Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:19:55.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barth's Resurrection of the Dead: further reflections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2003

David Fergusson
Affiliation:
Faculty of Divinity, New College, Mound Place, Edinburgh EH1 2LX, [email protected]

Abstract

A theological commentary on 1 Corinthians, Barth's Resurrection of the Dead (1924) is written in a complex genre, embracing the discourses of preaching, doctrine, ethics and historical criticism. Based on lectures delivered in 1923, it reveals the dialectical emphases of his early theology, though one may detect some development of his doctrine of the church and its apostolic authority. Barth's claim that the hermeneutical key to 1 Corinthians lies in its penultimate chapter on the resurrection was contested by Bultmann in an important article review. Already in the 1920s significant differences between two of the leading dialectical theologians can be detected. Bultmann's stress on the character of faith is apparent in the claim that 1 Cor 13 is the centre of the text, whereas Barth's stronger objectivism can be discerned in his appeal to Paul's foundational attesting of the resurrection. While Barth is arguably on stronger exegetical ground at this point, his reticence on the general resurrection of the dead remains puzzling. Despite its centrality for Paul and the later credal traditions of the church, this article of faith is handled with a restraint requiring some explanatory comment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd, 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)