Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:54:58.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of seed quality in spring barley in four environments. I. Germination and longevity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

C. Pieta Filho  and
R. H. Ellis
C. Pieta Filho
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading RG6 2AT, UK
R. H. Ellis*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading RG6 2AT, UK
*
* Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seed development and changes in germination ability and longevity were monitored in control and shaded spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)crops grown in two contrasting years. Shading reduced seed dry matter accumulation rates by 24–28% and delayed maturation drying slightly, but had little effect (0–2 d) on the timing of physiological maturity (end of the seed-filling period); final seed dry weights were 76–85% of controls. Moisture contents (wb) at physiological maturity were 48–55%; final mean seed dry weights in the controls were 40.9 mg(S.E. 0.6) in 1988 and 35.2 mg (S.E. 0.5) in 1989. Shading had little orno effect on germination ability or longevity in either year. Seeds fromthe first harvest were viable when dried below 15% moisture content despite being only 34% (1988) to 63% (1989) filled; desiccation promoted germination. Maximum germination achieved after forced desiccation occurredin seeds harvested 7–10 d (1989) to 11–13 d (1988) after physiological maturity, with little subsequent change during the following 14 (1988) or 27 d (1989). Longevity continued to increase during development until a maximum was reached 18–20 d (1988) to 27 d (1989) after physiological maturity (at moisture contents on the mother plant of 18–19% and 14–15%, respectively). In both years, the longevity of these seeds was greater (P<0.005) than that of seeds harvested either subsequently or earlier at physiological maturity. The results contradict the hypothesis that maximum seed quality coincides with physiological maturity and thereafter declines. Rather, maximum seed quality was attained close to when barley seed crops can be combine harvested The subsequent decline in potential longevity on the maternal plant in the field was quantitatively similar to that expected during post-harvest storage.

Keywords

barley desiccation germinationHordeum vulgare L.seed developmentseed longevityseed quality
Type
Research Papers
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 163 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: Empresa Catarinense de Pesquisa Agropecuária EMPASC, Caixa Postal 1460.88001, Florianópolis/SC/Brazil.

References

Anon. (1985a) International rules for seed testing. Rules 1985. Seed Science and Technology 13, 299–355.Google Scholar
Anon. (1985b) International rules for seed testing. Annexes 1985. Seed Science and Technology 13, 356–513.Google Scholar
Austin, R.B. (1972) Effects of environment beforeharvesting on viability. pp. 115–149 in Roberts, E.H. (Ed.) Viability of seeds. London, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Baker, R.J., and Nelder, J.A. (1978) The GLIM system, Release 3. Oxford, Numerical Algorithms Group.Google Scholar
Brewer, D.H. and Poehlman, J.M. (1968) Grain yield and kernel quality of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) harvested at different moisture levels. Agronomy Journal 60, 472–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C.C., Andrews, C.H., Baskin, C.C. and Delouche, J.C. (1972) Influence of quality f seed on growth, development and productivity of some horticulturalcrops. Proceedings of the International Seed Testing Association 37, 923–939.Google Scholar
Delouche, J.C. (1980) Environment effects on seed development and seed quality. HortScience 15, 775–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.H. (1988) The viability equation, seed viability nomographs, and practical adviceon seed storage. Seed Science and Technology 16, 29–50.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.H. and Roberts, E.H. (1980a) Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity. Annals of Botany 45, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.H. and Roberts, E.H. (1980b) The influence of temperature and moisture on seed viability period in barley (Hordeum distichum L.). Annals of Botany 45, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.H. and Roberts, E.H. (1980c) Towards a rational basis for testing seed quality. pp. 605–635 in Hebblethewaite, P.D. (Ed.) Seed production. London, Butterworths.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.H. and Roberts, E.H. (1981a) Aninvestigation into the possible effects of ripeness and repeated threshing on barley seed longevity under six different storage environments. Annals of Botany 48, 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.H. and Roberts, E.H. (1981b) The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Science and Technology 9, 373–409.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.H., Hong, T.D. and Roberts, E.H. (1987) Comparison of cumulative germination and rate of germination of dormant and aged barley seed lots at different constant tempertures. Seed Science and Technology 15, 717–727.Google Scholar
Evans, L.T. (1978) The influence of irradiance before and after anthesis on grain yield and its components in microcrops of wheat grown in a constant day length and temperature regime. Field Crops Research 1, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlan, H.V. (1920) Daily development of kernelsof Hannchen barley from flowering to maturity at Aberdeen, Idaho. Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 393–429.Google Scholar
Harlan, H.V. (1923) Water content of barley kernels during growth and maturation. Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 333–360.Google Scholar
Harlan, H.V. and Pope, M.N. (1922) The germinationof barley seeds harvested at different stages of growth. Journal of Heredity 13, 72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J.F. (1972) Seed storage and longevity. pp. 145–245 in Kozlowski, T.T. (Ed.) Seed biology. Vol.III. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, F.A., Crowe, J.H. and Crowe, L.M. (1990 Membrane behaviour in drought and its physiological significance. pp.71–88 in Taylorson, R.B. (Ed.) Recentadvances in the development and germination of seeds. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Housley, T.L., Kirleis, A.W., Ohm, H.W. and Patterson, F.L. (1982) Dry matter accumulation in soft red winter wheat seeds. Crop Science 22, 290–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kameswara Rao, N., Appa Rao, S., Mengesha, M.H. and Ellis, R.H. Longevity of pearl millet seeds harvested at different stages of maturity. Annals of Applied Biology (in press).Google Scholar
Kaufmann, M.L. (1984) Optimum seed size. pp. 1–22 in Gupta, U.S. (Ed.) Crop physiology: advancing frontiers. India, Oxford and IBH Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kay, F.F. (1936) A soil survey of the University Farm, Sonning, Berkshire. Reading, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Maguire, J.D. (1977) Seed quality and germination. pp. 219–235 in Khan, A.A. (Ed.) The physiology and biochemistry of seed dormancy and germination.Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. (1980) Controlled deterioration: a new vigour test for crop seeds. pp. 647–660 in Hebblethwaite, P.D. (Ed.) Seed production. London, Butterworths.Google Scholar
Parkes, M.E., Legesse, N. and Don, R. (1990) Assumptions used with the seed viability equation. Seed Science and Technology 18, 653–660.Google Scholar
Perry, D.A. (1980) Seed vigour and seedling establishment. Advances in Research and Technology of Seeds 5, 25–40.Google Scholar
Pieta Filho, C. and Ellis, R.H. (1991) The development of seed quality in spring barley in four environments. II. Field emergence and seedling size. Seed Science Research 1, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieta Filho, C. and Ellis, R.H. Estimating the value of the seed lot constant (K i) of the seed viability equation in barley and wheat. Seed Science and Technology 1, 169–175.Google Scholar
Pinthus, M.J. (1963) Comparison of dry matter accumulation and moisture content in the developing kernels of bread wheat, durum wheat, and barley. Israel Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 117–123.Google Scholar
Powell, A.A. and Matthews, S. (1978) The damaging effect of water on dry pea embryos during imbibition. Journal of Experimental Botany 29, 1215–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, A.A., Matthews, S. and Oliveira, M. De A. (1984) Seed quality in grain legumes. Advances in Applied Biology 10, 217–285.Google Scholar
Rasyad, D.A., Van Sanford, D.A. and TeKrony, D.M. (1990) Changes in seed viability and vigour during wheat seed maturation. Seed Science and Technology 18, 259–267.Google Scholar
Roberts, E.H. (1972) Storage environment and thecontrol of viability. pp. 14–58 in Roberts, E.H. (Ed.) Viability of seeds. London, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E.H. and Ellis, R.H. (1989) Water and seed survival. Annals of Botany 63, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shands, H.L., Janisch, D.C. and Dickson, A.D. (1967) Germination response of barley following different harvesting conditions and storage treatments. Crop Science 7, 444–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, R.H. and Loomis, W.E. (1950) Bases for the prediction of corn yields. Plant Physiology 25, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willey, R.W. and Holliday, R. (1971a) Plant population and shading studies in barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R.W. and Holliday, R. (1971b) Plant population and shading studies in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 453–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T. and Kouzak, C.F. (1974) A decimal code for the growth of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar