^{page 287 note 1} Moltmann, J., The Trinity and the Kingdom of God, trans. Kohl, Margarel (London: SCM Press; New York: Harper & Row, 1981). I am here developing further some ideas put forward there.Google Scholar

^{page 290 note 2} Greg. Naz., Or. 31, 11.

^{page 290 note 3} Augustine, De trinitate, XII c. 5. Also Thomas Aquinas, S.Th., I, q. 93 a.4. Cf. also the comments of Mayr, F. K., ‘Trinitätstheologie und theologische Anthropologie’, ZThk 68 (1971), pp. 427–477.Google Scholar

^{page 291 note 4} Schmaus, M., Die psychologische Trinitätslehre des hl. Augustinus (Münster, 1927), p. 199.Google Scholar

^{page 291 note 5} ibid., pp. 222f; cf. Mayr, F. K., ‘Augustins Kritik der Analogie zwischen Trinität und menschlichcr Familie in De Trinitate XII’, Révue des Études Augustiennes 19 (1971).Google Scholar

^{page 293 note 6} This discussion is very well described in Krusche, W., Das Wirken des Heiligen Geistes nach Calvin (Göttingen, 1957), pp. 33ff.Google Scholar

^{page 292 note 7} Quoted in Krusche, op. cit., p. 41.

^{page 293 note 8} For criticism of this view cf. Bφrresen, K. E., Subordination et equivalence. Nature et rôle de femme d'apres Augustin et Thomas d'Aquin (Oslo & Paris, 1968)Google Scholar; Ruether, R., New Woman — New Earth: Sexist Ideologies and Human Liberation (New York: Seabury Press, 1975).Google Scholar

^{page 293 note 9} Staniloae, D., ‘The Holy Trinity: Structure of Supreme Love’ in his Theology and the Church (New York, 1980), pp. 73–108Google Scholar; Osthathios, G. Mar, Theology of a Classless Society (London, 1979; Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis Books, 1980), esp. 92ff.Google Scholar

^{page 293 note 10} On the concept of the charismatic church cf. Eichholz, G., ‘Charismatische Gemeinde’ ThEx 77 (1959)Google Scholar; Moltmann, J., The Church in the Power of the Spirit, trans. Kohl, Margaret (London: SCM Press; New York: Harper & Row, 1975)Google Scholar. In eucumenical discussions it is always only the mutual recognition of ministries which is talked about as condition for the church's unity. Why is the fellowship of the congregations not also brought into the discussion as a condition for unity?

^{page 295 note 11} Chenu, M.-D., ‘Die Neubelehung der trinitarischen Grundstruktur der Kirche’, Concilium 17 (1981), pp. 453–460.Google Scholar

^{page 295 note 12} Zinzendorf, Nikolaus Graf, Hauptschriften, II (Hildesheim, 1963), pp. 33ff.: The first address in Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

^{page 295 note 13} Many of the homilies ascribed to Macarius appear to be the work of Symeon: cf. the extensive historical study by 1Dörries, H., Die Theologie des Makarios/Symeon (Göttingen, 1978).Google Scholar

^{page 295 note 14} For further evidence cf. Murray, R., Symbols of Church and Kingdom. A Study in Early Syriac Tradition (London, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 142ff., 312ff.Google Scholar

^{page 296 note 15} Schmid, H., Die Dogmatik der Evangelisch-Lutherischen Kirche, 7th ed. (Gütersloh, 1893), I: De scriptura sacra, pp. 18ffGoogle Scholar. Also the comments of Barth, K., Church Dogmatics I/1, trans. Bromiley, Geoffrey (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975). §4, PP. 120ff.Google Scholar