Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher was born on the 2Ist day of November 1768, and died on the 12th day of February 1834. It is altogether fitting that as we honour the birth of this great man by dedicating to his memory this number of the Scottish Journal of Theology, we should consider that aspect of his thought which has continued to influence us in the twentieth century so powerfully.
page 257 note 1 See especially Schleiermacher, F. D. E., Hermeneutik, Nach den Handschriften neu herausgegeben und eingeleitet von Heinz Kimmerle, Heidelberg 1959Google Scholar, and the discussion of Gadamer, H.-G., Wahrheit und Methode, 1960, pp. 172ffGoogle Scholar. Also, “Ueber den Begriff der Hermeneutik mit Bezug auf F. A. Wolfs Andeutungen und Asts Lehrbuch”, Werke, III. 3, pp. 344ffGoogle Scholar; Hermeneutik und Kritik, mit besonderer Beziehung auf das Neue Testament, edit, by Lücke, F., Werke, 1. 7Google Scholar. For a brief account of Schleiermacher's Hermeneutics in English, see Hodges, H. A., Wilhelm Dilthey, pp. 234ffGoogle Scholar. Hodges sees Schleiermacher through the eyes of Dilthey, , Die Hermeneutik Schleiermachers, 1860.Google Scholar
page 257 note 2 Schleiermacher, , The Christian Faith, 4; Kurze Darstellung des Theologischen Studiums zum Behuf Einleitender Vorlesungen, edit, by Scholz, H., 1961Google Scholar. See also Flückiger, F., Philosophic und Theologie bei Schleiermacher, 1947Google Scholar; and Löffler, P., “Selbstbewustsein und Selbstverstandnis als theologische Principien bei Schleiermacher und Bultmann” in Kerygma und Dogma, II. 4, 1956, pp. 304ff.Google Scholar
page 258 note 1 See Gadamer, op. cit., pp. I66f, 172ff.
page 258 note 2 Hermeneutik, p. 38. Cf. Kimmerle's, Introduction, p. 17.Google Scholar
page 258 note 3 Hermeneutik, pp. 45f, 48f, 75f gof.
page 259 note 1 op. cit., p. 61f.
page 259 note 2 op. cit., pp. 57ff, goff, 161f.
page 259 note 3 op. cit., pp. 1O7ff, 113ff.
page 259 note 4 op. cit., p. 116f.
page 259 note 5 op. cit., pp. 165ff.
page 259 note 6 cf. Gadamer, op. cit., p. 178, and Hodges, op. cit., p. 12f.
page 260 note 1 Hermeneutik, pp. 87f, 109. Cf. Gadamer, op. cit., p.177f.
page 260 note 2 Hermeneutik, p. 109; cf. Werke, 1.7, p. 147, and Hermeneutik, pp. 136ff.
page 260 note 3 Kurze Darstellung, p. 55f.
page 260 note 4 cf. Niebuhr, R. R., “Schleiermacher on Language and Feeling”, Theology Today, 17. 2, 1960, pp. 150ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 261 note 1 cf. Gadamer, op. cit., pp. 173f and 180.
page 261 note 2 op. cit., p. 179.
page 261 note 3 Werke, I.7, p.32.
page 261 note 4 cf. Kimmerle, op. cit., p. 23.
page 261 note 5 Hodges, op. cit., p. 119.
page 261 note 6 Kimmerle, op. cit., p. 20f.
page 262 note 1 Hermeneutik, pp. 3If, 7gfF; cf. Gadamer, op. cit., p. 175f. See also Schleiermacher's, Kurze Darstellung, edit, by Scholz, H., p. 53f.Google Scholar
page 262 note 2 Hermeneutik, pp. 93ff.
page 263 note 1 cf. Barth, K., Theologische Fragen u. Antworten, p. 77f.Google Scholar
page 263 note 2 The Christian Faith, pp. 12ff.
page 263 note 3 cf. Barth, K., Theologische Fragen u. Antworten, p. 77f.Google Scholar
page 264 note 1 The Christian Faith, pp. 12ff.