Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:12:35.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Secondary Point of Reference in Barth's Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

Extract

In twenty centuries theological anthropology has hardly seen a more revolutionary method than that proposed by Karl Barth in Church Dogmatics 111.2 of founding anthropology on Christology. At the outset, however, Barth makes clear that ‘there can be no question of a direct equation of human nature as we know it in ourselves with the human nature of Jesus, and therefore of a simple deduction of anthropology from Christology’. That is, Barth intends that the method of theological anthropology avoid monism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 132 note 1 C.D.111.2, p. 47. Cf. pp. 47–54, 71, 222, 512.

page 132 note 2 C.D.IV.1, p. 10.

page 132 note 3 Prenter, R., ‘Die Einheit von Schöpfung und Erlösung’, in Theologische Zritschrift, II (May-June, 1946), 180.Google Scholar

page 132 note 4 Berkouwer, , The Triumph of Grace in the Theology of Karl Barth, (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1956), 56.Google Scholar

page 132 note 5 von Balthasar, H. U., Karl Barth (Darstellung und Deutung seiner Theologie) (Jakob Hegner Bucherei, Köln und Olten, 1951), p. 148.Google Scholar

page 135 note 1 ibid., p. 131.

page 135 note 2 Kreck, , ‘Analogia fidei oder analogia entis?’, in Antwort (Evangelischer Verlag A. G., Zollikon-Zürich, 1956), p. 277.Google Scholar