^{page 359 note 1} Oct. 1974, pp. 18–19.

^{page 359 note 2} See, e.g., the latter half of his book God and the Universe of Faiths (Macmillan, 1973)Google Scholar

^{page 359 note 3} Reform, p. 18.

^{page 359 note 4} ibid.

^{page 359 note 5} ibid.

^{page 360 note 1} Reform p. 18.

^{page 360 note 2} ibid.

^{page 360 note 3} ibid.

^{360 4} ibid.

^{page 360 note 5} This point is treated at greater length in e.g. God and the Universe of Faiths, p. 117.

^{page 360 note 6} Reform, p. 19.

^{page 360 note 7} ibid.

^{page 360 note 8} Hick concedes something very much along these lines when he says in another place: ‘Indeed so central is the belief in the deity of Christ to the established system of Christian theology that many people would today identify it as the essential Christian belief’, op. cit., p. 114.

^{page 360 note 9} Reform, p. 19.

^{page 361 note 1} In the ensuing discussion ‘Church’ is used as a convenient abbreviation for some such phrase as ‘those persons who would call themselves believing and committed Chraistians’.

^{page 361 note 2} Reform, p. 19.

^{page 361 note 3} ibid.

^{page 362 note 1} Reform p. 19.

^{page 362 note 2} ibid.

^{page 362 note 3} ibid.

^{page 365 note 1} Reform, p. 19.

^{page 367 note 1} God and the Universe of Faiths, ch. 3.