No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
For some years a Committee of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church of Australia has been at work preparing a statement on ‘The Nature and Functions of the Ministry’. Those portions of its statement which deal with the New Testament and Reformation bases for the Presbyterian conception of the Ministry were given general approval by the 1959 Assembly (Min. 131.2), and are being considered by Presbyteries. The Assembly has instructed the Committee meanwhile to prepare statements on certain other aspects of the subject, including ‘the non-theological factors that are influencing the conception of the Ministry in the changed place of the Church in the modern community’ (Min. 131.3). This paper (which owes something to work already done on behalf of this Committee) is intended as a contribution to thought concerning these ‘non-theological factors’.
page 383 note 1 The Ecumenical Review, vol. II (1949–1950), pp. 52–56.Google Scholar
page 384 note 1 Winfred E. Garrison, ‘Social and Cultural Factors in our Divisions’, ibid., vol. V (1952–3), p. 44.
page 384 note 2 ‘The Ecumenical Movement and its “Non-theological Factors” ’, ibid., vol. III (1950–1), p. 340.
page 385 note 1 E. R. Wickham, ‘The Encounter of the Christian Faith and Modern Technological Society’, ibid., vol. XI (1958–9), p. 259.
page 386 note 1 ‘The Structure of Modern Society and the Structure of the Church’, ibid., p. 158.
page 387 note 1 The Form of Presbyterial Church-Government, viii.
page 390 note 1 ‘Reflections on the Divinity Curriculum’, The Evangelical Quarterly, vol. XVI (1944), p. 119.Google Scholar
page 390 note 2 In a sermon, ‘The Priesthood Militant’, printed in Kemp, Eric W., N. P. Williams (S.P.C.K., London, ca. 1954)Google Scholar; cited in The Expository Times, vol. LXVI (1954–1955), P. 66.Google Scholar
page 391 note 1 ‘Institutional Factors Affecting Unity and Disunity’, The Ecumenical Review, vol. VIII (1955–1956), p. 119.Google Scholar
page 391 note 2 Of course, not all. the consequences of bureaucracy are evil. As Muelder himself points out, it has much to do with the promotion of efficiency and security.
page 392 note 1 Campbell, E. Q. and Pettigrew, T. F., Christians in Racial Crisis (Public Affairs Press, Washington, 1959), p. 92Google Scholar; cited in the Bulletin of the Department of Theology of the World Presbyterian Alliance, vol. I, no. 2 (August 1960), p. 15.