No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
At the beginning of 1917, there was published The Jesus of History by T. R. Glover, and it would be difficult to overestimate the influence that this book had on students and others of my generation. It seemed to bring Jesus down from the stained-glass existence in which our youthful piety had pictured Him, to make of Him a person real, vibrant and responsive to our twentieth-century needs—‘a man living upon victuals’ as Carlyle said of Richard Cœur de Lion. Glover too dispensed with all the theological jargon that seemed to us to stand as a barrier between the Jesus of the Gospels and the common man, and we heard Him speaking to us in a language that we could understand. Besides, this Jesus of History was a Jesus that could be preached, and the Gospel that was proclaimed by many younger men from their pulpits in the years following the 1914–18 War was the Gospel according to T. R. Glover. Glover has gone very much out of fashion today, and there were indeed limitations in his portrait of Jesus as there are bound to be in every such portrait made by man. Yet when I read this book again a few months ago, it seemed to me that almost everything that Glover said—and how well he said it!—was true in the sense that it fitted into the picture that any honest historian would make of the Jesus of the Gospels.
page 151 note 1 Past and Present. Bk. II, Ch. 1.
page 151 note 2 Glover, T. R.: The Jesus of History (henceforth cited as Jesus of History), London, 1917, p. 174.Google Scholar
page 152 note 1 For a study of the ways in which this contribution has been made, see Jeremias, J., ‘The Present Position in the Controversy concerning the Problem of the Historical Jesus’, in Expository Times, LXIX (1958), pp. 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 152 note 2 Renan, E., The Life of Jesus (London, 1864), p. 20. Translation of Vie de Jésus.Google Scholar
page 152 note 3 1 Pet. 1.8.
page 153 note 1 Robinson, James M., A New Quest of the Historical Jesus, Studies in Biblical Theology No. 25 (henceforth cited as New Quest) (London, 1959), p. 77.Google Scholar
page 153 note 2 Quoted by Althaus, P., The So-called Kerygma and the Historical Jesus henceforth cited as So-called Kerygma) (Edinburgh, 1959), p. 20Google Scholar. Translation of Das sogennante Kerygma und der historische Jesus (Gütersloh, 1958).Google Scholar
page 153 note 3 Robinson, J. M., New Quest, p. 97.Google Scholar
page 153 note 4 Gal. 3.1.
page 153 note 5 Jesus of History, p. 3.
page 153 note 6 Acts 17.18.
page 153 note 7 1 Cor. 2.2.
page 153 note 8 Althaus, P., So-called Kerygma, p. 85.Google Scholar
page 154 note 1 Jesus of History, p. 36.
page 154 note 2 ibid., p. 61.
page 154 note 3 cf. Evans, C. F., ‘The Central Section of Luke's Gospel’, in Nineham, D. E., ed., Studies in the Gospels (Oxford, 1955), pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
page 155 note 1 Quoted in Wood, H. G., Terrot Reaveley Glover (Cambridge 1953), p. 110.Google Scholar
page 156 note 1 Althaus, P., So-called Kerygma, p. 23.Google Scholar
page 156 note 2 Robinson, J. M., New Quest p. 80.Google Scholar
page 156 note 3 Althaus, P., So-called Kerygma, p. 22.Google Scholar
page 156 note 4 Mark 10.32.
page 156 note 5 Jesus of History, p. 174.
page 157 note 1 ibid, Jesus of History. p. 91.
page 157 note 2 ibid., p. 64.
page 157 note 3 ibid., pp. 103, 104.
page 157 note 4 ibid., p. 64.
page 157 note 5 Mark i.27; 10.24; 10.32 (θ⋯μβoς, Luke 4.36; 5.9).
page 157 note 6 Mark 9.15.
page 157 note 7 Mark 2.10.
page 157 note 8 Jesus of History, p. 85.
page 158 note 1 Life of jesus, p. 193.
page 158 note 2 ibid., p. 189.
page 158 note 3 ibid., p. 29.
page 158 note 4 Jesus of History, p. 106.
page 158 note 5 Bultmann, D. R., Jesus and the Word (London, 1935), p. 173Google Scholar. Translation of Jesus (Berlin, 2nd ed., 1934).Google Scholar
page 159 note 1 Ezek. 4.1–3.
page 159 note 2 New Quest, p. 95.
page 160 note 1 Quoted in Robinson, J. M., New Quest, p. 83.Google Scholar
page 160 note 2 MacQuarrie, J., An Existentialist Theology (London, 1955), Ch. V, §16.Google Scholar
page 160 note 3 Terrot Reaveley Glover, p. 110.
page 160 note 4 Goguel, M., The Life of Jesus (London, 1933), p. 570Google Scholar. Translation of La Vie de Jesus (Paris, 1932).Google Scholar
page 161 note 1 Matt. 11.12.
page 162 note 1 cf. Althaus, , So-called Kerygma, p. 16.Google Scholar
page 163 note 1 cf. Robinson, J. M., New Quest, pp. 66–72Google Scholar. An interesting parallel to this in another sphere is found in MacKinnon, D. M., A Study in Ethical Theory (London, 1957)Google Scholar, in which moralists of the past are seen to join excitingly in present-day ethical conversations.