993, Reference Baskin, Baskin and Van Auken1994, Reference Baskin, Baskin and Van Auken1998) with dormancy being broken in summer and winter, respectively.

Little is known about Type 4 non-deep PD, except that both dormancy-break and germination occur at relatively high temperatures. The four species of Asteraceae known to have Type 4 (Table 1) occur in hot deserts (two species of Pectis) or in relatively mesic tropical/subtropical areas (Tridax procumbens and Synedrella nodifolia). In a habitat that is warm all year, it is assumed that timing of onset of the wet season is a major factor in determining the timing of germination. However, much additional research is needed on the environmental conditions required for dormancy-break and germination of species of Asteraceae (and other families) growing in tropical/subtropical regions.

Type 5 non-deep PD has been reported in cypselae of Coespeletia timothensis, Filago california and Schoenia cassiniana (Table 1). The thing that these species have in common is that their cypselae germinate only at low temperatures. At high elevations in the Andes Mountains, it is reasonable that cypselae of C. timothensis would gain the ability to germinate only at low temperatures. However, for F. california and S. cassiniana that grow in habitats with a Mediterranean-type climate, a low temperature requirement for germination would delay germination until late in autumn when the soil is likely to be moist. That is, a delay of germination until temperatures are low helps ensure that there is enough soil moisture for seedling establishment and growth.

Nine species of Asteraceae are listed in Table 1 as having Type 6 non-deep PD, and they can be divided into two general categories depending on their habitat: (1) cold desert and (2) relatively moist temperate. In the cold desert, timing of rainfall is highly unpredictable. Thus, ability of cypselae to germinate over a wide range of temperatures as dormancy-break is occurring would allow at least some cypselae of the cold desert winter annuals Echinops gmelinii, Epilasia acrolasia and Koelipia linearis to germinate at any time during the growing season in response to a rainfall event or snowmelt in late winter/early spring (Nur et al., Reference Nur, Baskin, Lu, Tan and Baskin2014). In the case of Glebionis coronata in the Mediterranean region, Type 6 would allow cypselae to germinate regardless of whether the onset of the wet season began early or late in the autumn. The other five species with Type 6 grow in the regions of the deciduous forest in eastern North America, where there is no definite dry season. Presumably Type 6 would allow cypselae to germinate at any time during the growing season, but this has not been tested. However, cypselae of Boltonia decurrens (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1988) and Polymnia canadensis (Bender et al., Reference Bender, Baskin and Baskin2003) exposed to natural temperature regimes germinate in both spring and autumn.

Intraspecific variation in dormancy

Not only is there species-to-species variation in dormancy in the Asteraceae due to different types of non-deep PD, but there may be variation in dormancy between the cypselae produced by the same species. For example, cypselae of various species of Asteraceae differed in their germination characteristic when collected in different populations (Schütz and Urbanska, Reference Schütz and Urbanska1984; Meyer et al., Reference Meyer, McArthur and Jorgensen1989, Reference Meyer, Monsen and McArthur1990; Ren and Abbott, Reference Ren and Abbott1991; Maluf, Reference Maluf1993; Martin et al., Reference Martin, Grzeskowiak and Puech1995; Keller and Kollmann, Reference Keller and Kollmann1999; Qaderi and Cavers, Reference Qaderi and Cavers2000a; Giménez-Benavides et al., Reference Giménez-Benavides, Escudero and Pérez-García2005; Bischoff et al., Reference Bischoff, Vonlanthen, Steinger and Muller-Schärer2006; Jorritsma-Wienk et al., Reference Jorritsma-Wienk, Ameloot, Lenssen and de Kroon2007; Li and Feng, Reference Li and Feng2009; Bischoff and Muller-Schärer, Reference Bischoff and Muller-Schärer2010; Bartle et al., Reference Bartle, Moles and Bonser2013; Torres-Martínez et al., Reference Torres-Martínez, Weldy, Levy and Emery2017; de Pedro et al., Reference de Pedro, Mayol and González-Martínez2021). However, the reason (genetic and/or maternal environmental effects) for population differences in dormancy was not determined in these studies.

Cypselae of the invasive Senecio madagascariensis from populations at the edge of its range in eastern Australia germinated to significantly higher percentages that those from populations in the established part of its range in eastern Australia (Bartle et al., Reference Bartle, Moles and Bonser2013). Simulation studies of cypselae germination and seedling survival of Artemisia tridentata under climate change conditions across its western North American range suggest that regeneration from cypselae will be higher at the leading (relatively moist) than at the trailing (relatively dry) edge of the range of distribution shift (Schlaepfer et al., Reference Schlaepfer, Taylor, Pennington, Nelson, Martyn, Rottler, Lauenroth and Bradford2015).

Cypsela dormancy in Asteraceae has a genetic component, for example, Helianthus bolanderi (Olivieri and Jain, Reference Olivieri and Jain1978), Lactuca sativa (Eenink, Reference Eenink1981) and Senecio vulgaris (Kadereit, Reference Kadereit1984). In particular, the genetics of cypsela dormancy have been investigated in detail for Helianthus annuus (Snow et al., Reference Snow, Moran-Palma, Rieseberg, Wszelaki and Seiler1998; Weiss et al., Reference Weiss, Primer, Pace and Mercer2013; Layat et al., Reference Layat, Leymarie, Maarouf-Bouteau, Caius, Langlade and Bailly2014; Lachabrouilli et al., Reference Lachabrouilli, Rigal, Corbineau and Bailly2021; Hernández et al., Reference Hernández, Vercellino, Pandolfa, Mandel and Presotto2022) and L. sativa (Argyris et al., Reference Argyris, Truco, Ochoa, McHale, Dahal, Van Deynze, Michelmore and Bradford2011; Huo et al., Reference Huo, Wei and Bradford2016). Inbred dormant and non-dormant lines of H. annuus exhibit differences in pericarp anatomy and hormone profiles (Andrade et al., Reference Andrade, Riera, Lindstrom, Alemano, Alvarez, Abdala and Vigliocoo2015). Also, the dormancy/germination characteristics of the mature cypselae can vary depending on the environmental conditions under which the maternal plant was growing during cypsela development, including day length (Gutterman et al., Reference Gutterman, Thomas and Heydecker1975), mineral nutrition (Thompson, Reference Thompson1937; Allison, Reference Allison2002), soil moisture (Qaderi and Cavers, Reference Qaderi and Cavers2000b) and temperature (Nosova, Reference Nosova1981; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Gallagher and Shea2012; Bodrone et al., Reference Bodrone, Rodríguez and Arisnabarreta2017). Furthermore, the maternal environment and genetics of the embryo can interact to influence cypsela dormancy (Weiss et al., Reference Weiss, Primer, Pace and Mercer2013), and there could be epigenetic (i.e. non-genetic transgenerational inheritance, e.g. Robertson and Richards, Reference Robertson and Richards2015; Skinner and Nilsson, Reference Skinner and Nilsson2021) control of dormancy via maternal inheritance, as in Arabidopsis thaliana (Iwasaki et al., Reference Iwasaki, Hyvärinen, Piskurewicz and Lopez-Molina2019).

In the case of Silybum marianum, populations vary with regard to the type of non-deep PD in the mature cypselae (Monemizadeh et al., Reference Monemizadeh, Ghaderi-Far, Sadeghipour, Siahmarguee, Soltani, Torabi and Baskin2021). Cypselae from plants of S. marianum growing at three population sites in northern Iran were allowed to afterripen in dry storage. Cypselae from two populations first gained the ability to germinate over a range of temperatures, indicating Type 6 non-deep PD. However, cypselae from the third population first germinated only at low temperatures but as afterripening continued the maximum temperature at which they germinated increased, indicating Type 1 non-deep PD. The cypselae with Type 6 developed under relatively dry, warm conditions and those with Type 1 developed during relatively wet, cool conditions. These results suggest that the maternal environment affected the type of non-deep PD that developed in the cypselae, but the effects of genetics and environment × genetics on the type of non-deep PD that developed in the cypselae in different populations have not been investigated.

Heteromorphic cypselae

According to Scholl et al. (Reference Scholl, Calle, Miller and Venable2020), heteromorphic diaspores differ in morphology and ecology, and the variation can be discrete or continuous, and if continuous the extreme diaspores differ greatly. In the classification scheme for variation in diaspore size/mass and morphology of Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2014, p. 341), Asteraceae species mentioned in this section fit into Subgroup a (Heterocarpy) of Group A (Heterodiaspory) of Division II (Heteromorphic). Diaspore heteromorphism occurs primarily in annual plants, and it is viewed as an adaptation (via a bet-hedging strategy) to unpredictable or disturbed environments (Mandák, Reference Mandák1997; Imbert, Reference Imbert2002; Cruz-Mazo et al., Reference Cruz-Mazo, Buide, Samuel and Narbona2009, Reference Cruz-Mazo, Narbona and Buide2010). The majority (ca. 80%) of heterodiasporous species occurs in three eudicot families: Asteraceae > Amaranthaceae > Brassicaceae (Mandák, Reference Mandák1997). The number of diaspore heteromorphic species of Asteraceae worldwide has not been determined, but in southwestern North America it is the family with the most diaspore heteromorphic species, that is, 64 species in 38 genera. The Boraginaceae is the second most important family with heteromorphic diaspores in this region with 23 species in 5 genera (Scholl et al., Reference Scholl, Calle, Miller and Venable2020).

Cypselae produced in the same capitulum of many species of Asteraceae vary in size, mass, colour, shape, ornamentation, presence/absence of pappus, thickness of pericarp, dispersal ability, presence/absence of dormancy and degree of non-deep PD (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Lu, Baskin and Tan2013; Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). Various dimorphic, and a few trimorphic, species of Asteraceae have been studied in detail. In general, peripheral cypselae are more dormant (higher degree of non-deep PD) than central cypselae, which are ND in some species; however, central cypselae can be more dormant than peripheral cypselae (Table 2). Cypselae that differ in degree of dormancy also can be produced by species with only ligulate (El-Keblawy, Reference El-Keblawy2003) or only ray (Olivieri et al., Reference Olivieri, Swan and Gouyon1983) flowers. Both the peripheral and central cypselae of Crepis sancta (Imbert et al., Reference Imbert, Escarré and Lepart1996) and Synedrella nodiflora (Souza Filho and Takaki, Reference Souza Filho and Takaki2011) have been reported to be ND.

Table 2. Comparison of dormancy in examples of Asteraceae species with heteromorphic (dimorphic) cypselae

CA, central cypselae; ND, non-dormant; PA, peripheral cypselae.

Germination of trimorphic cypselae of Asteraceae has been studied in some detail for Calendula arvensis (Ruiz de Clavijo, Reference Ruiz de Clavijo2005), Garhadiolus papposus (Sun et al., Reference Sun, Lu, Tan, Baskin and Baskin2009), Heteracia szovitsii (Cheng and Tan, Reference Cheng and Tan2009; Lu et al., Reference Lu, Dong, Tan, Baskin and Baskin2020) and Heterosperma pinnatum (Venable et al., Reference Venable, Búrquez, Corral, Morales and Espinosa1987). Trimorphic cypselae have been reported for Xanthocephalum spp. (Lane, Reference Lane1983) and Chaptalia hieracioides (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Zheng, Funk and Wen2018), but their dormancy has not been studied. We note that some species of Chaptalia in Brazil (Pasini et al., Reference Pasini, Katinas and Ritter2014) and Mexico (Redonda-Martínez, Reference Redonda-Martínez2018) have trimorphic florets and presumably trimorphic cypselae. In G. papposus (Sun et al., Reference Sun, Lu, Tan, Baskin and Baskin2009), H. szovitsii (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Dong, Tan, Baskin and Baskin2020) and H. pinnatum (Venable et al., Reference Venable, Búrquez, Corral, Morales and Espinosa1987), the central cypselae are the least dormant and the peripheral cypselae the most dormant. Central, intermediate and peripheral cypselae of the cold desert annual H. szovitsii allowed to afterripen for 48 months germinated to 85% (30/15°C), 30.5% (5/2°C) and 10.5% (15/2°C), respectively. However, when the pericarp was removed from intermediate and peripheral cypselae they germinated to 100 and 69.3%, respectively (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Dong, Tan, Baskin and Baskin2020). Since seedlings derived from excised embryos of intermediate and peripheral cypselae produced normal plants and since afterripening, scarification/pericarp removal and GA3 promoted germination of both kinds of cypselae (but more germination of intermediate than peripheral cypselae), it was concluded that intermediate and peripheral cypselae have intermediate PD. When central, intermediate and peripheral cypselae were sown outdoors in spring 2016, germination of central cypselae occurred in autumn 2016 and spring 2017; intermediate in spring and autumn 2017, 2018 and 2019; and peripheral in spring and autumn 2017, 2018, 2019 and spring 2020, showing that intermediate and peripheral cypselae can form a persistent soil cypsela bank.

Cypsela heteromorphism translates into differences not only in degree of dormancy but also differences in dispersal and timing of germination (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). Generally, in Asteraceae, the central cypselae have low dormancy and high dispersal, and peripheral cypselae have high dormancy and low dispersal (Venable and Lawlor, Reference Venable and Lawlor1980; see Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Lu, Baskin and Tan2013). This combination of traits for cypselae from the same plant allows seedlings to escape an unfavourable environment for establishment and growth in both time and space. Variability in degree of dormancy spreads the risk over time, and variability in dispersal ability spreads the risk over space. Cypselae with low dormancy and high dispersal may be dispersed to a new site where they may germinate immediately. Most cypselae with high dormancy and low dispersal remain near the mother plant and germinate after some period of time during which the mother plant may have died, creating a favourable site for establishment of a seedling of the same species.

In studies on dormancy and dispersal of the trimorphic cypselae of Heterosperma pinnatum, Venable et al. (Reference Venable, Búrquez, Corral, Morales and Espinosa1987) concluded that the low dormancy-high dispersal of the central cypselae was a high-risk strategy, and the high dormancy-low dispersal of the peripheral cypselae was a low-risk strategy, with the intermediate cypselae having a strategy between the two extremes. The proportion of heteromorphic cypselae (morphs) in H. pinnatum varied genetically between populations and between individuals (Venable and Búrquez, Reference Venable and Búrquez1989). Furthermore, the percentage of central cypselae with awns increased from dry open to mesic closed habitats and with an increase in annual precipitation (Venable et al., Reference Venable, Dyreson and Morales1995).

Fenesi et al. (Reference Fenesi, Sándor, Pyšek, Dawson, Ruprecht, Essl, Kreft, Pergl, Weigelt, Winter and van Kleunen2019) found evidence that cypsela heteromorphism is related to naturalization success of Asteraceae, but a short life cycle (annual or biennial) and relatively tall height of mature plants also contribute to the naturalization success of the heteromorphic species. Thus, the authors concluded that cypsela heteromorphism may be a part of the combination of traits that leads to naturalization success.

Amphicarpy

In the Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2014, p. 341) classification scheme, the two Asteraceae species mentioned in this section belong to Subgroup b sensu lato of Group B (Amphicarpy) of Division II (Heteromorphic). In the two known amphicarpic species of Asteraceae, Gymnarrhena micrantha and Catananche lutea, plants produce subterranean and aerial cypselae (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Baskin, Baskin, Cheplick, Yang and Huang2020). The subterranean and aerial cypselae of the winter annual G. micrantha are ND and germinate to higher percentages in light than in dark with the optimum temperature for germination being 15°C (Koller and Roth, Reference Koller and Roth1964). The aerial cypselae are smaller than the subterranean cypselae and may not be formed in years with low soil moisture; however, the plants always produce subterranean cypselae. The aerial cypselae potentially distribute the species to new suitable habitats, while the subterranean cypselae maintain the species in a habitat that has already proven to be suitable for production of offspring.

Individual plants of the annual C. lutea can produce five morphs: two kinds of subterranean cypselae (amphi-I that are non-dormant and amphi-II that have non-deep PD) and three kinds of aerial cypselae (central intermediate and peripheral) that are mostly ND but require light and relatively low (12, 19°C) temperatures for high germination percentages (Ruiz de Clavijo, Reference Ruiz de Clavijo1995). The aerial central cypselae have a more highly developed pappus than the intermediate cypselae, which in turn have more pappus than the peripheral cypselae. Thus, central, intermediate and peripheral acenes have high, intermediate and low dispersal, respectively. Overall, the subterranean cypselae ensure that the species is distributed in time, and the aerial cypselae ensure dispersal in both time and space. That is, the aerial peripheral and the aerial central cypselae of C. lutea ensure dispersal in time and space, respectively. We are not aware of any species of Asteraceae with amphi-basicarpy (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Baskin, Baskin, Cheplick, Yang and Huang2020).

Bet-hedging

When viewed from an evolutionary perspective, the production of cypselae with different strategies by the same plant is an adaptive bet-hedging strategy. That is, the production of two or more kinds of cypselae with different dormancy, dispersal and germination characteristics can increase the geometric mean and reduce variance in fitness. A commonly held idea is that, on average (i.e. arithmetic mean) the most-fit individuals leave the most offspring. However, this is not true in an environment that fluctuates stochastically, thus causing the number of offspring (fitness, e.g. R o) to vary among the years. In this case, geometric mean is the best measure of fitness, and it is maximized across generations (years) by bet-hedging.

Geometric mean is the product of the number of values being considered raised to the 1/n power, for example, (4 × 12 × 20)1/3 = (960)1/3 = 9.86, which is lower than the arithmetic mean (i.e. 12). Thus, with a decrease in variance (σ2) or an increase in arithmetic mean (μA), geometric mean (μG) increases, and this relationship is expressed as μG = μA–(σ2/2) when fitness is >0 (Gillespie, Reference Gillespie1977; Crean and Marshall, Reference Crean and Marshall2009; Simons, Reference Simons2011). According to Seger and Brockmann (Reference Seger and Brockmann1987), ‘The geometric mean is the natural measure of long-term fitness under temporal variation because, like population growth itself, it is inherently multiplicative rather than additive’. Thus, the production of heterodiaspores is a way to decrease variance in the number of offspring produced per year and thus increase the geometric mean of the number of offspring across generations, that is, by bet-hedging.

A bet-hedging strategy is adaptive in temporally varying environments that result in both good and poor years for seedling establishment and survival (Venable Reference Venable1985a,Reference Venableb; Venable and Levin, Reference Venable and Levin1985a,Reference Venable and Levinb; Philippi and Seger, Reference Philippi and Seger1989; Philippi, Reference Philippi1993; Simons, Reference Simons2011; Gremer et al., Reference Gremer, Crone and Lesica2012; Starrfelt and Kokko, Reference Starrfelt and Kokko2012; Gianella et al., Reference Gianella, Bradford and Guzzon2021). The production of two kinds of offspring as in diaspore heteromorphic Asteraceae is a diversified bet-hedging strategy (Rajon et al., Reference Rajon, Venner and Menu2009; Crowley et al., Reference Crowley, Ehlman, Korn and Sih2016; Haaland et al., Reference Haaland, Wright, Tufto and Ratikainen2018). The cypselae with a low-risk strategy germinate immediately, but those with a high-risk strategy delay germinating, thereby providing a reserve of cypselae for the future regardless of whether a good or poor year follows the year of cypsela production. Based on a demographic–life-history study of disc versus ray cypselae, Venable (Reference Venable1985a,Reference Venableb) and Venable and Levin (Reference Venable and Levin1985a,Reference Venable and Levinb) present a strong case for bet-hedging in the heterocarpic (dimorphic) species Heterotheca subaxillaris var. latifolia. This is an annual species that grows in disturbed and open sites in which the disc and ray cypselae and the plants that originate from them have a high-risk–low-risk strategy, that is, high risk for disc cypselae and low risk for ray cypselae. The disc cypselae increase the μG by increasing μA, and the ray cypselae increase μG by decreasing σ2.

In addition to cypselae differences in dispersal ability and degree of dormancy, bet-hedging has been attributed to other differences between disc and ray cypselae, including pre-dispersal insect predation, persistence in the seed bank and thickness of the pericarp (Evans et al., Reference Evans, Ferrière, Kane and Venable2007; Kistenmacher and Gibson, Reference Kistenmacher and Gibson2016). Also, genetic diversity between ray and disc cypselae has been considered. The observed heterozygosity across all populations of Grindelia ciliata was significantly higher in the disc pool than the ray cypsela pool, but the mean outcrossing percentage did not differ between ray and disc cypselae (Gibson, Reference Gibson2001). In Heterotheca subaxillaris, the level of genetic diversity did not differ significantly between ray and disc cypselae, and there was a mixed mating system with some inbreeding in most populations, which may result in founder effects (Gibson and Tomlinson, Reference Gibson and Tomlinson2002). However, the authors concluded that differences in size and dispersal ability between ray and disc cypselae helped reduce the effects of inbreeding depression on the populations.

Local adaptation

Ecotypes/local adaptations not involving cypsela dormancy/germination have been documented in various species of Asteraceae (Wacquant and Picard, Reference Wacquant and Picard1992; Andersson and Shaw, Reference Andersson and Shaw1994; Imbert et al., Reference Imbert, Escarré and Lepart1999; Scherber et al., Reference Scherber, Crawley and Porembski2003; Becker et al., Reference Becker, Colling, Dostal, Jakobsson and Matthies2006; Sambatti and Rice, Reference Sambatti and Rice2006; Ramsey et al., Reference Ramsey, Robertson and Husband2008; Raabová et al., Reference Raabová, Münzbergová and Fischer2011; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Chen, Zan, Wang and Su2012; Imani et al., Reference Imani, Rahbarian, Masoumi and Khorasani2014; Moore et al., Reference Moore, Moore and Baldwin2014; Pánková et al., Reference Pánková, Raabová and Münzbergová2014; Müller et al., Reference Müller, Schultz, Lauterbach, Ristow, Wissemann and Gemeinholzer2017; Molina-Montenegro et al., Reference Molina-Montenegro, Acuña-Rodriguez, Flores, Hereme, Lafon, Atala and Torres-Diaz2018; Sakaguchi et al., Reference Sakaguchi, Kimura, Kyan, Maki, Nishino, Ishikawa, Nagano, Honjo, Yasugi, Kudoh, Li, Choi, Chernyagina and Ito2018; van Boheemen et al., Reference van Boheemen, Atwater and Hodgins2019; Ollivier et al., Reference Ollivier, Kazakou, Corbin, Sartori, Gooden, Lesieur, Thomann, Martin and Tixier2020; Challagundla and Wallace, Reference Challagundla and Wallace2021; de Pedro et al., Reference de Pedro, Mayol and González-Martínez2021; Lin et al., Reference Lin, Landis, Sun, Huang, Zhang, Liu, Zhang, Sun, Wang and Deng2021). However, Carlina vulgaris (Jakobsson and Dinnetz, Reference Jakobsson and Dinnetz2005) and Centaurea hyssopifolia (Sánchez et al., Reference Sánchez, Alonso-Valiente, Albert and Escudero2017) did not exhibit local adaptation, except the survival of juveniles of C. hyssopifolia was higher in native than in non-native sites. Thus, there is evidence that some, but not all, species of Asteraceae can adapt to the local habitat conditions.

Some invasive species of Asteraceae, for example, Ambrosia artemisiifolia (van Boheemen et al., Reference van Boheemen, Atwater and Hodgins2019), Arctotheca populifolia (Brandenburger et al., Reference Brandenburger, Sherwin, Creer, Buitenwerf, Poore, Frankhan, Finnerty and Moles2019), Helianthus annuus (Hernández et al., Reference Hernández, Poverena, Garayalde and Presotto2019), Sonchus oleraceus (Ollivier et al., Reference Ollivier, Kazakou, Corbin, Sartori, Gooden, Lesieur, Thomann, Martin and Tixier2020) and Taraxacum campylodes (Molina-Montenegro et al., Reference Molina-Montenegro, Acuña-Rodriguez, Flores, Hereme, Lafon, Atala and Torres-Diaz2018) not only have developed local adaptations in new (invaded) sites but have done so rapidly. These results lend support to the conclusion of Oduor et al. (Reference Oduor, Leimu and van Kleunen2016) that invasive species develop local adaptations as frequently as native species. Rapid local adaptation of Asteraceae to new habitats, no doubt, has contributed not only to the great diversification of species in this family but also to its occurrence in all major vegetation zones on earth.

Species diversification

According to Tank et al. (Reference Tank, Eastman, Pennell, Soltis, Soltis, Hinchliff, Brown, Sessa and Harmon2015), ‘ … we still do not have a clear idea of the drivers of differential diversification among plant species’. Zhang et al. (Reference Zhang, Landis, Sun, Zhang, Lin, Kuang, Huang, Wang and Sun2021b) proposed that phylogenomic, morphological, ecological and model-based approaches need to be integrated into studies of diversification. Magallón et al. (Reference Magallón, Sánchez-Reyes and Gómez-Acevedo2019) identified a species diversification rate shift in Asteraceae at a mean time of 76.79 Ma, as one of 30 exceptional changes in species diversification rates of angiosperms.

An outstanding example of species diversification in Asteraceae is the 28 species of Argroxiphium, Dubautia and Wilkesia that evolved in the Hawaiian Islands (USA) from a single dispersal event of a tarweed (Madia/Raillardiopsis group) from California to Hawaii. Among the three genera, the diversity of life forms in the Hawaiian Islands includes trees, shrubs, cushion plants, vines and long-lived monocarpic and polycarpic rosette plants that grow in a range of habitats from dry woodland/scrublands to bogs (Robichaux et al., Reference Robichaux, Carr, Liebman and Pearcy1990; Baldwin and Sanderson, Reference Baldwin and Sanderson1998). Other examples of species diversification in the Asteraceae include: (1) Bidens, Hawaiian Islands, 19 species (Knope et al., Reference Knope, Morden, Funk and Fukami2012), (2) Brachyglottis, New Zealand, 30 species (Wagstaff and Breitwieser, Reference Wagstaff and Breitwieser2004), (3) Cheirolophus, Macaronesia, 20 species (Vitales et al., Reference Vitales, García-Fernández, Pellicer, Vallès, Santos-Guerra, Cowan, Fay, Hidalgo and Garnatje2014), (4) Dendroseris, Juan Fernández Islands, Chile, 11 species (Cho et al., Reference Cho, Kim, Yang, Crawford, Stuessy, López-Sepúlveda and Kim2020), (5) Encelia, deserts of the Americas, 15 species and 5 subspecies (Singhal et al., Reference Singhal, Roddy, DiVittorio, Sanchez-Amaya, Henriquez, Brodersen, Fehlberg and Zapata2021), (6) Espeletia complex, tropical Andes, 140 species (Pouchon et al., Reference Pouchon, Fernández, Nassar, Boyer, Aubert, Lavergne and Mavárez2018), (7) Hypochaeris apargioides complex, central-south Chile and adjacent Argentina, 4 species (López-Sepúlveda et al., Reference López-Sepúlveda, Tremetsberger, Ángeles-Ortiz, Baeza, Peñailillo and Stuessy2013), (8) Ligularia-Chremanthodium-Parasenecio complex, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, 11 species (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Wang, Wang, Hideaki and Abbott2006), (9) Psiadia, Madagascar and surrounding islands in western Indian Ocean, about 60 species (Strijk et al., Reference Strijk, Noyes, Strasberg, Cruaud, Gavory, Chase, Abbott and Thébaud2012), (10) Saussurea, high mountains of temperate Asia including the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, about 100 species (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Landis, Sun, Zhang, Lin, Kuang, Huang, Wang and Sun2021b), (11) woody Sonchus alliance, Canary Islands, 19 species (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Crawford, Francisco-Ortega and Santos-Guerra1999) and (12) Senecio, high equatorial Andes, 29 species (Dušková et al., Reference Dušková, Sklenář, Kolář, Vásquez, Romoleroux, Fér and Marhold2017).

Hybridization

Hybridization in plants, and Asteraceae in particular, can be between biotypes or subspecies of the same species or between species. Cypselae from crosses between wild and domesticated plants of Helianthus annus had increased germination (Snow et al., Reference Snow, Moran-Palma, Rieseberg, Wszelaki and Seiler1998; Mercer et al., Reference Mercer, Shaw and Wyse2006; Presotto et al., Reference Presotto, Poverene and Cantamutto2014). Cypselae from hybrids between Artemisia tridentata subsp. tridentata and A. tridentata subsp. vaseyana germinated to higher percentages than those from A. t. subsp. tridentata but to lower percentages than those from A. t. subsp. vaseyana (Graham et al., Reference Graham, Freeman and McArthur1995; Wang et al., Reference Wang, McArthur, Sanderson, Graham and Freeman1997). Cypselae from crosses between Solidago canadensis and S. virgaurea germinated to higher percentages than those from S. canadensis but to lower percentages than those from S. virgaurea (Pliszko and Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, Reference Pliszko and Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt2017). However, cypselae from the hybrid germinated faster than those from either parent (Pliszko and Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, Reference Pliszko and Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt2018).

Hybridization can lead to offspring having more than two sets of chromosomes, and in some cases, a new polyploid species is formed (e.g. Abbott and Lowe, Reference Abbott and Lowe2004). In general, there are two main kinds of polyploids: autopolyploids and allopolyploids. Autopolyploidy results from crosses within the same species or from WGD, while allopolyploidy results from crosses between species (see Parisod et al., Reference Parisod, Holderegger and Brochmann2010). Both kinds of polyploids are found in the Asteraceae.

Polyploidization and its consequences

WGD occurred in the early evolution of angiosperms (Masterson, Reference Masterson1994; Simillion et al., Reference Simillion, Vandepoele, Van Montagu, Zabeau and Van de Peer2002; Otto, Reference Otto2007; Soltis and Burleigh, Reference Soltis and Burleigh2009; Van de Peer et al., Reference Van de Peer, Fawcett, Proost, Sterck and Vandepoele2009; Schranz et al., Reference Schranz, Mohammadin and Edger2012; Ren et al., Reference Ren, Wang, Guo, Zhang, Zeng, Chen, Ma and Qi2018). Tank et al. (Reference Tank, Eastman, Pennell, Soltis, Soltis, Hinchliff, Brown, Sessa and Harmon2015) noted that increases in rates of angiosperm diversification tend to occur after WGD (palaeopolyploidization). Barker et al. (Reference Barker, Kane, Matvienko, Kozik, Michelmore, Knapp and Rieseberg2008) concluded that three WGDs occurred in the early history of the Asteraceae, prior to rapid radiation of its tribes in the Oligocene. Barker et al. (Reference Barker, Li, Kidder, Reardon, Lai, Oliveira, Scascitelli and Rieseberg2016) concluded that the Asteraceae share a paleotetraploid ancestor with the Calyceraceae (sister to Asteraceae) and that most Asteraceae ‘are descendants of a paleohexaploid’. Huang et al. (Reference Huang, Zhang, Liu, Hu, Gao, Qi and Ma2016) suggested that WGDs have been an important driving force in the evolution of Asteraceae and that they may have occurred during times of global catastrophe and dramatic changes in the environment, leading to stressful conditions for plant growth. These authors found WGDs in the core Asteraceae and at the separation of Asteraceae and Calyceraceae, crown node of Heliantheae alliance and clades Tussilaginae and Tragopogon-Scorzonerina. In addition, a WGD was found within Gnaphalieae. It should be noted that Zenil-Ferguson et al. (Reference Zenil-Ferguson, Burleigh, Freyman, Mayrose and Goldberg2019) concluded that lineage diversification in the Solanaceae was better explained by breeding system than by polyploidy.

In a consideration of polyploids in angiosperms, Barker et al. (Reference Barker, Arrigo, Baniaga, Li and Levin2015) found diploids, autopolyploids and allopolyploids in various genera of Asteraceae including Artemisia, Carthamus, Centaurea, Helianthus, Melampodium and Senecio but only diploids and allopolyploids in Stephanomeria. Although studies comparing seed germination of diploids and polyploids have been conducted for species in various plant families including Amaryllidaceae (Fialová et al., Reference Fialová, Jandová, Ohryzek and Duchoslav2014), Asteraceae (Thomas et al., Reference Thomas, Lefkovitch, Woo, Bowes and Peschken1994), Brassicaceae (Neuffer and Eschner, Reference Neuffer and Eschner1995), Cactaceae (Cohen et al., Reference Cohen, Fait and Tel-Zur2013), Cyperaceae (Escudero et al., Reference Escudero, Hahn, Brown, Lueders and Hipp2016), Fabaceae (Eliásová et al., Reference Eliásová, Trávníček, Mandák and Münzbergová2014), Onagraceae (Smith-Huerta, Reference Smith-Huerta1984), Plantaginaceae (Puech et al., Reference Puech, Rascol, Michel and Andary1998) and Poaceae (Hacker, Reference Hacker1988), relatively few species have been investigated in most families including the Asteraceae.

Among the Asteraceae that have been studied, diploid and tetraploid cypselae of Centaurea stoeba had similar germination percentages and rates when sown in a greenhouse (Hahn et al., Reference Hahn, Lanz, Fasel and Müller-Schärer2013). Diploid and tetraploid cypselae of Matricaria perforata had similar responses to temperature with the optimum for germination being 30/10°C. However, at suboptimal temperatures (5–15°C), tetraploid cypselae of M. perforata germinated to higher percentages than diploid cypselae. Cypselae of the polyploids Taraxacum venustum and T. albium had higher germination percentages at the optimum temperature (19°C) than those of the diploid T. platycarpum. However, at a low temperature (4°C), T. playcarpum cypselae germinated to a higher percentage than those of T. venustum but about the same as T. albium (Hoya et al., Reference Hoya, Shibaike, Morita and Ito2007). Furthermore, cypselae mass of polyploids may be greater than that of diploids (Hoya et al., Reference Hoya, Shibaike, Morita and Ito2007; Hahn et al., Reference Hahn, Lanz, Fasel and Müller-Schärer2013), which could have effects on germination, establishment and growth of the seedlings. The more or less lack of differences in germination of diploids and polyploids at least seems to suggest that ancient polyploidization had little, or no, effect on germination of cypselae in the Asteraceae.

In general, polyploidization may lead to changes/increases in breeding systems (Soltis et al., Reference Soltis, Soltis and Tate2003; Hojsgaard and Hörandl, Reference Hojsgaard and Hörandl2019), adaptability to new ecological niches (Levin, Reference Levin1983; Fawcett and Van de Peer, Reference Fawcett and Van de Peer2010; Ramsey, Reference Ramsey2011), invasiveness (te Beest et al., Reference te Beest, Le Roux, Richardson, Brysting, Suda, Kubešová and Pyšek2012; Hahn et al., Reference Hahn, Lanz, Fasel and Müller-Schärer2013), plant morphology (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Huang, Liu, Hu, Panera, Luebert, Gao and Ma2021a), seed size (Thompson, Reference Thompson1990), speciation/diversification (Comai, Reference Comai2005; Tank et al., Reference Tank, Eastman, Pennell, Soltis, Soltis, Hinchliff, Brown, Sessa and Harmon2015; Parisod and Broennimann, Reference Parisod and Broennimann2016; Stuessy and Weiss-Schneeweiss, Reference Stuessy and Weiss-Schneeweiss2019), tolerance to stress (Godfree et al., Reference Godfree, Marshall, Young, Miller and Mathews2017; Van de Peer et al., Reference Van de Peer, Mizrachi and Marchal2017) and mediators of gene flow (Peskoller et al., Reference Peskoller, Silbernagl, Hülber, Sonnleitner and Schönswetter2021). That is, polyploidy is not an ‘evolutionary dead-end’ (Soltis et al., Reference Soltis, Segovia-Salcedo, Jordon-Thaden, Majure, Miles, Mavrodiev, Mei, Cortez, Soltis and Gitzendanner2014a,Reference Soltis, Visger and Soltisb). Many of these changes in polyploids could have helped ameliorate the risk of extinction during times of catastrophic environmental (mass extinction) events (McElwain and Punyasena, Reference McElwain and Punyasena2007; Fawcett et al., Reference Fawcett, Maere and Van de Peer2009; Soltis and Burleigh, Reference Soltis and Burleigh2009; Vanneste et al., Reference Vanneste, Baele, Maere and Van de Peer2014).

Apomixis

Another consequence of polyploidization could be the loss of sexual reproduction due to the failure of gamete production (Tucker and Koltunow, Reference Tucker and Koltunow2009; te Beest et al., Reference te Beest, Le Roux, Richardson, Brysting, Suda, Kubešová and Pyšek2012; Hojsgaard and Hörandl, Reference Hojsgaard and Hörandl2019), which is a first step in the development of non-sexual formation of seeds (i.e. apomixis). The Asteraceae is an important family in terms of the number of species that can produce seeds asexually. The non-sexual formation of embryos and seeds is called agamospermy, but it usually is referred to as apomixis. However, apomixis s.l. includes agamospermy and reproduction only by vegetative means (de Meeȗs et al., Reference De Meeȗs, Prugnolle and Agnew2007; Noyes, Reference Noyes2007, Reference Noyes2022; Hojsgaard et al., Reference Hojsgaard, Klatt, Baier, Carman and Hörandl2014; Majeský et al., Reference Majeský, Krahulee and Vašut2017). In gametophytic apomixis, the embryo sac is diploid, and the egg develops parthenogenetically and includes apospory and diplospory (Richards, Reference Richards2003). In apospory, the embryo sac forms from a diploid somatic cell, and in diplospory an embryo sac forms from a megaspore mother cell that fails to undergo meiosis. In sporophytic or adventitious embryony, the embryo forms from somatic tissue, that is, usually from the nucellus or the integument, and is related to the production of multiple embryos in a seed (polyembryony) (Whitten et al., Reference Whitten, Seras, Baack and Otto2008; Hand and Koltunow, Reference Hand and Koltunow2014; Cardoso et al., Reference Cardoso, Viana, Matias, Furtado, Caetano, Consolaro and Brito2018). Carman (Reference Carman1997) listed 10 genera of Asteraceae in which polyembryony has been reported. It should be noted that Carman (Reference Carman1997) did not include sporophytic embryony in his definition of apomixis. In diplospory, the endosperm must be fertilized or seeds will not form (Hojsgaard and Hörandl, Reference Hojsgaard and Hörandl2019). However, in autonomous diplosory, which occurs predominantly in Asteraceae, both the embryo and endosperm develop without fertilization (Vinkenoog and Scott, Reference Vinkenoog and Scott2001).

Although asexual progeny of apomictic plants are genetically identical to the mother plant (Koltunow, Reference Koltunow1993; Koltunow and Grossniklaus, Reference Koltunow and Grossniklaus2003), they may vary epigenetically. Thus, for common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale, Asteraceae) genetically identical apomicitic plants exposed to various stress treatments exhibited epigenetic variation that was heritable (Verhoeven et al., Reference Verhoeven, Jansen, van Dijk and Biere2010). That is, the stress-induced DNA methylation changes in the F0 generation (maternal stress exposure) were faithfully transmitted to the F1 (progeny) generation.

Sexuality and apomixis could/can occur in the same species (i.e. facultative apomixis), and a seed lot collected from a population site of a species might be a mixture of sexually and asexually produced seeds (Koltunow, Reference Koltunow1993; Hand et al., Reference Hand, Krahulcová, Johnson, Oilkers, Siddons and Chrtek2015). Hojsgaard et al. (Reference Hojsgaard, Klatt, Baier, Carman and Hörandl2014) found apomictic seed production in 32 orders, 78 families and 293 genera of plants, and Asteraceae, Poaceae and Rosaceae had the majority of apomictic genera. In general, apomictic species are polyploids (Thompson and Ritland, Reference Thompson and Ritland2006; Mráz and Zdvořák, Reference Mráz and Zdvořák2019), and they occur mostly in tropical and temperate regions, with few species occurring in boreal and Arctic zones (Hojsgaard et al., Reference Hojsgaard, Klatt, Baier, Carman and Hörandl2014). In the Asteraceae, apomictic species occur in 47 genera (e.g. Antennaria, Crepis, Erigeron, Hieracium, Taraxacum) in four subfamilies (Asteroideae, 34; Cichorioideae, 9; Carduoideae, 2 and Mutisiodeae, 2), accounting for 13.9% of the genera in these subfamilies (Hojsgaard et al., Reference Hojsgaard, Klatt, Baier, Carman and Hörandl2014).

It is not clear how apomixis develops in a natural population of a plant species (Hojsgaard and Hörandl, Reference Hojsgaard and Hörandl2019). Hybridization long has been regarded as an important reason for the origin of apomictic taxa (Carman, Reference Carman1997; Bicknell and Koltunow, Reference Bicknell and Koltunow2004). Although some apomictic species are diploid hybrids (Beck, Reference Beck1986), many apomictic species are polyploids (Carman, Reference Carman1997). Thus, hybridization, but not polyploidy per se, seems to be a requirement for development of apomictic reproduction (Koltunow and Grossniklaus, Reference Koltunow and Grossniklaus2003). Genetic studies have revealed that apomixis is an inherited trait, for example, Erigeron (Noyes, Reference Noyes2000, Reference Noyes2022; Noyes and Rieseberg, Reference Noyes and Rieseberg2000), Hieracium (Bicknell et al., Reference Bicknell, Podivinsky, Catanach, Erasmuson and Lambie2001) and Taraxacum (Van Dijk et al., Reference Van Dijk, Tas, Falque and Bakx-Schotman1999), which helps explain why apomixis may appear in hybrids.

Five-month-old dry stored (i.e. probably afterripened) cypselae from autonomously apomicic biotypes of Taraxacum officinale differed in mass and germination percentages (Tweney and Mogie, Reference Tweney and Mogie1999). Cypselae that weighed >0.8 mg germinated to 87.3% in moist soil (compost) in a greenhouse. On the other hand, cypselae that weighed 0.7–0.79 mg germinated to 52.4% but those weighing <0.3 mg germinated to only 0.28%. In another study of the germination of apomictic cypselae, Sailer et al. (Reference Sailer, Tiberi, Schmid, Stöcklin and Grossniklaus2021) used a common garden experiment to determine if plants from asexual cypselae of the faculative apomictic species Pilosella officinarum competed better than plants from sexual cypselae. They found that germination proportion of offspring (cypselae) of sexual plants was higher than that of apomictic plants.

Soil cypsela banks

Cypselae of Asteraceae have been found in soil samples collected in a wide diversity of habitats. In the results from 185 soil seed bank studies (see Tables 7.2, 7.4 and 7.5 in Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014 for references) that were conducted in such a way that it is highly probable that persistent seeds were present (i.e. samples collected after germination but before input of new seeds), we found species belonging to 155 families, including Asteraceae. In the Asteraceae, there were 131 species in 73 genera. However, the presence of cypselae in the soil tells us very little about how long they can live after burial. Studies of individual species of Asteraceae that involved collecting soil samples at population sites and counting the number of viable cypselae in the sample or the number of seedlings that emerged from them have been conducted for various species, for example, Ageratina adenophora (Shen et al., Reference Shen, Liu, Baskin, Baskin and Cao2006), Artemisia quettensis (Ahmad et al., Reference Ahmad, Gul, Islam and Athar2007), Brachyscome muelleri (Jusaitis et al., Reference Jusaitis, Sorensen and Polomka2003), Centaurea solstitialis (Joley et al., Reference Joley, Maddox, Schoenig and Mackey2003), Chromolaena odorata (Epp, Reference Epp1987; Witkowski and Wilson, Reference Witkowski and Wilson2001), Pilosella aurantiaca, P. piloselloides subsp. praealta (Bear et al., Reference Bear, Giljohann, Cousens and Williams2012), Polymnia canadensis (Bender et al., Reference Bender, Baskin and Baskin2003) and Symphyotrichum laurentianum (Kemp and Lacroix, Reference Kemp and Lacroix2004). Unfortunately, even with these individualized studies, the longevity of cypselae in the soil is not known.

To determine their longevity, cypselae of various species of Asteraceae have been placed in mesh bags/containers and buried in the soil (Table 3). The period of burial ranged from a few months to 40 years, and viability at the end of burial varied from 0 to 97%, with a mean (±SE) survival of 25.6±3.7%. These burial studies included 39 species in 10 tribes, which is a very low representation of the species and tribes in Asteraceae. Furthermore, only in the study of Galinsoga parviflora was the survival of ray and disk cypselae (which are dimorphic) compared with 21.3 and 0% of the cypselae, respectively, viable after 2.1 years (Espinosa-Garcia et al., Reference Espinosa-Garcia, Vazquez-Bravo and Martinez-Ramos2003). Overall, it does not appear that long-lived persistent cypselae banks are very common for species of Asteraceae.

Table 3. Survival of cypselae of Asteraceae species placed in bags or other containers and buried in soil in the field for 0.25 to 40 years, depending on species

a Cypselae placed in a soil-filled bottle that was inverted and buried in the soil.

b Cypselae placed in short cylinders (7.6 wide × 2.5 cm deep) cut from polyvinylchloride pipe with nylon mesh on each end.

Also, if cypselae are dispersed/sown onto the soil surface, they generally germinate in the first year, but some may delay germination until the second or a later year. We sowed freshly matured cypselae of 52 species of Asteraceae (78 datasets because cypselae of some species were collected and sown in more than one year) on soil and exposed them to natural seasonal temperature cycles (see temperature data in Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Chester2019) and semi-natural watering regimes in a non-heated glasshouse in Lexington, Kentucky (USA). Germination was monitored weekly for 1 year after the last cypselae of a species/sowing germinated (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin, Hu and Zhang2022). For one group of species, including Echinacea tennesseensis, Helianthus atrorubens, Liatris squarrosa, Solidago altissima and Symphotrichum pilosum, cypselae sown in autumn germinated only the following (first) spring. In another group of species, including Boltonia decurrens, Echinacea simulata, Eupatorium altissimum, Helenium amarum and Rudbeckia triloba, many cypselae sown in autumn germinated in the first spring, but in the second, and sometimes the third, spring a few additional cypselae germinated (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin, Hu and Zhang2022). For short-lived monocarpic perennial (MP), polycarpic perennial (PP) summer annuas (SA) and winter annual (WA) Asteraceae, the mean (±SE) number of years for germination was 1.70 ± 0.20, 1.69 ± 0.25, 1.56 ± 0.22 and 1.81 ± 0.28, respectively (Table 4). Species whose cypselae germinated in 3 or more years include Polymnia canadensis (MP, 3 years), Achillea millefolium (PP, 7), Ambrosia artemisiifolia (SA, 4), A. trifida (SA, 3), Crepis pulchra (WA, 3) Helenium amarum (WA, 5) Krigia virginica (WA, 3) and Lactuca serriola (WA, 3).

Table 4. Number of years cypselae of Asteraceae germinated in the non-heated glasshouse in Lexington, Kentucky (USA)

a Cypselae may have intermediate physiological dormancy, but this has not been confirmed by laboratory experiments.

The germination responses of Lactuca floridana cypselae that we buried in soil in the non-heated glasshouse help explain why a species has only one germination season. At maturity in autumn, cypselae of this species germinated to 9, 9, 66, 99 and 93% when incubated in light at 15/6, 20/10, 25/15, 30/15 and 35/20°C, respectively, with no germination at any temperature regime in darkness. During exposure to low temperatures during burial in winter, cypselae gained the ability to germinate to 98–100% in both light and dark at the five temperature regimes. When bags of buried cypselae were exhumed in spring (1 March), 50% of the cypselae had already germinated, and when bags were exhumed on 1 April, 1 May and 1 June, only 29, 21 and 0%, respectively, of the cypselae remained non-germinated. That is, during cold stratification, cypselae gained the ability to germinate in darkness and thus germinated as soon as temperatures increased in spring (Baskin and Baskin, unpublished).

Life form, vegetation zone and phylogeny (tribes) of cypsela dormancy in Asteraceae

Information on cypsela dormancy and life form of Asteraceae species previously was compiled for 755 species growing in the various vegetation zones on earth (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). Since 2014, we have continued to collect information on cypselae dormancy in Asteraceae. In addition to regularly checking new issues of plant-related journals for dormancy/germination information, we conducted many web searches using a variety of search terms in various combinations: Asteraceae, Compositae, names of tribes and genera of Asteraceae, names of countries in South America, Asia and Africa, achene, cypsela, germinação, germinación, semillas and sementes.

In the papers found in the literature, if fresh cypselae germinated to a relatively high percentage over a range of temperatures and dormancy-breaking treatments such as afterripening, cold stratification, warm stratification, scarification and gibberellin did not increase germination, the species was listed as having ND cypselae. However, if any dormancy-breaking treatment increased the percentage and/or rate of germination, the species was listed as having PD. In the case of heteromorphic species, if one cypsela morph was ND and another had PD, the species was listed as PD. If a species was listed in Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2014) as ND/PD or PD/ND, it was counted as PD in this review. In comparing ND and PD of tropical and temperate regions, the data for Asteraceae species from special habitats were included under the temperate region.

We found information for 450 additional species, bringing the total to 1205 species entries in supplementary Table S1. All species of Asteraceae were recorded according to life form and vegetation zone/special habitats (supplementary Table S1). However, 12 species of weeds (Ageratum conyzoides, Bidens pilosa, Chromolaena odorata, Cirsium arvense, Emilia sonchifolia, Galinsoga parviflora, Synedrella nodiflora, Tithonia diversifolia, T. rotundifolia, Tridax procumbens, Senecio vulgaris and Tanacetum vulgare) are common in more than one vegetation zone in supplementary Table S1, which reduces the total number of species to 1182. The 1182 species occur in 373 genera and 35 tribes of Asteraceae. In working with the results of our compilation, the multiple listings of the 12 weeds were counted as separate species based on research done in different vegetation zones.

Life forms and dormancy

Among the 1205 entries in the database, there were 14 (1.2%), 180 (14.9%), 8 (0.7%) and 1003 (83.2%) trees, shrubs, vines (including woody and herbaceous climbers) and herbs, respectively (Table 5). Overall, 22.2% of the species had ND cypselae, and 50.0, 20.6, 25.0 and 22.0% of the tree, shrub, vine and herb species, respectively, had ND cypselae; thus, 50.0, 79.4, 75.0 and 78.0%, respectively, had PD. We found germination data for 14 species of Asteraceae that are trees, and 13 of them occur in tropical vegetation zones and one in the warm moist temperature woodlands (i.e. the broad-leaved evergreen forest). Trees occur in various tribes of Asteraceae, including Astereae, Bahieae, Coreopsideae, Eupatorieae, Gochnatieae, Heliantheae, Inuleae, Liabeae, Millerieae Neurolaeneae, Senecioneae and Vernonieae (Ricker et al., Reference Ricker, Hernández, Sousa and Ochoterena2013; Beech et al., Reference Beech, Rivers, Oldfield and Smith2017; Redonda-Martínez et al., Reference Redonda-Martínez, Pliscoff, Moreira-Muñoz, Salas and Samain2021). Thus, clearly cypsela dormancy has been studied in only a small fraction of the tree species of Asteraceae.

Table 5. Number of species of trees, shrubs, vines and herbs of Asteraceae in different vegetation zones/special habitats with non-dormant (ND) and physiologically dormant (PD) cypselae

The lack of research is even more apparent for Asteraceae vines than for trees. Only eight species of vines were recorded – two with ND and six with PD. Gentry (Reference Gentry, Putz and Mooney1991) says there are 470 species and 23 genera of climbing Asteraceae in the New World, but he does not show Asteraceae in bar diagrams depicting the most important plant families of vines in the Amazon rainforest of Brazil or in Africa or Borneo. However, he does show vines of Asteraceae for upper Andean sites in Bolivia, Ecuador and Columbia and for a lowland dry forest in Ecuador. Gentry (Reference Gentry, Putz and Mooney1991) gives the number of vine species of Asteraceae in temperate North America and Europe as one to three but does not provide their names. Vines occur in tribes Astereae, Barnadesieae, Coreopsideae, Eupatorieae, Gnaphalieae, Heliantheae, Mutisieae, Senecioneae and Vernonieae of Asteraceae (Morellato and Leitão-Filho, Reference Morellato and Leitão-Filho1996; Cai et al., Reference Cai, Schnitzer, Wen, Chen and Bongers2009; Schnitzer et al., Reference Schnitzer, Mangan, Dalling, Baldeck, Hubbell, Ledo, Muller-Landau, Tobin, Aguilar, Brassfield, Hernandez, Lao, Perez, Valdes and Yorke2012; Seger and Hartz, Reference Seger and Hartz2014; Sánchez-Chávez et al., Reference Sánchez-Chávez, Rodríguez, Castro-Castro, Pérez-Farrera and Sosa2019).

Of the 180 species of shrubs, germination of 90 each has been studied in the tropical and temperate regions; four of the temperate region shrubs are psammophytes (i.e. in a special habitat). However, for the 1003 herbs, 199, 772 and 32 species are from the tropics, temperate region and special habitats, respectively, with 74.4, 78.8 and 81.3% of them having cypselae with PD, respectively.

Vegetation zone and dormancy

The proportion of species with ND and PD cypselae for each vegetation zone is shown in Fig. 1. In evergreen and semi-evergreen rain forests, more species have ND than PD cypselae. However, in all other vegetation zones, except the (temperate) alpine/high-latitude tundra, where the number of species with ND and PD is the same, more species have cypselae with PD than ND.

Fig. 1. Proportion of Asteraceae species with non-dormant (ND) and physiologically dormancy (PD) cypselae in each tropical and temperate vegetation zone.

Tribes, life forms, vegetation zones and dormancy

In the tropical region (all tropical vegetation zones combined), the number of tribes of tree species with ND and PD was 4 and 2, respectively; shrubs 11 and 17, respectively; vines 2 and 2, respectively; and herbs 13 and 22, respectively (Table 6). In the temperate region, the number of tribes of tree species with ND and PD was 0 and 1, respectively; shrubs 6 and 9, respectively; vines 0 and 4, respectively; and herbs 17 and 25, respectively. Thus, in the tropical region, more tribes are represented by shrubs and herbs than by vines or trees, and more shrubs and herbs have PD than ND. In the temperate region, more tribes are represented by herbs than by trees, shrubs and vines, and more herbs have PD than ND.

Table 6. Number of species of trees, shrubs, vines and herbs with non-dormant (ND) and physiologically dormant (PD) cypselae in tribes of Asteraceae in tropical and temperate regions

B, basal grade; C, central grade; HA, Heliantheae Allianace of Asteraceae. Tribes of Asteraceae are sensu Susanna et al. (Reference Susanna, Baldwin, Bayer, Bonifacino, Garcia-Jacas, Keeley, Mandel, Ortiz, Robinson and Stuessy2020).

aNo information was found for species in tribes Eremothamneae, Famatinantheae, Feddeeae, Hecastocleideae, Moquinieae, Neurolaeneae, Oldenburgieae, Onoserideae, Platycarpheae or Wunderlichieae.

Across the tropical and temperate zones and all life forms, the tribes with ≥10% of the 1205 species were Anthemideae (11.7%), Astereae (16.7%) and Gnaphalieae (10.3%). The tribes Antroismeae, Barnadesieae, Chaenactideae, Corymbieae, Gymnarrheneae, Nassauvieae, Perityleae, Pertyeae, Polymnieae and Stiffieae are represented by only one species (0.08%) each (Table 6). Among the 35 tribes, 19 had both ND and PD, 7 only ND and 9 only PD. In the basal grade (B), central grade (C) and Heliantheae Alliance (HA) of Asteraceae (sensu Susanna et al., Reference Susanna, Baldwin, Bayer, Bonifacino, Garcia-Jacas, Keeley, Mandel, Ortiz, Robinson and Stuessy2020), if a tribe was represented by two or more species, both ND and PD were found among them, except for Bahieae, Liabeae and Tarchonantheae. Bahieae (HA) was represented by four PD species, Liabeae (HA) by two ND species and Tarchonantheae (C) by two ND species. We note that tribes Eremothamneae, Famatinantheae and Feddeeae are monospecific. Information about the occurrence of ND and PD is plotted on the Asteraceae tribe-level chronogram of Mandel et al. (Reference Mandel, Dikow, Siniscalchi, Thapa, Watson and Funk2019) shows that both ND and PD are widely distributed throughout the family (supplementary Fig. S1).

Tropical trees occurred in 1, 2 and 1 tribe(s) in B, C and HA, respectively, but temperate trees were in only one C tribe (Table 6). Except for one tropical C tribe (Vernonieae) with both ND and PD, all tribes of trees had only ND cypselae. Tropical shrubs were in 3, 10 and 7 tribes of B, C and HA, respectively, and temperature shrubs in 2, 8 and 1 tribe(s), respectively. With the exception of species in 1 C and 2 HA tribes in the tropical zone and 1 B and 1 C tribes in the temperate zone with ND cypselae, all tribes had either both ND and PD or only PD. Tropical vines were in 1, 1 and 2 tribes of B, C and HA, respectively, and temperate vines in 1, 1 and 2, respectively. With the exception of species in 2 HA tribes in the tropical zone with ND cypselae, all tribes had cypselae with PD. Tropical herbs were in 1, 14 and 9 tribes of B, C and HA, respectively, and with the exception of species in 1 C tribe with ND cypselae all tribes had either both ND and PD or only PD. Temperate herbs were in 2, 14 and 10 tribes, respectively, and with the exception of species in 2 B tribes with ND cypselae, all tribes had either both ND and PD or only PD.

The tribes with the best representation across the different vegetation zones are: Senecioneae (in all zones except temperate montane) and Astereae (not in rainforest or hot desert) (Table 7). The second most geographically widely distributed tribes are the Eupatorieae and Heliantheae, but each is missing from four vegetation zones. Eupatorieae was not recorded in temperate montane, temperate alpine, matorral or cold desert and Heliantheae was not in tropical alpine, temperate alpine, temperate montane or broad-leaved evergreen.

Table 7. Tribes of Asteraceae in different vegetation zones represented by one or more species with non-dormant (N) or physiologically dormant (P) cypselae

Tropical: Rainf, rainforest; Mont, montane zone on mountains; Alpine, alpine zone on mountains; Semie, semi-evergreen rainforests; Dry, dry deciduous forests; Sav, savanna; H-D, hot deserts. Temperate/arctic: Mator, matorral/sclerophyllous woodlands; Br, broad-leaved evergreen or moist-warm temperature woodlands; Decid, deciduous (nemoral) forests; Grass, grasslands; C-D, cold deserts; Boreal, subalpine/high-latitude boreal; Alpine, alpine/high-latitude tundra; Mont, montane zone on mountains; Woodl, woodland zone on mountains.

The number of tribes represented by one or more species (with ND or PD) in each vegetation zone ranges from 3 to 20 (Table 7). The low number (3) is for tribes in the temperate montane zone, where data were found for only five species of Asteraceae, while the high number (20) is for hot deserts, where data are available for 108 species (Table 5). Of the six tribes found in the rainforest, 5 and 3 of them had species with ND and PD, respectively. However, for all vegetation zones, except the rainforest and the tropical alpine (5 and 5 with ND and PD, respectively), the tribes were represented by more species with PD than ND. Tribes represented by either ND or PD (but not by both) in only one vegetation zone are Antroismeae, Barnadesieae, Chaenactideae, Corymbieae, Dicomeae, Gymnarrheneae, Nassaurieae, Perityleae, Petryeae, Plucheeae and Polymnieae. Clearly, more data are needed for Asteraceae in many of the vegetation zones, especially for the poorly represented tribes.

