No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Contemporary concern with the problems, exegetical and theological, relating to the nature and significance of the historical Jesus, is receiving widespread attention. Paul Althaus in his book The So-Called Kerygma and the Historical Jesus puts the matter thus: ‘… Certain though it may be that dogmatic theology is forbidden to try to get behind the Kerygma and the Christ proclaimed by it, the question still arises whether in another sense theology must not go behind the Kerygma; i.e. whether it must not inquire what is the relation of the Kerygma to the history, about which it informs us, and to which it bears witness.’ Althaus' book is useful in reminding us that we cannot properly emphasise the fact of Jesus' historical life without concern for the actual content of this life and the concrete character of the converse of Jesus with men. Althaus points to preservation of the Synoptic records in the canon as the reflection of the significance attached to the teaching and healing ministry of the historical Jesus.
page 133 note 1 Althaus, Paul, The So-Called Kerygma and the Historical Jesus, tr. Cairns, David (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1959), p. 23f.Google Scholar See also the useful inaugural lecture by Davies, W. D., ‘A Quest to be Resumed in New Testament Studies’, Union Seminary Quarterly Review, January 1960, pp. 83ff.Google Scholar Among works belonging to an earlier period in this century, reference might be made to Baillie, D. M., Faith in God and Its Christian Consummation (T. and T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1927)Google Scholar, especially Chapter VII, ‘Faith and the Historical Jesus’.
page 134 note 1 Robinson, J. M., A New Quest of the Historical Jesus (S.C.M. Press, London, 1959), p. 28.Google Scholar
page 134 note 2 Ritschl, Albrecht, The Christian Doctrine of Justification and Reconciliation, III, tr. Mackintosh, H. R. and Macaulay, A. B. (T. and T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1902), p. 3Google Scholar. Hereafter cited as JR III.
page 134 note 3 JR III, p. 1.
page 134 note 4 Robinson, op. cit., p. 44.
page 135 note 1 Brunner, Emil, The Mediator, tr. Wyon, Olive (Lutterworth Press, London, 1934). P. 57.Google ScholarPubMed
page 135 note 2 ibid., p. 97.
page 135 note 3 Ritschl, Albrecht, A Critical History of the Christian Doctrine of Justification and Reconciliation, tr. Black, J. S. (Edmonston and Douglas, Edinburgh, 1872), p. 598Google Scholar. Hereafter cited as JR. I.
page 135 note 4 Barth, Karl, Die protestantische – Theologie im ig Jahrhundert (Evangelischer Verlag AG. Zollikon, Zürich, 1952) p. 599.Google Scholar
page 136 note 1 JR III, p.386.
page 136 note 2 JR III, P.593.
page 136 note 3 JR I, p. 188.
page 136 note 4 Robinson, op. cit., p. 35.
page 137 note 1 JR III, p. 608.
page 137 note 2 JR III, p. 400.
page 138 note 1 JR III, p.591.
page 138 note 2 JR III, p. 417.
page 138 note 3 Ritschl, Albrecht, Theologie und Metaphysik, zur Verständigung tmd Abwthr (Adolph Marcur, Bonn. 1881), p. 38.Google Scholar
page 139 note 1 Barth, Karl, Church Dogmatics, IV/1, tr. Bromiley, G. W. (T. and T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1956) p. 127.Google Scholar
page 139 note 2 JR III, p. 406.
page 139 note 3 Bosc, Jean. The Kingly Office of Jesus Christ, tr. Reid, J. K. S. (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1959), p. 33.Google Scholar
page 140 note 1 JR III, 417.
page 140 note 2 JR III, p.441.
page 141 note 1 JR. III, p. 451, p. 454. The importance which not only Ritschl but also Harnack attached to Matt. 11.25–30 (cf. Luke 10.21–22) has often been underestimated in studies of Ritschlian theology. See Manson's, W. judicious comments in Jesus the Messiah (Hodder and Stoughton, London, 1943), p. 71f.Google Scholar
page 142 note 1 Karl Barth, CD. III/2, p. 208.
page 143 note 1 JR I, p. 214.
page 143 note 2 JR I, p. 213.
page 143 note 3 JR I, p. 526.
page 144 note 1 JR III, p. 453.
page 145 note 1 JR III, p. 474. See also Ritschl, Albrecht, ‘Die Aussagen iiber den Heilswerth des TodesJesu im Neuen Testament’, Jahrbücher für Deutsche Theologie, Achter Band, Zweites Heft, 1863.Google Scholar
page 145 note 2 Ritschl, Albrecht, Rechtfertigung und Versöhnung, II (A. Marcus und E. Weber, Bonn, 1903), p. 58.Google Scholar
page 146 note 1 JR III, p. 477.
page 146 note 2 JR III, p. 430.
page 147 note 1 JR III, p. 547.
page 148 note 1 Ritschl, Albrecht, Instruction in the Christian Religion, tr. from 4th ed. by Swing, A. T. in The Theology of Albrecht Ritschl (Longmans, Green and Co., New York, 1901), p. 199.Google Scholar
page 148 note 2 Karl Barth, CD. III/2, p. 446; See also Bultmann, Rudolf, ‘Ein Versuch ihn zu verstehen’, Theologische Studien, Heft 34 (Evangelischer Verlag AG. Zollikon, Zürich, 1953), p. 12f.Google Scholar
page 149 note 1 JR. III, p. 199. On this point, sec Mackintosh, H. R., Types of Modem Theology (Nisbet and Co., London, 1937), p. 151f.Google Scholar