Article contents
Discovery and Theology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Extract
Among the reforms needed for a relevant Christian theology today is a capacity for discovery. One of the chief powers of modern science is its ability to discover hidden areas of reality and bring them to our understanding. Science by its success in continually finding new levels and dimensions in nature testifies regularly that life is interesting and dynamic. The example of science has yet to be followed in theology which may explain why the layman today does not really expect much from theologians except the trite clichés of the past.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1975
References
page 301 note 1 The Idea of Revelation in Recent Thought (New York: Columbia University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
page 301 note 2 Religious Language (London: S.G.M. Press, 1957).Google Scholar
page 301 note 3 Christianity in an Age of Science (London: Oxford University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
page 302 note 1 London: Oxford University Press, 1971.
page 302 note 2 ‘Science and Religion: Separate Dimensions or Common Ground?’ Philosophy Today, VII (Spring, 1963), pp. 4–14.Google Scholar
page 302 note 3 Popper, Karl, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson and Co., 1959), p. 16.Google Scholar
page 303 note 1 Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958).Google Scholar
page 303 note 2 Polanyi, Michael, ‘Genius in Science’, Encounter, XXXVIII (Jan. 1972), p. 48.Google Scholar
page 303 note 3 The Tacit Dimension (Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Co., Inc., 1966), pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
page 304 note 1 The Tacit Dimension, p. 10; Personal Knowledge, pp. 55–7.
page 304 note 2 The Tacit Dimension, pp. 24–5.
page 305 note 1 The Study of Man (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959), p. 72.Google Scholar
page 305 note 2 ibid., p. 73.
page 305 note 3 ibid., pp. 75f.
page 305 note 4 ibid.
page 306 note 1 The Study of Man, p. 76.
page 306 note 2 Personal Knowledge, pp. 167–8.
page 306 note 3 ibid., pp. 3–17.
page 307 note 1 Science, Faith and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964), pp. 65–74.Google Scholar
page 307 note 2 Personal Knowledge, p. 194, and ‘What is a Painting’, The American Scholar, XXXIX (Autumn, 1970), pp. 655–669.Google Scholar
page 308 note 1 The Tacit Dimension, pp. 32–3.
page 308 note 2 ibid., p. 13 and 33f.
page 308 note 3 ‘Genius in Science’, p. 45.
page 309 note 1 ibid., p. 50.
page 309 note 2 Personal Knowledge, pp. 195–202.
page 309 note 3 ibid., pp. 327–405, and The Tacit Dimension, pp. 29–52.
page 309 note 4 ibid., p. 83.
page 311 note 1 Personal Knowledge, p. 403.
page 311 note 2 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), pp. 10, 81f.Google Scholar
page 313 note 1 Barbour, Ian, Issues in Science and Religion (New York: Harper and Row, 1971Google Scholar), Charles Coulson, op. cit., Schilling, Harold, Science and Religion (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1962Google Scholar), and Arthur Peacocke, op. cit.
page 313 note 2 ‘Michael Polanyi and the Task of Theology’, Journal of Religion, XLVI (Jan. 1966), p. 46.Google Scholar
page 314 note 1 ‘Science and Religion: Separate Dimension or Common Ground’ pp. 4–14.
page 315 note 1 Scott, William T., ‘A Bridge from Science to Religion Based on Polanyi's Theory of Knowledge’, Zygon, V (March, 1970), pp. 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 316 note 1 Ulrich, Lawrence P., ‘Polanyi's Theory of Commitment’, Fourth Annual Colloquium in Philosophy, University of Dayton, Oct. 1973.Google Scholar
page 316 note 2 Personal Knowledge, p 304.
page 316 note 3 ibid., p. 311.
page 317 note 1 Jeeves, M. A., The Scientific Enterprise and Christian Faith (London: Tyndale Press, 1969), pp. 41–44.Google Scholar
page 318 note 1 Personal Knowledge, p. 324.
page 318 note 2 ibid., p. 281.
page 319 note 1 Science, Faith and Society, p. 59.
page 319 note 2 Radical Monotheism and Western Culture (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1960), pp. 59–60.Google Scholar
page 320 note 1 Personal Knowledge, p. 285.
page 320 note 2 Grene, Marjorie, The Knower and the Known (New York: Basic Books, 1966), p. 13.Google Scholar
page 321 note 1 The Tacit Dimension, p. 10.
- 2
- Cited by