Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:51:59.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Writer Looking for His Writing Scene: Paul Valéry's Procedures in His Notebooks around 1894

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2013

Karin Krauthausen
Karin Krauthausen*
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

The famous Cahiers of Paul Valéry (1871–1945) cannot be reduced to a single scientific discipline, a specific philosophical tradition, or a literary genre. For today's reader these notebooks constitute a format sui generis, one very often characterized by an “observation of a second order”: in the Cahiers Valéry uses writing, drawing, and calculating not only for purposes of argumentation; he also pays attention to the significance of such writing, drawing, and calculating processes for the production of knowledge. It is particularly the practice of note-taking and sketching in Valéry's notebooks that documents, rehearses, or questions the medial and instrumental conditions of both scientific research and artistic production. This is especially true of the early stages of the Cahiers in the years beginning around 1894 when Valéry was intensely searching for notation systems that would be conducive to his research interests. At the time the problem of how to write (as well as calculate and draw) was intrinsically bound up with the way he established his notebooks as a specific scene of writing. By closely examining a number of pages from the early notebooks I hope to show that the emerging regulation of Valéry's writing in the Cahiers results from simple operations that are noted and repeated by the writer until they gradually become procedures. What Valéry's Cahiers show us, however, is that procedures do not always work in favor of a final synthesis, but may also give rise to a format of eternal beginning. In the following I will present some of the constitutive procedures found in Valéry's early notebooks, procedures that range from a tentative gathering together and simple forms of recursion and variation to the rehearsing or invention of symbolic or graphic forms of notation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 26 , Special Issue 2: Knowledge in the Making , June 2013 , pp. 305 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binet, Alfred, and Passy, Jacques. 1894–95. “Études de psychologie sur les auteurs dramatiques.” Année Psychologique 1:60–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourjea, Serge. 2001. “Écriture et dessin dans les premiers ‘Cahiers’ de Valéry.” Forschungen zu Paul Valéry/Recherches Valéryennes 14:97–120.Google Scholar
Campe, Rüdiger. 1991. “Die Schreibszene. Schreiben.” In Paradoxien, Dissonanzen, Zusammenbrüche. Situationen offener Epistemologie, edited by Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich and Pfeiffer, Klaus Ludwig, 759–772. Frankfurt am main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Celeyrette-Pietri, Nicole. 1979. Valéry et le Moi: Des Cahiers à l'Œuvre. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Contat, Michel, and Ferrer, Daniel, eds. 1998. Pourquoi la Critique Génétique? Méthodes, Théories. Paris: CNRS Éditions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donalies, Hans. 1912. “Leonardo da Vinci's Flugtheorie.” (In installments) Deutsche Luftfahrer-Zeitschrift 16:8–10, 32–34, 54–55.Google Scholar
Faraday, Michael. 1839–1855. Experimental Researches in Electricity. London: Taylor.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Peter, ed. 2009. André Gide – Paul Valéry. Correspondance 1890–1942. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Fechner, Gustav Theodor. 1860. Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Hay, Louis. 1996. “Pour une sémiotique du mouvement.” Genesis 10:25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Christoph. 2008a. “Festhalten, Bereitstellen. Verfahren der Aufzeichnung.” In Daten sichern. Schreiben und Zeichnen als Verfahren der Aufzeichnung, edited by Hoffmann, Christoph, 7–20. Zurich, Berlin: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Christoph. 2008b. “Wie lesen? Das Notizbuch als Bühne der Forschung.” In Werkstätten des Möglichen 1930–1936: L. Fleck, E. Husserl, R. Musil, L. Wittgenstein, edited by Giesecke, Birgit, 45–57. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. 2 vols. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Kimura, Masahiko. 