Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:22:51.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Martin Buber and some Theologians of ‘Encounter’1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

Bryan J. Fair
Affiliation:
London

Extract

I would like to draw attention to certain influential misrepresentations of the views of Martin Buber and others relating to the notion of an encounter between God and man.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 27 note 2 Hepburn, , Christianity and Paradox, 1958, p. 26.Google Scholar

page 27 note 3 Hepburn, , op. cit., p. 28.Google Scholar

page 27 note 4 Hepburn, , op. cit., p. 37.Google Scholar

page 27 note 5 Hepburn, , op. cit., p. 35Google Scholar. Hepburn's arguments are cited with approval by Ferré, Frederick in Language, Logic and God, 1962, ch. 8.Google Scholar

page 27 note 6 Lewis, , Our Experience of God, 1959, p. 51Google Scholar; ‘God and Mystery’ in Prospect for Metaphysics, ed. Ramsey, I., 1961, pp. 214–16Google Scholar; Teach Yourself Philosophy of Religion, 1965, pp. 105, 111, 206.

page 28 note 1 Lewis, , Teach Yourself Philosophy of Religion, p. 111.Google Scholar

page 28 note 2 Wodehouse, , ‘Martin Buber's “I and Thou”’, Philosophy, Vol. XX, p. 17.Google Scholar

page 28 note 3 Brunner, , Truth as Encounter, enlarged edition of The Divine-Human Encounter, 1964, p. 32.Google Scholar

page 28 note 4 Farmer, , The World and God, paperback 1963, p. 20.Google Scholar

page 28 note 5 Farmer, , Towards Belief in God, 1942, p. 34.Google Scholar

page 28 note 6 Baillie, , Our Knowledge of God, paperback 1963, p. 217f.Google Scholar

page 28 note 7 The best exposition of I and Thou is by Diamond, M. L., Martin Buber: Jewish Existentialist, 1960Google Scholar. Helen Wodehouse shows insight into Buber's meaning in the article cited above. Friedman's, M. S.Martin Buber: the Life of Dialogue, 1955Google Scholar is largely uncritical paraphrase. H. J. Paton gives a sympathetic but critical summary in his Gifford, Lectures, The Modern Predicament, 1955, pp. 162–73.Google Scholar

page 29 note 1 I and Thou, 1937, pp. 6 and 101.

page 29 note 2 op. cit., pp. 3, 10, 11, 79.

page 29 note 3 op. cit., pp. 3, 43ff, 58.

page 29 note 4 Diamond, , op. cit., p. 20 and ch. 2.Google Scholar

page 29 note 5 op. cit., p. 6.

page 30 note 1 ibid., p. 8.

page 30 note 2 ibid., p. 46, my italics.

page 30 note 3 Diamond, , op. cit., p. 27.Google Scholar

page 30 note 4 Buber, , op. cit., p. 3.Google Scholar

page 30 note 5 ibid., p. 34.

page 30 note 6 ibid., p. 114f.

page 30 note 7 ibid., p. 42.

page 31 note 1 ibid., p. 7.

page 31 note 2 Buber, , Between Man and Man, paperback 1961, p. 27.Google Scholar

page 31 note 3 I and Thou, pp. 6 and 101.

page 31 note 4 ibid., p. 76.

page 31 note 5 Buber, , Eclipse of God, 1953, pp. 3940.Google Scholar

page 31 note 6 I and Thou, pp. 92–93, cf. Eclipse of God, pp. 39–40.

page 31 note 7 op. cit., p. 40, Buber's italics.

page 31 note 8 Hepburn, , op. cit., pp. 26, 53.Google Scholar

page 31 note 9 ibid., p. 49f.

page 32 note 1 ibid., pp. 53, 54.

page 32 note 2 Farmer, , The World and God, p. 23.Google Scholar

page 32 note 3 ibid., p. 78.

page 32 note 4 Baillie, , Our Knowledge of God, paperback 1963, p. 214.Google Scholar

page 32 note 5 ibid., p. 222; cf. Baillie, , The Idea of Revelation in Recent Thought, 1956, p. 26.Google Scholar

page 32 note 6 op. cit., p. 114.

page 33 note 1 Hepburn, , op. cit., p. 31.Google Scholar

page 33 note 2 Brunner, , op. cit., p. 115.Google Scholar

page 33 note 3 Hepburn, , op. cit., pp. 3139.Google Scholar

page 33 note 4 ibid., p. 35.

page 33 note 5 ibid., p. 38f.

page 34 note 1 Brunner, , op. cit., p. 118.Google Scholar

page 34 note 2 ibid., p. 129.

page 34 note 3 Brunner, , Revelation and Reason, 1946, pp. 372–3.Google Scholar

page 34 note 4 Martin, , Religious Belief, 1959, p. 89.Google Scholar

page 35 note 1 Brunner, , Revelation and Reason, pp. 147f, 409.Google Scholar

page 35 note 2 ibid., p. 409.

page 35 note 3 Farmer, , Revelation and Religion, 1954, p. 66.Google Scholar

page 35 note 4 Baillie, , The Sense of the Presence of God, 1962, p. 92.Google Scholar

page 35 note 5 ibid., p. 260.

page 35 note 6 Martin, , op. cit., p. 66.Google Scholar

page 35 note 7 ibid., p. 93.

page 35 note 8 Ferré, , op. cit., p. 103Google Scholar; cf. Hepburn, , op. cit., p. 30.Google Scholar

page 35 note 9 Towards Belief in God, pp. 40, 41.