Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:23:33.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Comments on Tillich's Doctrine of Creation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

Extract

The doctrine of Creation has occupied theologians very much in recent years and in this Paul Tillich has not been an exception.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 113 note 1 Tillich, , Systematic Theology (Chicago Univ. Press), vol. I, p. 237.Google Scholar

page 113 note 2 cf. ibid., p. 183f.

page 113 note 3 Ehrhardt, A., ‘Creatio ex nihilo’, Studia Theologica, vol. IV, pp. 14ff.Google Scholar

page 114 note 1 Systematic Theology, vol. I, p. 253.Google Scholar

page 114 note 2 Bréhier, E., Les Ideés philosophiques et religieuses de Philon de l' Aléxandrie, pp. 7883.Google Scholar

page 114 note 3 ibid., p. 81, n. 2.

page 115 note 1 Pseudo-Aristotle, De XZG, 1, 975a, 8.

page 115 note 2 Plutarch, De Anim. Procr., v, 1014b.

page 115 note 3 Ehrhardt, op. cit., p. 25.

page 115 note 4 Systematic Theology, vol. 1, p. 253.Google Scholar

page 116 note 1 Systematic Theology, vol. I, p. 253.Google Scholar

page 116 note 2 ibid., vol. 1, p. 187.

page 117 note 1 Mill, J. S., Logic, bk. 1, vi, 2.Google Scholar

page 118 note 1 Mutability is inseparable from creatureliness, according to Augustine—see Contra Julianum opus imperfectum, v, 42.

page 118 note 2 Contra Julianum op. imp., v, 44.