^{page 145 note 1} Barth, Karl, Church Dogmatics, 1/1, p. 332.Google Scholar

^{page 145 note 2} Ibid., p. 306.

^{page 145 note 3} Ibid., p. 324.

^{page 146 note 4} Ibid., p. 307.

^{page 146 note 5} Ibid., 2/1, section 28, pp. 257ff.

^{page 146 note 6} Ibid., section 30, pp. 351ff.

^{page 146 note 7} Ibid., section 31, pp. 440ff.

^{page 146 note 8} Ibid., p. 301.

^{page 146 note 9} Ibid., p. 303.

^{page 146 note 10} Ibid. Therefore ‘God must not only be unconditioned but, in the absoluteness in which he can and will also be conditioned.… This ability, proved and manifested to us in this action, constitutes this Freedom’.

^{page 147 note 11} Ibid., 1/1, p. 381.

^{page 147 note 12} Franks, R. S.The Doctrine of the Trinity, p. 183.Google Scholar

^{page 148 note 13} C.D., 2/1, p. 317.

^{page 148 note 14} Ibid.

^{page 148 note 15} Ibid.

^{page 148 note 16} Ibid.

^{page 148 note 17} Ibid.

^{page 148 note 18} C.D. 4/1, p. 185.

^{page 148 note 19} Ibid.

^{page 149 note 20} Ibid., p. 192.

^{page 149 note 21} Ibid., p. 209.

^{page 149 note 22} Ibid.

^{page 149 note 23} Ibid., pp. 209ff.

^{page 149 note 24} C.D., 2/1, p. 57.

^{page 149 note 25} C.D., 1/1, p. 316.

^{page 150 note 26} The ‘relative clarity’, in the opinion of Williams, R. D., of Barth's treatment of Father and Son, is itself put in question by the apparent failure of the same method to produce an adequate doctrine of the Spirit’. Karl Barth — Studies of his Theological Methods, ed. Sykes, S. W., p. 171.Google Scholar

^{page 150 note 27} Jenson, R., God after God, pp. 173–174.Google Scholar

^{page 150 note 28} C.D., 1/1, p. 330.

^{page 151 note 29} Ibid., p. 331.

^{page 151 note 30} C.D., 4/3, p. 761.

^{page 151 note 31} Ibid.

^{page 152 note 32} Rosato, P., The Spirit as Lord, p. 20.Google Scholar

^{page 152 note 33} C.D., 4/2, p. 345.

^{page 152 note 34} Ibid., p. 347.

^{page 152 note 35} Ibid., p. 346.

^{page 153 note 36} Tillich, P., Perspectives on 19th & 20th Century Protestant Theology, p. 75.Google Scholar

^{page 153 note 37} Macquarrie, J., Twentieth-Century Religious Thought, pp. 378–379.Google Scholar

^{page 154 note 38} Caird, E., Hegel, p. 124.Google Scholar

^{page 154 note 39} von Balthasar, H. U., The Theology of Karl Barth, p. 78.Google Scholar

^{page 155 note 40} Op. cit., p. 135.

^{page 155 note 41} Ibid.

^{page 155 note 42} Ibid.

^{page 155 note 43} Green, T. H., Works, iii, p. 233.Google Scholar

^{page 156 note 44} Bromiley, G. W., Introduction to the Theology of Karl Barth, p. 82.Google Scholar

^{page 156 note 45} C.D., 2/1, pp. 659f.

^{page 156 note 46} Caird, op. cit., pp. 174–5.

^{page 156 note 47} Dorner, I. A., System of Christian Doctrine, Vol. 1, p. 435.Google Scholar

^{page 157 note 48} Pannenberg, W., Grundfragen systematischer Theologie, Band 2, pp. 98ff.Google Scholar

^{page 157 note 49} Ibid., p. 101 [My translations].

^{page 157 note 50} Ibid., pp. 101–2. Cf. Moltmann, , The Trinity and the Kingdom of God, p. 142.Google Scholar

^{page 157 note 51} Ibid.

^{page 158 note 52} Jüngel, E., The Doctrine of the Trinity, p. 102.Google Scholar

^{page 159 note 53} Torrance, T. F., Karl Barth: An Introduction to his early theology, p. 159.Google Scholar

^{page 160 note 54} Bouillard, H., Karl Barth, vol. 1, p. 109, citing J. Hamer [My translation].Google Scholar

^{page 160 note 55} Op. cit., pp. 164ff.

^{page 160 note 56} Ibid., p. 182.

^{page 160 note 57} Ibid., pp. 185–6.

^{page 160 note 58} C.D., 2/2, p. 175.

^{page 161 note 59} Gunton, Colin E., Becoming and Being: The Doctrine of God in Charles Hartshorne and Karl Barth, p. 198.Google Scholar

^{page 162 note 60} Macquarrie, J., God-Talk, pp. 65–78.Google Scholar

^{page 162 note 61} Ibid., p. 68.

^{page 162 note 62} In Sykes, op. cit., pp. 181ff.

^{page 163 note 63} Ibid., p. 181.

^{page 163 note 64} Ibid., pp. 181–2.

^{page 163 note 65} Ibid., p. 183. Williams, cites Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, pp. 84–85.Google Scholar

^{page 163 note 66} Op. cit., pp. 175 and 184.