Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:17:06.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed bank of an invasive alien, Heracleum mantegazzianum, and its seasonal dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

Lukáš Krinke ,
Lenka Moravcová ,
Petr Pyšek ,
Vojtěch Jarošík ,
Jan Pergl  and
Irena Perglová
Lukáš Krinke
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01, Praha, 2, Czech Republic
Lenka Moravcová
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Petr Pyšek*
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic Department of Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 01, Praha, 2, Czech Republic
Vojtěch Jarošík
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic Department of Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 01, Praha, 2, Czech Republic
Jan Pergl
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Irena Perglová
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic
*
*Correspondence Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The seed bank of Heracleum mantegazzianum, native to the western Caucasus and invasive in Europe, was studied in the Slavkovský les Protected Landscape Area, the Czech Republic, during the course of two growing seasons. In each of seven study sites with dominating stands of the species, soil samples were taken in October (after the fruit release), April (before germination) and June–July (before the fruit release). Ten samples were taken from each site using a soil hand bore, 4.6 cm in diameter. Seeds elutriated from the samples were immediately germinated in laboratory conditions (10°C, 12 h light/12 h dark); those that germinated during 1 month were considered as non-dormant. Non-germinated but viable seeds, tested for viability by tetrazolium, were considered as dormant. The number of dead seeds was also recorded. The total number of seeds significantly increased with mean density of flowering plants at a site. Of the total variation in seed-bank size, about four-fifths were attributed to that among sites, and one-fifth to that within sites. The number and proportion of living seeds differed significantly between years in summer, but not in autumn and spring. Total number and the numbers of dormant, non-dormant, living and dead seeds significantly differed among the autumn, spring and summer samples. The percentage of living seeds in the total seed bank decreased from 56% in autumn to 42% in spring to 15% in summer. The percentage of non-dormant seeds among those living was 0.3% in autumn, it increased to 87.5% in the spring sample, and decreased to 3% in summer. Pooled across all sites, the average seed numbers (expressed per m2) were 6719±4119 (mean±SD) in autumn, 4907±2278 in spring and 1301±1036 in summer for the total number of seeds, and 3759±2906, 2044±1198 and 192±165, respectively, for living seeds. The majority of seeds (95%) were concentrated in the upper 5 cm soil layer. However, some seeds were present in lower soil layers, which indicates a short-term persistent seed bank. The present data are the first quantitative estimate of the seed bank in H. mantegazzianum, and show that the reproductive potential of the species is enormous, which seems to be a crucial feature of its invasion success.

Keywords

ApiaceaedormancygerminationHeracleum mantegazzianumplant invasionsseasonal dynamicsseed bank
Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 239 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, U.V. and Calov, B. (1996) Long-term effects of sheep grazing on giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum). Hydrobiologia 340, 277–284.Google Scholar
Baker, H.G. (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. pp. 147–169in Baker, H.G.;Stebbins, G.L. (Eds) The genetics of colonizing species. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (1998) Seeds. Ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Box, G.E.P. and Cox, D.R. (1964) An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 26, 211–252.Google Scholar
Box, G.E.P. and Cox, D.R. (1982) An analysis of transformations revisited. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77, 209–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffrey, J.M. (1999) Phenology and long-term control of Heracleum mantegazzianum. Hydrobiologia 415, 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J.H. (1980) Diversity and coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of the competition past. Oikos 35, 131–138.Google Scholar
Crawley, M.J. (1993) GLIM for ecologists. London, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Drever, J.C. and Hunter, J.A. (1970) Giant hogweed dermatitis. Scottish Medical Journal 15, 315–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forcella, F., Wood, J.T. and Dillon, S.P. (1986) Characteristics distinguishing invasive weeds in Echium. Weed Research 26, 351–364.Google Scholar
Holub, J. (1997) Heracleum – bolševník pp. 386–395in Slavík, J. J., Chrtek, J. Jr;Tomšovic, P. (Eds.) Květena České republiky 5. Praha, Academia.Google Scholar
Kalamees, R. and Zobel, M. (2002) The role of the seed bank in gap regeneration in a calcareous grassland community. Ecology 83, 1017–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, R.M. and Crawley, M.J. (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17, 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kos, J. and Maršáková, M. (1997) Chráněná území České republiky Praha, Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny.Google Scholar
Kubát, K. and Jehlík, V. (2003) Persicaria pensylvanica in the Czech Republic. Preslia 75, 183–188.Google Scholar
Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T. and Simpson, R.L. (1989) Ecology of soil seed banks. London. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liška, J. and Soldán, Z. (2004) Alien vascular plants recorded from the Barentsburg and Pyramiden settlements, Svalbard. Preslia 76, 279–290.Google Scholar
Lundström, H. (1989) New experience of the fight against the giant hogweed, Heracleum mantegazzianum. pp. 51–58 in Weeds and weed control. 30th Swedish Crop Protection Conference 2. Uppsala, Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences.Google Scholar
Mandák, B., Pyšek, P. and Bímová, K. (2004) History of the invasion and distribution of Reynoutria taxa in the Czech Republic: a hybrid spreading faster than its parents. Preslia 76, 15–64.Google Scholar
Mandenova, I.P. (1950) Kavkazskye vidy roda Heracleum. Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoj SSR.Google Scholar
Matus, G., Verhagen, R. and Bekker, R.M. (2001) Soil seed bank and vegetation composition of two fen-meadow stands in the Netherlands. Acta Botanica Hungarica 43, 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeely, J.A., Mooney, H.A., Neville, L.E., Schei, P.J. and Waage, J.K. (2001) Global strategy on invasive alien species. Gland, Switzerland, IUCN.Google Scholar
Mihulka, S., Pyšek, P. and Pyšek, A. (2003) Oenothera coronifera, a new alien species for the Czech flora, and Oenothera stricta, recorded again after nearly two centuries. Preslia 75, 263–270.Google Scholar
Moravcová, L., Perglová, I., Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V. and Pergl, J. (2005) Effects of fruit position on fruit mass and seed germination in the alien species Heracleum mantegazzianum (Apiaceae) and the implications for its invasion. Acta Oecologica (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J.K. (1978) Distribution of giant cow parsnip (Heracleum mantegazzianum) in Canada. Canadian Field Naturalist 92, 182–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müllerová, J., Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V. and Pergl, J. (2005) Aerial photographs as a tool for assessing regional dynamics of the invasive plant species Heracleum mantegazzianum. Journal of Applied Ecology (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochsmann, J. (1996) Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier et Levier (Apiaceae) in Deutschland: Untersuchungen zur Biologie, Verbreitung, Morphologie und Taxonomie. Feddes Repertorium 107, 557–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petřík, P. (2003) Cyperus eragrostis – a new alien species for the Czech flora and the history of its invasion of Europe. Preslia 75, 17–28.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P. (1991) Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republic: the dynamics of spreading from the historical perspective. Folia Geobotanica and Phytotaxonomica 26, 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyšek, P. and Prach, K. (1993) Plant invasions and the role of riparian habitats: a comparison of four species alien to central Europe. Journal of Biogeography 20, 413–420.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P. and Pyšek, A. (1995) Invasion by Heracleum mantegazzianum in different habitats in the Czech Republic. Journal of Vegetation Science 6, 711–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyšek, P., Kučera, T., Puntieri, J. and Mandák, B. (1995) Regeneration in Heracleum mantegazzianum: response to removal of vegetative and generative parts. Preslia 67, 161–171.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P., Kopecký, M., Jarošík, V. and Kotková, P. (1998) The role of human density and climate in the spread of Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Central European landscape. Diversity and Distributions 4, 9–16.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P., Sádlo, J. and Mandák, B. (2002) Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 74, 97–186.Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M. (1996) A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biological Conservation 78, 171–181.Google Scholar
Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M.G., Panetta, F.D. and West, C.J. (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6, 93–107.Google Scholar
Roy, J. (1990) In search of the characteristics of plant invaders. pp. 335–352in di Castri, F.;Hansen, A.J.;Debussche, M. (Eds) Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry. New York, Freeman.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. (1986) Seeds and seed banks. New Phytologist 106, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K. (1992) The functional ecology of seed banks. pp. 231–258in Fenner, M. (Ed.) Seeds: The ecology of regeneration in plant communities. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Thompson, K., Bakker, J.P. and Bekker, R.M. (1997) The soil seed banks of north west Europe: Methodology, density and longevity. CambridgeCambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tiley, G.E.D., Dodd, F.S. and Wade, P.M. (1996) Biological flora of the British Isles. 190. Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier et Levier. Journal of Ecology 84, 297–319.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1997) Experiments in ecology: Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, M.H. (1996) Biological invasions. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Yamamura, K. (1999) Transformation using (x +0.5) to stabilize the variance of populations. Researches on Population Ecology 41, 229–234.Google Scholar