Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:02:06.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Endosperm variability: from endoreduplication within a seed to higher ploidy across species, and its competence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2020

Parimalan Rangan Open the ORCID record for Parimalan Rangan [Opens in a new window]
Parimalan Rangan*
Affiliation:
Division of Genomic Resources, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi110012, India Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD4072, Australia
*
Author for Correspondence: Parimalan Rangan, E-mail:[email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Endosperm tissue that nourishes the embryo during seed development, upon maturity, nourishes the global population with special reference to cereal crops like maize, wheat and rice. In about 70% of the angiosperms, endosperm genome content is ‘3n’ with 2:1 (maternal:paternal) contribution, as a result of the second fertilization event. However, angiosperms evolution also documents diversity in endosperm genome content from ‘2n’ to ‘15n’, in scale with the corresponding maternal genome dosage variability (‘1n’ to ‘14n’), whereas paternal contribution is invariable. In apomicts, due to lack of fertilization, or pseudogamy (fertilization of the central cell for endosperm formation), endosperm genome dosage (m:p) has been reported to range between 1:1 and 8:3. Exceptionally, the central cell with one unreduced nucleus and fused with a reduced sperm cell, with 2:1 normal genome dosage, has been reported in Panicum. Altered genome dosage levels are reportedly correlative with eccentricities among maternal and paternal contribution to seed resource allocation. Besides endosperm ploidy variability between species of angiosperms, the present review gives an overview of the ploidy variability in endosperm cells within a seed, up to ‘690n’. In addition to genome-scale variability in the endosperm, some taxa of angiosperms exhibit chlorophyllous endosperms and some chlorophyllous embryos. Also, endosperm cell number during seed development is reported to have a strong association with grain weight at maturity. Genes underlying these traits of variability are unknown, and the present review underscores the variability and highlights the potential of the single-cell sequencing techniques towards understanding the genetic mechanisms associated with these variable traits.

Keywords

apomixiscerealsdosage levelendoreduplicationendosperm variabilityplant genetic resourcessingle-cell sequencing
Type
Review Paper
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 173 - 185
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is dedicated to the great academician Nikolay Ivanovich Vavilov (25 November 1887 to 26 January 1943), who had envisioned a hunger-free world but, ironically, died of hunger and malnutrition.

References

Adams, S, Vinkenoog, R, Spielman, M, Dickinson, HG and Scott, RJ (2000) Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana require DNA methylation. Development 127, 2493–2502.Google ScholarPubMed
Albertini, E, Marconi, G, Reale, L, Barcaccia, G, Porceddu, A, Ferranti, F and Falcinelli, M (2005) SERK and APOSTART. Candidate genes for apomixis in Poa pratensis. Plant Physiology 138, 2185–2199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alves, ER, Carneiro, VT and Araujo, AC (2001) Direct evidence of pseudogamy in apomictic Brachiaria brizantha (Poaceae). Sexual Plant Reproduction 14, 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoniazzi, CA, de Faria, RB, de Carvalho, PP, Mikovski, AI, de Carvalho, IF, de Matos, EM, Reis, AC, Viccini, LF, Pinto, DLP and Rocha, DI (2018) In vitro regeneration of triploid plants from mature endosperm culture of commercial passionfruit (Passiflora edulis Sims). Scientia Horticulturae 238, 408–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, N (1970) Variation in the apomictic seedlings of certain species of ficus, pp. 52–63 in Khokhlov, S (Ed.) Apomixis and breeding. New Delhi, Amerind Publishing Co Pvt Ltd.Google Scholar
Arias, T and Williams, JH (2008) Embryology of Manekia naranjoana (Piperaceae) and the origin of tetrasporic, 16-nucleate female gametophytes in Piperales. American Journal of Botany 95, 272–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Artlip, T, Madison, J and Setter, T (1995) Water deficit in developing endosperm of maize: cell division and nuclear DMA endoreduplication. Plant, Cell & Environment 18, 1034–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asker, S and Jerling, L (1992) Apomixis in plants. Baton Roca, FL, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Barke, BH, Daubert, M and Hörandl, E (2018) Establishment of apomixis in diploid F2 hybrids and inheritance of apospory from F1 to F2 hybrids of the Ranunculus auricomus complex. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baroux, C, Spillane, C and Grossniklaus, U (2002) Evolutionary origins of the endosperm in flowering plants. Genome Biology 3, 1021–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrada, A, Djendli, M, Desnos, T, Mercier, R, Robaglia, C, Montané, M-H and Menand, B (2019) A TOR-YAK1 signaling axis controls cell cycle, meristem activity and plant growth in Arabidopsis. Development 146, dev171298.Google ScholarPubMed
Bashaw, E and Hanna, WW (1990) Apomictic reproduction, pp. 100–130 in Chapman, GP (Ed.) Reproductive versatility in the grasses. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Batista, RA, Figueiredo, DD, Santos-González, J and Köhler, C (2019) Auxin regulates endosperm cellularization in Arabidopsis. Genes & Development 33, 466–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Battaglia, E (1971) The embryo sac of Podostemaceae – an interpretation. Caryologia 24, 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becraft, PW (2001) Cell fate specification in the cereal endosperm. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 12, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becraft, PW and Gutierrez-Marcos, J (2012) Endosperm development: dynamic processes and cellular innovations underlying sibling altruism. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology 1, 579–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becraft, PW and Yi, G (2010) Regulation of aleurone development in cereal grains. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 1669–1675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, F, Grini, PE and Schnittger, A (2006) Endosperm: an integrator of seed growth and development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9, 664–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyer, P, Al-Babili, S, Ye, X, Lucca, P, Schaub, P, Welsch, R and Potrykus, I (2002) Golden rice: introducing the β-carotene biosynthesis pathway into rice endosperm by genetic engineering to defeat vitamin A deficiency. The Journal of Nutrition 132, 506S–510S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicknell, RA and Koltunow, AM (2004) Understanding apomixis: recent advances and remaining conundrums. Plant Cell 16, S228–S245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bocchini, M, Galla, G, Pupilli, F, Bellucci, M, Barcaccia, G, Ortiz, JPA, Pessino, SC and Albertini, E (2018) The vesicle trafficking regulator PN_SCD1 is demethylated and overexpressed in florets of apomictic Paspalum notatum genotypes. Scientific Reports 8, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandt, R, Mascher, M and Thiel, J (2018) Laser capture microdissection-based RNA-Seq of barley grain tissues, pp. 397–409 in Murray, G (Ed.) Laser capture microdissection. Methods in molecular biology. New York, Springer.Google Scholar
Brukhin, V (2017) Molecular and genetic regulation of apomixis. Russian Journal of Genetics 53, 943–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, GW (1948) The method of reproduction in common bahia grass, Paspalum notatum 1. Agronomy Journal 40, 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, WS and Moore, JH (2012) Genome-wide association studies. PLoS Computational Biology 8, e1002822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cailleau, A, Cheptou, P-O and Lenormand, T (2010) Ploidy and the evolution of endosperm of flowering plants. Genetics 184, 439–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carman, JG, Jamison, M, Elliott, E, Dwivedi, KK and Naumova, TN (2011) Apospory appears to accelerate onset of meiosis and sexual embryo sac formation in sorghum ovules. BMC Plant Biology 11, 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cervigni, GD, Paniego, N, Pessino, S, Selva, JP, Díaz, M, Spangenberg, G and Echenique, V (2008) Gene expression in diplosporous and sexual Eragrostis curvula genotypes with differing ploidy levels. Plant Molecular Biology 67, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J, Bardes, EE, Aronow, BJ and Jegga, AG (2009) ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Research 37, W305–W311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, J, Tanaka, K, Cao, Y, Qi, Y, Qiu, J, Liang, Y, Lee, SY and Stacey, G (2014) Identification of a plant receptor for extracellular ATP. Science 343, 290–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coelho, CM, Dante, RA, Sabelli, PA, Sun, Y, Dilkes, BP, Gordon-Kamm, WJ and Larkins, BA (2005) Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in maize endosperm and their potential role in endoreduplication. Plant Physiology 138, 2323–2336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daigle, C, Mazin, B and Matton, DP (2019) The Solanum chacoense Fertilization-Related Kinase 3 (ScFRK3) is involved in male and female gametophyte development. BMC Plant Biology 19, 202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
den Boer, BG and Murray, JA (2000) Triggering the cell cycle in plants. Trends in Cell Biology 10, 245–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Oliveira, FA, Vigna, BB, da Silva, CC, Fávero, AP, de Matta, FP, Azevedo, AL and de Souza, AP (2020) Coexpression and transcriptome analyses identify active apomixis-related genes in Paspalum notatum leaves. BMC Genomics 21, 78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Depetris, MB, Acuña, CA, Pozzi, FI, Quarin, C and Felitti, SA (2018) Identification of genes related to endosperm balance number insensitivity in Paspalum notatum. Crop Science 58, 813–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Veylder, L, Larkin, JC and Schnittger, A (2011) Molecular control and function of endoreplication in development and physiology. Trends in Plant Science 16, 624–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Croce, L and Helin, K (2013) Transcriptional regulation by Polycomb group proteins. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 20, 1147–1155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doll, N, Royek, S, Fujita, S, Okuda, S, Chamot, S, Stintzi, A, Widiez, T, Hothorn, M, Schaller, A and Geldner, N (2020) A two-way molecular dialogue between embryo and endosperm is required for seed development. Science 367, 431–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dujardin, M and Hanna, WW (1983) Apomictic and sexual pearl millet × Pennisetum squamulatum hybrids. Journal of Heredity 74, 277–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, RE and Ross, JG (1950) The nucleus in differentiation and development: III. Nuclei of maize endosperm. Journal of Heredity 41, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eekhout, T and De Veylder, L (2019) Plant stress: hitting pause on the cell cycle. eLife 8, e46781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Efroni, I and Birnbaum, KD (2016) The potential of single-cell profiling in plants. Genome Biology 17, 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelen-Eigles, G, Jones, RJ and