Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:41:55.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed science in the 21st century: rights that scientists have to deal with

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Niels Louwaars
Niels Louwaars*
Affiliation:
Centre for Genetic Resources, Wageningen UR, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Law and Governance, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
*Correspondence Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seed researchers, like anybody else working with materials containing genes, have to deal with a variety of rules. Their ‘freedom to operate’ does not only depend on intellectual property rights but also on various rights arising from biodiversity policies and possibly traditional knowledge. The most relevant are, however, patents on both materials and biotechnologies. It is in this field that recent developments indicate that the pendulum of ever-increasing levels of rights has started to swing back a little. This is due to recent court cases both in the USA and Europe, and emerging political debates in various countries. After describing the general policy arena involving national sovereign rights, private rights and ‘group-rights’ we focus on recent trends in the patent system. Seed scientists hardly even had to deal with such rights in the past, but in the 21st century they need to be aware of their implications.

Keywords

biodiversity rightsgenetic resourcesintellectual property rightspoliciesseeds
Type
Review Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 22 , Supplement S1: Seed Science in the 21st Century , February 2012 , pp. S9 - S14
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bobrow, M. and Thomas, S. (2000) Patents in a genetic age. Nature 409, 763–764.Google Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) Nagoya Protocol. Available at http://www.cbd.int/abs/ (accessed 22 November 2011).Google Scholar
De Jonge, B. and Louwaars, N. (2009) Valorizing science: whose values? EMBO Reports 10, 535–539.Google Scholar
FAO (1985) International undertaking on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Available at www.fao.org/ag//CGRFA/iu.htm (accessed 22 November 2011).Google Scholar
FAO (2001) International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Available at www.planttreaty.org (accessed 22 November 2011).Google Scholar
Heller, M. and Eisenberg, R. (1998) Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280, 698–701.Google Scholar
Le Buanec, B. (2007) Evolution of the seed industry in the past three decades. Presentation at the 2007 ISTA Congress. ISTA News Bulletin 134, October 2007.Google Scholar
Louwaars, N. (2006) Ethics Watch: controls over plant genetic resources – a double-edged sword. Nature Reviews Genetics 7, 241.Google Scholar
Louwaars, N., Dons, H., van Overwalle, G., Raven, H., Eaton, A.A.D. and Nelis, A. (2009) Breeding business. The future of plant breeding in the light of developments in patent rights and plant breeder's rights. CGN-Report 2009-14. Wageningen, Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands. 65 pp.Google Scholar
Ludwig, S.P. and Chumney, J.C. (2003) No room for experiment; the Federal Circuit's narrow construction of the experimental use defense. Nature Biotechnology 21, 453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Octaviani, A. (2010) Biotechnology in Brazil; promoting open innovation. pp. 79–101 in Shaver, L. (Ed.) Access to knowledge in Brazil; new research in intellectual property, innovation and development. London & New York, Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Plantum (2009) Plantum NL position on patents – and plant breeder's rights. Available at http://www.plantum.nl/plantum/documenten/Standpunt%20Octrooi%20en%20Kwekersrecht%20samenvatting%20ENG.pdf (accessed 22 November 2011).Google Scholar
Reitzig, M. (2004) The private values of ‘Thickets’ and ‘Fences’: towards an updated picture of the use of patents across industries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13, 457–476.Google Scholar
Waltz, E. (2009) Under wraps. Nature Biotechnology 27, 880–882.Google Scholar