Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:20:14.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Concept of Subordination in Barth's Special Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

A. J. McKelway
A. J. McKelway
Affiliation:
Davidson CollegeNorth Carolina 28036
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of the many difficult formulations in Karl Barth's ‘Special Ethics’, none seems less amenable to acceptable interpretation than his conception of the relation of male and female. I do not refer to Barth's insistence that Man, created as male and female, maintain both the unity and distinction required for true co-humanity. I refer, rather, to his puzzling (even if textually supported) assertion that this co-humanity is ordered by God in such a way that the woman is ‘sub-ordinate’ to the man without inferiority or disadvantage. Putting aside the exegetical issues involved, I will try to show that Barth's redefinition of the concept of sub-ordination gains coherence when understood as an ‘ordering’ of human life by a revealed order of creation, which in turn is an expression of the divine life itself. I will argue that the analogy Barth draws between the order of the Trinity and sexual relationship is authorized by his doctrine of creation, by his view of Christ as the analogia relationis, and by what I believe to be his application of the doctrine of perichoresis to anthropology. And finally, I want to suggest that, while some of Barth's language may have to be set aside, the arguments described here inform the presuppositions and method of an ethic more relevant for moral discrimination than has commonly been supposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Scottish Journal of Theology , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , August 1979 , pp. 345 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 346 note 1 Barth, Karl, Church Dogmatics, Vol. III/1 (Edinburgh, T. & T. Clark, 1958), pp. 178ffGoogle Scholar. Hereafter referred to in the text by volume numbers only.

page 346 note 2 Barth, III/1, pp. 288ff.

page 347 note 1 Barth, III/2, pp. 285–324.

page 347 note 2 Barth, III/4, pp. 172ff.

page 348 note 1 op. cit., pp. 169–170.

page 348 note 2 op. cit., p. 170.

page 348 note 3 Jewett, Paul K., Man as Male and Female (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975), p. 43Google Scholar. See also Oden, Thomas, The Promise of Karl Barth, pp. 97–8.Google Scholar

page 348 note 4 op. cit., p. 85.

page 348 note 5 ibid.

page 348 note 6 Willis, Robert E., The Ethics of Karl Barth (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1971), pp. 383ff.Google Scholar

page 349 note 1 Barth, II/1; see ‘The Being of God as Act’, pp. 257ff, and Willis, op. cit., p. 70.

page 349 note 2 Barth, Karl, Christ and Adam (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1957), p. 9.Google Scholar

page 350 note 1 Barth, II/2, p. 583.

page 350 note 2 Barth, III/4, p. 38.

page 350 note 3 Brunner, Emil, The Divine Imperative (Philadelphia: Westminster Press), p. 125.Google Scholar

page 352 note 1 von Harnack, Adolf, History of Dogma, Vol. IV (New York: Dover Publications, 1961), pp. 265ff.Google Scholar

page 352 note 2 Willis, op. cit., p. 122.

page 353 note 1 Barth, III/2, p. 262.

page 353 note 2 Willis, op. cit., p. 213.

page 353 note 3 ibid.

page 353 note 4 Seeberg, Reinhold, Text-book of the History of Doctrines, Vol. II (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1964), p. 324.Google Scholar

page 354 note 1 Karl Barth and the Future of Theology, in ‘Yale Divinity School Colloquium’ (Yale Divinity School Association, 1969), p. 15.Google Scholar

page 355 note 1 Hunsinger, George, Karl Barth and Radical Politics (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1976), p. 57.Google Scholar

page 356 note 1 Lehmann, Paul, ‘Karl Barth, Theologian of Permanent Revolution’, in Union Seminary Quarterly Review, Vol. XXVIII, no. 1, Fall 1972, p. 80.Google Scholar

page 356 note 2 ibid.

page 357 note 1 Lehmann, , The Transfiguration of Politics (New York: Harper and Row, 1975), p. 271.Google Scholar

page 357 note 2 ibid.