No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Any attempt to examine the main trends of contemporary theology may well open with the salutary reflection that history always has its own way of defying our efforts at exact analysis. The events which seem to have the quality of new departures are inexplicably linked with the past out of which they have grown and to which, in some sense and degree, they are related as effect to cause. This is especially true when we find ourselves in the realm of ideas, and Christian theology must not be supposed, even by those who are convinced that it takes its rise from a “revelatum”, to be of such a nature as to provide, or allow, an exception to the general rule. Only when we compare the broad features of periods sufficiently separate in point of time and temper can we recognise differences so sharp as to be unmistakable.
page 226 note 1 Fosdick, H. E., The Power to See it Through (Harper & Sons), p. 199.Google Scholar
page 230 note 1 Kraemer, H., The Christian Message in a non-Christian World (Edinburgh House Press, 1938 edn.), p. 443.Google Scholar
page 230 note 2 op. cit., p. 70.
page 231 note 1 op. cit., p. 177.
page 231 note 2 op. cit., pp. 104–5.
page 233 note 1 op. cit., p. 69.
page 234 note 1 op. cit., p. 270.
op. cit., p. 35.
page 237 note 1 op. cit., p. 90.
page 239 note 1 op. cit., pp. 67, 79.
page 240 note 1 Ranson, C. W., The Christian Minister in-India (U.S.C.L.), p. 143.Google Scholar
page 241 note 1 The Triumph of God, edited by Warren, Canon Max (Longmans, Green & Co.), pp. 160–1.Google Scholar