¹ Zizioulas, John D., ‘The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity: The Significance of the Cappadocian Contribution’, in Schwōbel, Christoph (ed.), Trinitarian Theology Today: Essays on Divine Being and Act (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1995), pp. 51–52.Google Scholar

² Torrance, Thomas F., The Christian Doctrine of God: One Being Three Persons (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1996), p. 141.Google Scholar

³ Torrance, Thomas F., The Trinitarian Faith: The Evangelical Theology of the Ancient Catholic Church (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1988).Google Scholar

⁴ Zizioulas, John D., Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church (Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1985).Google Scholar

⁵ Torrance, Alan J., Persons in Communion: Trinitarian Description and Human Participation (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1996).Google Scholar

⁶ Zizioulas, John D., ‘On Being a Person: Towards an Ontology of Personhood’, in Schwōbel, Christoph and Gunton, Colin (eds), Persons, Divine and Human (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991), p. 40.Google Scholar

⁷ Zizioulas, ‘The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity: The Significance of the Cappadocian Contribution’, p. 52.

⁸ Ibid.

⁹ Torrance, , The Christian Doctrine of God, pp. 116, 124.Google Scholar

¹⁰ von Harnack, Adolph, History of Dogma: Vol. IV. Translated by Buchanan, Neil (New York: Dove, 1900, 1961), p. 352.Google Scholar

¹¹ Zizioulas, , Being as Communion, p. 39.Google Scholar

¹² Ibid., p. 107.

¹³ Zizioulas, , ‘On Being a Person: Towards an Ontology of Personhood’, p. 43.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Zizioulas, , Being as Communion, p. 53.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Ibid., p. 106.

¹⁶ Zizioulas, , ‘On Being a Person: Towards an Ontology of Personhood’, p. 46.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Ibid., p. 45.

¹⁸ Quoted in Torrance, Thomas F., The Christian Doctrine of God, p. 179.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Zizioulas, , ‘The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity: The Significance of the Cappadocian Contribution’, pp. 51–52.Google Scholar

²⁰ See, for example, Egan, John P. SJ, ‘Primal Cause and Trinitarian Perichoresis in Gregory Nazianzen's Oration 31.14’, Studia Patristica 27 (1991) 21–28Google Scholar. Also, Meijering, E. P., ‘The Doctrine of the Will and of the Trinity in the Orations of Gregory of Nazianzus’, Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschritt 27 (1973) 224–234Google Scholar. Meijereng's concluding sentence is quite interesting to say the least: ‘In our time when there are “theologians” who want to make us believe that God is dead, but that Jesus is alive, Gregory's insistence that the Father is the [aitia] (or [pete]) of the Son and as such more than the Son, could remind us that “faith in Jesus” does not mean that we believe that Jesus is (our) God, but that we believe that the living God is the subject of the words and acts of Jesus of Nazareth’, p. 234.

²¹ Torrance, , The Trinitarian Faith: The Evangelical Theology of the Ancient Catholic Church, pp. 302–340. Also, The Christian Doctrine of God, pp. 175–85.Google Scholar

²² Zizioulas, , ‘The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity: The Significance of the Cappadocian Contribution’, p. 50.Google Scholar

²³ Torrance, . The Christian Doctrine of God, p. 212.Google Scholar

²⁴ Zizioulas, , Being as Communion, p. 134.Google Scholar

²⁵ Ibid.

²⁶ Ibid., p. 44.

²⁷ Zizioulas, , ‘The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity: The Significance of the Cappadocian Contribution’, p. 59.Google Scholar

²⁸ Torrance, Alan, Persons in Communion, p. 300.Google Scholar

²⁹ Ibid., p. 289.

³⁰ Thomas F. Torrance, The Christian Doctrine of God, p. 124.

³¹ Ibid., p. 131.

³² Ibid., p. 124.

³³ Zizioulas, , Being as Communion, p. 88.Google Scholar

³⁴ Torrance, Thomas F., The Christian Doctrine of God, p. 133.Google Scholar

³⁵ Ibid., p. 171.

³⁶ Zizioulas, , Being as Communion, p. 41.Google Scholar

³⁷ The monarchia or the Monas is essentially and intrinsically trinitarian in the inner relations of God's eternal Ousia.' Torrance, , The Christian Doctrine of God, p. 183.Google Scholar

³⁸ Ibid., p. 179. Also, quoting Gregory Nazianzen to the effect that such would overthrow the Trinity.

³⁹ Ibid.

⁴⁰ Torrance, Thomas F., ‘significant Features, a Common Reflection on the Agreed Statement’, Trinitarian Perspectives: Toward Doctrinal Agreement (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994), p. 135.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Ibid., ‘Calvin's Doctrine of the Trinity’, pp. 41–76.

⁴² Ibid., ‘Toward an Ecumenical Consensus on the Trinity’, p. 80, n. 8.

⁴³ Torrance, , The Christian Doctrine of God, p. 182.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Ibid., pp. 140–1.

⁴⁵ Ibid., p. 180.

⁴⁶ Ibid., p. 161.

⁴⁷ Ibid.

⁴⁸ Here I rely on Hill's, William J.The Three-Personed God: The Trinity as a Mystery of Salvation (Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press of America, 1982), pp. 255ff.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Zizioulas, , Being as Communion, p. 39.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Quoted in Clarke, W. Norris, Person and Being (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1993), p. 8.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Hill, , The Three-Personed God, p. 260.Google Scholar

⁵² Clark, , Person and Being, p. 14.Google Scholar

⁵³ Ibid., p. 111.

⁵⁴ See, for example, the Eleventh Council of Toledo (675): ‘He Himself is the Father of His own essence, who in an ineffably way has begotten the Son from His ineffable substance … We must believe that the Son is begotten or born … from the womb of the Father, that is from His substance’ (308, 525; 309, 526). Quoted from The Christian Faith in the Doctrinal Documents of the Catholic Church—Revised Edition. Edited by Neuner, J. SJ and Dupuis, J. SJ (New York: Alba House, 1982)Google Scholar. Bold numbers are from this volume with the corresponding italics numbers being their equivalent in Denzinger, H. and Schonmetzer, A.. Enchiridion Symbolorum, Definitionum et Dedarationum de rebus fidei et morum (Freiburg im Breisgau, 1965).Google Scholar

⁵⁵ See especially the Fourth Lateran General Council (1215): ‘the three persons together, and each person distinctly; therefore in God there is only Trinity, not a quaternity, because each of the persons is that reality, viz. that divine substance, essence or nature which alone is the beginning of all things, apart from which nothing else can be found’. Ibid., 318, 804.