Phillips, R (2000) DNA endoreduplication in maize endosperm cells: the effect of exposure to short-term high temperature. Plant, Cell & Environment 23, 657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ermakova, M, Danila, FR, Furbank, RT and Von Caemmerer, S (2020) On the road to C4 rice: advances and perspectives. Plant Journal 101, 940–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felitti, SA, Seijo, JG, González, AM, Podio, M, Laspina, NV, Siena, L, Ortiz, JPA and Pessino, SC (2011) Expression of lorelei-like genes in aposporous and sexual Paspalum notatum plants. Plant Molecular Biology 77, 337–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felitti, SA, Acuña, CA, Ortiz, JPA and Quarin, CL (2015) Transcriptome analysis of seed development in apomictic Paspalum notatum. Annals of Applied Biology 167, 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarini, A, Forcato, C, Buson, G, Tononi, P, del Monaco, V, Terracciano, M, Bolognesi, C, Fontana, F, Medoro, G, Neves, R, Möhlendick, B, Rihawi, K, Ardizzoni, A, Sumanasuriya, S, Flohr, P, Lambros, M, de Bono, J, Stoecklein, NH and Manaresi, N (2018) A streamlined workflow for single-cells genome-wide copy-number profiling by low-pass sequencing of LM-PCR whole-genome amplification products. PLoS ONE 13, e0193689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fishman, L and Sweigart, AL (2018) When two rights make a wrong: the evolutionary genetics of plant hybrid incompatibilities. Annual Review of Plant Biology 69, 707–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiume, E and Fletcher, JC (2012) Regulation of Arabidopsis embryo and endosperm development by the polypeptide signaling molecule CLE8. Plant Cell 24, 1000–1012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Florez-Rueda, AM, Waser, L and Grossniklaus, U (2020) Laser-assisted microdissection of plant embryos for transcriptional profiling, pp. 127–139 in Bayer, M (Ed.) Plant embryogenesis. Methods in molecular biology. New York, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, WE (1992) Evidence of a pre-angiosperms origin of endosperm: implications for the evolution of flowering plants. Science 255, 336–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, WE (1998) The evolution of double fertilization and endosperm: a “historical” perspective. Sexual Plant Reproduction 11, 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, CMR and Sumner, MJ (2009) Maturation of the embryo, endosperm, and fruit of the dwarf mistletoe Arceuthobium americanum (Viscaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 170, 290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, WE, Madrid, EN and Williams, JH (2008) Origin of the fittest and survival of the fittest: relating female gametophyte development to endosperm genetics. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Aguilar, M, Michaud, C, Leblanc, O and Grimanelli, D (2010) Inactivation of a DNA methylation pathway in maize reproductive organs results in apomixis-like phenotypes. Plant Cell 22, 3249–3267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gehring, M and Satyaki, P (2017) Endosperm and imprinting, inextricably linked. Plant Physiology 173, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gehring, M, Bubb, KL and Henikoff, S (2009) Extensive demethylation of repetitive elements during seed development underlies gene imprinting. Science 324, 1447–1451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbon, BC and Larkins, BA (2005) Molecular genetic approaches to developing quality protein maize. Trends in Genetics 21, 227–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaubitz, JC, Casstevens, TM, Lu, F, Harriman, J, Elshire, RJ, Sun, Q and Buckler, ES (2014) TASSEL-GBS: a high capacity genotyping by sequencing analysis pipeline. PLoS ONE 9, e90346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gmitter, F, Ling, X and Deng, X (1990) Induction of triploid Citrus plants from endosperm calli in vitro. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80, 785–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Götz, S, García-Gómez, JM, Terol, J, Williams, TD, Nagaraj, SH, Nueda, MJ, Robles, M, Talón, M, Dopazo, J and Conesa, A (2008) High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Research 36, 3420–3435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greilhuber, J, Ebert, I, Lorenz, A and Vyskot, B (2000) Origin of facultative heterochromatin in the endosperm of Gagea lutea (Liliaceae). Protoplasma 212, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimanelli, D, Hernández, M, Perotti, E and Savidan, Y (1997) Dosage effects in the endosperm of diplosporous apomictic Tripsacum (Poaceae). Sexual Plant Reproduction 10, 279–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerin, J, Rossel, JB, Robert, S, Tsuchiya, T and Koltunow, A (2000) A DEFICIENS homologue is down-regulated during apomictic initiation in ovules of Hieracium. Planta 210, 914–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haig, D and Westoby, M (1991) Genomic imprinting in endosperm: its effect on seed development in crosses between species, and between different ploidies of the same species, and its implications for the evolution of apomixis. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 333, 1–13.Google Scholar