2008. Le mythe du Savoir. Naissance et évolution de la pensée scientifique chez Paul Valéry (1880–1920). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Krämer, Sybille. 1988. Symbolische Maschinen. Die Idee der Formalisierung in geschichtlichem Abriß. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Krauthausen, Karin. 2010a. “Paul Valéry and Geometry: Instrument, Writing Model, Practice.” Configurations. Special Issue: Aesthetics of the Tool. 18 (3):231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauthausen, Karin. 2010b. “Zur Notation topologischer Objekte. Interview mit Moritz Epple.” In Notieren, Skizzieren. Schreiben und Zeichnen als Verfahren des Entwurfs, edited by Krauthausen, Karin and Nasim, Omar W., 119–138. Zurich, Berlin: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
Krauthausen, Karin, and Nasim, Omar W.. 2010. “Papierpraktiken im Labor. Interview mit Hans-Jörg Rheinberger.” In Notieren, Skizzieren. Schreiben und Zeichnen als Verfahren des Entwurfs, edited by Krauthausen, Karin and Nasim, Omar W., 139–158. Zurich, Berlin: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1986. “Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together.” Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture and Present 6:1–40.Google Scholar
Leonardo da Vinci. 1881–1891. Les manuscrits de Léonard de Vinci de la bibliothèque de l'Institut de France, vol. 1–6. Edited by Ravaisson-Mollien, Charles. Paris: A. Quantin.Google Scholar
Leonardo da Vinci. 1893. I Manoscritti di Leonardo da Vinci. Codice sul volo degli uccelli e varie altre materie. Edited by Sabachnikoff, Teodoro. Paris: E. Rouveyre.Google Scholar
Leonardo da Vinci. 2000. Der Vögel Flug. Sul volo degli uccelli. Edited by Schneider, Marianne. Munich, Paris, London: Schirmer/Mosel.Google Scholar
Lilienthal, Otto. 1889. Der Vogelflug als Grundlage der Fliegekunst. Ein Beitrag zur Systematik der Flugtechnik; auf Grund zahlreicher von O. und G. Lilienthal ausgeführter Versuche. Berlin: R. Gaertners Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Lussy, Florence de. 2003. “Valéry et la science de 1890 à 1908.” Revue de la Bibliothèque nationale de France 15:84–93.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. 1886. Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen. Jena: Gustav Fischer. (Repeatedly reworked in the following editions, see: Mach, Ernst. 1906. Die Analyse der Empfindungen und das Verhältnis des Physischen zum Psychischen. Jena: Gustav Fischer).Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. 1897. “Über Gedankenexperimente.” Zeitschrift für den Physikalischen und Chemischen Unterricht 10th edition, first issue: 1–5.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. 1905. Erkenntnis und Irrtum. Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.Google Scholar
Mainberger, Sabine. 2009. “Le parti pris du trait. Zu Paul Valéry und Leonardo da Vinci.” Poetica 41/1–2:127–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannoni, Laurent. 1999. Étienne-Jules Marey. La mémoire de l'œil. Milan: Mazzotta.Google Scholar
Marey, Étienne-Jules. 1894. Le movement. Paris: G. Masson.Google Scholar
Maxwell, James Clerk. [1873] 1881. A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, vol.1 and 2, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Maxwell, James Clerk. 1885–1887. Traité d'électricité et du magnétisme, vols. 1 and 2. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Métraux, Alexandre. 2008. “Paul Valéry als Selbstaufschreiber. Analysen einiger autographischer Bruchstücke.” In ‘Schreiben heißt: sich selber lesen.’ Schreibszenen als Selbstlektüren, edited by Giuriato, Davide, Stingelin, Martin, and Zanetti, Sandro, 217–248. Munich: Fink.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Robert. 1996. Paul Valéry. La page, l'écriture. Clermont-Ferrand: Association des Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Clermont-Ferrand.Google Scholar
Poincaré, Henri. 1894. “Sur la nature du raisonnement mathématique.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 2:371–384.Google Scholar
Poincaré, Henri. 1902. La Science et l'Hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Poe, Edgar Allan. 1848. Eureka: A prose poem. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1994. “Alles, was überhaupt zu einer Inskription führen kann.” In Im Zug der Schrift, edited by Haas, Norbert, Nägele, Rainer, and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg, 295–309. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Ribot, Théodule. 1900. Essai sur l'imagination créatrice. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Robinson, Judith 1963. L'Analyse de l'Esprit dans les Cahiers de Paul Valéry. Paris: Corti.Google Scholar
