Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:04:23.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disentangling factors controlling fruit and seed removal by rodents in temperate forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2011

Ramón Perea ,
Alfonso San Miguel  and
Luis Gil
Ramón Perea
Affiliation:
Departamento de Silvopascicultura, ETSI Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040Madrid, Spain
Alfonso San Miguel
Affiliation:
Departamento de Silvopascicultura, ETSI Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040Madrid, Spain
Luis Gil*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Silvopascicultura, ETSI Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040Madrid, Spain
*
*Correspondence Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fleshy fruits fall on to the ground together with cleaned seeds previously ingested by primary dispersers, offering a wide range of fruits and seeds to the ground foragers. Although nutritional properties strongly differ between fruits and seeds, this different seed presentation (cleaned seeds versus seeds within the pulp) has not been addressed in seed removal studies. This study reports on the removal of fruits versus their seeds in five fleshy-fruited species in a temperate forest. We found that rodents removed most of the seeds and partially consumed most of the fruits, preferring seeds to fruits. Rodents bit the fruits to extract the seeds, leaving most of the pulp. We found a preference ranking for the seeds (Sorbus aucuparia>Ilex aquifolium>Sorbus aria>Rosa canina>Crataegus monogyna) but no preferences were found for the fruits, probably due to their similarities in pulp constituents. Seed and fruit choice were affected by chemical and physical properties and not by their size. The presence of alternative and preferred seeds (nuts) delayed the encounter of the fruits and seeds and diminished their removal rates. We found that higher rodent abundance is not necessarily associated with higher removal rates of fleshy fruits. Rodent abundance, fruit size and seed size are minor factors in the removal of fleshy fruits and their seeds. This study underlines that scatter-hoarding rodents are important removers of fleshy fruits and their seeds, producing a differential seed removal depending on the seed presentation (with or without pulp), the nutritional properties of the seeds (but not of the fruits) and the presence of alternative food.

Keywords

food availabilityfruit/seed sizenut cropnutritional propertiesrodent abundancescatter-hoardingseed choice
Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 227 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnea, A., Yom-Tov, Y.andFriedman, J. (1991) Does ingestion by birds affect seed germination? Functional Ecology 5, 394–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.S. and Kotler, B.P. (2004) Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecology Letters 7, 999–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M.J. (2007) The R book. England, Wiley Editorial.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Den Ouden, J., Jansen, P.A. and Smit, R. (2005) Jays, mice and oaks: Predation and dispersal of Quercus robur and Q. petraea in north-western Europe. pp. 223–240in Forget, P.M.; Lambert, J.; Vander Wall, S.B. (Eds) Seed fate. Wallingford, UK, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Fedriani, J.M. and Manzaneda, A.J. (2005) Pre- and postdispersal seed predation by rodents; balance of food and safety. Behavioral Ecology 16, 1018–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, A. (2006) Dinámica forestal del Hayedo de Montejo en la última década mediante comparación de dos inventarios sucesivos. EUIT Forestal. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid.Google Scholar
Gómez, J.M., Puerta-Piñero, C. and Schupp, E.W. (2008) Effectiveness of rodents as local seed dispersers of Holm oaks. Oecologia 155, 529–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera, C.M. (1984) A study of avian frugivores, bird-dispersed plants, and their interaction in Mediterranean scrublands. Ecological Monographs 54, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, C.M. (1987) Vertebrate-dispersed plants of the Iberian Peninsula: a study of fruit characteristics. Ecological Monographs 57, 305–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, C.M. (1989) Frugivory and seed dispersal by carnivorous mammals, and associated fruit characteristics, in undisturbed Mediterranean habitats. Oikos 55, 250–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, H.F. (1989) Scatter- and clump-dispersal and seedling demography: hypothesis and implications. Oecologia 79, 417–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulme, P.E. (1994) Rodent post-dispersal seed predation in grassland: magnitude and sources of variation. Journal of Ecology 82, 645–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, P.E. (1998) Post-dispersal seed predation: consequences for plant demography and evolution. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 1, 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, P.E. and Borelli, T. (1999) Variability in post-dispersal seed predation in deciduous woodland: relative importance of location, seed species, burial and density. Plant Ecology 145, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D.H. (1971) Seed predation by animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2, 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. (1990) Effects of forage availability on home range and population density of Microtus pennsylvanicus. Journal of Mammalogy 71, 382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerley, G.I.H.andErasmus, T. (1991) What do mice select for in seeds? Oecologia 86, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kollmann, J., Coomes, D.A. and White, S.M. (1998) Consistencies in post-dispersal seed predation of temperate fleshy-fruited species among seasons, years and sites. Functional Ecology 12, 683–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C.J. (1999) Ecological methodology (2nd edition). New York, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Lambert, J.E. (2002) Exploring the link between animal frugivory and plant strategies: the case of primate fruit-processing and post-dispersal seed fate. pp. 365–379in Levey, D.J.; Silva, W.R.; Galetti, M. (Eds) Seed dispersal and frugivory: Ecology, evolution and conservation. Wallingford, UK, CAB International.Google Scholar
Obeso, J.R. and Fernández-Calvo, I. (2002) Fruit removal, pyrene dispersal, post-dispersal predation and seedling establishment of a bird-dispersed tree. Plant Ecology 165, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, F., Gil, L. and Pardos, J.A. (2004) Structure and composition of pole-stage stands developed in an ancient wood pasture in central Spain. Forestry 77, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perea, R., San Miguel, A. and Gil, L. (2011) Leftovers in seed dispersal: ecological implications of partial seed consumption for oak regeneration. Journal of Ecology 99, 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puerta-Piñero, C., Gómez, J.M.andSchupp, E.W. (2010) Spatial patterns of acorn dispersal by rodents: do acorn crop size and ungulate presence matter? Oikos 119, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulliainen, E. (1978) The nutritive value of rowan-berries, Sorbus aucuparia L., for birds and mammals. Aquilo, Serie Zoologica 18, 28–32.Google Scholar
Raspé, O., Findlay, C. and Jacquemart, L. (2000) Sorbus aucuparia L. Journal of Ecology 88, 910–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schupp, E.W. (1988) Seed and early seedling predation in the forest understory and in the tree fall gaps. Oikos 51, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, D.W. and Krebs, J.R. (1986) Foraging theory. Monographs in behaviour and ecology. Princeton, USA, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Valbuena-Carabaña, M., González-Martínez, S.C., Sork, V.L., Collada, C., Soto, A., Goicoechea, P.G. and Gil, L. (2005) Gene flow and hybridisation in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl.) in central Spain. Heredity 95, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Wall, S.B. (1990) Food hoarding in animals. Chicago, USA, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vander Wall, S.B. (2001) The evolutionary ecology of nut dispersal. Botanical Review 67, 74–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Wall, S.B. (2003) Effects of seed size of wind-dispersed pines (Pinus) on secondary seed dispersal and the caching behavior of rodents. Oikos 100, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Wall, S.B., Kuhn, K. and Gworek, J. (2005) Two-phase seed dispersal: linking the effects of frugivorous birds and seed-caching rodents. Oecologia 145, 282–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, B. and Chen, J. (2008) An experiment using artificial ‘seeds’. Acta Oecologica 34, 379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willson, M.F. (1993) Mammals as seed-dispersal mutualists in North America. Oikos 67, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Z.S., Zhang, Z.B. and Whang, Y.S. (2005) Effects of seed size on dispersal distance in five rodent-dispersed fagaceous species. Acta Oecologica 28, 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yagihashi, T., Hayashida, M. and Miyamoto, T. (1998) Effects of bird ingestion on seed germination of Sorbus commixta. Oecologia 114, 209–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed