Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
In the history of exegesis there have been few books within the Old Testament which have roused more vigorous controversy than the interpretation of the Book of Jonah. There was a time when one's orthodoxy could be quickly determined simply on the basis of opinions held regarding its historicity. Yet in spite of the stormy past it is a surprising fact that in modern times there has been a great unanimity of interpretation reached among Old Testament scholars. On the one hand, the attempt of the older expositors, such as Pusey and Orelli, to defend the book as literal history has been almost universally rejected as untenable. On the other hand, the allegorical interpretation of G. A. Smith has found few followers. Rather, the great majority of modern scholars have reached the conclusion that the book of Jonah is simply a narrative which the author used as a means of conveying a general truth in an interesting and effective manner. R. H. Pheiffer is typical when he calls it ‘a short story with a moral’. The spiritual message of the book is the lesson that God's love is not exclusively confined to Israel, but that Israel carries a responsibility of sharing it with others.
page 53 note 1 Cf. Bewer, J., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Jonah (1912), pp. 78ffGoogle Scholar; Robinson, T. H., Die Zwölf Kleinen Propheten (1938), p.:118Google Scholar; Weiser, A., Das Buch der zwölf Kleinen Propheten, I (1949), p. 188Google Scholar; Bentzen, A., Introduction to the Old Testament, II (1949). p. 147.Google Scholar
page 53 note 2 Introduction to the Old Testament (1941), p. 587.
page 58 note 1 Cf. the discussion of Torrance, T. F., Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 3 (1950), pp. 301ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 60 note 1 Cf. Schmidt, Hans, Jona (1907)Google Scholar, for a detailed study of the traditions.