Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:33:31.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study of Sin and Salvation in Terms of C. G. Jung's Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

Extract

Psychology offers a particularly subtle and dangerous challenge to religious belief. The theologian and the psychologist are both interested in the facts of man's spiritual nature, but the difference in their approach to these facts inevitably arouses tension between them. The psychologist's approach is purely empirical and he uses descriptive terms which ignore the cosmic significance of the experiences which he describes. But the experiences of the Christian believer are vitally affected by his beliefs about them. Christian doctrine is not the result of later reflection on experiences which had no intrinsic meaning. Doctrine is an inseparable part of the total Christian experience.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 400 note 1 Two Essays on Analytical Psychology, p. 209.Google Scholar

page 401 note 1 The Secret of the Golden Flower, p. 124.Google Scholar

page 401 note 2 Psychology and Religion, p. 99.Google Scholar

page 401 note 3 Two Essays on Analytical Psychology, p. 246.Google Scholar

page 402 note 1 The Secret of the Golden Flower, p. 133.Google Scholar

page 402 note 2 ibid., p. 124.

page 402 note 3 ibid., p. 135.

page 402 note 4 Fundamental Psychological Conceptions, p. 204.Google Scholar

page 403 note 1 Psychology and Religion, p. 50.Google Scholar

page 406 note 1 Nature, Man and God, p. 458.Google Scholar

page 407 note 1 The Integration of the Personality, p. 288.Google Scholar

page 408 note 1 Von Hügel, : Selected Letters, p. 71.Google Scholar