Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:40:21.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relevance Of Kierkegaard to the Demythologising Controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

J. Heywood Thomas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The controversy which has this forbidding name arose as a result of Bultmann's essay «New Testament and Mythology’. The essay appears to have evoked a very loud and fierce criticism in Germany and has become the bone of contention among its theologians. This controversy has spread to America where Bultmann's friend Professor Paul Tillich has put before the theological public not only the issue involved in the debate but also his own unhesitating support of Bultmann's programme. It has also come to us in Britain through the publication of Professor Henderson's Myth in the New Testament, and the ‘documents in the case’ in the volume Kerygma and Myth. First let us see what it is that Bultmann has to say.

Type
Research Article
Information
Scottish Journal of Theology , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1957 , pp. 239 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 239 note 1 Kerygma and Myth (London, S.P.C.K. 1953), p. 1.Google Scholar

page 240 note 1 op. cit., p. 3.

page 241 note 1 op. cit., p. 4.

page 241 note 2 op. cit., p. 10.

page 241 note 3 ibid., p. II.

page 242 note 1 op. cit., pp. 18–19.

page 242 note 2 ibid., p. 19.

page 242 note 3 ibid., p. 31.

page 243 note 1 Henderson, I., Myth in the New Testament (London, S.C.M. 1952), p. 21, Vide Kerygma und Mythos, p. 59.Google Scholar

page 243 note 2 Ruggiero, , Existentialism, p. 31.Google Scholar

page 245 note 1 Henderson, op. cit., p. 23. The reference to Mackintosh is to Types of Modern Theology, p. 219n.

page 247 note 1 Ketygma and Myth, p. 146.

page 247 note 2 ibid.

page 249 note 1 Kerygma and Myth, p. 164.

page 250 note 1 Kerygma and Myth, p. 185.

page 250 note 2 ibid., p. 184.

page 251 note 1 Kerygma and Myth, p. 185.

page 251 note 2 ibid., pp. 150–1.

page 251 note 3 ibid., p. 85.