Ryan, Paul. 2007. Paul Valéry et le dessin. Frankfurt am Main et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Schneider, Marianne. 2000. “Zum Codex Der Vögel Flug.” In Leonardo da Vinci. Der Vögel Flug. Sul volo degli uccelli, edited by Schneider, Marianne, 14–18. Munich, Paris, London: Schirmer/Mosel.Google Scholar
Séailles, Gabriel. 1892. Léonard de Vinci. L'artiste et savant. Essai de biographie psychologique. Paris: Perrin.Google Scholar
Siegert, Bernhard. 2009. “Weiße Flecken und finstre Herzen. Von der symbolischen Weltordnung zur Weltentwurfsordnung.” In Kulturtechnik Entwerfen. Praktiken, Konzepte und Medien in Architektur und Design Science, edited by Gethmann, Daniel and Hauser, Susanne, 19–47. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatin, Victor. 1910. Théorie et Pratique de L'Aviation. Paris: H. Dunod & E. Pinat.Google Scholar
Toulouse, Édouard. 1896. Enquêtes médico-psychologiques sur les rapports de la supériorité intellectuelle avec la névropathie. Vol. 1: Introduction générale. Émile Zola. Paris: Société d'éditions scientifiques.Google Scholar
Toulouse, Édouard. 1910. Enquêtes médico-psychologiques sur la supériorité intellectuelle, vol. 2: Henri Poincaré. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. Ca. 1894. Journal de bord. Bibliothèque nationale de France: Naf 19205.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. Ca. 1894–1896. Pré-cahier. Bibliothèque nationale de France: Naf 19117.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1928. “La création artistique.” Bulletin de la Société française de Philosophie 28:2–14.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1957a. “Introduction à la méthode de Léonard de Vinci.” In Œuvres, vol. 1, edited by Hytier, Jean, 1153–1199. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1957b. “Note et digression.” In Œuvres, vol. 1, edited by Hytier, Jean, 1199–1233. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1957c. “Léonard et les philosophes.” In Valéry, Paul. Œuvres, vol. 1, edited by Hytier, Jean, 1234–1269. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1964. “The Creation of Art.” In The Collected Works of Paul Valéry, vol. 13, Aesthetics, translated by Manheim, Ralph, 117–138. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1972a. “Introduction to the Method of Leonardo da Vinci.” In The Collected Works of Paul Valéry, vol. 8, Leonardo Poe Mallarmé, translated by Cowley, Malcolm and Lawler, James R., 3–63. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1972b. “Note and Digression.” In The Collected Works of Paul Valéry, vol. 8, Leonardo Poe Mallarmé, translated by Cowley, Malcolm and Lawler, James R., 64–109. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1972c. “Leonardo and the Philosophers.” In The Collected Works of Paul Valéry, vol. 8, Leonardo Poe Mallarmé, translated by Cowley, Malcolm and Lawler, James R., 110–157. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1973. Cahiers, vol. 1. Edited by Robinson, Judith. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 1987. Cahiers 1894–1914, vol. 1. Edited by Celeyrette-Pietri, Nicole and Robinson-Valéry, Judith. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. 2000. Cahiers/Notebooks, vol. 1. Edited by Stimpson, Brian, Gifford, Paul, Pickering, Robert, translated by Gifford, Paul, Miles, Siân, Pickering, Robert, Stimpson, Brian. Frankfurt am Main et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vogel, Christina. 2005. “La problématique de la réécriture – en partant des ‘Éléments de critique’ d'Almuth Grésillon.” In Le laboratoire génétique – ‘feuilles volantes’ & Cahiers, edited by Hontebeyrie, Micheline and Haffner, Françoise (= Bulletin des Études valéryennes, vols. 98/99), 35–54. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Windgätter, Christof. 2009. “ZeitSchriften. Von einer Revolution der Experimentalkultur im 19. Jahrhundert.” In Zeitkritische Medien, edited by Volmar, Axel, 81–104. Berlin: Kadmos.Google Scholar
Wouwermans, Armand. 1894. Contribution à la bibliographie de la locomotion aérienne. Anvers: Vve De Backer.Google Scholar