Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:20:11.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A critique of current trends in the statistical analysis of seed germination and viability data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

Gudeta W. Sileshi
Gudeta W. Sileshi*
Affiliation:
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), SADC-ICRAF Agroforestry Programme, PO Box 30798, Lilongwe, Malawi
*
*Correspondence Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Statistical analysis is increasingly used in seed germination/viability studies across different disciplines. The objective of this opinion piece is to assess current trends in statistical analysis of such data, and draw attention of readers to the limitations of the usual inferential statistics in controlling error rates. The assessments are based on a survey of 429 papers published in 139 peer-reviewed journals in the past 11 years. My intention is to identify areas of concern across a wide range of studies. Accordingly, the areas of greatest concern found in the analysis of percentage seed germination and viability data were: (1) pseudoreplication and/or use of a few replicates; (2) ignoring assumptions of ANOVA and non-parametric tests (NPARTs); (3) uncritical data transformation; (4) arbitrary choice of multiple comparison tests; and (5) lack of emphasis on effect sizes. Given the prevalence of these problems, in my opinion we would be building a body of knowledge on a shaky ground. The discussions that follow will: (1) describe situations where germination data violate assumptions of ANOVA and NPARTs; (2) highlight the implications of the various problems to Type I and Type II error rates; and (3) indicate remedial measures based on the recent statistical literature.

Keywords

ANOVAconservationfalse discovery rategeneralized linear mixed modelsgeneralized linear modelsinvasive alienspseudoreplication
Type
Research Opinion
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 145 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahrens, W.H., Cox, D.J. and Budhwar, G. (1990) Use of the arcsine and square root transformations for subjectively determined percentage data. Weed Science 38, 452–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, R. and Lange, S. (2001) Adjusting for multiple testing – when and how? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 54, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolker, B.M., Brooks, M.E., Clark, C.J., Geange, S.W., Poulsen, J.R., Stevens, M.H.H. and White, J.S.S. (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24, 127–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cribbie, R.A. and Keselman, H.J. (2003) The effects of non-normality on parametric, nonparametric, and model comparison approaches to pair-wise comparisons. Educational and Psychological Measurement 63, 615–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, R.W. and Quinn, G.P. (1989) Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecological Monographs 59, 433–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A.J. (2001) An introduction to generalized linear models (2nd edition). London, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Fagerland, M.W. and Sandvik, L. (2009) The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test under scrutiny. Statistics in Medicine 28, 1487–1497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feise, R.J. (2002) Do multiple outcome measures require P-value adjustment? BMC Medical Research Methodology 2, 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figuerola, J., Green, A.J. and Santamaría, L. (2002) Comparative dispersal effectiveness of wigeongrass seeds by waterfowl wintering in south-west Spain: quantitative and qualitative aspects. Journal of Ecology 90, 989–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, L.V. (2004) Escaping the Bonferroni iron claw in ecological studies. Oikos 105, 657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godefroid, S., Van de Vyver, A. and Vanderborght, T. (2010) Germination capacity and viability of threatened species collections in seed banks. Biodiversity and Conservation 19, 1365–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hara, Y. (2005) Estimating the temperature dependence of germination time by assuming multiple rate-determining steps. Plant Production Science 8, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, J.W. and Hilbe, J.M. (2007) Generalized linear models and extensions (2nd edition). College Station, Texas, Stata Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S.K., Regnier, E.E., Schmoll, J.T. and Harrison, J.M. (2007) Seed size and burial effects on giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) emergence and seed demise. Weed Science 55, 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, J.C. (1996) Multiple comparisons. London, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, S.H. (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54, 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T.F. (2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 434–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, D.H. (1995) Statistical sirens: the lure of nonparametrics. Ecology 76, 1998–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keselman, H.J., Cribbie, R. and Holland, B. (1999) The pairwise multiple comparison multiplicity problem: an alternative approach to familywise and comparisonwise Type I error control. Psychological Methods 4, 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A. and Rayner, G.D. (2003) Robustness to non-normality of common tests for the many-sample location problem. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences 7, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikvidze, Z. and Moya-Laraño, J. (2008) Unexpected failures of recommended tests in basic statistical analyses of ecological data. Web Ecology 8, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littell, R.C. (2002) Analysis of unbalanced mixed model data: a case study comparison of ANOVA versus REML/GLS. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 7, 472–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, C. and Searle, S. (2001) Generalized, linear and mixed models. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
McGuinness, K.A. (2002) Of rowing boats, ocean liners and tests of the ANOVA homogeneity of variance assumption. Austral Ecology 27, 681–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R.G. (1986) Beyond ANOVA: Basics of applied statistics. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Moder, K. (2010) Alternatives to F-test in one way ANOVA in case of heterogeneity of variances (a simulation study). Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling 52, 343–353.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. and Morris, E. (2000) Pseudoreplication in experimental designs for the manipulation of seed germination treatments. Austral Ecology 25, 292–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onofri, A., Gresta, F. and Tei, F. (2010) A new method for the analysis of germination and emergence data of weed species. Weed Research 50, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piepho, H.-P. (2003) The folded exponential transformation for proportions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series D) 52, 575–589.Google Scholar
Potvin, C. and Roff, D. (1993) Distribution-free methods: viable alternatives to parametric statistics. Ecology 74, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranal, M.A. and De Santana, D.G. (2006) How and why to measure the germination process? Revista Brasileira de Botânica 29, 1–11.Google Scholar
Rasch, D., Kubinger, K.D. and Moder, K. (2011) The two-sample t test: pre-testing its assumptions does not pay off. Statistical Papers 52, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razali, N. M, . and Wah, Y.B. (2011) Power comparisons of Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson–Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics 2, 21–33.Google Scholar
Shaffer, J.P. (1995) Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology 46, 561–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sileshi, G. (2007) Evaluation of statistical procedures for efficient analysis of insect, disease and weed abundance and incidence data. East African Journal of Science 1, 1–9.Google Scholar
Simons, A.M. and Johnston, M.O. (2006) Environmental and genetic sources of diversification in the timing of seed germination: implications for the evolution of bet hedging. Evolution 60, 2280–2292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, K. and Ooi, M.K.J. (2010) To germinate or not to germinate: more than just a question of dormancy. Seed Science Research 20, 209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tielbörger, K. and Prasse, R. (2009) Do seeds sense each other? Testing for density-dependent germination in desert perennial plants. Oikos 118, 792–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryon, W.W. and Lewis, C. (2009) Evaluating independent proportions for statistical difference, equivalence, indeterminacy, and trivial difference using inferential confidence intervals. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 34, 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valcu, M. and Valcu, C.-M. (2011) Data transformation practices in biomedical sciences. Nature Methods 8, 104–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waite, T.A. and Campbell, L.G. (2006) Controlling the false discovery rate and increasing statistical power in ecological studies. Ecoscience 13, 439–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L. and Zhou, X.H. (2005) A fully nonparametric diagnostic test for homogeneity of variances. Canadian Journal of Statistics 33, 545–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warton, D. and Hui, F. (2011) The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology 92, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, D.W. (2004) Inflation of type I error rates by unequal variances associated with parametric, nonparametric, and rank-transformation tests. Psicológica 25, 103–133.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D.W. (2011) Inheritance of properties of normal and non-normal distributions after transformation of scores to ranks. Psicológica 32, 65–85.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sileshi supplementary material

Sileshi supplementary material

Download Sileshi supplementary material(File)
File 18.6 KB