Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:58:42.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subcellular organization and metabolic activity during the development of seeds that attain different levels of desiccation tolerance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Jill M. Farrant ,
N. W. Pammenter ,
Patricia Berjak  and
Christina Walters
Jill M. Farrant
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch, 7700South Africa
N. W. Pammenter*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Natal, Durban, 4041South Africa
Patricia Berjak
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Natal, Durban, 4041South Africa
Christina Walters
Affiliation:
USDA Agricultural Research Service, National Seed Storage Laboratory, 1111 S. Mason Street, Fort Collins, CO 80521–4500, USA
*
*Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Water contents, desiccation tolerance, respiratory rates and subcellular characteristics of three contrasting seed types were studied during development. Avicennia marina (a tropical wetland species) and Aesculus hippocastanum (a temperate species) produce recalcitrant seeds and Phaseolus vulgaris produces orthodox seeds. During development, A. hippocastanum and P. vulgaris seeds showed a decline in water content and respiration rate with a concomitant increase in desiccation tolerance. These parameters did not change during the development of A. marina seeds once they had become germinable. There was a decrease in the degree of vacuolation and an increase in the deposition of insoluble reserves in A. hippocastanum and P. vulgaris seeds, while A. marina seeds remained highly vacuolated and did not accumulate insoluble reserves. Mitochondria and endomembranes degenerated during the development of A. hippocastanum and P. vulgaris seeds, but remained unchanged in A. marina seeds. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that extensive vacuolation and high metabolic rates contribute to desiccation sensitivity. However, the development of recalcitrant A. hippocastanum seeds is similar to that of orthodox P. vulgaris seeds. These data are in accord with the concept of seed recalcitrance being a consequence of truncated development. The results suggest that there may be three categories of seeds: orthodox seeds which develop desiccation tolerance, seeds which show similar development to orthodox seeds, but are shed before desiccation tolerance is well developed, and seeds which show no developmental trends giving rise to increased tolerance.

Keywords

desiccation tolerancedevelopmentorthodoxrecalcitrantseed
Type
Physiology
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 135 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berjak, P., Dini, M. and Pammenter, N.W. (1984) Possible mechanisms underlying the differing dehydration responses in recalcitrant and orthodox seeds desiccation associated subcellular changes in propagules of Avicennia marina. Seed Science and Technology 12, 365–384.Google Scholar
Berjak, P., Farrant, J.M. and Pammenter, N.W. (1989) The basis of recalcitrant seed behaviour: cell biology of the homoiohydrous seed condition. pp 89–108in Taylorson, R.B (Ed.) Recent advances in the development and germination of seeds. New York, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berjak, P., Farrant, J.M., Mycock, D.J. and Pammenter, N.W. (1990) Recalcitrant (homoiohydrous) seeds: the enigma of their desiccation sensitivity. Seed Science and Technology 18, 297–310.Google Scholar
Berjak, P., Pammenter, N.W. and Vertucci, C.W. (1992) Homoiohydrous (recalcitrant) seeds: developmental status, desiccation sensitivity and the state of water in axes of Landolphia kirkii Dyer. Planta 186, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berjak, P., Vertucci, C.W. and Pammenter, N.W. (1993) Desiccation-sensitive (recalcitrant) seeds: effects of developmental status and dehydration rate on characteristics of water and desiccation-sensitivity in Camellia sinensis. Seed Science Research 3, 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, J.D. and Black, M. (1994) Seeds. Physiology of development and germination. Second edition. New York, London, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drennan, P.M. andBerjak, P. (1982) Degeneration of the salt glands accompanying foliar maturation in Avicennia marina (Forsskål) Vierh. New Phytologist 90, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.H., Hong, T.D. and Roberts, E.H. (1990) An intermediate category of seed storage behaviour? I. Coffee. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 1167–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Berjak, P. and Pammenter, N.W. (1985) The effect of drying rate on viability retention of recalcitrant propagules of Avicennia marina. South African Journal of Botany 51, 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1986) The increasing desiccation sensitivity of recalcitrant Avicennia marinaseeds with storage time. Physiologia Plantarum 67, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1988) Recalcitrance — a current assessment. Seed Science and Technology 16, 155–166.Google Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1989) Germination-associated events and the desiccation sensitivity of recalcitrant seeds — a study on three unrelated species. Planta 178, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1992) Development of the recalcitrant (homoiohydrous) seeds of Avicennia marina: anatomical, ultrastructural and biochemical events associated with development from histodifferentiation to maturation. Annals of Botany 70, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1993a) A contribution to an understanding of desiccation tolerance from a study of desiccation-sensitive seed species. pp 715–722in Côme, D. and Corbineau, F. (Eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on seeds: basic and applied aspects of seed biology. Paris, AFSIS.Google Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Berjak, P. and Pammenter, N.W. (1993b) Studies on the development of the desiccation-sensitive (recalcitrant) seeds of Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh.: the acquisition of germinability and response to storage and dehydration. Annals of Botany 71, 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Berjak, P., Vertucci, C.W., Farnsworth, E. and Pammenter, N.W. (1996) Presence of dehydrin-like proteins and levels of abscisic acid in recalcitrant (desiccation sensitive) seeds may be related to habitat. Seed Science Research 6, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch-Savage, W.E. (1992) Seed development in the recalcitrant species Quercus robur L.: germinability and desiccation tolerance. Seed Science Research 2, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch-Savage, W.E., Blake, P.S. and Clay, A.H. (1996) Desiccation stress in recalcitrant Quercus robur L seeds results in lipid peroxidation and increased synthesis of jasmonates and abscisic acid. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 661–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, D.J. and Ludlow, M.M. (1986) Contribution of osmotic adjustment to the dehydration tolerance of water stressed pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 9, 33–40.Google Scholar
Hong, T.D. and Ellis, R.H. (1990) A comparison of maturation-drying, germination and desiccation tolerance between developing seeds of Acer pseudoplatanus L. and Acer platanoides L.. New Phytologist 116, 589–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, T.D. and Ellis, R.H. (1996) A protocol to determine seed storage behaviour. Technical Bulletin No. 1. Engels, J.M.M. and Toll, J. (Eds) Rome, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Kovach, D. and Bradford, K.J. (1992) Imbibitional damage and desiccation tolerance of wild rice (Zizania palustris) seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 43, 747–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, J. (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Volume II. Water, radiation, salt and other stresses. Second edition. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, S.R., Dale, R.M.K. and Sussex, I.M. (1981) Maturation and germination of Phaseolus vulgaris embryonic axes in culture. Planta 153, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pammenter, N.W., Farrant, J.M. and Berjak, P. (1984) Recalcitrant seeds: short term storage effects in Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. may be germination associated. Annals of Botany 54, 843–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pammenter, N.W., Vertucci, C.W. and Berjak, P. (1991)Homeohydrous (recalcitrant) seeds: dehydration, the state of water and viability characteristics in Landolphia kirkii. Plant Physiology 96, 1093–1098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pammenter, N.W., Berjak, P., Farrant, J.M., Smith, M.T. and Ross, G. (1994) Why do stored hydrated recalcitrant seeds die? Seed Science Research 4, 187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompsett, P.B. and Pritchard, H.W. (1993) Water status changes during development in relation to the germination and desiccation tolerance of Aesculus hippocastanum L. seeds. Annals of Botany 71, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertucci, C.W. and Farrant, J.M. (1995) Acquisition and loss of desiccation tolerance. pp 237–271in Kigel, J. and Galili, G. (Eds) Seed development and germination. New York, Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar