No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
A. G. Hogg, although still not well known outside of India, has become in recent years the centre of increasing interest, particularly as studies of major missionary thinkers have demonstrated his importance to Protestant thought during the first half of this century.1 Hogg, who was Principal of the Madras Christian College from 1928 to 1938, first arrived in India from Scotland in 1903 as Professor of Philosophy at the College. During his first years in Madras, he contributed several articles to the Madras Christian College Magazine, the most significant being a series entitled ‘Karma and Redemption’ (1904–5), published in book form in 1909.2 In it, he outlined his fundamental missionary approach, which was based on his distinction between faith and faiths.
page 241 note 1 See: Sharpe, Eric J., Not to destroy but to fulfil. The contribution of J. N. Farquhar to Protestant missionary thought in India before 1914. Uppsala: Gleerup, 1965Google Scholar; Hallencreutz, Carl, Kraemer towards Tambaram. A study in Hendrik Kraemer's missionary approach. Uppsala: Gleerup, 1966Google Scholar; Eilert, Haken, Boundlessness. Studies in Karl Ludwig Reichelt's missionary thinking with special regard to the Buddhist-Christian encounter. Arhus C., Denmark: Forlaget Aros 1974Google Scholar; Cox, James L., The development of A. G. Hogg's theology in relation to non-Christian faith: its significance for the Tambaram meeting of the International Missionary Council 1938. University of Aberdeen: Unpublished Thesis, 1977Google Scholar. See also: Sharpe, Eric J., The theology of A. G. Hogg. Madras: CLS, 1971Google Scholar; Hallencreutz, Carl, New approaches to men of other faiths. Geneva: WCC, 1970Google Scholar; Van Lin, J. J. E., Protestanse Theologie der Godsdiensten van Edinburgh naar Tambaran (1910–1938)Google Scholar. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum and Comp. B.V., 1974.
page 241 note 2 Hogg, A. G., ‘Karma and redemption’. Madras Christian College Magazine. N.S. 4 (6–10), 1904–1905, 281–92; 359–73; 393–409; 449–62; 505–22Google Scholar. Hogg, A. G., Karma and redemption. An essay toward the interpretation of Hinduism and the re-statement of Christianity. London, Madras, Colombo: CLS, 1909. The book was reprinted by the CLS in 1971 with an introduction by Eric Sharpe.Google Scholar
page 243 note 1 Varghese, V. E., ‘Review of literature on Indian Christian theology published in India during the past twenty-five years’, Indian Journal of Theology 25 (3 and 4), 1976, 144–145.Google Scholar
page 243 note 2 Letter to members of the Jerusalem meeting. International Review of Missions no. 62 = 16 (April), 1927, 281.
page 243 note 3 The contributors were A. K. Reischauer, Nicol Macnicol, W. H. T. Gairdner, J. Leighton Stuart, Kenneth Saunders, D. Willard Lyon, and Rufus M. Jones.
page 244 note 1 Cited by Speer, Robert, in Jerusalem Report, Volume I, 418–419Google Scholar.
page 244 note 2 These were Rufus Jones' words in his preparatory paper on secularism.
page 244 note 3 Oliver Chase Quick, ‘The Jerusalem meeting and the Christian message’, I.R.M. no. 67 = 17 (July), 1928, 448–9.
page 244 note 4 Schlunk, Martin (ed.), Von den höhen des Oelberges. Bericht der deutschen Unordnung über die Missionstagung in Jerusalem. Stuttgart and Basel: Evang. Missionsverlag, 1928, 203–218.Google Scholar
page 245 note 1 Kraemer, Hendrik, The Christian message in a non-Christian world. London: Edinburgh House Press, 1938.Google Scholar
page 245 note 2 See especially Kraemer's chapter, ‘The Christian faith and the Christian ethic’, pp. 61–100.
page 245 note 3 Hogg made three contributions to the Tambaram discussions: ‘The Christian attitude to non-Christian faith’, in The authority of the faith (Tambaram volume, no. 1), 102–25; ‘The Word made flesh’, in Addresses and other records (Tambaram volume, no. 8), 131–44; Towards clarifying my reactions to Dr. Kraemer's book. Madras: Diocesan Press, 1938.Google Scholar
page 247 note 1 Hogg made the above points in his contribution to The Authority of the faith.
page 247 note 2 Hogg underscored this difference from Kraemer in his pamphlet, Towards clarifying my reactions to Dr Kraemer's book.
page 248 note 1 For a brief summary of these changes and an analysis of the current developments, see Samartha, S.J., ‘Courage for dialogue: an interpretation of the Nairobi debate’, Religion and Society 23 (3), 1976, 22–35.Google Scholar
page 248 note 2 For example, see Anderson, Gerald H. (ed.), Asian voices in Christian theology. Maryknoll: Orbis, 1976, 289.Google Scholar
page 248 note 3 Thomas, M. M., ‘Review of Karma and redemption’, Religion and Society 18 (1), 1971, 92–94.Google Scholar
page 250 note 1 Newbigin, Lesslie, The finality of Christ. London: SCM, 1969, 35–40; 49–56.Google Scholar
page 251 note 1 Kraemer, Hendrik, Religion and the Christian faith. London: Lutterworth Press, 1956.Google Scholar
page 253 note 1 Newbigin, Lesslie, ‘The basis, purpose, and manner of inter-faith dialogue’, Scot. Journ. of Theol. 30 (3), 1977, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 254 note 1 Ariarajah, S. Wesley, ‘Towards a theology of dialogue’, Ecumenical Review 29 (I), 1977, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar