^{page 449 note 1} Robinson, John A. T., Honest to God, (London: SCM Press, 1963), pp. 51–2, 61, 119.Google Scholar

^{page 449 note 2} Langford, Thomas A., ‘The Natural Theology of John Macmurray’, Canadian Journal of Theology, XII 1: (1966), p. 9.Google Scholar

^{page 449 note 3} ibid.

^{page 449 note 4} Gilson, Étienne, ‘Historical Research and the Future of Scholasticism’, in A Gilson Reader, Pegis, Anton C., ed., (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1975), p. 156.Google Scholar

^{page 450 note 1} Cf. Langford, op. cit., where he objects to Macmurray's restriction of ‘religion’ to the personal sphere. It is doubtful whether Langford would find the definition so limiting had he placed it in the context of Macmurray's descriptive analysis of Hebrew and Christian Community in his earlier works, for the whole range of social expression and communion are implied when Macmurray speaks of persons in relation, along with the Personal Agent, whose intention they are.

^{page 450 note 2} Macmurray, John, Reason and Emotion (New York: D. Appleton-Century, 1936), p. 194Google Scholar; cf. Langford, op. cit., p. 9.

^{page 450 note 3} Macmurray, , Creative Society: A Study of the Relation of Christianity to Communism (New York: Association Press, 1936), p. 12.Google Scholar

^{page 450 note 4} ibid.

^{page 451 note 1} Macmurray, , Search for Reality in Religion (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1965), pp. 22–3.Google Scholar

^{page 451 note 2} ibid., pp. 12–14, 25.

^{page 451 note 3} ibid., pp. 25–6.

^{page 451 note 4} Macmurray, , The Clue to History (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1939), p. 17.Google Scholar

^{page 451 note 5} Macmurray, , The Self As Agent (London: Faber & Faber Ltd., 1957), p. 179.Google Scholar

^{page 452 note 1} Macmurray, , The Clue to History, p. 17.Google Scholar

^{page 453 note 1} ibid., p. 31.

^{page 454 note 1} Macmurray, , The Clue to History, pp. 33–4.Google Scholar

^{page 454 note 2} ibid., p. 38.

^{page 454 note 3} Macmurray, , Creative Society, p. 58.Google Scholar

^{page 455 note 1} ibid., pp. 58–9.

^{page 455 note 2} ibid., pp. 60–3.

^{page 455 note 3} ibid., pp. 73–4.

^{page 456 note 1} Macmurray, , The Clue to History, p. 50.Google Scholar

^{page 456 note 2} ibid., pp. 88–9.

^{page 457 note 1} Macmurray, , Creative Society, pp. 101–3.Google Scholar

^{page 457 note 2} ibid., p. 105.

^{page 458 note 1} Macmurray, , Creative Society, pp. 82–3.Google Scholar

^{page 458 note 2} ibid., pp. 84–5.

^{page 458 note 3} Macmurray, , Persons in Relation (New York: Harper, 1960), p. 165.Google Scholar

^{page 459 note 1} Macmurray, , The Clue to History, p. 122.Google Scholar

^{page 459 note 2} Macmurray, , Search for Reality in Religion, p. 21.Google Scholar

^{page 459 note 3} Macmurray, , The Clue to History, p. 122.Google Scholar

^{page 459 note 4} ibid., p. 147.

^{page 460 note 1} Macmurray, , The Clue to History, p. 147.Google Scholar

^{page 460 note 2} Macmurray, , The Self As Agent, p. 101.Google Scholar

^{page 460 note 3} Langford, op. cit., p. 9.

^{page 460 note 4} Macmurray, , The Self As Agent, p. 83.Google Scholar

^{page 461 note 1} Macmurray, , Persons in Relation, p. 48.Google Scholar

^{page 461 note 2} ibid., pp. 44–63.

^{page 463 note 1} Langford, op. cit., p. 18. Note that Macmurray explains what he means by a focus on practical as opposed to theoretical intention when he talks of the Copernican revolution he proposes in going from the self as subject to the self as agent. Cf. The Self As Agent, pp. 85–6.