Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:10:50.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Place and Limit of The Wisdom in The Framework of The Old Testament Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

Walther Zimmerli
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The faith of the Old Testament has its origin in the fundamental fact that God encountered Israel in the midst of history. The preamble of the decalogue mentions it: ‘I am Yahweh thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.’ From this beginning Israel knows that her God encountered her not in a reaction but in a free divine action in history. Through this action He laid hold upon Israel, called her and made her His people. At a later time this previous deed of God came to be designated by the term ‘election of Israel’. The powerful word-event of Old Testament Prophecy made plain once more this structure of God's action: Yahweh, the God who addresses Israel in and through history by the word of His messengers and who is not only reacting against Israel's sin but acting by His free grace, proves to be the God who stands by the independence of His election.

Type
Research Article
Information
Scottish Journal of Theology , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 1964 , pp. 146 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 147 note 1 Prov. 11.14, 14.28, 28.15, 29.2.

page 147 note 2 Prov. 14.28, 35, 16.10, I4f etc.; Eccles. 4.13, 5.8 (RV 5.9), 8.2, 4 etc.

page 148 note 1 Prov. 14.31; 17.5; Eccles. 12.1.

page 148 note 2 Rylaarsdam, J. C., Revelation in Jewish Wisdom Literature, 1946, 23.Google Scholar

page 148 note 3 Brunner, H., Handbuch der Orientalistik, 1, 2, 1952, 93–96.Google ScholarGese, H., Lehre und Wirklichkeit in der alten Weisheit, 1958.Google Scholar

page 149 note 1 Pritchard, J. B., Ancient Near Eastern Texts, 1955, 421.Google Scholar

page 149 note 2 Prov. 22.19.

page 149 note 3 von Rad, G., Old Testament Theology, vol. 1, 418f.Google Scholar Also Zimmerli, W., ‘Die Weisung des Alten Testamentes zum Geschäft der Sprache’ (in Das Problem der Sprache in Theologie und Kirche, ed. by Schneemelcher, W., 1959).Google Scholar

page 149 note 4 Alt, A., ‘Die Weisheit Salomos’ (in Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte Israels, 2, 1953, 90–99, esp. 94).Google Scholar

page 150 note 1 von Rad, G., ‘Hiob 38 und die altägyptische Weisheit’ (in Wisdom in Israel and in the Ancient Near East, Suppl. to Vetus Testamentum, 3, 1955, 293–301).Google Scholar

page 151 note 1 Gen. a.19–23.

page 152 note 1 Gen. 1.28.

page 152 note 2 Fichtner, J., ‘Die altorientalische Weisheit in ihrer israelitisch-jüdischen Ausprägung’, BZAW 62, 1933, 75–79.Google Scholar

page 153 note 1 2 Sam. 17.1–14. Cf. also Boer, P. de, ‘The Counsellor’ (in Suppl. to VT, 3, 1955, 42–71).Google Scholar

page 153 note 2 Prov. 161, 9, 19.21.

page 153 note 3 Prov. 16.2, 21.2.

page 153 note 4 Prov. 21.1.

page 153 note 5 Prov. 25.2.

page 154 note 1 Prov. 17.15, 20.10.

page 154 note 2 Prov. 11.1, 20, 12.22.

page 154 note 3 Prov. 15.26.

page 154 note 4 Prov. 12.2.

page 154 note 5 Prov. 15.25, 16.4.

page 154 note 6 Prov. 15.29.

page 154 note 7 Prov. 15.3 (11).

page 154 note 8 Prov. 16.3, 20, 18.10, 20.22, 22.19, 28.25, 29.25.

page 154 note 9 Prov. 10.27, 14, 26f.

page 157 note 1 Pritchard, op. cit., 412.

page 157 note 2 Eccles. 1.13, 2.26 (twice), 3.10, 11, 5.17, 18 (RV 5.18, 19), 6.2, 8.15, 9.9, 12.7, 11.

page 157 note 3 Eccles. 2.10, 21, 3.22, 5.17, 18 (RV 5.18, 19), 9.6, 9 (11.2).