^{page 181 note 1} Mackintosh, H. R., Types of Modern Theology (Fontana, London, 1904), p. 106.Google Scholar

^{page 182 note 1} See Gollwitzer, H., The Christian Faith and the Marxist Criticism of Religion (Edinburgh, 1970), pp. 75–76, 123, 154.Google Scholar

^{page 183 note 1} Tucker, R., Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1961), p. 46.Google Scholar

^{page 183 note 2} This is certainly not to agree that the Christian understanding of alienation is ahistorical, as Mészáros suggests (Marx' Theory of Alienation [London, 1970], pp. 36ff)Google Scholar but rather to question the Hegelian-Marxist interpretation of the historicity of alienation.

^{page 183 note 3} The young Marx was in his most Hegelian mood when he wrote: ‘The more man puts into God, the less he retains in himself’ (Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 [Moscow, 1961], p. 70).Google Scholar

^{page 184 note 1} Wetter, G., Dialectical Materialism (London, 1958), pp. 7–8Google Scholar. An illuminating recent study of the young Hegelian movement is McLellan, David, The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx (London, 1969), see esp. pp. 1–4, 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 185 note 1} Tucker, op. cit., p. 73.

^{page 185 note 2} Avineri, S., The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx (Cambridge, 1968), p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 185 note 3} On Bauer see McLellan, op. cit., pp. 48–81.

^{page 185 note 4} Lichtheim, George, Marxism (London, 1964), p. 16.Google Scholar

^{page 185 note 5} Barth, Karl, From Rousseau to Ritschl (S.C.M. Press, London, 1959), chapter IX.Google Scholar

^{page 186 note 1} Cited in Marcuse, H., Reason and Revolution (New York, 1954), p. 268.Google Scholar

^{page 186 note 2} H. R. Mackintosh, op. cit., p. 122.

^{page 186 note 3} Feuerbach, L., Essence of Christianity (Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1957), p. xliv.Google Scholar

^{page 186 note 4} ibid., p. 274.

^{page 186 note 5} Feuerbach, L., Sämtliche Werke, VI, p. 325, cited in McLellan, op. cit., p. 90.Google Scholar

^{page 186 note 6} Cited in Kamenka, E., The Philosophy of Ludwig Feuerbach (London, 1970), p. 17.Google Scholar

^{page 187 note 1} Cited in Wetter, op. cit., p. 12.

^{page 187 note 2} Tucker, op. cit., p. 86.

^{page 187 note 3} Feuerbach, op. cit., p. 63.

^{page 187 note 4} Tucker, op. cit., pp. 2, 79, 96.

^{page 188 note 1} Cited in Wilson, Edmund, To the Finland Station (Fontana, 1960), p. 192.Google Scholar

^{page 188 note 2} K. Marx, Theses on Feuerbach, Thesis IV, cited from Marx, K. and Engels, F., On Religion (Moscow, 1957), p. 70.Google Scholar

^{page 189 note 1} Theses on Feuerbach, II.

^{page 190 note 1} Marx, and Engels, , The German Ideology (Moscow, 1968), p. 24.Google Scholar

^{page 190 note 2} Marx, Karl, Contribution to the Critique of Hegel' Philosophy of Right. Cited in: Marx and Engels, On Religion, p. 42.Google Scholar

^{page 190 note 3} Löwith, Karl, From Hegel to Nietzsche (Constable, London, 1965), pp. 327–328, 371, III.Google Scholar

^{page 190 note 4} Training in Christianity, trans. Lowrie, Walter (Princeton, 1944), p. 89; cf. pp. 88–90.Google Scholar

^{page 191 note 1} Cited in Löwith, op. cit., pp. 159–60.

^{page 192 note 1} SK—The Last Tears: Journals I853–55, ed. and trans. Smith, R. Gregor (London, 1965), p. 30.Google Scholar

^{page 192 note 2} Lowrie, Walter, Kierkegaard (Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1962), pp. 264–65.Google Scholar

^{page 192 note 3} Tucker, op. cit., pp. 68–69.

^{page 192 note 4} Cited in MacIntyre, A. C., Marxism—An Interpretation, p. 28.Google Scholar

^{page 192 note 5} Kierkegaard, S., Journals, ed. and trans. Drue, A. (Fontana, 1958), p. 98.Google Scholar

^{page 193 note 1} See Lochman, Jan Milik, Church in a Marxist Society (London, 1970)Google Scholar, and Hromadka, Josef L., Thoughts of a Czech Pastor (London, 1970).Google Scholar

^{page 194 note 1} Newbigin, Lesslie, Christ our Eternal Contemporary (Madras, 1908), p. 81.Google Scholar

^{page 195 note 1} See Avineri, op. cit., pp. 65ff, for a penetrating examination of Marx's materialism.

^{page 195 note 2} cf. Engels: ‘Fortunately it is easy enough to be an atheist today. Atheism is so near to being self-obvious with European working-class parties nowadays. … It can even be said of the German Social-Democratic workers that atheism has already outlived itself with them: this purely negative word no longer has any application as far as they are concerned inasmuch as their opposition to faith in God is no longer one of theory, but one of practice; they have purely and simply finished with God, they live and think in the world of reality and are therefore materialists’ (cited in On Religion, p. 141).

^{page 195 note 3} Pace Mészarós, op. cit., pp. I66–8.

^{page 195 note 4} The problem posed by Pannenburg, W. in ‘Can Christianity do without an Eschatology?‘, The Christian Hope (S.P.C.K. Theological Collections, London, 1970), p. 29Google Scholar. Cf. James Klugmann's reply in the same volume, pp. 59–63.

^{page 196 note 1} e.g. Mézarós, op. cit., pp. 28–33 and 165–73.