No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Mr Samuel Johnson said, I believe, that no question of precedence could arise between a flea and a louse. If we asked the average educated Westerner a similar question about theology and philosophy (at least of the old type), he would very probably, though perhaps more politely, give a similar answer; the question of precedence between theology and philosophy has become quite irrelevant, except perhaps to a small, archaic and esoteric clique still entrenched in the traditionalism of the older universities, who taught and wrote about theology and metaphysics. Having been jealous and contending queens these subjects have become Cinderellas.
page 107 note * (Note.—I do not like using the concept of mind, convenient as it is, because it lacks clarity; and it is significant that it has no equivalent in either French or German. I equally tend to refrain from using the concept of soul, ancient and universally used as it is. Instead of the body-soul relation—with its inherent danger of dualism—I speak of the mystery of the whole of man irreducibly constituted of spirit, body and reason.)