Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:11:24.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

Extract

For the ministerial fundamentalist the yardstick is the ministry. … There is no doubt that this is the crucial issue in reunion today. So Canon Fison wrote ten years ago and the same might be written in the same context today.

This yardstick is bound up with validity and so some attempt to consider its meaning may help; but first we shall define the word and then mention some relevant discussions. ‘That is valid which, by virtue of satisfying certain conditions laid down by competent authority, is actually entitled to everything to which it appears or claims to have a title.’ Much argument has centred on the exclusive claims made for episcopacy in The Apostolic Ministry, though, after the introduction, there is only one reference in the index of that work to validity. The late Bishop Rawlinson dealt with ‘validity’ in Problems of Reunion; he used certain arguments Canon Quick had outlined in his contribution to The Ministry and the Sacraments and also in The Christian Sacraments. Historical considerations on the topic have been ably summarised by Professor S. L. Greenslade in his Schism in the Early Church. Useful contributions have been made more recently by Dr A. L. Peck in Anglicanism and Episcopacy. All these writers are Anglicans.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 124 note 1 Fison, J. E., The Blessing of the Holy Spirit (Longmans, 1950), p. 156.Google Scholar

page 124 note 2 Kirk, K. E., The Apostolic Ministry (Hodder and Stoughton, 1946 and 1957), p. 33.Google Scholar

page 124 note 3 pp. 25ff, 77ff.

page 124 note 4 pp. 123ff.

page 124 note 5 pp. 265ff and 427ff.

page 125 note 1 p. 265.

page 125 note 2 e.g. Kirk, p. 33f, and Nelson, p. 123.

page 125 note 3 Peck, pp. 29ff, and Nelson, p. 124.

page 126 note 1 esp. pp. 265ff and 427.

page 126 note 2 Kirk, op. cit., p. 280.

page 126 note 3 Lund Coherence Report, p. 30.

page 127 note 1 p. 178f.

page 127 note 2 Rawlinson, pp. 54ff passim, and ref. to Quick.

page 127 note 3 Quick (1945 reprint), pp. 141ff passim.

page 128 note 1 pp. 39, 77ff and 81ff.

page 128 note 2 pp. 286ff.

page 131 note 1 Newbigin, L., The Reunion of the Church (revised edition 1960), pp. xxxiiixxxiv.Google Scholar

page 131 note 2 Hebert, A. G., The Form of the Church (revised edition 1954) pp. 126, 135.Google Scholar