No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Possibility of Apologetics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Extract
Anyone who enters the batter's box of contemporary theology carrying a bat labelled ‘apologetics’ finds that he has two strikes against him before he even begins. Gone are the days when Christian apologetics held a prominent position in theological endeavour. Today such issues as the nature and situation of man, Christian ethics, the unity of the church, and the task of missions dominate the centre of the theological stage. Undoubtedly this is as it should be and it is not the purpose of this article to belittle any of these concerns. There are, however, certain observations which do bear mentioning with regard to the importance of apologetics for contemporary theology. To begin with, it should be noted that the primary purpose of all theological endeavour is to come to a better understanding of the Christian message and effectively to relate it to man and his situation. Even the above-mentioned areas of contemporary concern all have as their ultimate aim to witness to the new life in Christ. The significance of this fact is appreciated when one realises that apologetics also has this witness as its ultimate purpose. It is clear that apologetics is not unrelated to the basic theological task of this or any age.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1963
References
page 138 note 1 Barth, Karl, Church Dogmatics (Scribners, New York, 1936), vol. I, p. 3Google Scholar.
page 138 note 2 Niebuhr, Reinhold, The Nature and Destiny of Man (Scribners, New York, 1949), vol. I, p. 165Google Scholar. For a further delineation of Niebuhr's, view, see ‘Reinhold Niebuhr and Apologetics’, in Theology Today, July 1960.Google Scholar
page 139 note 1 Hordern, Wm., The Case for a New Reformation Theology, (Westminster Press, Philadelphia, 1959), p. 92.Google Scholar
page 140 note 1 Niebuhr, Reinhold, Faith and History (Scribners, New York, 1949), p. 152.Google Scholar
page 140 note 2 Hordern, op. cit., p. 94.
page 140 note 3 ibid., p. 94.
page 140 note 4 ibid., p. 92.
page 142 note 1 For further suggestions concerning the importance of empiricism for Christian revelation, see Ramsey's, Ian T. article ‘Contemporary Empiricism’, in The Christian Scholar, Fall 1960.Google Scholar
page 145 note 1 Farrer, Austin, ‘Revelation’, in Faith and Logic, ed. by Mitchell, Basil (Beacon Press, Boston, 1957), p. 101.Google Scholar
page 145 note 2 Hordern, op. cit., p. 39.
page 145 note 3 ibid., p. 40.
page 146 note 1 Kee, Howard Clark, Jesus and God's New People: The Four Gospels (Westminster Press, Philadelphia, 1959).Google Scholar
page 147 note 1 Hordern, op. cit., p. 40.
page 147 note 2 Kraft, Victor, The Vienna Circle, trans. Pap, Arthur (Philosophical Library, New York, 1953), p. 144.Google Scholar
page 148 note 1 Wilde, John, ‘Is There a World of Ordinary Language?’, in Philosophical Review, Oct. 1958.Google Scholar