No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
The purpose of this article is to explore ways of defending the biblical basis of Paul Tillich's christology, and so to reveal some of the issues concerning the relationship between scripture and theology. ‘Christology’ is selected because it is central to Tillich's theology; ‘Tillich’ is selected because of his recorded words that students should ask ‘the systematic theologian about the biblical foundation of his statements, in the actual biblical texts as they are philologically related’.
page 517 note 1 History of Christian Thought, ed. Braaten, C. E. (S.C.M., 1968), p. 245.Google Scholar
page 517 note 2 Church Quarterly Review, CXLVII (1949).Google Scholar
page 518 note 1 Hamilton, K., System and Gospel (S.C.M., 1963), pp. 169fGoogle Scholar; Van Buren, , Secular Meaning of the Gospel (S.C.M., 1963), p. 52, n. 31.Google Scholar
page 519 note 1 ‘Reply to Interpretation and Criticism’, Theology of Paul Tillich, ed. Kegley, and Bretall, (Macmillan, 1961).Google Scholar
page 519 note 2 ‘He who is the Christ’, Shaking of the Foundations, (Penguin, 1962), pp. 143fGoogle Scholar; cf. Theology of Culture, ed. Kimball, (O.U.P., 1959), pp. 53f.Google Scholar
page 520 note 1 McKelway, A., Systematic Theology of Paul Tillich (Lutterworth, 1964), p. 182, n. 20.Google Scholar
page 520 note 2 Fuller, R. H., Formation of Resurrection Narratives (S.P.C.K., 1972), p. 69.Google Scholar
page 520 note 3 Tavard, G., Paul Tillich and Christian Message (Scribner's, 1962), p. 134.Google Scholar
page 520 note 4 Respectively, R. H. Fuller, op. cit.; Marxsen, W., Resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth (S.C.M., 1970), p. 111Google Scholar; Knox, J., Chapters in Life of Paul, (Black, 1954), p. 120.Google Scholar
page 521 note 1 ‘Personal Introduction to the Systematic Theology’, unpublished (Chicago).
page 522 note 1 Perspectives on 19th and 20th Century Protestant Theology (S.C.M. Press, 1967), p. 227Google Scholar; Cf. Interpretation of History (Scribner's, 1936), p. 261.Google Scholar
page 522 note 2 Wiles, M., ‘Does Christology Rest on a Mistake?’ Christ, Faith and History, ed. Sykes, and Clayton, (C.U.P., 1972).Google Scholar
page 523 note 1 Schoonenberg, P., The Christ (Sheed and Ward, 1971), p. 20.Google Scholar
page 523 note 2 New Being (S.C.M., 1956), p. 100.Google ScholarTillich corrected ‘transparent’ to ‘translucent’: ‘Rejoinder’, Journal of Religion, XLVI (1966), p. 187.Google Scholar
page 523 note 3 McKelway, , op. cit., p. 98, n. 11.Google Scholar
page 524 note 1 Downing, G., Has Christianity a Revelation? (S.C.M., 1964).Google Scholar
page 524 note 2 Protestant Era (Chicago, 1957), p. 27Google Scholar; ST, II, p. 138.
page 524 note 3 Adams, J. L., ‘Tillich's Interpretation of History’, Theology of Paul Tillich, p. 306.Google Scholar
page 524 note 4 Killen, R. A., Ontological Theology of Paul Tillich (Kok, 1956), p. 229.Google Scholar
page 524 note 5 Kiesling, C., ‘The Life of the New Being’, Paul Tillich in Catholic Thought, ed. O'Meara, and Weisser, (London, 1965).Google Scholar
page 525 note 1 Dunn, J., ‘2 Cor. 3.17: “The Lord is the Spirit”’, Journal of Theological Studies (N.S., 21), 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 525 note 2 Copper, J. C., ‘Significance of Pauline Spirit-Christology’, unpublished (Chicago University, 1966).Google Scholar
page 525 note 3 History of Christian Thought, p. 231.
page 525 note 4 ‘Re-interpretation of Doctrine of Incarnation’, p. 147.
page 525 note 5 Interpretation of History, p. 264.
page 526 note 1 Courage To Be (Collins, 1962), p. 106.Google Scholar
page 526 note 2 Rhein, C., Paul Tillich Philosoph und Theologe (Stuttgart, 1957), pp. 46, 177.Google Scholar
page 526 note 3 Scott, E. F., The Apologetic of the N.T. (London, 1907), p. 248.Google Scholar
page 527 note 1 Martin, B., Paul Tillich's Doctrine of Man, (Nisbet, 1966), p. 178.Google Scholar
page 527 note 2 Robinson, J. A. T., Human Face of God (S.C.M., 1973), p. 15.Google Scholar
page 527 note 3 Moule, C. F. D., ‘The Manhood of Jesus in the N.T.’, Christ, Faith and History.Google Scholar
page 528 note 1 Zahrnt, H., Question of God (Collins, 1969), p. 323.Google Scholar
page 528 note 2 Knox, J., Humanity and Divinity of Christ (C.U.P., 1967), p. 40.Google Scholar
page 529 note 1 Käsemann, E., ‘The Problem of a N.T. Theology’, New Testament Studies (04 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 529 note 2 Carrez, M., ‘Miracle’, Vocabulary of the Bible, von Allmen (Lutterworth, 1958).Google Scholar
page 530 note 1 Tait, L. G., The Promise of Tillich (Philadelphia, 1971), p. 100.Google Scholar
page 530 note 2 Arts, H., Moltmann et Tillich (Duculot, 1972), p. 167.Google Scholar
page 530 note 3 Cooper, J. C., op. cit., p. 303.Google Scholar
page 531 note 1 Protestant Era, p. 81.
page 531 note 2 Courage To Be, p. 132.
page 531 note 3 Wiles, M., Making of Christian Doctrine (C.U.P., 1967), p. 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 532 note 1 Hamilton, K., op. cit., p. 82.Google Scholar
page 532 note 2 ‘The Bible and Systematic Theology’, mimeograph, Washington.
page 532 note 3 Biblical Religion and the Search for Ultimate Reality (Nisbet, 1956), p. vii.Google Scholar
page 532 note 4 Ultimate Concern, ed. Brown, D. M. (S.C.M., 1965), p. 21.Google Scholar
page 532 note 5 Fuller, R. H., Foundations of N.T. Christology (Fontana, 1969), ch. ix.Google Scholar
page 533 note 1 Knox, J., Humanity and Divinity, p. 26.Google Scholar
page 534 note 1 Hamilton, op. cit., Nygren, A., Meaning and Method (Epworth, 1972), p. 200.Google Scholar