Hand, ML and Koltunow, AM (2014) The genetic control of apomixis: asexual seed formation. Genetics 197, 441–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, RJ, Rangan, P, Furtado, A, Busch, FA and Farquhar, GD (2017) Does C4 photosynthesis occur in wheat seeds? Plant Physiology 174, 1992–1995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, T-F, Hakim, O, Ohad, N and Fischer, RL (2003) From flour to flower: how Polycomb group proteins influence multiple aspects of plant development. Trends in Plant Science 8, 439–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, G, Liang, G and Wassom, C (1991) Chemical induction of apomictic seed formation in maize. Euphytica 56, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y, Wang, H, Huang, X, Wang, Q, Wang, J, An, D, Li, J, Wang, W and Wu, Y (2019) Maize VKS1 regulates mitosis and cytokinesis during early endosperm development. Plant Cell 31, 1238–1256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huh, JH, Bauer, MJ, Hsieh, T-F and Fischer, R (2007) Endosperm gene imprinting and seed development. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 17, 480–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imai, KK, Ohashi, Y, Tsuge, T, Yoshizumi, T, Matsui, M, Oka, A and Aoyama, T (2006) The A-type cyclin CYCA2;3 is a key regulator of ploidy levels in Arabidopsis endoreduplication. Plant Cell 18, 382–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jankowicz-Cieslak, J and Till, B (2015) Forward and reverse genetics in crop breeding, pp. 215–240 in Al-Khayri, J; Jain, S and Johnson, D (Eds) Advances in plant breeding strategies: breeding, biotechnology and molecular tools. Switzerland, Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, S, Den Nijs, T, Peloquin, S and Hanneman, R (1980) The significance of genic balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 57, 5–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johri, B, Ambegaokar, K and Srivastava, P (1992) Comparative embryology of angiosperms. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joubès, J and Chevalier, C (2000) Endoreduplication in higher plants. Plant Molecular Biology 43, 735–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaushal, P, Dwivedi, KK, Radhakrishna, A, Srivastava, MK, Kumar, V, Roy, AK and Malaviya, DR (2019) Partitioning apomixis components to understand and utilize gametophytic apomixis. Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keçeli, BN, De Storme, N and Geelen, D (2017) In vivo ploidy determination of Arabidopsis thaliana male and female gametophytes, pp. 77–85 in Schmidt, A (Ed.) Plant germline development methods and protocols. New York, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehr, J (2003) Single cell technology. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6, 617–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khush, GS (Ed.) (1994) Apomixis: exploiting hybrid vigor in rice. Philippines, Int. Rice Res. Inst. IRRI.Google Scholar
Kirkbride, RC, Lu, J, Zhang, C, Mosher, RA, Baulcombe, DC and Chen, ZJ (2019) Maternal small RNAs mediate spatial-temporal regulation of gene expression, imprinting, and seed development in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116, 2761–2766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knox, R (1967) Apomixis: seasonal and population differences in a grass. Science 157, 325–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köhler, C, Hennig, L, Spillane, C, Pien, S, Gruissem, W and Grossniklaus, U (2003) The Polycomb-group protein MEDEA regulates seed development by controlling expression of the MADS-box gene PHERES. Genes & Development 17, 1540–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollmann, J, Steinger, T and Roy, BA (2000) Evidence of sexuality in European Rubus (Rosaceae) species based on AFLP and allozyme analysis. American Journal of Botany 87, 1592–1598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koltunow, AM (1993) Apomixis: embryo sacs and embryos formed without meiosis or fertilization in ovules. Plant Cell 5, 1425–1437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowles, RV and Phillips, RL (1985) DNA amplification patterns in maize endosperm nuclei during kernel development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 82, 7010–7014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowles, RV, Srienc, F and Phillips, RL (1990) Endoreduplication of nuclear DNA in the developing maize endosperm. Developmental Genetics 11, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowles, R, McMullen, M, Yerk, G, Phillips, R, Kraemer, S and Srienc, F (1992a) Endosperm mitotic activity and endoreduplication in maize affected by defective kernel mutations. Genome 35, 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowles, R, Yerk, G, Srienc, F and Phillips, R (1992b) Maize endosperm tissue as an endoreduplication system, pp. 65–88 in Setlow, JK (Ed.) Genetic engineering: principles and methods. Boston, MA, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowles, R, Yerk, G, Haas, K and Phillips, R (1997) Maternal effects influencing DNA endoreduplication in developing endosperm of Zea mays. Genome 40, 798–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labombarda, P, Busti, A, Caceres, ME, Pupilli, F and Arcioni, S (2002) An AFLP marker tightly linked to apomixis reveals hemizygosity in a portion of the apomixis-controlling locus in Paspalum simplex. Genome 45, 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, L (1931) A microchemical and morphological study of the developing endosperm of maize. Botanical Gazette 91, 337–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkins, BA, Dilkes, BP, Dante, RA, Coelho, CM, Woo, Ym and Liu, Y (2001) Investigating the hows and whys of DNA endoreduplication. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 183–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laspina, NV, Vega, T, Seijo, JG, González, AM, Martelotto, LG, Stein, J, Podio, M, Ortiz, JPA, Echenique, VC and Quarin, CL (2008) Gene expression analysis at the onset of aposporous apomixis in Paspalum notatum. Plant Molecular Biology 67, 615–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lauria, M, Rupe, M, Guo, M, Kranz, E, Pirona, R, Viotti, A and Lund, G (2004) Extensive maternal DNA hypomethylation in the endosperm of Zea mays. Plant Cell 16, 510–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, JA and Jacobsen, SE (2010) Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nature Reviews Genetics 11, 204–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leblanc, O, Pointe, C and Hernandez, M (2002) Cell cycle progression during endosperm development in Zea mays depends on parental dosage effects. Plant Journal 32, 1057–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, HO, Davidson, JM and Duronio, RJ (2009) Endoreplication: polyploidy with purpose. Genes & Development 23, 2461–2477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C and Song, R (2020) The regulation of zein biosynthesis in maize endosperm. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. doi:10.1007/s00122-019-03520-z.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, Z, Traore, A, Maximova, S and Guiltinan, MJ (1998) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from floral explants of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) using thidiazuron. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant 34, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, A, Hu, B-Q, Xue, Z-Y, Chen, L, Wang, W-X, Song, W-Q, Chen, C-B and Wang, C-G (2011) DNA methylation in genomes of several annual herbaceous and woody perennial plants of varying ploidy as detected by MSAP. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 29, 784–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, B-Y (1977) Ploidy variation in maize endosperm. Journal of Heredity 68, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, MA and Larkins, BA (1993) Endosperm origin, development, and function. Plant Cell 5, 1383–1399.Google Scholar
Lora, J, Yang, X and Tucker, MR (2019) Establishing a framework for female germline initiation in the plant ovule. Journal of Experimental Botany 70, 2937–2949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorenzo-Orts, L, Witthoeft, J, Deforges, J, Martinez, J, Loubéry, S, Placzek, A, Poirier, Y, Hothorn, LA, Jaillais, Y and Hothorn, M (2019) Concerted expression of a cell cycle regulator and a metabolic enzyme from a bicistronic transcript in plants. Nature Plants 5, 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, I and Powell, W (2007) Methods for linkage disequilibrium mapping in crops. Trends in Plant Science 12, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maheshwari, P (1950) An introduction to the embryology of angiosperms (1st edn). New York, McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mambelli, S and Setter, TL (1998) Inhibition of maize endosperm cell division and endoreduplication by exogenously applied abscisic acid. Physiologia Plantarum 104, 266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, M, Permingeat, H, Colono, C, Siena, L, Pupilli, F, Azzaro, C, de Alencar Dusi, DM, de Campos Carneiro, VT, Podio, M and Seijo, JG (2018) The MAP3K-coding QUI-GON JINN (QGJ) gene is essential to the formation of unreduced embryo sacs in Paspalum. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, MI, Abecasis, GR, Cardon, LR, Goldstein, DB, Little, J, Ioannidis, JP and Hirschhorn, JN (2008) Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics 9, 356–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meerow, AW and Snijman, DA (2001) Phylogeny of Amaryllidaceae tribe Amaryllideae based on nrDNA ITS sequences and morphology. American Journal of Botany 88, 2321–2330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Min, Y, Frost, JM and Choi, Y (2019) Nuclear chaperone ASF1 is required for gametogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Scientific Reports 9, 13959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyashita, T, Ohashi, T, Shibata, F, Araki, H and Hoshino, Y (2009) Plant regeneration with maintenance of the endosperm ploidy level by endosperm culture in Lonicera caerulea var. emphyllocalyx. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 98, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montezuma-de-Carvalho, J (1967) The effect of N2O on pollen tube mitosis in styles and its potential significance for inducing haploidy in potato. Euphytica 16, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno-Romero, J, Del Toro-De León, G, Yadav, VK, Santos-González, J and Köhler, C (2019) Epigenetic signatures associated with imprinted paternally expressed genes in the Arabidopsis endosperm. Genome Biology 20, 41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motamayor, JC, Venzon, D, Bajon, C, Sauvanet, A, Grandjean, O, Marchand, M, Bechtold, N, Pelletier, G and Horlow, C (2000) Switch (swi1), an Arabidopsis thaliana mutant affected in the female meiotic switch. Sexual Plant Reproduction 12, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawy, T (2014) Single-cell sequencing. Nature Methods 11, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, T, Tausta, SL, Gandotra, N and Liu, T (2006) Laser microdissection of plant tissue: what you see is what you get. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, DW, Lu, J and Chen, ZJ (2012) Big roles for small RNAs in polyploidy, hybrid vigor, and hybrid incompatibility. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 15, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Normile, D (2008) Reinventing rice to feed the world. Science 321, 330–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novak, F, Afza, R, Van Duren, M, Perea-Dallos, M, Conger, B and Xiaolang, T (1989) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in suspension cultures of dessert (AA and AAA) and cooking (ABB) bananas (Musa spp.). Bio/Technology 7, 154–159.Google Scholar
