Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T01:05:12.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Buckwheat seed set in planta and during in vitro inflorescence culture: Evaluation of temperature and water deficit stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

Jolanta Slawinska
Affiliation:
Seed Biology, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 617 Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-1901, USA Plant Physiology Department, Horticultural Faculty, Agricultural University, 31-425 Krakow, Al. 29 Listopada 54, Poland
Ralph L. Obendorf*
Affiliation:
Seed Biology, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 617 Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-1901, USA
*
*Correspondence Fax: +1 607 255 2644 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) plants produce many flowers, but fewer seeds. Seed set is highly variable among years, between plants, and during the period of flowering within a plant or raceme. Seasonal variations suggest that temperature and water-deficit stresses are important factors for seed set. The effects of mild temperature and water-deficit stresses on seed set and seed filling were determined in planta and in vitro. An in vitro method to culture matched sets of racemes from individual plants was used for precise comparisons between experimental treatments. Buckwheat racemes form new flowers continuously during several weeks in planta. Seed set resulting in yield occurs during the first 2–3 weeks of flowering and then rapidly declines in planta independently of mild stresses. Plants grown at 18°C have 40% increased seed set, set seeds over a longer duration, and produce 40% more dry matter per seed than plants grown at 25°C. Similar patterns occurred in vitro. A 3-day water-deficit stress during the first week of flowering reduced the number of seeds by 50%without a reduction in seed size and dry weight, or the number of flowers formed in planta or in vitro. The effect of water-deficit stress continued after rewatering and subsequently was expressed as a reduction in fertility in newly formed flowers, both in planta and in vitro. Mild temperature and water-deficit stresses affected both female and male components of seed set in common buckwheat, resulting in a persistent but non-additive reduction in sink strength.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adachi, T. (1990) How to combine the reproductive system with biotechnology in order to overcome the breeding barrier in buckwheat. Fagopyrum 10, 711.Google Scholar
Ahmed, F.E. and Hall, A.E. (1993) Heat injury during early floral bud development in cowpea. Crop Science 33, 764767.Google Scholar
Barnabás, B. (1985) Effect of water loss on germination ability of maize (Zea mays L.) pollen. Annals of Botany 55, 201204.Google Scholar
Björkman, T. (1995a) The effect of pollen load and pollen grain competition on fertilization success and progeny performance in Fagopyrum esculentum. Euphytica 83, 4752.Google Scholar
Björkman, T. (1995b) The effectiveness of heterostyly in preventing illegitimate pollination in dish-shaped flowers. Sexual Plant Reproduction 8, 143146.Google Scholar
Björkman, T. (1995c) Role of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the pollination of buckwheat in eastern North America. Journal of Economic Entomology 88, 17391745.Google Scholar
Björkman, T., Rathburn, K. and Pearson, K.J. (1995a) The progression of female fertility in buckwheat through the flowering season. pp. 437441in Matano, T.; Ujihara, A. (Eds) Current advances in buckwheat research. Asahi Matsumoto City, Japan, Shinshu University Press.Google Scholar
Björkman, T., Samimy, C. and Pearson, K.J. (1995b) Variation in pollen performance among plants of Fagopyrum esculentum. Euphytica 82, 235240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, M.G., Boyer, J.S. and Morgan, P.W. (1991) Stem infusion of liquid culture medium prevents reproductive failure of maize at low water potential. Crop Science 31, 12461252.Google Scholar
Gamborg, O.L., Miller, R.A. and Ojima, K. (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Experimental Cell Research 50, 151158.Google Scholar
Guan, L.M. and Adachi, T. (1992) Reproductive deterioration in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) under summer conditions. Plant Breeding 109, 304312.Google Scholar
Guan, L.M. and Adachi, T. (1994) Ultrastructural changes of the mature embryo sac in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) as a result of high temperature exposure. Cytologia (Tokyo) 59, 237248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horbowicz, M. and Obendorf, R.L. (1992) Changes in sterols and fatty acids of buckwheat endosperm and embryo during seed development. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 40, 745750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horbowicz, M., Brenac, P. and Obendorf, R.L. (1998) Fagopyritol B1, O-α-D-galactopyranosyl-(1→2)-Dchiro- inositol, a galactosyl cyclitol in maturing buckwheat seeds associated with desiccation tolerance. Planta 205, 111.Google Scholar
Lachmann, S. and Adachi, T. (1990) Studies on the influence of photoperiod and temperature on floral traits in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) under controlled stress conditions. Plant Breeding 105, 248253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, H.G. and Pomeranz, Y. (1982) Buckwheat: description, breeding, production, and utilization. Advances in Cereal Science and Technology 5, 157210.Google Scholar
Morris, M.R. (1952) Cytogenetic studies on buckwheat. Genetic and cytological studies of compatibility in relation to heterostyly in common buckwheat, Fagopyrum sagittatum. Journal of Heredity 42, 8589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15, 473497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namai, H. (1990) Pollination biology and reproductive ecology for improving genetics and breeding common buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum (1). Fagopyrum 10, 2346.Google Scholar
Namai, H. and Takeyama, A. (1992) Effects of the number of compatible pollen grains deposited on a stigma lobe of each flower to seed set percentage, seed weight and seed yield in common buckwheat. pp. 149156in Lin, R.; Zhou, M.; Tao, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z. (Eds) Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on buckwheat20–26 August 1992Taiyuan, China.Beijing, Agriculture Publishing House.Google Scholar
Obendorf, R.L., Horbowicz, M. and Taylor, D.P. (1993a) Structure and chemical composition of developing buckwheat seed. pp. 244251in Janick, J.; Simon, J.E. (Eds) New crops. New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Obendorf, R.L., Horbowicz, M., Taylor, D.P. and Slawinska, J. (1993b) Buckwheat seed development and regulation of seed set. pp. 3946in Côme, D.; Corbineau, F. (Eds) Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on seeds: Basic and applied aspects of seed biologyAngers, France20–24 July 1992.Paris, ASFIS.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, Y. (1983) Buckwheat: Structure, composition, and utilization. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 19, 213258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slawinska, J. and Obendorf, R.L. (1993) Buckwheat seed set and development by in vitro inflorescence culture. pp. 6166in Côme, D.; Corbineau, F. (Eds) Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on seeds: Basic and applied aspects of seed biology20–24 July 1992.Paris, ASFIS.Google Scholar
Taylor, D.P. and Obendorf, R.L. (2001) Quantitative assessment of some factors limiting seed set in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench, Polygonaceae). Crop Science 41 (in press).Google Scholar
Zinselmeier, C., Westgate, M.E., Schussler, J.R. and Jones, R.J. (1995) Low water potential disrupts carbohydrate metabolism in maize (Zea mays L.) ovaries. Plant Physiology 107, 385391.Google Scholar