No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Aremark of E. G. Selwyn, in the course of his essay ‘Eschatology in 1 Peter’ contributed to the C. H. Dodd Festschrift, deserves more attention than it has yet received. He mentions his misgivings over the term kerygma which has been so prominent in the last decades and suggests that the word martyria would be more appropriate to describe the primitive and indispensable core of the Christian message. ‘At any rate’, he writes, if we examine the comparative occurrences in the New Testament of the two sets of terms, we find that the occurrences of the verbs alone which speak of ‘witness’ considerably outnumber the occurrences of κηρύσσειν while the occurrences of the noun μαρτυρία outnumber those of the noun κήρυγμα by more than six to one. (p. 395)
page 90 note 1 The Background of the New Testament and its Eschatology, edited by W. D. Davies and D. Daube.
page 91 note 1 On this matter cf. chapter 16 of my book The Second Advent (Epworth, London, 1945, 3rd and revised ed. 1963).
page 94 note 1 cf. C. F. D. Moule, The Birth of the New Testament, pp. 189ff.
page 95 note 1 On this passage of John 20 see Kerygma and Myth II.266f.
page 95 note 2 cf. the remark of Cullmann: ‘eyewitnessing played an important role, being reckoned with the saving events (1 Cor. 15.3ff)’—his italics (Salvation in History, p. 99).