Ochogavía, A, Galla, G, Seijo, JG, González, AM, Bellucci, M, Pupilli, F, Barcaccia, G, Albertini, E and Pessino, S (2018) Structure, target-specificity and expression of PN_LNC_N13, a long non-coding RNA differentially expressed in apomictic and sexual Paspalum notatum. Plant Molecular Biology 96, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olmedo-Monfil, V, Durán-Figueroa, N, Arteaga-Vázquez, M, Demesa-Arévalo, E, Autran, D, Grimanelli, D, Slotkin, RK, Martienssen, RA and Vielle-Calzada, J-P (2010) Control of female gamete formation by a small RNA pathway in Arabidopsis. Nature 464, 628–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsen, O-A (2020) The modular control of cereal endosperm development. Trends in Plant Science 25, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortiz, JPA, Quarin, CL, Pessino, SC, Acuña, C, Martínez, EJ, Espinoza, F, Hojsgaard, DH, Sartor, ME, Cáceres, ME and Pupilli, F (2013) Harnessing apomictic reproduction in grasses: what we have learned from Paspalum. Annals of Botany 112, 767–787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortiz, JPA, Revale, S, Siena, LA, Podio, M, Delgado, L, Stein, J, Leblanc, O and Pessino, SC (2017) A reference floral transcriptome of sexual and apomictic Paspalum notatum. BMC Genomics 18, 318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paine, JA, Shipton, CA, Chaggar, S, Howells, RM, Kennedy, MJ, Vernon, G, Wright, SY, Hinchliffe, E, Adams, JL and Silverstone, AL (2005) Improving the nutritional value of Golden Rice through increased pro-vitamin A content. Nature Biotechnology 23, 482–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pflieger, S, Lefebvre, V and Causse, M (2001) The candidate gene approach in plant genetics: a review. Molecular Breeding 7, 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pignatta, D, Novitzky, K, Satyaki, P and Gehring, M (2018) A variably imprinted epiallele impacts seed development. PLoS Genetics 14, e1007469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto, SC, Mendes, MA, Coimbra, S and Tucker, MR (2019) Revisiting the female germline and its expanding toolbox. Trends in Plant Science 24, 455–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podio, M, Cáceres, ME, Samoluk, SS, Seijo, JG, Pessino, SC, Ortiz, JPA and Pupilli, F (2014a) A methylation status analysis of the apomixis-specific region in Paspalum spp. suggests an epigenetic control of parthenogenesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 6411–6424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podio, M, Felitti, SA, Siena, LA, Delgado, L, Mancini, M, Seijo, JG, González, AM, Pessino, SC and Ortiz, JPA (2014b) Characterization and expression analysis of SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE (SERK) genes in sexual and apomictic Paspalum notatum. Plant Molecular Biology 84, 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polegri, L, Calderini, O, Arcioni, S and Pupilli, F (2010) Specific expression of apomixis-linked alleles revealed by comparative transcriptomic analysis of sexual and apomictic Paspalum simplex Morong flowers. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 1869–1883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quarin, CL (1999) Effect of pollen source and pollen ploidy on endosperm formation and seed set in pseudogamous apomictic Paspalum notatum. Sexual Plant Reproduction 11, 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarin, CL, Burson, BL and Burton, GW (1984) Cytology of intra-and interspecific hybrids between two cytotypes of Paspalum notatum and P. cromyorrhizon. Botanical Gazette 145, 420–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghavan, V (2006) Double fertilization: embryo and endosperm development in flowering plants. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ramulu, K, Sharma, V, Naumova, T, Dijkhuis, P and van Lookeren Campagne, M (1999) Apomixis for crop improvement. Protoplasma 208, 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rangan, P, Venugopalan, A, Giridhar, P and Ravishankar, G (2011) Somatic embryogenesis and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in Bixa orellana L. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 105, 317–328.Google Scholar
Rangan, P, Furtado, A and Henry, RJ (2016) New evidence for grain specific C4 photosynthesis in wheat. Scientific Reports 6, 31721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rangan, P, Furtado, A and Henry, R (2020a) Transcriptome profiling of wheat genotypes under heat stress during grain-filling. Journal of Cereal Science 91, 102895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rangan, P, Furtado, A, Henry, R and Gaikwad, A (2020b) Development of transcriptome analysis methods in Smithers, G and Knoerzer, K (Eds) Reference module in food science. Australia, Elsevier. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22752-2Google Scholar
Rea, M, Zheng, W, Chen, M, Braud, C, Bhangu, D, Rognan, TN and Xiao, W (2012) Histone H1 affects gene imprinting and DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 71, 776–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rich-Griffin, C, Stechemesser, A, Finch, J, Lucas, E, Ott, S and Schäfer, P (2020) Single-cell transcriptomics: a high-resolution avenue for plant functional genomics. Trends in Plant Science 25, 186–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigo, JM, Zappacosta, DC, Selva, JP, Garbus, I, Albertini, E and Echenique, V (2017) Apomixis frequency under stress conditions in weeping lovegrass (Eragrostis curvula). PLoS ONE 12, e0175852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, M, Florez-Rueda, AM and Städler, T (2019) Differences in effective ploidy drive genome-wide endosperm expression polarization and deed failure in wild tomato hybrids. Genetics 212, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryu, KH, Huang, L, Kang, HM and Schiefelbein, J (2019) Single-cell RNA sequencing resolves molecular relationships among individual plant cells. Plant Physiology 179, 1444–1456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sablowski, R and Carnier Dornelas, M (2014) Interplay between cell growth and cell cycle in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 2703–2714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakai, K, Taconnat, L, Borrega, N, Yansouni, J, Brunaud, V, Paysant-Le Roux, C, Delannoy, E, Magniette, M-LM, Lepiniec, L