Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:33:55.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Baptism — Is Missionary Practice Inconsistent?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

Extract

In his booklet The Teaching of the Church regarding Baptism, p. 46, Karl Barth discusses a curious Lutheran view ‘that baptism effects something quite different in children and in adults’. He adds, in a footnote: ‘Is it clear in present day missionary work, where there seems to be agreement in a double practice of baptism, that such presupposes a double teaching regarding the meaning of baptism?’ As a missionary, I should like to answer emphatically ‘No!’ When we are baptising a convert from another faith after careful preparation, and when we are baptising the infant child of believing parents, we are doing essentially the same thing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 29 note 1 Used simply as a general term to include adult or child.

page 29 note 2 Shorter Catechism definition.

page 30 note 1 John 15.1, 2, 6, R.S.V.

page 30 note 2 Peter 2.9, R.S.V., spelling Anglicised.

page 30 note 3 e.g. Phil. 4.15; Philem. 3.

page 30 note 4 e.g. Rom. 16.33; I Cor. 10.32.

page 30 note 5 The question of the Pauline authorship of Ephesians does not really this statement, as ‘the Body of Christ’ is mentioned in I Corinthians and Colossians, whose authenticity is not questioned.

page 31 note 1 Dogmatics in Outline, p. 143.

page 31 note 2 Gal. 6.16.

page 32 note 1 R.S.V.

page 32 note 2 Isaiah xl–lxvi, p. 237 (4th ed., 1895).

page 33 note 1 2 Tim. 4.2.

page 33 note 2 I Cor. 3.15.

page 33 note 3 Isa. 49.3 (G. A. Smith).