Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 April 2013
Charles Taylor's A Secular Age is by any account a monumental work. It has spawned a cottage industry of comment which should not abate for a long time to come. While social theorists have engaged Taylor's arguments from the very moment the book appeared, theologians seem to have been slower to comment. Recently, however, two important theological assessments have appeared in the Journal of Religion and Modern Theology.
1 See Journal of Religion 90 (2010), pp. 367–406; and Modern Theology 26 (2010), pp. 321–416.
2 Taylor, Charles, A Secular Age (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007), p. 25.Google Scholar
3 Tulley, James and Weinstock, Daniel M., Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question (Cambridge: CUP, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Ibid., p. 226.
5 Taylor, A Secular Age, p. 643.
6 Tulley and Weinstock, Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism, p. 47.
7 Ibid., p. 47, quoting Sources of the Self, p. 519.
8 Ibid.
9 Taylor, A Secular Age, p. 519.
10 Tulley and Weinstock, Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism, p. 47.
11 Connolly, William, American Political Science Review 90 (1996), p. 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Tulley and Weinstock, Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism, p. 225.
13 Ibid., p. 226.
14 Connolly, William, American Political Science Review 90 (1996), p. 182CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 Ibid.
16 Ibid.
17 Ibid.
18 Pascal, Blaise, Pensées and Other Writings, trans. Levi, Honor (Oxford: OUP, 1995).Google Scholar