and Faure, JD (2018) Combining laser-assisted microdissection (LAM) and RNA-Seq allows to perform a comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of epidermal cells of Arabidopsis embryo. Plant Methods 14, 10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santeramo, D, Howell, J, Ji, Y, Yu, W, Liu, W and Kelliher, T (2020) DNA content equivalence in haploid and diploid maize leaves. Planta 251, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šarhanová, P, Vašut, RJ, Dančák, M, Bureš, P and Trávníček, B (2012) New insights into the variability of reproduction modes in European populations of Rubus subgen. Rubus: how sexual are polyploid brambles? Sexual Plant Reproduction 25, 319–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satyaki, PR and Gehring, M (2019) Paternally acting canonical RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway genes sensitize Arabidopsis endosperm to paternal genome dosage. Plant Cell 31, 1563–1578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savidan, Y (2000) Apomixis: genetics and breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 18, 13–86.Google Scholar
Scheid, OM, Jakovleva, L, Afsar, K, Maluszynska, J and Paszkowski, J (1996) A change of ploidy can modify epigenetic silencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93, 7114–7119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, A (2020) Controlling apomixis: shared features and distinct characteristics of gene regulation. Genes 11, 329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schubert, D, Clarenz, O and Goodrich, J (2005) Epigenetic control of plant development by Polycomb-group proteins. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweizer, L, Yerk-Davis, G, Phillips, R, Srienc, F and Jones, RJ (1995) Dynamics of maize endosperm development and DNA endoreduplication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92, 7070–7074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, RJ, Spielman, M, Bailey, J and Dickinson, HG (1998) Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125, 3329–3341.Google ScholarPubMed
Selva, JP, Siena, L, Rodrigo, JM, Garbus, I, Zappacosta, D, Romero, JR, Ortiz, JPA, Pessino, SC, Leblanc, O and Echenique, V (2017) Temporal and spatial expression of genes involved in DNA methylation during reproductive development of sexual and apomictic Eragrostis curvula. Scientific Reports 7, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharbel, TF, Voigt, ML, Corral, JM, Thiel, T, Varshney, A, Kumlehn, J, Vogel, H and Rotter, B (2009) Molecular signatures of apomictic and sexual ovules in the Boechera holboellii complex. Plant Journal 58, 870–882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherwood, R, Berg, C and Young, B (1994) Inheritance of apospory in buffelgrass. Crop Science 34, 1490–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siena, LA, Ortiz, JPA, Calderini, O, Paolocci, F, Cáceres, ME, Kaushal, P, Grisan, S, Pessino, SC and Pupilli, F (2016) An apomixis-linked ORC3-like pseudogene is associated with silencing of its functional homolog in apomictic Paspalum simplex. Journal of Experimental Botany 67, 1965–1978.Google ScholarPubMed
Simkin, AJ, Faralli, M, Ramamoorthy, S and Lawson, T (2020) Photosynthesis in non-foliar tissues: implications for yield. Plant Journal 101, 1001–1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sita, GL, Ram, NR and Vaidyanathan, C (1980) Triploid plants from endosperm cultures of sandalwood by experimental embryogenesis. Plant Science Letters 20, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Q and Chen, ZJ (2015) Epigenetic and developmental regulation in plant polyploids. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 24, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spillane, C, Steimer, A and Grossniklaus, U (2001) Apomixis in agriculture: the quest for clonal seeds. Sexual Plant Reproduction 14, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spillane, C, Curtis, MD and Grossniklaus, U (2004) Apomixis technology development — virgin births in farmers’ fields? Nature Biotechnology 22, 687–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugimoto-Shirasu, K, Roberts, GR, Stacey, NJ, McCann, MC, Maxwell, A and Roberts, K (2005) RHL1 is an essential component of the plant DNA topoisomerase VI complex and is required for ploidy-dependent cell growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 18736–18741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, D-Q, Lu, X-H, Liang, G-L, Guo, Q-G, Mo, Y-W and Xie, J-H (2011) Production of triploid plants of papaya by endosperm culture. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 104, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, H (1950) The constancy of desoxyribose nucleic acid in plant nuclei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 36, 643–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabor, HK, Risch, NJ and Myers, RM (2002) Candidate-gene approaches for studying complex genetic traits: practical considerations. Nature Reviews Genetics 3, 391–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanay, A and Regev, A (2017) Scaling single-cell genomics from phenomenology to mechanism. Nature 541, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, C-Y (1977) Apomixis in sorghum: mode of reproduction, inheritance, and improvement of apomictic frequency. PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station.Google Scholar
