Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:49:04.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conifer seed germination is faster after membrane tube invigoration than after prechilling or osmotic priming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Bruce Downie*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Botany, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, NIG 2W1, Canada
Urban Bergsten
Affiliation:
Dept. of Silviculture, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83, Umeå, Sweden
Ben S. P. Wang
Affiliation:
National Tree Seed Centre, Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Forestry Canada, Chalk River, Ontario, K0J 1J0, Canada
J. Derek Bewley
Affiliation:
Dept. of Botany, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, NIG 2W1, Canada
*
* Correspondence

Abstract

Two different pre-emergence treatments preventing radicle protrusion by limiting the extent of imbibition were tested on conifer seeds. Osmotic priming in solutions of polyethylene glycol (PEG) which prevented radicle protrusion during prolonged (3 weeks) treatment resulted in variable percentage germination, mean germination time, and coefficient of uniformity of germination among different seedlots when placed on water. All three germination parameters were either unchanged or inferior in seeds subjected to the various PEG concentrations, treatment temperatures and treatment durations when compared with prechilled controls. In contrast, white spruce and jack pine seeds invigorated at 30% moisture content and 15°C in Gore-Tex membrane tubes consistently germinated faster than prechilled control seeds when subsequently placed on water. Tube invigoration affected neither the ability of seeds to complete germination nor the uniformity of germination. The decrease in mean germination time as treatment duration progressed was always linear and plateaued at approximately 4 days after the tube-invigorated seeds were placed on water regardless of species or seedlot. On average, tube invigoration decreased white spruce mean germination time by 0.13±0.02, and black spruce by 0.23±0.03 day per day of invigoration for up to 20 days of treatment. Jack pine mean germination time decreased 0.2±0.04 day per day of invigoration for up to 14 days of treatment.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergsten, U. (1987) Incubation of Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies L. (Karst.) seeds at controlled moisture content as an invigoration step in the IDS method. Ph. D. diss., Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
Bewley, J.D. and Black, M. (1982) Physiology and biochemistry of seeds in relation to germination. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodsworth, S. and Bewley, J D. (1981) Osmotic priming of seeds of crop species with polyethylene glycol as a means of enhancing early and synchronous germination at cool temperatures Canadian Journal of Botany 59, 672676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, J. and Malek, L. (1991) Metabolic changes related to the acceleration of jack pine germination by osmotic priming Tree Physiology 8, 407413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgass, R W and Powell, A A. (1984) Evidence for repair processes in the invigoration of seeds by hydration Annals of Botany 53, 753757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coolbear, P., Grierson, D. and Heydecker, W. (1980) Osmotic presowing treatments and nucleic acid accumulation in tomato seeds (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) Seed Science and Technology 8, 289303Google Scholar
Donald, D.G.M. (1981). Dormancy control in Pinus patula seed Suid-Afrikaanse Bosboutydskrif 118, 1419Google Scholar
Downie, B. and Bergsten, U. (1991) An invigoration regime for Pinus strobus seeds Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21, 13431348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Kassaby, Y.A., Edwards, D.G.W and Taylor, D W (1992) Genetic control of germination parameters in Douglas-fir and its importance for domestication Silvae Genetica 41, 4854Google Scholar
Fleming, R.L. and Lister, S.A. (1984) Stimulation of black spruce germination by osmotic priming: Laboratory studies. Inf-Rep-O X, Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Environment Canada, Candian Forestry ServiceGoogle Scholar
Fowler, N (1990) The 10 most common statistical errors Ecological Society of America Bulletin 71, 161164Google Scholar
Haridi, M B. (1985) Effect of osmotic priming with polyethylene glycol on germination of Pinus elliotti seeds Seed Science and Technology 13, 669674Google Scholar
Huang, Y G. (1989) Enhancing tolerance of lodgepole pine and white spruce seeds to thermo-hygro-stresses by osmoconditioning Seed Science and Technology 17, 341353Google Scholar
Huang, Y.G.; and Zou, Q (1989) Effects of osmoconditioning and drying on germination of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica and Larix gmelinii seeds Seed Science and Technology 17, 235242Google Scholar
International Seed Testing Association (1985) International rules for seed testing 1985 Seed Science and Technology 13, 300513Google Scholar
Kirk, R.E (1982) Experimental design. Belmont, California, Brooks/Cole Pub. CoGoogle Scholar
Lesham, B. (1965) Toxic effects of carbowaxes (polyethylene glycols) on Pinus halepensis Mill. seedlings Plant and Soil 24, 322324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, B.E. and Kaufmann, M.R. (1973) The osmotic potential of polyethyelene glycol 6000 Plant Physiology 51, 914916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pehap, A (1972) Seed eluates on the germination blotter—a germinability test? Studia Forestalia Suecica 101, 121Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System (1985) SAS Institute Inc. Box 8000, Cary NCGoogle Scholar
Simak, M. (1976) Frö kan grö snabbare och bättre genom behandling med polyetylenglykol Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbunds Tidskrift 74, 615622Google Scholar
Simak, M. (1985) Seed germination after incubation at different moisture stress, pp. 125137 in Proc. IUFRO International Symposium on Seed Problems under Stressful Conditions. Vienna and Gmunden AustriaGoogle Scholar