Dormancy/germination flexibility and adaptability

ND and PD are found in cypselae of Asteraceae in various tribes, genera and species; life forms and life cycles; and in all vegetation zones on earth. Except for one of the three morphs of the cypsela-trimorphic species Heteracia szovitsii (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Dong, Tan, Baskin and Baskin2020) with intermediate PD, the level of PD in the Asteraceae is non-deep. Furthermore, six types of non-deep PD have been identified, and all of them are known to occur in the Asteraceae. The types of non-deep PD are broken by exposure of cypselae to environmental conditions that are not favourable for seedling establishment and growth. Since dormancy-break occurs during the non-favourable season for growth, cypselae are ND and can germinate at the beginning of the favourable season for growth, giving the seedling the full length of the favourable season to become established. Variation in the types of non-deep PD allows for fine-tuning of germination, which is part of the suite of adaptations of Asteraceae species to many of the vast diversity of habitats on earth. In general, we can conclude that cypselae dormancy in Asteraceae is not complicated but that it is very flexible.

According to the evolutionary transition analysis between seed dormancy states, morphophysiological dormancy (MPD) is probably the ancestral dormancy state, and there have been three major shifts from MPD to PD (Willis et al., Reference Willis, Baskin, Baskin, Auld, Venable, Cavender-Bares, Donohue and Rubio de Casas2014). PD has been an evolutionary hub and has given rise to seeds that are ND and to those with MPD, morphological dormancy (MD), physical dormancy (PY) and combinational dormancy (PY + PD). However, there have been transitions from ND, MPD, PY, PY + PD and MD back to PD. Thus, the close association between ND and PD throughout the Asteraceae is no doubt related to the transitions between PD and ND (i.e. PD ↔ ND). Willis et al. (Reference Willis, Baskin, Baskin, Auld, Venable, Cavender-Bares, Donohue and Rubio de Casas2014) described ND as ‘either a recent evolutionary development or an ephemeral state’. However, in an investigation of the evolutionary transitions between seed dormancy and ND, Zhang et al. (Reference Zhang, Liu, Sun, Baskin, Baskin, Cao and Yang2022) found no evidence that ND is an evolutionary end point or that species with ND seeds have a higher extinction rate than those with dormant seeds. Further ND ‘has adaptive evolutionary significance’ (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Liu, Sun, Baskin, Baskin, Cao and Yang2022).

Clearly, PD is an adaptive strategy for the persistence of Asteraceae species growing in habitats with annually fluctuating favourability/unfavourability of conditions for germination and seedling survival. On the other hand, the lack of dormancy in cypselae of an Asteraceae species would seem to indicate that cypselae mature and are dispersed at a time of high predictability that environmental conditions are favourable for seedling establishment. That is, there is no benefit in germination being delayed via PD. However, as described for Helenium amarum (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1973), cypselae dispersed late in a so-called favourable season for seedling establishment may not germinate due to environmental temperatures being below those required for germination. In which case, germination can be delayed until the temperatures increase again. Would this scenario lead to selection for Type 2 non-deep PD?

In response to the selective pressure due to changes in seasonal patterns of temperature and precipitation and/or dispersal of seeds/cypselae to new habitats, six types of non-deep PD have evolved. The evolutionary pathways proposed for type of non-deep PD are Type 4 → Type 2 → Type 3 and Type 5 → Type 1 → Type 3 (see Fig. 12.21 in Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). Type 6 was not known at the time these pathways were proposed. However, the occurrence of Types 1 and 6 in cypselae of Silybum marianum (Monemizadeh et al., Reference Monemizadeh, Ghaderi-Far, Sadeghipour, Siahmarguee, Soltani, Torabi and Baskin2021) from different populations suggests a close relationship between Types 1 and 6. Type 6 in which seeds/cypselae germinate over a wide range of temperatures without going through conditional dormancy may represent a response to unpredictable timing of rainfall during the growing season.

Conclusions

ND and the six types of non-deep PD in Asteraceae enhance the flexibility of the dormancy-break/germination and seedling establishment stages of the life cycle. Thus, germination is closely linked to the time/season when the probability of successful seedling establishment is high. In addition to the various reasons that have been proposed (see Introduction) to help explain high species diversification in Asteraceae, we suggest that dormancy-break and germination need to be considered. The great flexibility/adaptability in terms of control of timing of dormancy-break and germination of Asteraceae helped ensure the survival of new species as they evolved, and it promoted successful establishment when cypselae were dispersed to new habitats. Furthermore, the occurrence of ND and PD in the basal tribes of Asteraceae suggests that flexibility of dormancy/germination has long been a part of the ability of species in this family to adapt to new habitats.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258523000107.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

Abbott, RJ and Lowe, AJ (2004) Origins, establishment and evolution of new polyploid species: Senecio cambrensis and S. eboracensis in the British Isles. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82, 467474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afolayan, AJ, Meyer, JJM and Leeuwner, DV (1997) Germination in Helichrysum aureonitens (Asteraceae): effect of temperature, light, gibberellic acid, scarification and smoke extract. South African Journal of Botany 63, 2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguado, M, Martínez-Sánchez, JJ, Reig-Armiñana, J, García-Breojp, FJ, Franco, JA and Vicente, MJ (2011) Morphology, anatomy and germination response of heteromorphic achenes of Anthemis chrysantha J. Gay (Asteraceae), a critically endangered species. Seed Science Research 21, 283294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, S, Gul, S, Islam, M and Athar, M (2007) Seed dispersal and soil seed bank of Seriphidium quettense (Asteraceae) in highland Balochistan, Pakistan. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute Texas 1, 569575.Google Scholar
Aiello, N, Lombardo, G, Gianni, S, Scartezzini, F and Fusani, P (2017) The effect of cold stratification and of gibberellic acid on the seed germination of wild musk yarrow [Achillea erba-rotta subsp. moschata (Wulfen) I. Richardson] populations. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 7, 108112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, MA, Dell, ND and Long, QG (2020) Seed germination traits in the rare sandstone rockhouse endemic Solidago albopilosa (Asteraceae). Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 147, 172184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, HM and Schrag, AM (2003) Role of soil seed banks and newly dispersed seeds in population dynamics of the annual sunflower, Helianthus annuus. Journal of Ecology 91, 987998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, G and Hamed, ZK (2012) Effects of seed collecting date and storage duration on seed germination in Artemisia spp. African Journal of Biotechnology 14, 97829787.Google Scholar
Allen, AM, Thorogood, CJ, Hegarty, MJ, Lexer, C and Hiscock, SJ (2011) Pollen-pistil interactions and self-incompatibility in the Asteraceae: new insights from studies of Senecio squalidus (Oxford ragwort). Annals of Botany 108, 687698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, VJ (2002) Nutrients, arbuscular mycorrhizas and competition interact to influence seed production and germination success in Achillea millefolium. Functional Ecology 16, 742749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, N and Mathur, A (2012) Occurrence of vivipary behavior in Tagetes erecta L. European Journal of Experimental Biology 2, 23172319.Google Scholar
Anderberg, AA, Baldwin, BG, Bayer, RG, Breitwieser, J, Jeffrey, C, Dillon, MO, Eldenäs, P, Funk, V, Garcia-Jacas, N, Hind, DJN, Karis, PO, Lack, HW, Nesom, G, Nordenstam, B, Oberprieler, C, Panero, JL, Puttock, C, Robinson, H, Stuessy, TF, Susanna, A, Urtubey, E, Vogt, R, Ward, J and Watson, LE (2007) Compositae, pp. 1588 in Kadereit, JW and Jeffrey, C (Eds) The families and genera of vascular plants. VIII. Flowering plants – Eudicots. Asterales. Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
Andersson, S (1990) Parental effects on seed size in a population of Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae). Oikos 59, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, A (1993) The potential for selective seed maturation in Achillea ptarmica (Asteraceae). Oikos 66, 3642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, S and Shaw, RG (1994) Phenotypic plasticity in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): genetic correlations across light regimes. Heredity 72, 113125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, A, Riera, N, Lindstrom, L, Alemano, S, Alvarez, D, Abdala, G and Vigliocoo, A (2015) Pericarp anatomy and hormone profiles of cypselas in dormant and non-dormant inbred sunflower lines. Plant Biology 17, 351360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Argyris, J, Truco, MJ, Ochoa, O, McHale, L, Dahal, P, Van Deynze, A, Michelmore, RW and Bradford, KJ (2011) A gene encoding an abscisis acid biosynthetic enzyme (LsNCED4) collocates with the high temperature germination locus Htg6.1 in lettuce (Lactuca sp.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 122, 95108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arista, M, Berjano, R, Viruel, J, Ortiz, , Talavera, M and Ortiz, PL (2017) Uncertain pollination environment promotes the evolution of a stable mixed reproductive system in the self-incompatible Hypochaeris salzmanniana (Asteraceae). Annals of Botany 120, 447456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arroyo, MTK, Cavieres, LA and Humana, AM (2004) Experimental evidence of potential for persistent seed bank formation at a subantarctic alpine site in Tierra del Fuego, Chile. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 91, 357365.Google Scholar
Arroyo, MTK, Chacon, P and Cavieres, LA (2006) Relationship between seed bank expression, adult longevity and aridity in species of Chaetanthera (Asteraceae) in Central Chile. Annals of Botany 98, 591600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aubert, S, Boucher, F, Lavergne, S, Renaud, J and Choler, P (2014) 1914–2014: a revised worldwide catalogue of cushion plants 100 years after Hauri and Schröter. Alpine Botany 124, 5970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awang, MB and Monaco, TJ (1978) Germination, growth, development, and control of camphorweed (Heterotheca subaxillaris). Weed Science 26, 5157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, BG and Sanderson, MJ (1998) Age and rate of diversification of the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Compositae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 94029406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banovetz, SJ and Scheiner, SM (1994) Secondary seed dormancy in Coreopsis lanceolata. The American Midland Naturalist 131, 7583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, MS, Kane, NC, Matvienko, M, Kozik, A, Michelmore, RW, Knapp, SJ and Rieseberg, LH (2008) Multiple paleopolyploidizations during the evolution of the Compositae reveal parallel patterns of duplicate gene retention after millions of years. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 24452455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, MS, Arrigo, N, Baniaga, AE, Li, Z and Levin, DA (2015) On the relative abundance of autopolyploids and allopolyploids. New Phytologist 210, 391398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, MS, Li, Z, Kidder, TI, Reardon, CR, Lai, Z, Oliveira, LO, Scascitelli, M and Rieseberg, LH (2016) Most Compositae (Asteraceae) are descendants of a paleohexaploid and all share a paleotetraploid ancestor with the Calyceraceae. American Journal of Botany 103, 12031211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreda, VD, Palazzesi, L, Tellería, MC, Katinas, L, Crisci, JV, Bremer, K, Passalia, MG, Corsolini, R, Brizuela, RR and Bechis, F (2010) Eocene Patagonia fossils of the daisy family. Science 329, 1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barreda, VD, Palazzesi, L, Katinas, L, Crisci, JV, Tellería, MC, Bremer, K, Passalia, MG, Bechis, F and Corsolini, R (2012) An extinct Eocene taxon of the daisy family (Asteraceae): evolutionary, ecological and biogeographical implications. Annals of Botany 109, 127134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barreda, VD, Palazzesi, L, Tellería, MC, Olivero, EB, Raine, JI and Forest, F (2015) Early evolution of the angiosperm clade Asteraceae in the Cretaceous of Antarctica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 1098910994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartle, K, Moles, AT and Bonser, SP (2013) No evidence for rapid evolution of seed dispersal ability in range edge populations of the invasive species Senecio madagascariensis. Austral Ecology 38, 915920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (1973) Ecological life cycle of Helenium amarum in central Tennessee. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 100, 117124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (1976) Germination dimorphism in Heterotheca subaxillaris var. subaxillaris. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 103, 201206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (1977) Dormancy and germination in seeds of common ragweed with reference to Beal's buried seed experiment. American Journal of Botany 64, 11741176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (1979a) Studies on the autecology and population biology of the monocarpic perennial Grindelia lanceolata. The American Midland Naturalist 102, 290299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (1979b) The germination strategy of oldfield aster (Aster pilosus). American Journal of Botany 66, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (1980) Ecophysiology of secondary dormancy in seeds of Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Ecology 61, 475480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (1981) Temperature relations of seed germination and ecological implications in Galinsoga parviflora and G. quadriradiata. Bartonia 48, 1218.Google Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (1988) Studies on the germination ecophysiology of herbaceous plants in a temperate region. American Journal of Botany 75, 286305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (1989) Ecophysiology of seed germination and flowering in Liatris squarrosa. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 116, 4551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (1996) Role of temperature and light in the germination ecology of buried seeds of weedy species of disturbed forests. II. Erechtites hieracifolia. Canadian Journal of Botany 74, 20022005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (1998) Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2002) Achene germination ecology of the federally threatened floodplain endemic Boltonia decurrens (Asteraceae). The American Midland Naturalist 147, 1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2014) Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination (2nd edn). San Diego, Academic Press/Elsevier.Google Scholar
Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (2015) Inbreeding depression and the cost of inbreeding on seed germination. Seed Science Research 25, 355385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (2019) How much influence does the paternal parent have on seed germination? Seed Science Research 29, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2020) Breaking seed dormancy during dry storage: a useful tool or major problem for successful restoration via direct seedling? Plants 9, 636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (2021) The great diversity in kinds of seed dormancy: revision of the Nikolaeva-Baskin classification system for primary seed dormancy. Seed Science Research 31, 249277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2022a) Mimicking the natural thermal environments experienced by seeds to break physiological dormancy to enhance seed testing and seedling production. Seed Science & Technology 50, 2129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2022b) Cold stratification in winter is more than enough for seed dormancy-break of summer annuals in eastern North America: implications for climate change. Seed Science Research 32, 6369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM and Chester, EW (1991) Temperature response pattern during afterripening of achenes of the winter annual Krigia oppositifolia (Asteraceae). Plant Species Biology 6, 111115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM and Hoffman, GR (1992a) Seed dormancy in the prairie forb Echinacea angustifolia var. angustifolia (Asteraceae): afterripening pattern during cold stratification. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153, 239243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM and Van Auken, OW (1992b) Germination response patterns to temperature during afterripening of achenes of four Texas winter annual Asteraceae. Canadian Journal of Botany 70, 23542358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM and Leck, MA (1993) Afterripening pattern during cold stratification of achenes of 10 perennial Asteraceae from eastern North America, and evolutionary implication. Plant Species Biology 8, 6165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM and Van Auken, OW (1994) Germination response patterns during dormancy loss in achenes of six perennial Asteraceae from Texas, USA. Plant Species Biology 9, 113117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM and Chester, EW (1995a) Role of temperature in the germination ecology of the summer annual Bidens polylepis Blake (Asteraceae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 122, 275281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM and Van Auken, OW (1995b) Temperature requirements for dormancy break and germination in achenes of the winter annual Lindheimera texana (Asteraceae). Southwestern Naturalist 40, 268272.Google Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM and Van Auken, OW (1998) Role of temperature in dormancy break and/or germination of autumn-maturing achenes of eight perennial Asteraceae from Texas, USA. Plant Species Biology 13, 1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM and Van Auken, OW (1999) Dormancy-breaking and germination requirements in seeds of the summer annual Palafoxia callosa (Asteraceae) from central Texas. Southwestern Naturalist 44, 272277.Google Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM, Yoshinaga, A and Thompson, K (2005) Germination of drupelets in multi-seeded drupes of the shrub Leptecophylla tameiameiae (Ericaceae) from Hawaii, a case for deep physiological dormancy broken by high temperatures. Seed Science Research 15, 349356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM, Lu, JJ, Baskin, CC and Tan, DY (2013) The necessity for testing germination of fresh seeds in studies on diaspore heteromorphism as a life-history strategy. Seed Science Research 23, 8388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM and Chester, EW (2019) Long-term persistence of summer annuals in soil seed banks of seasonally dewatered mudflats. Plant Ecology 220, 731740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM, Hu, XW and Zhang, CH (2022) Width of the temperature range for seed germination of herbaceous plant species in temperate eastern North America: life cycles, seasons and temperature variation and implication for climate warming. Seed Science Research 32, 1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastida, F and Menéndez, J (2004) Germination requirements and dispersal timing in two heterocarpic weedy Asteraceae. Communication of Applied Biological Sciences of Ghent University 69, 6776.Google ScholarPubMed
Bastida, F, González-Andújar, JL, Monteagudo, JF and Menéndez, J (2010) Aerial seed bank dynamics and seedling emergence patterns in two annual Mediterranean Asteraceae. Journal of Vegetation Science 21, 541550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bear, JL, Giljohann, KM, Cousens, RD and Williams, NSG (2012) The ecology of two invasive Hieracium (Asteraceae) species. Australian Journal of Botany 60, 615624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, E (1986) Biology of Afroalpine Dendrosenecio (Asteraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 152, 123131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, U, Colling, G, Dostal, P, Jakobsson, A and Matthies, D (2006) Local adaptation in the monocarpic perennial Carlina vulgaris at different spatial scales across Europe. Oecologia 150, 506518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beech, E, Rivers, M, Oldfield, S and Smith, PP (2017) GlobalTreeSearch: the first complete global database of tree species and country distributions. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 36, 454489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekker, RM, Knevel, IC, Tallowin, JBR, Troost, EML and Bakker, JP (1998) Soil nutrient input effects on seed longevity: a burial experiment with fen-meadow species. Functional Ecology 12, 673682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, MH, Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (2003) Seed germination ecology of Polymnia canadensis (Asteraceae), a monocarpic species of the North American temperate deciduous forest. Plant Ecology 168, 221253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneke, K, Van Rooyen, MW, Theron, GK and Van De Venter, HA (1993) Fruit polymorphism in ephemeral species of Namaqualand: III. Germination differences between the polymorphic diaspores. Journal of Arid Environments 24, 333344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertin, RI and Gwisc, GM (2002) Floral sex ratios and gynomonoecy in Solidago (Asteraceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 77, 413422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertin, RI and Kerwin, MA (1998) Floral sex ratios and gynomonoecy in Aster (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 85, 235244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicknell, RA and Koltunow, AM (2004) Understanding apomixis: recent advances and remaining conundrums. The Plant Cell 16, S228S245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicknell, R, Podivinsky, E, Catanach, A, Erasmuson, S and Lambie, S (2001) Strategies for isolating mutants in Hieracium with dysfunctional apomixis. Sexual Plant Reproduction 14, 227232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bischoff, A and Muller-Schärer, H (2010) Testing population differentiation in plant species – how important are environmental maternal effects. Oikos 119, 445454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bischoff, A, Vonlanthen, B, Steinger, T and Muller-Schärer, H (2006) Seed provenance matters – effects on germination of four plant species used for ecological restoration. Basic and Applied Ecology 7, 347359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodrone, MP, Rodríguez, MV and Arisnabarreta, S (2017) Maternal environment and dormancy in sunflower: the effect of temperature during fruit development. European Journal of Agronomy 82, 93103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brändel, M (2004a) Dormancy and germination of heteromorphic achenes of Bidens frondosa. Flora 199, 228233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brändel, M (2004b) The role of temperature in the regulation of dormancy and germination of two related summer-annual mudflat species. Aquatic Botany 79, 1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brändel, M (2007) Ecology of achene dimorphism in Leontodon saxatilis. Annals of Botany 100, 11891197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brändel, M and Jensen, K (2005) Effect of temperature on dormancy and germination of Eupatorium cannabinum L. achenes. Seed Science Research 15, 143151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburger, CR, Sherwin, WB, Creer, SM, Buitenwerf, R, Poore, AGB, Frankhan, R, Finnerty, PB and Moles, AT (2019) Rapid reshaping: the evolution of morphological changes in an introduced beach daisy. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286, 20181713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, K (1994) Asteraceae. Cladistics & classification. Portland, Timber Press.Google Scholar
Bremer, K and Jansen, RK (1992) A new subfamily of the Asteraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79, 414415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, AC, Harris, SA and Hiscock, SJ (2005) Modes and rates of selfing and associated inbreeding depression in the self-incompatible plant Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae): a successful colonizing species in the British Isles. New Phytologist 168, 475486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchele, DE, Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (1991) Ecology of the endangered species Solidago shortii. III. Seed germination ecology. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 118, 288291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtt, BL (1977) Aspects of diversification in the capitulum, pp. 4259 in Heywood, VH and Harborne, JB (Eds) The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Byers, DL (1998) Effect of cross proximity on progeny fitness in a rare and a common species of Eupatorium (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 85, 644653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, L and Dieringer, G (1992) Reproductive biology of a population of Acourtia runcinata (Asteraceae: Mutisieae) at the northeastern limit of its range. The American Midland Naturalist 128, 8388.Google Scholar
Cai, ZQ, Schnitzer, SA, Wen, B, Chen, YJ and Bongers, F (2009) Liana communities in three tropical forest types in Xishuangbanna, south-west China. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 21, 252264.Google Scholar
Campbell, LG and Husband, BC (2007) Small populations are mate-poor but pollinator-rich in a rare, self-incompatible plant, Hymenoxys herbacea (Asteraceae). New Phytologist 174, 915925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caño, L, Escarré, J, Blanco-Moreno, JM and Sans, FX (2008) Assessing the effect of inbreeding and long-distance gene flow on the invasive potential of Senecio pterophorus (Asteraceae). Australian Journal of Botany 56, 539549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, JCF, Viana, ML, Matias, R, Furtado, MT, Caetano, APS, Consolaro, H and Brito, VLG (2018) Towards a unified terminology for angiosperm reproductive systems. Acta Botanica Brasilica 32, 329348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carman, JG (1997) Asychronous expression of duplicate genes in angiosperms may cause apomixis, bispory, tetraspory, and polyembryony. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61, 5194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, GD, Powell, EA and Kyhos, DW (1986) Self-incompatibility in the Hawaiian Madiinae (Compositae): an exception to Baker's rule. Evolution 40, 430434.Google ScholarPubMed
Castillo-Lorenzo, E, Pritchard, HW, Finch-Savage, WE and Seal, CE (2019) Comparison of seed and seedling functional traits in native Helianthus species and the crop H. annuus (sunflower). Plant Biology 21, 533543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaharsoghi, AT and Jacobs, B (1998) Manipulating dormancy of capeweed (Arctotheca calendula L.). Seed Science Research 8, 139146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Challagundla, L and Wallace, LE (2021) Patterns of genetic divergence across geographically variable populations of Xanthisma gracile (Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 182, 609619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS and Johnson, DE (2008) Germination ecology of two troublesome Asteraceae species of rainfed rice: Siam weed (Chromolaena odorata) and coat buttons (Tridax procumbens). Weed Science 56, 567573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS and Johnson, DE (2009) Seed germination and seedling emergence of Syndrella (Synedrella nodiflora) in a tropical environment. Weed Science 57, 3642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, RS, Bahuguna, YM, Nautiyal, MC and Cota-Sánchez, JH (2018) First account of vivipary in Saussurea lappa (Decne.) Sch. Bip. Brazilian Journal of Botany 14, 507514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X-J and Tan, D-Y (2009) Bet hedging in heteromorphic achenes of Heteracia szovitsii (Asteraceae), a desert ephemeral. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 33, 901910.Google Scholar
Cheptou, P-O, Imbert, E, Lepart, J and Escarré, J (2000) Effects of competition on lifetime estimates of inbreeding depression in the outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13, 522531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheptou, P-O, Lepart, J and Escarré, J (2001) Inbreeding depression under intraspecific competition in a highly outcrossing population of Crepis sancta (Asteraceae): evidence for frequency-dependent variation. American Journal of Botany 88, 14241429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, M-S, Kim, S-H, Yang, JY, Crawford, DJ, Stuessy, TF, López-Sepúlveda, P and Kim, S-C (2020) Plastic phylogenomics of Dendroseris (Cichorieae; Asteraceae): insights into structural organization and molecular evolution of an endemic lineage from the Juan Fernández Islands. Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 594272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, H, Fait, A and Tel-Zur, N (2013) Morphological, cytological and metabolic consequences of autopolyploidization in Hylocereus (Cactaceae) species. BMC Plant Biology 13, 173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colling, G, Reckinger, C and Matthies, D (2004) Effects of pollen quantity and quality on reproduction and offspring vigor in the rare plant Scorzonera humilis (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 91, 17741782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comai, L (2005) The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews Genetics 6, 836846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costin, BJ, Morgan, JW and Young, AG (2001) Reproductive success does not decline in fragmented populations of Leucochrysum albicans subsp. albicans var. tricolor (Asteraceae). Biological Conservation 98, 273284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crean, AJ and Marshall, DJ (2009) Coping with environmental uncertainty: dynamic bet hedging as a maternal effect. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364, 10871096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowley, PH, Ehlman, SM, Korn, E and Sih, A (2016) Dealing with stochastic environmental variation in space and time: bet hedging by generalist, specialist, and diversified strategies. Theoretical Ecology 9, 149161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz-Mazo, G, Buide, ML, Samuel, R and Narbona, E (2009) Molecular phylogeny of Scorzoneroides (Asteraceae): evolution of heterocarpy and annual habit in unpredictable environments. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53, 835847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz-Mazo, G, Narbona, E and Buide, ML (2010) Germination patterns of dimorphic achenes in three related species of Scorzoneroides (Asteraceae, Lactuceae) growing in different environments. Annales Botanici Fennici 47, 337345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuena-Lombraña, A, Sanna, M, Porceddu, M and Bacchetta, G (2020) Does storage under gene bank conditions affect seed germination and seedling growth? The case of Senecio morisii (Asteraceae), vascular plant exclusive to Sardinian water meadows. Plants 9, 581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dakshini, KMM and Aggarwal, SK (1974) Intracapitular cypsele dimorphism and dormancy in Bidens bipinnata. Biologia Plantarum 16, 469471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, WE (1930) Primary dormancy, after-ripening, and the development of secondary dormancy in embryos of Ambrosia trifida. American Journal of Botany 17, 5876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, ES, Fay, PK, Chicoine, TK and Lacey, CA (1993) Persistence of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) seed in soil. Weed Science 41, 5761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, TJ, Klinkhamer, PGL and de Heiden, JLH (2000) The evolution of generation time in metapopulations of monocarpic perennial plants: some theoretical considerations and the example of the rare thistle Carlina vulgaris. Evolutionary Ecology 14, 213231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, ND, Long, QG and Albrecht, MA (2019) Germination traits in the threatened southeastern grassland endemic, Marshallia morhii (Asteraceae). Castanea 84, 212223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Meeȗs, T, Prugnolle, F and Agnew, P (2007) Asexual reproduction: genetics and evolutionary aspects. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 64, 13551372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denisiuk, Z, Chmura, D and Adamski, P (2009) Flowering and generative reproduction in isolated populations of endangered species Carlina onopordifolia Besser (Asteraceae) in Poland. Polish Journal of Ecology 57, 8997.Google Scholar
de Pedro, M, Mayol, M and González-Martínez, SC (2021) Environmental patterns of adaptation after range expansion in Leontodon longirostris: the effect of phenological events on fitness-related traits. American Journal of Botany 109, 602615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vere, N (2007) Biological flora of the British Isles. No. 540. Cirsium dissectum (L.) Hill (Cirsium tuberosum (L.) All. subsp. anglicum (Lam.) Bonnier; Cnicus pratensis (Huds.) Willd., non Lam.; Cirsium anglicum (Lam.) DC.). Journal of Ecology 95, 876894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vere, N, Jongejans, E, Plowman, A and Williams, E (2009) Population size and habitat quality affect genetic diversity and fitness in the clonal herb Cirsium dissectum. Oecologia 159, 5968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Villiers, MAJ, van Rooyen, MW and Theron, GK (2002a) Germination strategies of Strandveld Succulent Karooo plant species for revegetation purposes: I. Temperature and light requirements. Seed Science & Technology 30, 1733.Google Scholar
de Villiers, MAJ, van Rooyen, MW and Theron, GK (2002b) Germination strategies of Strandveld Succulent Karoo plant species for revegetation purposes: II. Dormancy-breaking treatments. Seed Science & Technology 30, 3549.Google Scholar
Diboll, N (2004) Native wildflower and grass propagation information. Combined Proceedings of the International Plant Propagators’ Society 54, 391401.Google Scholar
Dickie, JB and Pritchard, HW (2002) Systematic and evolutionary aspects of desiccation tolerance in seeds, pp. 239259 in Black, M and Pritchard, HW (Eds) Desiccation and survival in plants. Drying without dying. Wallingford, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dissanayake, P, George, DL and Gupta, ML (2010) Effect of light, gibberellic acid and abscisic acid on germination of guayule (Parthenium argentatum Gray) seed. Industrial Crops and Products 32, 111117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucet, C and Cavers, PB (1996) A persistent seed bank of the bull thistle Cirsium vulgare. Canadian Journal of Botany 74, 13861391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, EF, dos Santos, JA, Peixoto, JS and Santos, CHB (2012) Maturacao e dormencia em diasporos de carrapicho-de-carneiro (Acanthospermum hispidum DC. – Asteraceae). Revista Brasileira de Sementes 34, 441449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dušková, E, Sklenář, P, Kolář, F, Vásquez, DLA, Romoleroux, K, Fér, T and Marhold, K (2017) Growth form evolution and hybridization in Senecio (Asteraceae) from the high equatorial Andes. Ecology and Evolution 7, 64556568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eddleman, LE and Romo, JT (1988) Spotted knapweed germination response to stratification, temperature, and water stress. Canadian Journal of Botany 66, 653657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eenink, AH (1981) Research on the inheritance of seed dormancy in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and selection for non-dormancy. Euphytica 30, 371380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Keblawy, A (2003) Effects of achene dimorphism on dormancy and progeny traits in the two ephemerals Hedypnois cretica and Crepis aspera (Asteraceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 81, 550559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliásová, A, Trávníček, P, Mandák, B and Münzbergová, Z (2014) Autotetraploids of Vicia cracca show a higher allelic richness in natural populations and a higher seed set after artificial selfing than diploids. Annals of Botany 113, 159170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, JR and McCauley, DE (2009) Phenotypic differentiation in fitness related traits between populations of an extremely rare sunflower: conservation management of isolated populations. Biological Conservation 142, 18361843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmqvist, T and Cox, PA (1996) The evolution of vivipary in flowering plants. Oikos 77, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elomaa, P, Zhao, Y and Zhang, T (2018) Flower heads in Asteraceae – recruitment of conserved developmental regulators to control the flower-like inflorescence architecture. Horticulture Research 5, e36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epp, GA (1987) The seed bank of Eupatorium odoratum along a successional gradient in a tropical rain forest in Ghana. Journal of Tropical Ecology 3, 139149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, M, Hahn, M, Brown, BH, Lueders, K and Hipp, AL (2016) Chromosomal rearrangements in holocentric organisms lead to reproductive isolation by hybrid dysfunction: the correlation between karyoptype rearrangements and germination rates in sedges. American Journal of Botany 103, 15291536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinosa-Garcia, FJ, Vazquez-Bravo, R and Martinez-Ramos, M (2003) Survival, germinability and fungal colonization of dimorphic achenes of the annual weed Galinsoga parviflora buried in the soil. Weed Research 43, 269275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, MEK, Ferrière, R, Kane, MJ and Venable, DL (2007) Bet hedging via seed banking in desert evening primroses (Oenothera, Onagraceae): demographic evidence from natural populations. The American Naturalist 169, 184194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Facelli, JM, Chesson, P and Barnes, N (2005) Differences in seed biology of annual plants in arid lands: a key ingredient of the storage effect. Ecology 86, 29983006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagua, JC and Gonzalez, VH (2007) Growth rates, reproductive phenology, and pollination ecology of Espeletia grandiflora (Asteraceae), a giant Andean caulescent rosette. Plant Biology 9, 127135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farnsworth, E (2000) The ecology and physiology of viviparous and recalcitrant seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31, 107138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, JA and Van de Peer, Y (2010) Angiosperm polyploids and their road to evolutionary success. Trends in Evolutionary Biology 1, e3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, JA, Maere, S and Van de Peer, Y (2009) Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 57375742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenesi, A, Sándor, C, Pyšek, P, Dawson, W, Ruprecht, E, Essl, F, Kreft, H, Pergl, J, Weigelt, P, Winter, M and van Kleunen, M (2019) The role of fruit heteromorphism in the naturalization of Asteraceae. Annals of Botany 123, 10431052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrer, MM and Good-Avila, SV (2007) Macrophylogenetic analyses of the gain and loss of self-incompatibility in the Asteraceae. New Phytologist 173, 401414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrer, MM, Good-Avila, SV, Montaña, C, Domínguez, CA and Eguiarte, LE (2009) Effect of variation in self-incompatibility on pollen limitation and inbreeding depression in Flourensia cernua (Asteraceae) scrubs of contrasting density. Annals of Botany 103, 10771089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fialová, M, Jandová, M, Ohryzek, J and Duchoslav, M (2014) Biology of the polyploid geophyte Allium oleraceum (Amaryllidaceae): variation in size, sexual and asexual reproduction and germination within and between tetra-, penta- and hexaploidy cytotypes. Flora 209, 312324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, SD and Palmblad, IG (1978) Germination dimorphism and developmental flexibility in the ruderal weed Heterotheca grandiflora. Oecologia 36, 3343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsyth, C and Brown, NAC (1982) Germination of the dimorphic fruits of Bidens pilosa L. New Phytologist 90, 151164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frangiote-Pallone, S and Souza, LA (2014) Pappus and cypsela ontogeny in Asteraceae: structural considerations of the tribal category. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85, 6277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, C (1986) Beyond the roaring forties. New Zealand's subantarctic islands. Wellington, Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Freas, KE and Kemp, PR (1983) Some relationships between environmental reliability and seed dormancy in desert annual plants. Journal of Ecology 71, 211217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, VA, Robinson, H, McKee, GS and Pruski, JF (1995) Neotropical montane Compositae with an emphasis on the Andes, pp. 451471 in Churchill, SP; Balslev, H; Forero, E and Luteyn, JL (Eds) Biodiversity and conservation of Neotropical montane forests. Bronx, The New York Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
Funk, VA, Bayer, RJ, Keeley, S, Chan, R, Watson, L, Gemeinholzer, B, Schilling, E, Panero, JL, Baldwin, BG, Garcia-Jacas, N, Susanna, A and Jansen, RK (2005) Everywhere but Antarctica: using a supertree to understand the diversity and distribution of the Compositae. Biologiske Skrifter 55, 343374.Google Scholar
Gandy, YP, Persans, MW and Summy, KR (2015) An acid-bath technique to break seed dormancy in common sunflower, Helianthus annuus L. (Asteraceae). Subtropical Agriculture and Environments 66, 2326.Google Scholar
Genna, NG and Pérez, HE (2016) Mass-based germination dynamics of Rudbeckia mollis (Asteraceae) seeds following thermal and ageing stress. Seed Science Research 26, 231244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, AH (1991) The distribution and evolution of climbing plants, pp. 352 in Putz, FE and Mooney, HA (Eds) The biology of vines. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gianella, M, Bradford, KJ and Guzzon, F (2021) Ecological, (epi)genetic and physiological aspects of bet-hedging in angiosperms. Plant Reproduction 34, 2136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, JP (2001) Ecological and genetic comparison between ray and disc achene pools of the heteromorphic species Prionopsis ciliata (Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 162, 137145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, JP and Tomlinson, AD (2002) Genetic diversity and mating system comparisons between ray and disc achene seed pools of the heterocarpic species Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 163, 10251034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, JH (1977) Natural selection for variances in offspring numbers: a new evolutionary principle. The American Naturalist 111, 10101014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giménez-Benavides, L, Escudero, A and Pérez-García, A (2005) Seed germination of high mountain Mediterranean species: altitudinal, interpopulation and interannual variability. Ecological Research 20, 433444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, HA and Cronquist, A (1991) Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada (2nd edn). Bronx, The New York Botanical Garden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfree, RC, Marshall, DJ, Young, AG, Miller, CH and Mathews, S (2017) Empirical evidence of fixed and homeostatic patterns of polyploid advantage in a keystone grass exposed to drought and heat stress. Royal Society Open Science 4, 70934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebel, KE (1905) Organography of plants. Part II. Special organography. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grace, BS, Sheppard, AW, Whalley, RDB and Sindel, BM (2002) Seedbanks and seedling emergence of saffron thistle (Carthamus lanatus) in eastern Australian pastures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 13271334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, JH, Freeman, DC and McArthur, ED (1995) Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). II. Selection gradients and hybrid fitness. American Journal of Botany 82, 709716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, HC and Curtis, JT (1950) Germination studies of Wisconsin prairie plants. The American Midland Naturalist 43, 186194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, SD, Espeland, EK and Carlsen, TM (2001) Demography and population biology of a rare tarplant, Blepharizonia plumosa, (Asteraceae) a California summer annual forb. Madroño 48, 272285.Google Scholar
Gremer, JR, Crone, EE and Lesica, P (2012) Are dormant plants hedging their bets? Demographic consequences of prolonged dormancy in variable environments. The American Naturalist 179, 315327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gresta, F, Cristaudo, A, Onofri, A, Restuccia, A and Avola, G (2010) Germination response of four pasture species to temperature, light, and post-harvest period. Plant Biosystems 144, 849856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grombone-Guaratini, MT, Solferini, VN and Semir, J (2004) Reproductive biology in species of Bidens L. (Asteraceae). Scientia Agricola 61, 185189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossenbacher, DL, Brandvain, Y, Auld, JR, Burd, M, Cheptou, P-O, Conner, JK, Grant, AG, Hovick, SM, Pannell, JR, Pauw, A, Petanidou, T, Randle, AM, Rubio de Casas, R, Vamosi, J, Winn, A, Igic, B, Busch, JW, Kalisz, S and Goldberg, EE (2017) Self-compatibility is over-represented on islands. New Phytologist 215, 469478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guariguata, MR and Azocar, A (1988) Seed bank dynamics and germination ecology in Espeletia timotensis (Compositae), an Andean giant rosette. Biotropica 20, 5459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, F, Noh, K, Li, Y, Xiao, J and Jeong, BR (2021) Seed germination of potential wild ornamental plants native to Korea in response to chilled-water stratification, GA3, and germination temperature. Propagation of Ornamental Plants 21, 1118.Google Scholar
Guppy, HB (1906) Observations of a naturalist in the Pacific between 1896 and 1899. Part II. Plant dispersal. New York, Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar
Guppy, HB (1912) Studies in seeds and fruits. London, Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Gutterman, Y, Thomas, TH and Heydecker, W (1975) Effect on the progeny of applying different day length and hormone treatments to parent plants of Lactuca scariola. Physiologia Plantarum 34, 3038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haaland, TR, Wright, J, Tufto, J and Ratikainen, II (2018) Short-term insurance versus long-term bet-hedging strategies as adaptations to variable environments. Evolution 73, 145157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hacker, JB (1988) Polyploid distribution and seed dormancy in relation to provenance rainfall in the Digitaria milanjiana complex. Australian Journal of Botany 36, 693700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, MA, Lanz, T, Fasel, D and Müller-Schärer, H (2013) Increased seed survival and seedling emergence in a polyploid plant invader. American Journal of Botany 100, 15551561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, ML and Koltunow, AMG (2014) The genetic control of apomixis: asexual seed formation. Genetics 197, 441450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hand, ML, Krahulcová, A, Johnson, SD, Oilkers, K, Siddons, H and Chrtek, J Jr (2015) Evolution of apomixis loci in Pilosella and Hieracium (Asteraceae) inferred from the conservation of apomixis-linked markers in natural and experimental populations. Heredity 114, 1726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hao, JH, Qiang, S, Chrobock, T, van Kleunen, M and Liu, QQ (2011) A test of Baker's law: breeding systems of invasive species of Asteraceae in China. Biological Invasions 13, 571580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, SK, Regnier, EE, Schmoll, JT and Harrison, JM (2007) Seed size and burial effects on giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) emergence and seed demise. Weed Science 55, 1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heenan, PB, Smissen, RD and Dawson, MI (2005) Self-incompatibility in the threatened shrub Olearia adenocarpa (Asteraceae). New Zealand Journal of Botany 43, 831841.Google Scholar
Hernández, F, Poverena, M, Garayalde, A and Presotto, A (2019) Re-establishment of latitudinal clines and local adaptation within the invaded area suggest rapid evolution of seed traits in Argentinean sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Biological Invasions 21, 25992612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, F, Vercellino, RB, Pandolfa, C, Mandel, JR and Presotto, A (2022) Rapid evolution of seed dormancy during sunflower de-domestication. Journal of Heredity 113, 288297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heywood, JS (1993) Biparental inbreeding depression in the self-incompatible annual plant Gaillardia pulchella (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 80, 545550.Google ScholarPubMed
Hiscock, SJ (2000) Genetic control of self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae): a successful colonizing species. Heredity 85, 1019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hojsgaard, D and Hörandl, E (2019) The rise of apomixis in natural plant populations. Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hojsgaard, D, Klatt, S, Baier, R, Carman, JG and Hörandl, E (2014) Taxonomy and biogeography of apomixis in angiosperms and associated biodiversity characteristics. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 33, 414427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, PM and Newton, RJ (2004) Patterns of seed persistence in South African fynbos. Plant Ecology 172, 143158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, TD, Linington, S and Ellis, RH (1998) Compendium of information on seed storage behaviour, vol. 1. A-H. Kew, Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Hoya, A, Shibaike, H, Morita, T and Ito, M (2007) Germination characteristics of native Japanese dandelion autopolyploids and their putative diploid parent species. Journal of Plant Research 120, 139147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoyle, GL, Daws, MI, Steadman, KJ and Adkins, SW (2008a) Mimicking a semi-arid tropical environment achieves dormancy alleviation for seeds of Australian native Goodeniaceae and Asteraceae. Annals of Botany 101, 701708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoyle, GL, Daws, MI, Steadman, KJ and Adkins, SW (2008b) Physiological dormancy in forbs native to south-west Queensland: diagnosis and classification. South African Journal of Botany 74, 208213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C-H, Zhang, C, Liu, M, Hu, Y, Gao, T, Qi, J and Ma, H (2016) Multiple polyploidization events across Asteraceae with two nested events in the early history revealed by nuclear phylogenomics. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33, 28202835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huo, H, Wei, S and Bradford, KJ (2016) DELAY OF GERMINATION1 (DOG1) regulates seed dormancy and flowering time through microRNA pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, E2199E2206.Google ScholarPubMed
Imani, S, Rahbarian, R, Masoumi, A and Khorasani, SK (2014) Cytogenetical study of different ecotypes of Cichorium intybus L. Crop Biotechnology 7, 2534.Google Scholar
Imbert, E (2002) Ecological consequences and ontogeny of seed heteromorphism. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 5, 1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbert, E, Escarré, J and Lepart, J (1996) Achene dimorphism and among-population variation in Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 157, 309315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbert, É, Escarré, J and Lepart, J (1999) Local adaptation and non-genetic maternal effects among three populations of Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Ecoscience 6, 223229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, M, Hyvärinen, L, Piskurewicz, U and Lopez-Molina, L (2019) Non-canonical RNA-directed DNA methylation participates in maternal and environmental control of seed dormancy. eLife 8, e37434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsson, A and Dinnetz, P (2005) Local adaptation and the effects of isolation and population size – the semelparous perennial Carlina vulgaris as a study case. Evolutionary Ecology 19, 449466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janišová, M and Škodová, I (2016) Seed bank and seedling recruitment of endangered Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica (Asteraceae). Folia Geobotanica 51, 343360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, RJ and Palmer, JD (1987) A chloroplast DNA inversion marks an ancient evolutionary split in the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 84, 58185822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, RJ and Palmer, JD (1988) Phylogenetic implications of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in the Mutisieae (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 75, 753766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffrey, C (1977) Corolla forms in Compositae – some evolutionary and taxonomic speculations, pp. 111118 in Heywood, VH; Harborne, JB and Turner, BL (Eds) The biology and chemistry of the Compositae, vol. I. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, C (2009) Evolution of Compositae flowers, pp. 131138 in Funk, VA; Susanna, A; Stuessy, TF and Bayer, RJ (Eds) Systematics, evolution, and biogeography of Compositae. Vienna, International Association for Plant Taxonomy.Google Scholar
Joley, DB, Maddox, DM, Schoenig, SE and Mackey, BE (2003) Parameters affecting germinability and seed bank dynamics in dimorphic achenes of Centaurea solstitialis in California. Canadian Journal of Botany 81, 9931007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorritsma-Wienk, LD, Ameloot, E, Lenssen, JPM and de Kroon, H (2007) Differential responses of germination and seedling establishment in populations of Tragopogon pratensis (Asteraceae). Plant Biology 9, 109115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juhren, M, Went, FW and Phillips, E (1956) Ecology of desert plants. IV. Combined field and laboratory work on germination of annuals in the Joshua Tree National Monument, California. Ecology 37, 318330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusaitis, M, Sorensen, B and Polomka, L (2003) Reproductive biology of the endangered Brachycome muelleri (Asteraceae), an endemic herb of Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 179188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabat, SM, Norcini, JG and Dehgan, B (2007) Temperature and light affects germination ecology of commercially produced seeds of Leavenworth's coreopsis. Native Plants Journal 8, 236247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadereit, JW (1984) Studies on the biology of Senecio vulgaris L. ssp. denticulatus (O. F. Muell.) P. D. Sell. New Phytologist 97, 681689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagaya, M, Tani, T and Kachi, N (2005) Effect of hydration and dehydration cycles on seed germination of Aster kantoensis (Compositae). Canadian Journal of Botany 83, 329334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagaya, M, Tani, T and Kachi, N (2011) Maternal and paternal effects on the germination time of non-dormant seeds of a monocarpic perennial species, Aster Kantoensis (Compositae). Plant Species Biology 26, 6672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahmen, S and Poschlod, P (2000) Population size, plant performance, and genetic variation in the rare plant Arnica montana L. in the Rhön, Germany. Basic and Applied Ecology 1, 4351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, LM, Tamado, T and Milberg, P (2008) Inter-species comparison of seed dormancy and germination of six annual Asteraceae weeds in an ecological context. Seed Science Research 18, 3545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmakar, NC and Hazra, A (2016) First evidences for induced pseudo-viviparous germination in Ageratina adenophora (Crofton weed), a common alien weed of Darjeeling Himalaya, India. Plant Science Today 3, 249257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmakar, NC, Hazra, A and Das, S (2019) Bidens pilosa L.: exclusive report of vivipary in a non-mangrove taxa from the eastern Himalayas. Plant Species Biology 34, 122126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, QON (1985) Hermaphrodites and subhermaphrodites in a reputedly dioecious plant, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. New Phytologist 100, 457472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, M and Kollmann, J (1999) Effects of seed provenance on germination of herbs for agricultural compensation sites. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 72, 8799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, JF and Lacroix, CR (2004) Estimation of seed bank and seed viability of the Gulf of Saint Lawrence aster, Symphyotrichum laurentianum (Fernald) Nesom. Canadian Field-Naturalist 118, 105110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiew, R (1982) Germination and seedling survival in kemenyan, Styrax benzoin. Malaysian Forester 45, 6980.Google Scholar
Kigel, J (1992) Diaspore heteromorphism and germination in populations of the ephemeral Hedypnois rhagadioloides (L.) F.W. Schmidt (Asteraceae) inhabiting a geographic range of increasing aridity. Acta Oecologica 13, 4553.Google Scholar
Kim, S-C, Crawford, DJ, Francisco-Ortega, J and Santos-Guerra, A (1999) Adaptive radiation and genetic differentiation in the woody Sonchus alliance (Asteraceae: Sonichinae) in the Canary Islands. Plant Systematics and Evolution 215, 101118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kistenmacher, M and Gibson, JP (2016) Bet-hedging against larval herbivory and seed bank mortality in the evolution of heterocarpy. American Journal of Botany 103, 13831395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knope, ML, Morden, CW, Funk, VA and Fukami, T (2012) Area and the rapid radiation of Hawaiian Bidens (Asteraceae). Journal of Biogeography 39, 12061216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, D and Roth, N (1964) Studies on the ecological and physiological significance of amphicarpy in Gymnarrhena micrantha (Compositae). American Journal of Botany 51, 2635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koltunow, AM (1993) Apomixis: embryo sacs and embryos formed without meiosis or fertilization in ovules. The Plant Cell 5, 14251437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koltunow, AM and Grossniklaus, U (2003) Apomixis: a developmental perspective. Annual Review of Plant Biology 54, 547574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kress, WJ (1986) The systematic distribution of vascular epiphytes: an update. Selbyana 9, 222.Google Scholar
Kucewicz, M, Wardzyńska, A and Źróbek-Sokolnik, A (2011) The effect of achene heteromorphism on germination in the shaggy soldier [Galinsoga ciliata (Rafin.) S.F. Blake]. Acta Agrobotanica 64, 3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachabrouilli, S, Rigal, K, Corbineau, F and Bailly, C (2021) Effects of agroclimatic conditions on sunflower seed dormancy at harvest. European Journal of Agronomy 124, 126209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, MA (1983) Taxonomy of Xanthocephalum (Compositae: Astereae). Systematic Botany 8, 305316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, BMH and Barrett, SCH (2000) A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69, 503520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, W and Salick, J (2005) Human-induced dwarfing of Himalayan snow locus, Saussurea laniceps (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 1021810220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, W, Salick, J and Knight, TM (2010) The effects of pollen limitation on population dynamics of snow lotus (Saussurea medusa and S. laniceps, Asteraceae): threatened Tibetan medicinal plants of the eastern Himalayas. Plant Ecology 210, 343357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layat, E, Leymarie, J, Maarouf-Bouteau, H, Caius, J, Langlade, N and Bailly, C (2014) Translatome profiling in dormant and nondormant sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seeds highlights post-transcriptional regulation of germination. New Phytologist 204, 864872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leck, MA and Outred, HA (2008) Seedlings natural history, pp. 1741 in Leck, MA; Parker, VT and Simpson, RL (Eds) Seedling ecology and evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leck, MA, Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (1994) Germination ecology of Bidens laevis (Asteraceae) from a tidal freshwater wetland. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 121, 230239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, JA and Harmer, R (1980) Vivipary, a reproductive strategy in response to environmental stress? Oikos 35, 254265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leppik, EE (1977) The evolution of capitulum types of the Compositae in the light of insect-flower interaction, pp. 6189 in Heywood, VH, Harborne, JB and Turner, BL (Eds) The biology and chemistry of the Compositae, vol. I. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leverett, LD and Jolls, CL (2014) Cryptic seed heteromorphism in Packera tomentosa (Asteraceae): differences in mass and germination. Plant Species Biology 29, 169180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, DA (1983) Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. The American Naturalist 122, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levyns, MR (1935) Germination in some South African seeds. South African Journal of Botany 1, 161170.Google Scholar
Lewis Smith, RI and Richardson, M (2011) Fuegian plants in Antarctica: natural or anthropogenically assisted immigrants? Biological Invasions 13, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y-P and Feng, Y-L (2009) Differences in seed morphometric and germination traits of crofton weed (Eupatorium adenophorum) from different elevations. Weed Science 57, 2630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, N, Landis, JB, Sun, Y, Huang, X, Zhang, X, Liu, Q, Zhang, H, Sun, H, Wang, H and Deng, T (2021) Demographic history and local adaptation of Myripnois dioica (Asteraceae) provide insight on plant evolution in northern China flora. Ecology and Evolution 11, 80008013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, L, Eidesen, PB, Müller, E, Dickinson, KJM and Lord, JM (2016) Leaf and floral heating in cold climates: do sub-Antarctic megaherbs resemble tropical alpine giants? Polar Research 35, 26030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J-Q, Wang, Y-J, Wang, A-L, Hideaki, O and Abbott, RJ (2006) Radiation and diversification within the Ligularia-Cremanthodium-Parasenecio complex (Asteraceae) triggered by uplift of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38, 3149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, DG (1972a) Breeding systems in Cotula L. (Compositae, Anthemideae). I. The array of monoclinous and diclinous systems. New Phytologist 71, 11811194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, DG (1972b) Breeding systems in Cotula L. (Compositae, Anthemideae). II. Monoecious populations. New Phytologist 71, 11951202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, DB (1975) Breeding systems in Cotula. III. Dioecious populations. New Phytologist 74, 109123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, DB (1976) The transmission of genes via pollen and ovules in gynodioecious angiosperms. Theoretical Population Biology 9, 299316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, DG and Mayall, AJ (1976) Sexual dimorphism in Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Annals of Botany 40, 115123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, T, Bedini, S and Bertacchi, A (2019) Germination ecology of the aromatic halophytic Artemisia caerulescens L.: influence of abiotic factors and seed after-ripening time. Folia Geobotanica 54, 115124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo Medico, JM, Rua, GH, Bonasora, MG and Vega, AS (2018) Floral reversion and first record of pseudovivipary in some species of Poaceae. Adansonia 40, 5966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Sepúlveda, P, Tremetsberger, K, Ángeles-Ortiz, M, Baeza, CM, Peñailillo, P and Stuessy, TF (2013) Radiation of the Hypochaeris apargiolides complex (Asteraceae: Cichorieae) of southern South America. Taxon 62, 550564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, J, Dong, W, Tan, D, Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2020) Dormancy and germination of the trimorphic achenes of a cold desert annual: spreading the risk over time. AoB Plants 12, plaa056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubbock, J (1892 [1978]) A contribution to our knowledge of seedlings. New York, Allanheld, Osmun/Universe Books.Google Scholar
Luijten, SH, Oostermeijer, JG, van Leeuwen, NC and den Nijs, HM (1996) Reproductive success and clonal genetic structure of the rare Arnica montana (Compositae) in The Netherlands. Plant Systematics and Evolution 201, 1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luijten, SH, Dierick, A, Gerard, J, Oostermeijer, B, Raijmann, LEL and den Nijs, HCM (2000) Population size, genetic variation, and reproductive success in a rapidly declining, self-incompatible perennial (Arnica montana) in The Netherlands. Conservation Biology 14, 17761787.Google Scholar
Lunt, ID (1995) Seed longevity of six native forbs in a closed Themeda triandra grassland. Australian Journal of Botany 43, 439449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabberley, DJ (2017) Mabberley's plant-book. A portable dictionary of plants, their classification and uses (4th edn). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magallón, S, Sánchez-Reyes, LL and Gómez-Acevedo, SL (2019) Thirty clues to the exceptional diversification of flowering plants. Annals of Botany 123, 491503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majeský, L, Krahulee, F and Vašut, RJ (2017) How apomictic taxa are treated in current taxonomy: a review. Taxon 66, 10171040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maleki, K, Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM, Kiani, M, Alahdadi, I and Soltani, E (2022) Seed germination thermal niche differs among nine populations of an annual plant: a modeling approach. Ecology and Evolution 12, e9240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maluf, AM (1993) Efeito de temperatura e luz na germinacao de sementes de duas populacones de Vernonia polyanthes (Asteraceae). Hoehnea 20, 133137.Google Scholar
Mandák, B (1997) Seed heteromorphism and the life cycle of plants: a literature review. Preslia 69, 129159.Google Scholar
Mandel, JR, Dikow, RB, Siniscalchi, CM, Thapa, R, Watson, LE and Funk, VA (2019) A fully resolved backbone phylogeny reveals numerous dispersals and explosive diversifications throughout the history of Asteraceae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116, 14083014088.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, AC (1946) The comparative internal morphology of seeds. The American Midland Naturalist 36, 513660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A, Grzeskowiak, V and Puech, S (1995) Germination variability in three species in disturbed Mediterranean environments. Acta Oecologia 16, 479490.Google Scholar
Marzinek, J, De-Paula, OC and Oliveira, DMT (2008) Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factors. Revista Brasileira de Botanica 31, 549553.Google Scholar
Mašková, T and Poschlod, P (2022) Soil seed bank persistence across time and burial depth in calcareous grassland habitats. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 790867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masterson, J (1994) Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264, 421424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattana, E, Fenu, G and Bacchetta, G (2012) Seed production and in situ germination of Lamyropsis microcephala (Asteraceae), a threatened Mediterranean mountain species. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 44, 343349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, WT (1975) Germination polymorphism in Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal. Northwest Science 49, 190200.Google Scholar
McElwain, JC and Punyasena, SW (2007) Mass extinction events and the plant fossil record. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22, 548557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McEvoy, PB (1984) Dormancy and dispersal in dimorphic achenes of tansy ragwort, Senecio jacobaea L. (Compositae). Oecologia 61, 160168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melo, PRB, Oliveira, JA, Pinto, JEBP, Castro, EM, Vieira, AR and Evangelista, JRE (2007) Germinacao de aquenios de arnica (Lychnophora pinaster Mart.) armazenados em diferentes condicoes. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 31, 7582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, KL, Shaw, RG and Wyse, DL (2006) Increased germination of diverse crop-wild hybrid sunflower seeds. Ecological Applications 16, 845854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, SE, McArthur, ED and Jorgensen, GL (1989) Variation in germination response to temperature in rubber rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosus: Asteraceae) and its ecological implications. American Journal of Botany 76, 981991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, SE, Monsen, SB and McArthur, ED (1990) Germination response of Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae) to light and chill: patterns of between-population variation. Botanical Gazette 151, 176183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaux, B (1989) Reproductive and vegetative biology of Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. (Compositae: Cynareae). New Zealand Journal of Botany 27, 401414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina-Montenegro, MA, Acuña-Rodriguez, IS, Flores, TSM, Hereme, R, Lafon, A, Atala, C and Torres-Diaz, C (2018) Is the success of plant invasions the result of rapid adaptive evolution in seed traits? Evidence from a latitudinal rainfall gradient. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mölken, T, Jorritsma-Wienk, LD, van Hoek, PH and de Kroon, H (2005) Only seed size matters for germination in different populations of the dimorphic Tragopogon pratensis subsp. pratensis (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 92, 432437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monemizadeh, Z, Ghaderi-Far, F, Sadeghipour, HR, Siahmarguee, A, Soltani, E, Torabi, B and Baskin, CC (2021) Variation in seed dormancy and germination among populations of Silybum marianum (Asteraceae). Plant Species Biology 36, 412424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, AJ, Moore, WL and Baldwin, BG (2014) Genetic and ecotypic differentiation in a Californian plant polyploid complex (Grindelia, Asteraceae). PLoS ONE 9, e95656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran-Palma, P and Snow, AA (1997) The effect of interplant distance on mating success in federally-threatened, self-incompatible Hymenoxys herbacea = H. acaulis var. glabra (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 84, 233238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreira-Muñoz, A (2011) Plant geography of Chile. Plant and Vegetation 5. Cham, Springer Science + Business Media B.V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morellato, PC and Leitão-Filho, HF (1996) Reproductive phenology of climbers in a southeastern Brazilian forest. Biotropica 28, 180191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, JW (1995) Ecological studies of the endangered Rutidosis leptorrhyncoides. I. Seed production, soil seed bank dynamics, population density and their effects on recruitment. Australian Journal of Botany 43, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, JW (1999) Effects of population size on seed production and germinability in an endangered, fragmented grassland plant. Conservation Biology 13, 266273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, JW, Meyer, MJ and Young, AG (2013) Severe habitat fragmentation leads to decline in genetic variation, mate availability, and reproductive success in small populations of a once-common Australiana grassland daisy. International Journal of Plant Sciences 174, 12091218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mráz, P and Zdvořák, P (2019) Reproductive pathways in Hieracium s.s. (Asteraceae): strict sexuality in diploids and apomixis in polyploids. Annals of Botany 123, 391403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, CM, Schultz, B, Lauterbach, D, Ristow, M, Wissemann, V and Gemeinholzer, B (2017) Geropogon hybridus (l.) Sch. Bip. (Asteraceae) exhibits micro-geographic genetic divergence at ecological range limits along a steep precipitation gradient. Plant Systematics and Evolution 303, 91104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, AA and Arroyo, MTK (2006) Pollen limitation and spatial variation of reproductive success in the insect-pollinated shrub Chuquiraga oppositifolia (Asteraceae) in the Chilean Andes. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 38, 608613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, AA and Cavieres, LA (2008) The presence of a showy invasive plant disrupts pollinator service and reproductive output in native alpine species only at high densities. Journal of Ecology 96, 459467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navie, SC, Panetta, FD, McFadyen, RE and Adkins, SW (1998) Behaviour of buried and surface-sown seeds of Parthenium hysterophorus. Weed Research 38, 335341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuffer, B and Eschner, S (1995) Life-history traits and ploidy levels in the genus Capsella (Brassicaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 73, 13541365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, FSP (1991) Manual of forest fruits, seeds and seedlings, vol. 1. Kuala Lumpur, Forest Research Institute Malaysia.Google Scholar
Ng, FSP (1992) Manual of forest fruits, seeds and seedlings, vol. 2. Kuala Lumpur, Forest Research Institute Malaysia.Google Scholar
Nielsen, LR, Siegismund, HR and Hansen, T (2007) Inbreeding depression in the partially self-incompatible endemic plant species Scalesia affinis (Asteraceae) from Galápagos Islands. Evolutionary Ecology 21, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, MG (1969) Physiology of deep dormancy in seeds. Leningrad, Izdatel'stvo Nauka (Translated from Russian by Z. Shapiro, NSF, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK and Oliveira, MJ (2007) Light and temperature requirements for common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) germination during after-ripening under field conditions. Weed Science 55, 227234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosova, LI (1981) Germination and germinability of seeds of Artemisia rhodantha Rupr. Soviet Journal of Ecology 12, 2530.Google Scholar
Noyes, RD (2000) Diplospory and parthenogenesis in sexual x agamospermous (apomictic) Erigeron (Asteraceae) hybrids. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noyes, RD (2007) Apomixis in the Asteraceae: diamonds in the rough. Functional Plant Science and Biotechnology 1, 207222.Google Scholar
Noyes, RD (2022) Mendelian segregation for parthenogenetic embryo development at the diploid level in the flowering plant Erigeron. American Journal of Botany 109, 16411651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noyes, RD and Rieseberg, LH (2000) Two independent loci control agamospermy (apomixis) in the triploid flowering plant Erigeron annuus. Genetics 155, 379390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nur, M, Baskin, CC, Lu, JJ, Tan, DY and Baskin, JM (2014) A new type of non-deep physiological dormancy: evidence from three annual Asteraceae species in the cold deserts of Central Asia. Seed Science Research 24, 301314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oduor, AMO, Leimu, R and van Kleunen, M (2016) Invasive plant species are locally adapted just as frequently and at least as strongly as native plant species. Journal of Ecology 104, 957968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivieri, AM and Jain, SK (1978) Effects of temperature and light variations on seed germination in sunflower (Helianthus) species. Weed Science 26, 277280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivieri, I, Swan, M and Gouyon, P-H (1983) Reproductive system and colonizing strategy of two species of Carduus (Compositae). Oecologia 60, 114117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ollivier, M, Kazakou, E, Corbin, M, Sartori, K, Gooden, B, Lesieur, V, Thomann, T, Martin, J-F and Tixier, MS (2020) Trait differentiation between native and introduced populations of the invasive plant Sonchus oleraceus L. (Asteraceae). NeoBiota 55, 85115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, , Talavera, S, García-Castaño, JL, Tremetsberger, K, Stuessy, T, Balao, F and Casimiro-Soriguer, R (2006) Self-incompatibility and floral parameters in Hypochaeris sect. Hypochaeris (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 93, 234244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otto, SP (2007) The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131, 452462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otzen, D and Doornbos, G (1980) Observations on germination and seedling establishment of Senecio erucifolius L. in relation to its northern boundary. Acta Botanical Neerlandica 29, 419427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palazzesi, L, Pellicer, J, Barreda, VD, Loeuille, B, Mandel, JR, Pokorny, L, Siniscalchi, CM, Tellería, MC, Leitch, IJ and Hidalgo, O (2022) Asteraceae as a model system for evolutionary studies: from fossils to genomes. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 200, 143164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, R and Willemsen, RW (1976) Seed germination of Hieracium pratense, a successional perennial. Botanical Gazette 137, 255261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panero, JL and Funk, VA (2008) The value of sampling anomalous taxa in phylogenetic studies: major clades of the Asteraceae revealed. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47, 757782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panero, JL, Freire, SE, Espinar, LA, Crozier, BS, Barboza, GE and Cantero, JJ (2014) Resolution of deep nodes yields an improved backbone phylogeny and a new basal lineage to study early evolution of Asteraceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 80, 4353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panetta, FD (2009) Seed persistence of the invasive aquatic plant, Gymnocoronis spilanthoides (Asteraceae). Australian Journal of Botany 57, 670674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pánková, H, Raabová, J and Münzbergová, Z (2014) Mycorrhizal symbiosis and local adaptation in Aster amellus: a field transplant experiment. PLoS ONE 9, e93967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parisod, C and Broennimann, O (2016) Towards unified hypotheses of the impact of polyploidy on ecological niches. New Phytologist 212, 708718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parisod, C, Holderegger, R and Brochmann, C (2010) Evolutionary consequences of autopolyploidy. New Phytologist 186, 517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pascual-Díaz, JP, Garcia, S and Vitales, D (2021) Plastome diversity and phylogenomic relationships in Asteraceae. Plants 10, 2699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasini, E, Katinas, L and Ritter, MR (2014) O genero Chaptalia (Asteraceae, Mutisieae) no Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Rodriguesia 65, 141158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pence, VC, Bruns, EB, Meyer, A, Pritchard, HW, Westwood, M, Linsky, J, Gratzfeld, J, Helm-Wallace, S, Liu, U, Rivers, M and Beech, E (2022) Gap analysis of exceptional species – using a global list of exceptional plants to expand strategic ex situ conservation action beyond conventional seed banking. Biological Conservation 266, 109439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, FL (1992) The influence of organic matter addition by caulescent Andean rosettes on surficial soil properties. Geoderma 54, 151171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, FL (1995) Plant-induced spatial patterns of surface soil properties near caulescent Andean rosettes. Geoderma 68, 101121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, FL (2001) Geoecological alternation of surface soils by the Hawaiian silversword (Argyroxiphium sandwicense DC.) in Haleakala's crater, Maui. Plant Ecology 157, 215233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peskoller, A, Silbernagl, L, Hülber, K, Sonnleitner, M and Schönswetter, P (2021) Do pentaploid hybrids mediate gene flow between tetraploid Senecio disjunctus and hexaploid S. carniolicus s.str. (S. carniolicus aggregate, Asteraceae)? Alpine Botany 131, 151160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipp, M, Hansen, LB, Adsersen, H and Siegismund, HR (2004) Reproductive ecology of the endemic Lecocarpus pinnatifidus (Asteraceae) in an isolated population in the Galápagos Islands. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 146, 171180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippi, T (1993) Bet-hedging germination of desert annuals: beyond the first year. The American Naturalist 142, 475487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philippi, T and Seger, J (1989) Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 4144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picó, FX and Koubek, T (2003) Inbreeding effects on fitness traits in the heterocarpic herb Leontodon autumnalis L. (Asteraceae). Acta Oecologica 24, 289294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picó, FX, Ouborg, NJ and van Groenendael, JM (2003) Fitness traits and dispersal ability in the herb Tragopogon pratensis (Asteraceae): decoupling the role of inbreeding depression and maternal effects. Plant Biology 5, 522530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picó, FX, Ouborg, NJ and van Groenendael, JM (2004) Influence of selfing and maternal effects on life-cycle traits and dispersal ability in the herb Hypochaeris radicata (Asteraceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 146, 163170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pliszko, A and Górecki, A (2021) First observation of true vivipary in Grindelia squarrosa (Asteraceae). Biologia 76, 11471151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pliszko, A and Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, K (2017) Resolving the naturalization strategy of Solidago x niederederi (Asteraceae) by the production of sexual ramets and seedlings. Plant Ecology 218, 12431253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pliszko, A and Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, K (2018) Effect of cold stratification on seed germination in Solidago x niederederi (Asteraceae) and its parental species. Biologia 73, 945950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, JA and Bell, DT (1995) The effect of temperature, light and gibberellic acid (GA3) on the germination of Australian everlasting daisies (Asteraceae, Tribe Inuleae). Australian Journal of Botany 43, 93102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popay, AI and Roberts, EH (1970a) Factors involved in the dormancy and germination of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. and Senecio vulgaris L. Journal of Ecology 58, 103122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popay, AI and Roberts, EH (1970b) Ecology of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. and Senecio vulgaris L. in relation to germination behaviour. Journal of Ecology 58, 123139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouchon, C, Fernández, A, Nassar, JM, Boyer, F, Aubert, S, Lavergne, S and Mavárez, J (2018) Phylogenomic analysis of the explosive adaptive radiation of the Espeletia complex (Asteraceae) in the tropical Andes. Systematic Biology 67, 10411060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Presotto, A, Poverene, M and Cantamutto, M (2014) Seed dormancy and hybridization effect of the invasive species, Helianthus annuus. Annals of Applied Biology 164, 373383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puech, S, Rascol, J-P, Michel, V and Andary, C (1998) Cytogenetics and adaptation to increasingly arid environments: the example of Plantago albicans L. (Plantaginaceae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 26, 267283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puglia, G, Grimaldi, S, Carta, A, Pavone, P and Toorop, P (2015) Pericarp structure of Glebionis coronaria (l.) Cass. ex Spach (Asteraceae) cypselae controls water uptake during germination. Seed Science Research 25, 255266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qaderi, MM and Cavers, PB (2000a) Variation in germination response among local populations of scotch thistle, Onopordum acanthium L. Seed Science & Technology 28, 881886.Google Scholar
Qaderi, MM and Cavers, PB (2000b) Variation in germination response within scotch thistle, Onopordum acanthium L., populations matured under greenhouse and field conditions. Ecoscience 7, 5765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qaderi, MM, Cavers, PB and Bernards, MA (2002) Seed bank dynamics of Onopordum acanthium: emergence patterns and chemical attributes. Journal of Ecology 90, 672683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, M and Upadhyaya, MK (1993) Seed germination ecophysiology of meadow salsify (Tragopogon pratensis) and western salsify (T. dubius). Weed Science 41, 362368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raabová, J, Münzbergová, Z and Fischer, M (2009) Consequences of near and far between-population crosses for offspring fitness in a rare herb. Plant Biology 11, 829836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raabová, J, Münzbergová, Z and Fischer, M (2011) The role of spatial scale and soil for local adaptation in Inula hirta. Basic and Applied Ecology 12, 152160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajon, E, Venner, S and Menu, F (2009) Spatially heterogeneous stochasticity and the adaptive diversification of dormancy. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22, 20942103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramsey, J (2011) Polyploidy and ecological adaptation in wild yarrow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 70967101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramsey, J, Robertson, A and Husband, B (2008) Rapid adaptive divergence in New World Achillea, an autopolyploid complex of ecological races. Evolution 62, 639653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rashid, I, Reshi, Z, Allaie, RR and Wafai, BA (2007) Germination ecology of invasive Anthemis cotula helps it synchronise its successful recruitment with favorable habitat conditions. Annals of Applied Biology 150, 361369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redonda-Martínez, R (2018) Tratamiento taxonomico de la tribu Mutisieae (Asteraceae) en Mexico. Acta Botanical Mexicana 123, 121166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redonda-Martínez, R, Pliscoff, P, Moreira-Muñoz, A, Salas, EMM and Samain, M-S (2021) Towards conservation of the remarkably high number of daisy trees (Asteraceae) in Mexico. Plants 10, 534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ren, Z and Abbott, RJ (1991) Seed dormancy in Mediterranean Senecio vulgaris L. New Phytologist 117, 673678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, R, Wang, H, Guo, C, Zhang, N, Zeng, L, Chen, Y, Ma, H and Qi, J (2018) Widespread whole genome duplications contribute to genome complexity and species diversity in angiosperms. Molecular Plant 11, 414428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renner, SS (2014) The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. American Journal of Botany 101, 15881596. +a 47-page appendix on sexual systems in angiosperms.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, CJ, Long, RL, Flematti, GR, Cherry, H and Turner, SR (2013) Karrikins promote germination of physiologically dormant seeds of Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. monilifera (boneseed). Weed Research 54, 4857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, AJ (2003) Apomixis in flowering plants: an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 358, 10851093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricker, M, Hernández, HM, Sousa, M and Ochoterena, H (2013) Tree and tree-like species of Mexico: Asteraceae, Leguminosae, and Rubiaceae. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84, 439470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rideau, M, Monin, J, Dommergues, P and Cornu, A (1976) Estude sur les mécanismes hereditaires de la dormance des akenes de Lactuca sativa L. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Academie des Sciences. Série D, Sciences Naturaleles 283, 769772.Google Scholar
Robertson, M and Richards, C (2015) Non-genetic inheritance in evolutionary theory – the importance of plant studies. Non-Genetic Inheritance 2, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robichaux, RH, Carr, GD, Liebman, M and Pearcy, RW (1990) Adaptive radiation of the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Compositae-Madiinae): ecological, morphological, and physiological diversity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77, 6472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, OJ (1996) The effects of achene heteromorphism on the dispersal capacity of Bidens pilosa L. International Journal of Plant Sciences 157, 316322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rout, JR, Das, R, Prusti, AB and Sahoo, SL (2009) Effects of scarification, cold stratification and gibberellic acid treatment on germination of Elephantopus scaber L. seeds. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science 6, 689691.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Clavijo, E (1995) The ecological significance of fruit heteromorphism in the amphicarpic species Catananche lutea (Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 156, 824833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Clavijo, E (2001) The role of dimorphic achenes in the biology of the annual weed Leontodon longirrostris. Weed Research 41, 275286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Clavijo, E (2005) The reproductive strategies of the heterocarpic annual Calendula arvensis (Asteraceae). Acta Oecologica 28, 119126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruziev, F, Pakr, K, Umurzokov, M, Khaitov, B, Bo, AB, Jia, WQ, Hien, LT, Choi, JS and Park, KW (2020) Seed germination ecology of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Korea. Weed and Turfgrass Science 9, 2128.Google Scholar
Sahoo, UK and Jha, LK (1997) Effect of depth and duration of burial on seed viability and dormancy of Bidens pilosa L. and Richardsonia pilosa H.B.K. Seed Research 25, 510.Google Scholar
Sailer, C, Tiberi, S, Schmid, B, Stöcklin, J and Grossniklaus, U (2021) Apomixix and genetic background affect distinct traits in Hieracium pilosella L. grown under competition. BMC Biology 19, 177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakaguchi, S, Kimura, T, Kyan, R, Maki, M, Nishino, T, Ishikawa, N, Nagano, AJ, Honjo, MN, Yasugi, M, Kudoh, H, Li, P, Choi, HJ, Chernyagina, OA and Ito, M (2018) Phylogenetic analysis of the East Asian goldenrod (Solidago virgaurea complex, Asteraceae) reveals hidden ecological diversification with recurrent formation of ecotypes. Annals of Botany 121, 489500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sambatti, JBM and Rice, KJ (2006) Local adaptation, patterns of selection, and gene flow in the Californian serpentine sunflower (Helianthus exilis). Evolution 60, 696710.Google ScholarPubMed
Sánchez-Chávez, E, Rodríguez, A, Castro-Castro, A, Pérez-Farrera, MA and Sosa, V (2019) Spatio-temporal; evolution of climbing habit in the Dahlia-Hidalgao group (Coreopsidae, Asteraceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 135, 166176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sánchez, AM, Alonso-Valiente, P, Albert, MJ and Escudero, A (2017) How might edaphic specialists in gypsum islands respond to climate change: reciprocal sowing experiment to infer local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity. Annals of Botany 120, 135146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarmento, ECS, Pereira, KTO, Oliveira, FS, Leal, CCP, Torres, SB and Dutra, AS (2019) Morphology and germination of Acmella oleracea L. R. Jansen under different temperatures and photoperiods. Revista Ciencia Agronomica 50, 660668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassaki, RM, Zaidan, LBP and Felippe, GM (1999) Effect of storage of achenes of Bidens gardneri Baker on light sensitivity during germination. Revista Brasileira de Botanica 22, 7581.Google Scholar
Scherber, C, Crawley, MJ and Porembski, S (2003) The effects of herbivory and competition on the invasive alien plant Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae). Diversity and Distributions 9, 415426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlaepfer, DR, Taylor, KA, Pennington, VE, Nelson, KN, Martyn, TE, Rottler, CM, Lauenroth, WK and Bradford, JB (2015) Simulated big sagebrush regeneration supports predicted changes at the trailing and leading edges of distribution shifts. Ecosphere 6, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, B and Dolt, C (1994) Effects of maternal and paternal environment and genotyope on offspring phenotype of Solidago altissima L. Evolution 48, 15251549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnitzer, SA, Mangan, SA, Dalling, JW, Baldeck, CA, Hubbell, SP, Ledo, A, Muller-Landau, H, Tobin, MF, Aguilar, S, Brassfield, D, Hernandez, A, Lao, S, Perez, R, Valdes, O and Yorke, SR (2012) Liana abundance, diversity, and distribution on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. PLoS ONE 7, e52114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholl, JP, Calle, L, Miller, N and Venable, DL (2020) Offspring polymorphism and bet-hedging: a large-scale phylogenetic analysis. Ecology Letters 23, 12231231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schranz, ME, Mohammadin, S and Edger, PP (2012) Ancient whole genome duplications, novelty and diversifications: the WGD radiation lag-time model. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 15, 147153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, ST and Ganders, FR (1996) Evolution of unisexually in the Hawaiian flora. A test of microevolutionary theory. Evolution 50, 842855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütz, W (1999) Some ecological and biogeographical aspects of achene dormancy and afterripening in Asteraceae, pp. 153168 in Breckle, S-W; Schweizer, B and Arndt, U (Eds) Results of worldwide ecological studies. Proceedings of the first symposium by the A.F.W. Schimper-Foundation. Hohenheim, October 1998. Stuttgart, Verlag Günter Heimbach.Google Scholar
Schütz, W, Milberg P, Lamont BB (2002) Seed dormancy, after-ripening and light requirements of four annual Asteraceae in south-western Australia. Annals of Botany 90, 707714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schütz, M and Urbanska, KM (1984) Germination behaviour and growth potential in Taraxacum alpinum (2n=32) from Swiss Alps. Berichte des Geobotanischen Institutes ETH Stiftung Rübel 51, 118131.Google Scholar
Schwienbacher, E, Marcante, S and Erschbamer, B (2010) Alpine species seed longevity in the soil in relation to seed size and shape – a 5-year burial experiment in the central Alps. Flora 205, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaman, FC (1982) Sesquiterpene lactose as taxonomic characters in the Asteraceae. The Botanical Review 48, 121594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seger, J and Brockmann, HJ (1987) What is bet-hedging? Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 4, 182211.Google Scholar
Seger, GDS and Hartz, SM (2014) Checklist of climbing plants in an Araucaria forest of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Biota Neotropica 14, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabir, PA, Nawchoo, IA, Wani, AA and Banday, A (2015) Pollen limitation and effects of local patch density on reproductive success in the alpine herb Inula royleana (Asteraceae). Plant Ecology 216, 10731081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y, Liu, W, Baskin, JM, Baskin, CC and Cao, M (2006) Persistent soil seed banks of the globally significant invasive species, Eupatorium adenophorum, in Yunnan Province, south-western China. Seed Science Research 16, 157162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simillion, C, Vandepoele, K, Van Montagu, MCE, Zabeau, M and Van de Peer, Y (2002) The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 1362713632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, AM (2011) Modes of response to environmental change and the elusive empirical evidence for bet hedging. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278, 16011609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, MJA (1979) Lack of dormancy in seeds of New Zealand plants. Canterbury Botanical Society Journal 13, 3637.Google Scholar
Singh, C, Kamble, UR, Gupta, V, Singh, G, Sheoran, S, Gupta, A, Tyagi, BS, Kumar, P, Mishra, CN, Krishannapa, G, Bishnoi, SK, Sharma, AK, Kumar, S and Singh, GP (2021) Pre-harvest sprouting in wheat: current status and future prospects. Journal of Cereal Research 13, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singhal, S, Roddy, AB, DiVittorio, C, Sanchez-Amaya, A, Henriquez, CL, Brodersen, CR, Fehlberg, S and Zapata, F (2021) Diversification, disparification and hybridization in the desert shrubs Encelia. New Phytologist 230, 12281241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, MK and Nilsson, EE (2021) Role of environmentally induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance in evolutionary biology: unified evolution theory. Environmental Epigenetics 7, dvab012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith-Huerta, NL (1984) Seed germination in related diploid and allotetraploid Clarkia species. Botanical Gazette 145, 246252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, AP and Young, TP (1982) The cost of reproduction in Senecio keniodendron, a giant rosette species of Mt. Kenya. Oecologia 55, 243247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, AP and Young, TP (1987) Tropical alpine plant ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18, 137158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, AA, Moran-Palma, P, Rieseberg, LH, Wszelaki, A and Seiler, GJ (1998) Fecundity, phenology, and seed dormancy of F1 wild-crop hybrids in sunflower (Helianthus annuus, Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 85, 794801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sohn, S-I, Pandian, S, Kumar, TS, Zoclanclounon, YAB, Muthuramalingam, P, Shilpha, J, Satish, L and Ramesh, M (2021) Seed dormancy and pre-harvest sprouting in rice – an updated overview. International Journal of Molecular Science 22, 11804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, E, Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2017) A graphical method for identifying the six types of nondeep physiological dormancy in seeds. Plant Biology 19, 673682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soltis, DE and Burleigh, JG (2009) Surviving the K-T mass extinction: new perspectives of polyploidization in angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 54555456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soltis, DE, Soltis, PS and Tate, JA (2003) Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation. New Phytologist 161, 173191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltis, DE, Segovia-Salcedo, MC, Jordon-Thaden, I, Majure, L, Miles, NM, Mavrodiev, FV, Mei, W, Cortez, MB, Soltis, PS and Gitzendanner, MA (2014a) Are polyploids really evolutionary dead-ends (again)? A critical reappraisal of Mayrose et al., (2011). New Phytologist 202, 11051117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltis, DE, Visger, CJ and Soltis, PS (2014b) The polyploidy revolution then…and now: Stebbins revisited. American Journal of Botany 101, 10571078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soons, MB and Heil, GW (2002) Reduced colonization capacity in fragemented populations of wind-dispersed grassland forbs. Journal of Ecology 90, 10331043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soto-Trejo, F, Kelly, JK, Archibald, JK, Mort, ME, Santos-Guerra, A and Crawford, DJ (2013) The genetics of self-compatibility and associated floral characters in Tolpis (Asteraceae) in the Canary Islands. International Journal of Plant Sciences 174, 171178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza Filho, PRM and Takaki, M (2011) Dimorphic cypsela germination and plant growth in Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn. (Asteraceae). Brazilian Journal of Biology 71, 541548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starrfelt, J and Kokko, H (2012) Bet-hedging – a triple trade-off between means, variances and correlations. Biological Reviews 87, 742755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, LC (2008) Self-incompatibility in Echinacea purpurea. HortScience 43, 13501354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strijk, JS, Noyes, RD, Strasberg, D, Cruaud, C, Gavory, F, Chase, MW, Abbott, RJ and Thébaud, C (2012) In and out of Madagascar: dispersal to peripheral islands, insular speciation and diversification of Indian Ocean daisy trees (Psiadia, Asteraceae). PLoS ONE 8, e42932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuessy, T and Weiss-Schneeweiss, H (2019) What drives polyploidization in plants? New Phytologist 223, 16901692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subbiah, A, Ramdhani, S, Pammenter, NW, Macdonald, AHH and Sershen, N (2019) Towards understanding the incidence and evolutionary history of seed recalcitrance: an analytical review. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 37, 1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, M and Ganders, FR (1988) Mixed mating systems in Hawaiian Bidens (Asteraceae). Evolution 42, 516527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, HZ, Lu, JJ, Tan, DY, Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (2009) Dormancy and germination characteristics of the trimorphic achenes of Garhadiolus papposus (Asteraceae), an annual ephemeral from the Junggar Desert, China. South African Journal of Botany 75, 537545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susanna, A, Baldwin, BG, Bayer, RH, Bonifacino, JM, Garcia-Jacas, N, Keeley, SC, Mandel, JR, Ortiz, S, Robinson, H and Stuessy, TF (2020) The classification of the Compositae: a tribute to Vicki Ann Funk (1947–2019). Taxon 69, 807814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, S (1986) Floral sex ratios, fruit-set, and resource allocation in plants. Ecology 67, 9911001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamado, T, Schütz, W and Milberg, P (2002) Germination ecology of the weed Parthenium hysterophorus in eastern Ethiopia. Annals of Applied Biology 140, 263270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tank, DC, Eastman, JM, Pennell, MW, Soltis, PS, Soltis, DE, Hinchliff, CE, Brown, JW, Sessa, EB and Harmon, LJ (2015) Nested radiations and the pulse of angiosperm diversification: increased diversification rates often follow whole genome duplications. New Phytologist 207, 454467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanowitz, BD, Salopek, PF and Mahall, BE (1987) Differential germination of ray and disc achenes in Hemizonia increscens (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 74, 303312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
te Beest, M, Le Roux, JJ, Richardson, DM, Brysting, AK, Suda, J, Kubešová, M and Pyšek, P (2012) The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Annals of Botany 109, 1945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Telewski, FW and Zeevaart, JAD (2002) The 120-yr period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. American Journal of Botany 89, 12851288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, AG, Lefkovitch, LP, Woo, SL, Bowes, GG and Peschken, DP (1994) Effect of temperature on germination within and between diploid and tetraploid populations of Matricaria perforata Mérat. Weed Research 34, 187198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, RC (1937) The germination of lettuce seed as affected by nutrition of the plant and the physiological age of the plant. Proceedings of the American Society of Horticultural Science 35, 599600.Google Scholar
Thompson, K (1990) Genome size, seed size and germination temperature in herbaceous angiosperms. Evolutionary Trends in Plants 4, 113116.Google Scholar
Thompson, SL and Ritland, K (2006) A novel mating system analysis for modes of self-oriented mating applied to diploid and polyploid arctic Easter daisies (Townsendia hookeri). Heredity 97, 119126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomlinson, PB (1986) The botany of mangroves. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torres-Martínez, L, Weldy, P, Levy, M and Emery, MC (2017) Spatiotemporal heterogeneity in precipitation patterns explain population-level germination strategies in an edaphic specialist. Annals of Botany 119, 253265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totland, Ø (1997) Effects of flowering time and temperature on growth and reproduction in Leontodon autumnalis var. taraxaci, a late-flowering alpine plant. Arctic and Alpine Research 29, 285290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, MR and Koltunow, AMG (2009) Sexual and asexual (apomictic) seed development in flowering plants: molecular, morphological and evolutionary relationships. Functional Plant Biology 36, 490504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuttle, KM, Martinez, SA, Schramm, EC, Takebayashi, Y, Seo, M and Steber, CM (2015) Grain dormancy loss is associated with changes in ABA and GA sensitivity and hormone accumulation in bread wheat, Triticum aestivum (L.). Seed Science Research 25, 179193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweney, J and Mogie, M (1999) The relationship between achene weight, embryo weight and germination in Taraxacum apomicts. Annals of Botany 83, 4550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upfold, SJ and Van Staden, J (1990) The germination characteristics of Tithonia rotundifolia. Annals of Botany 66, 5762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Boheemen, LA, Atwater, DZ and Hodgins, KA (2019) Rapid and repeated local adaptation to climate in an invasive plant. New Phytologist 222, 614627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Peer, Y, Fawcett, JA, Proost, S, Sterck, L and Vandepoele, K (2009) The flowering world: a tale of duplications. Trends in Plant Science 14, 680688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van de Peer, Y, Mizrachi, E and Marchal, K (2017) The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nature Reviews Genetics 18, 411424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderplanck, M, Gilles, H, Nonclercq, D, Duez, P and Gerbaux, P (2020) Asteraceae paradox: chemical and mechanical protection of Taraxacum pollen. Insects 11, 11050304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dijk, PJ, Tas, ICQ, Falque, M and Bakx-Schotman, T (1999) Crosses between sexual and apomictic dandelions (Taraxacum). II. The breakdown of apomixis. Heredity 83, 715721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanneste, K, Baele, G, Maere, S and Van de Peer, Y (2014) Analysis of 41 plant genomes supports a wave of successful genome duplication in association with the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Genome Research 24, 13341347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaupel, A and Matthies, D (2012) Abundance, reproduction, and seed predation of an alpine plant decrease from the center toward the range limit. Ecology 93, 22532262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velten, SB and Garcia, QS (2007) Variation between three Eremanthus (Asteraceae) species in their ability to form a seed bank. Revista Brasileira de Botanica 30, 713719.Google Scholar
Venable, DL (1985a) The evolutionary ecology of seed heteromorphism. The American Naturalist 126, 577595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venable, DL (1985b) Ecology of achene dimorphism in Heterotheca latifolia. III. Demographic variation within populations. Journal of Ecology 73, 757763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venable, DL and Búrquez, MA (1989) Quantitative genetics of size, shape, life-history, and fruit characteristics of the seed-heteromorphic composite Heterosperma pinnatum. I. Variation within and among populations. Evolution 43, 113124.Google ScholarPubMed
Venable, DL and Lawlor, L (1980) Delayed germination and dispersal in desert annuals: escape in space and time. Oecologia 46, 272282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venable, DL and Levin, DA (1983) Morphological dispersal structures in relation to growth habit in the Compositae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 143, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venable, DL and Levin, DA (1985a) Ecology of achene dimorphism in Heterotheca latifolia. I. Achene structure, germination and dispersal. Journal of Ecology 73, 133145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venable, DL and Levin, DA (1985b) Ecology of achene dimorphism in Heterotheca latifolia. II. Demographic variation within populations. Journal of Ecology 73, 743755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venable, DL, Búrquez, A, Corral, G, Morales, E and Espinosa, F (1987) The ecology of seed heteromorphism in Heterosperma pinnatum in Central Mexico. Ecology 68, 6576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venable, DL, Dyreson, E and Morales, E (1995) Population dynamic consequences and evolution of seed traits of Heterosperma pinnatum (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 82, 410420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, KJF, Jansen, JJ, van Dijk, PJ and Biere, A (2010) Stress-induced DNA methylation changes and their heritability in asexual dandelions. New Phytologist 185, 11081118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vinkenoog, R and Scott, RJ (2001) Autonomous endosperm development in flowering plants: how to overcome the imprinting problem? Sexual Plant Reproduction 14, 189194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vitales, D, Pellicer, J, Vallés, J and Garnatje, T (2013) Genetic structure and seed germination in Portuguese populations of Cheirolophus uliginosus (Asteraceae) implications for conservation strategies. Collectanea Botanica 32, 2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitales, D, García-Fernández, A, Pellicer, J, Vallès, J, Santos-Guerra, A, Cowan, RS, Fay, MF, Hidalgo, O and Garnatje, T (2014) Key processes for Cheirolophus (Asteraceae) diversification on oceanic islands inferred from AFLP data. PLoS ONE 9, e113207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wacquant, JP and Picard, JB (1992) Nutritional differentiation among populations of the Mediterranean shrub Dittrichia viscosa (Asteraceae) in siliceous and calcareous habitats. Oecologia 92, 1422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagstaff, SJ and Breitwieser, I (2004) Phylogeny and classification of Brachyglottis (Senecioneae, Asteraceae): an example of a rapid species radiation in New Zealand. Systematic Botany 29, 10031010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walck, JL, Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (1997a) Comparative achene germination requirements of the rockhouse endemic Ageratina luciae-brauniae and its widespread close relative A. altissima (Asteraceae). The American Midland Naturalist 137, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walck, JL, Baskin, JM and Baskin, CC (1997b) A comparative study of the germination biology of a narrow endemic and two geographically-widespread species of Solidago (Asteraceae). 3. Photoecology of germination. Seed Science Research 7, 293301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, C, Wheeler, LM and Grotenhuis, JM (2005) Longevity of seeds stored in a genebank: species characteristics. Seed Science Research 15, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H, McArthur, E, Sanderson, SC, Graham, JH and Freeman, DC (1997) Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). IV. Reciprocal transplant experiments. Evolution 51, 95102.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, T, Chen, G, Zan, Q, Wang, C and Su, Y-J (2012) AFLP genome scan to detect genetic structure and candidate loci under selection for local adaptation of the invasive weed Mikania micrantha. PLoS ONE 7, e41310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, CJ (1999) Empirical studies: evolution and maintenance of dimorphic breeding systems, pp. 6195 in Geber, MA; Dawson, TE and Delph, LF (Eds) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, AN, Primer, SB, Pace, BA and Mercer, KL (2013) Maternal effects and embryo genetics: germination and dormancy of crop-wild sunflower hybrids. Seed Science Research 23, 241255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, J, Seras, CJ, Baack, EJ and Otto, SP (2008) The dynamic nature of apomixis in the angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169, 169182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widén, B (1993) Demographic and genetic effects on reproduction as related to population size in a rare perennial herb, Senecio integrifolius. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 50, 179195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijayratne, UC and Pyke, DA (2012) Burial increases seed longevity of two Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae) subspecies. American Journal of Botany 99, 438447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, CG, Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM, Auld, JR, Venable, DL, Cavender-Bares, J, Donohue, K, Rubio de Casas, R and The NESCent Germination Working Group (2014) The evolution of seed dormancy: environmental cues, evolutionary hubs, and diversification of the seed plants. New Phytologist 203, 300309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, C, Lehmann, S and Diekmann, M (2008) Determinants of reproductive success: a comparative study of five endangered river corridor plants in fragmented habitats. Biological Conservation 141, 10951104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkowski, ETF and Wilson, M (2001) Changes in density, biomass, seed production and soil seed banks of the non-native invasive plant, Chromolaena odorata, along a 15 year chronosequence. Plant Ecology 152, 1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X, Zheng, W, Funk, VA and Wen, J (2018) Home at last II: Gerbera hieracioides (Kunth) Zardini (Mutisieae, Asteraceae) is really a Chaptalia. PhytoKeys 95, 93106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yampolsky, C and Yampolsky, H (1922) Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibliotheca Genetica 3, 162. +a 34-page table (without title) summarizing the kinds of sex forms in families of angiosperms.Google Scholar
Young, JA, Clements, CD, Pitcairn, MJ, Balciunas, J, Enloe, S, Turner, C and Hormon, D (2005) Germination-temperature profiles of achenes of yellow starthistle (Centaurea salstitialis). Weed Technology 19, 815823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, X and Wen, B (2018) Seed germination response to high temperature and water stress in three invasive Asteraceae weeds from Xishuangbanna, SW China. PLoS ONE 13, e0191710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zedler, PH, Guehlstorff, K, Scheidlinger, C and Gautier, CR (1983) The population ecology of a dune thistle, Circium rhothophilum (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 70, 15161527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenil-Ferguson, R, Burleigh, JG, Freyman, WA, Mayrose, I and Goldberg, EE (2019) Interaction among ploidy, breeding systems and lineage diversification. New Phytologist 224, 12521265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, T and Elomaa, P (2021) Don't be fooled: false flowers in Asteraceae. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 59, 101972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, R, Gallagher, RS and Shea, K (2012) Maternal warming affects early life stages of an invasive thistle. Plant Biology 14, 783788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, K, Yao, L, Zhang, Y and Tao, J (2019) Achene heteromorphism in Bidens pilosa (Asteraceae): differences in germination and possible adaptive significance. AoB Plants 11, plz026.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, K, Baskin, JM, Baskin, CC, Cheplick, G, Yang, X and Huang, Z (2020) Amphicarpic plants: definition, ecology, geographic distribution, systematics, life history, evolution and use in agriculture. Biological Reviews 95, 14421466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, C, Huang, C-H, Liu, M, Hu, Y, Panera, JL, Luebert, F, Gao, T and Ma, H (2021a) Phylotranscriptomic insights into Asteraceae diversity, polyploidy, and morphological innovation. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 63, 12731293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X, Landis, JB, Sun, Y, Zhang, H, Lin, N, Kuang, T, Huang, X, Wang, H and Sun, H (2021b) Macroevolution pattern of Saussurea (Asteraceae) provides insights into the drivers of radiating diversification. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 288, 20211575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y, Liu, Y, Sun, L, Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM, Cao, M and Yang, J (2022) Seed dormancy in space and time: global distribution, paleoclimatic and present climatic drivers, and evolutionary adaptations. New Phytologist 234, 17701781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Types (1–6) of non-deep physiological dormancy in Asteraceae species

Figure 1

Table 2. Comparison of dormancy in examples of Asteraceae species with heteromorphic (dimorphic) cypselae

Figure 2

Table 3. Survival of cypselae of Asteraceae species placed in bags or other containers and buried in soil in the field for 0.25 to 40 years, depending on species

Figure 3

Table 4. Number of years cypselae of Asteraceae germinated in the non-heated glasshouse in Lexington, Kentucky (USA)

Figure 4

Table 5. Number of species of trees, shrubs, vines and herbs of Asteraceae in different vegetation zones/special habitats with non-dormant (ND) and physiologically dormant (PD) cypselae

Figure 5

Fig. 1. Proportion of Asteraceae species with non-dormant (ND) and physiologically dormancy (PD) cypselae in each tropical and temperate vegetation zone.

Figure 6

Table 6. Number of species of trees, shrubs, vines and herbs with non-dormant (ND) and physiologically dormant (PD) cypselae in tribes of Asteraceae in tropical and temperate regions

Figure 7

Table 7. Tribes of Asteraceae in different vegetation zones represented by one or more species with non-dormant (N) or physiologically dormant (P) cypselae

Supplementary material: PDF

Baskin and Baskin supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Baskin and Baskin supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 300.3 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Baskin and Baskin supplementary material

Figure S2

Download Baskin and Baskin supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Baskin and Baskin supplementary material

Table S1

Download Baskin and Baskin supplementary material(File)
File 300.6 KB