¹ Barth, Karl, Church Dogmatics IV, 1, § 59 (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1956), p. 287Google Scholar. See also Church Dogmatics 1, 2, § 14, for an earlier discussion of time.

² Ritschl, Dietrich, The Logic of Theology (London: SCM Press, 1986, and Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

³ Barth, K., CD, IV, 1, § 59, p. 287.Google Scholar

⁴ See also my article, ‘The Trinity and Time’, Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 39, Nr. 1 (1986), 65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Other views are presented by Sorabji, Richard, Time, Creation and the Continuum, Theories in antiquity and the early middle ages (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983), p. 415Google Scholar, although his stated purpose is not to investigate time itself, but rather to attempt a partial rehabilitation of Aristotle, who caused so many problems for dynamics. See also the review of the latter by MacKinnon, Donald M., SJT Vol. 38, No. 2 (1985), pp. 270–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ von Rad, Gerhard, Old Testament Theology, Vol. II (New York: Harper & Row, 1965), pp. 99–125.Google Scholar

⁶ Cited in von der Osten-Sacken, Peter, Grundzuege einer Theologie im christlichjuedischen Gespraech (Muenchen: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1982), p. 212.Google Scholar

⁷ Farley, Edward, Ecclesial Reflection (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1982).Google Scholar

⁸ Von Rad, Vol. I (1962), p. 111; see also Vol. II, pp. 112–119.

⁹ See my article in note 4 above, 76–77, on Origen's assumption that God is beyond time. See also Butterworth, G. W., ‘Introduction’, in Origen, On First Principles (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1966), p. liv, on Origen's system.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Ritschl, Dietrich, Memory and Hope (New York: Macmillan Co., 1967).Google Scholar

¹¹ Ritschl, D., Logic, pp. 89–91Google Scholar, distinguishes between issues of lasting importance and issues of momentary urgency.

¹² See Wilfried Haerle/Eilert Herms, ‘Deutschsprachige Protestantische Dogmatik, nach 1945’, Teil I, 2.3.2, ‘Theologie des Wortes Gottes als Eschatologie’, Verkündigung und Forschung, Heft 2/1982, p. 42.

¹³ Bultmann, R., Theology of the New Testament, Vol. 1 (New York: Charles Scribners Sons, 1951), p. 302.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Farley, p. xiv passim.

¹⁵ Barth, K., loc. cit., IV, 1, § 58, p. 109.Google Scholar

¹⁶ P. von der Osten-Sacken, p. 35.

¹⁷ Paul van Buren has helped with reminders as to how closely the traditions of Christians and Jews are related: Discerning the Way (New York: Seabury Press, 1980)Google Scholar; A Christian Theology of the People of Israel (New York: Seabury press, 1983).Google Scholar

¹⁸ Bellah, Robert N. et al. , Habits of the Heart, Individualism and Commitment in American Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), p. 153.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Farley, p. 217.

²⁰ Pannenberg, Wolfhart, Anthropology in Theological Perspective (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1985), p. 516.Google Scholar

²¹ Loc. cit., p. 519.

²² On the ‘trinity’, see my article referred to above. For ‘implicit axioms’, see Ritschl, D., Logic, pp. 108–111.Google Scholar

²³ Van Buren, loc. cit.