Tang, Q, Zang, G, Cheng, C, Luan, M, Dai, Z, Xu, Y, Yang, Z, Zhao, L and Su, J (2017) Diplosporous development in Boehmeria tricuspis: insights from de novo transcriptome assembly and comprehensive expression profiling. Scientific Reports 7, 46043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, Q, Xu, Y, Deng, C, Cheng, C, Dai, Z, Yang, Z, Liu, C and Su, J (2019) A full-length reference floral transcriptome of Boehmeria tricuspis provides insights into apomeiosis and polyploidy. International Journal of Genomics 2019, 4025747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, TD and Chaturvedi, R (2008) Endosperm culture: a novel method for triploid plant production. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 93, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomaszewska, P and Kosina, R (2018) Instability of endosperm development in amphiploids and their parental species in the genus Avena L. Plant Cell Reports 37, 1145–1158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torkamaneh, D, Boyle, B, St-Cyr, J, Légaré, G, Pomerleau, S and Belzile, F (2020) NanoGBS: a miniaturized procedure for GBS library preparation. Frontiers in Genetics 11, 67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trolinder, NL and Goodin, J (1987) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Reports 6, 231–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulecke, W, McGranahan, G and Ahmadi, H (1988) Regeneration by somatic embryogenesis of triploid plants from endosperm of walnut, Juglans regia L. cv Manregian. Plant Cell Reports 7, 301–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valle, Cd, Glienke, C and Leguizamon, G (1994) Inheritance of apomixis in Brachiaria, a tropical forage grass. Apomixis Newsletter 7, 42–43.Google Scholar
Van Thang, B, Van Viet, N, Nam, VQ, Tung, HT and Nhut, DT (2018) Triploid plant regeneration from immature endosperms of Melia azedarach. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 133, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavilov, NI (1922) The law of homologous series in variation. Journal of Genetics 12, 47–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivek, B, Krivanek, A, Palacios-Rojas, N, Twumasi-Afriyie, S and Diallo, A (2008) Breeding quality protein maize (QPM): protocols for developing QPM cultivars. Mexico, CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Von Wangenheim, K (1962) Zur Ursache der Abortion von Samenanlagen in Diploid-Polyploid-Kreuzungen. II. Unterschiedliche Differenzierung von Endospermen mit gleichem Genom. Zeitschrift für Vererbungslehre 93, 319–334.Google Scholar
Wagner, A, Regev, A and Yosef, N (2016) Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics. Nature Biotechnology 34, 1145–1160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, P, Xia, H, Zhang, Y, Zhao, S, Zhao, C, Hou, L, Li, C, Li, A, Ma, C and Wang, X (2015) Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of DNA methylation identifies epigenetic variation across embryo and endosperm in Maize (Zea mays). BMC Genomics 16, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wangenheim, K-HFv (1957) Untersuchungen Über den Zusammenhang zwischen Chromosomenzahl und Kreuzbarkeit bei Solanum-Arten. Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs-und Vererbungslehre 88, 21–37.Google Scholar
Warmke, H (1954) Apomixis in Panicum maximum. American Journal of Botany 41, 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayne, ML and McIntyre, LM (2002) Combining mapping and arraying: an approach to candidate gene identification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 14903–14906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, JH and Friedman, WE (2002) Identification of diploid endosperm in an early angiosperms lineage. Nature 415, 522–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadegari, R and Drews, GN (2004) Female gametophyte development. Plant Cell 16, S133–S141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yakovlev, I, Viejo, M and Fossdal, CG (2020) microRNAs in the formation of epigenetic memory in plants: the case of Norway spruce embryos, pp. 57–72 in Miguel, C; Dalmay, T and Chaves, I (Eds) Plant microRNAs. Concepts and strategies in plant sciences. Switzerland, Springer.Google Scholar
Yan, D, Duermeyer, L, Leoveanu, C and Nambara, E (2014) The functions of the endosperm during seed germination. Plant and Cell Physiology 55, 1521–1533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, B, Sherwood, R and Bashaw, E (1979) Cleared-pistil and thick-sectioning techniques for detecting aposporous apomixis in grasses. Canadian Journal of Botany 57, 1668–1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, J, Xu, F, Wei, Z, Zhang, X, Chen, T and Pu, L (2020) Epigenomic landscape and epigenetic regulation in maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. doi:10.1007/s00122-020-03549-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yudin, B (1966) Experimental induction of marked polyploids in maize and problem in apomixis. Saratovska, Gos.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z, Ersoz, E, Lai, C-Q, Todhunter, RJ, Tiwari, HK, Gore, MA, Bradbury, PJ, Yu, J, Arnett, DK and Ordovas, JM (2010) Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics 42, 355–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y-W, Tamba, CL, Wen, Y-J, Li, P, Ren, W-L, Ni, Y-L, Gao, J and Zhang, Y-M (2020) mrMLM v4. 0: an R platform for multi-locus genome-wide association studies. bioRxiv, 976464.Google Scholar
Zhao, J and Grafi, G (2000) The high mobility group I/Y protein is hypophosphorylated in endoreduplicating maize endosperm cells and is involved in alleviating histone H1-mediated transcriptional repression. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 27494–27499.Google Scholar
Zhou, S (1980) Preliminary study on parthenogenesis in cotton. Acta Genetica Sinica 7, 247–256.Google Scholar
Zhu, M and Zhao, S (2007) Candidate gene identification approach: progress and challenges. International Journal of Biological Sciences 3, 420–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zühl, L, Volkert, C, Ibberson, D and Schmidt, A (2019) Differential activity of F-box genes and E3 ligases distinguishes sexual versus apomictic germline specification in Boechera. Journal of Experimental Botany 70, 5643–5657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed