Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T01:47:13.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Had Faith in Sociology? Scholarly and Ideological Divergences in Belgium around 1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Raf Vanderstraeten
Raf Vanderstraeten*
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Belgium E-mails: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

This paper examines the early institutionalization of sociology in Belgium. It displays how different intellectual and social contexts bred their own research interests and research approaches. It shows, more particularly, how ideological affiliations and divisions defined the setting within which this new discipline had to develop in Belgium in the decades around 1900. As a consequence of the ideological controversies, sociology had difficulty gaining legitimacy as a theory-driven analysis of society. Most scholars in Belgium could not avoid taking an explicitly normative position on society. This paper also displays how secularization and the reinforcement of the international level and its infrastructure gradually allowed for more academic autonomy for sociology in Belgium.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 457 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. 1999. Department and Discipline. Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abend, Gabriel, Petre, Caitlin, and Sauder, Michael. 2013. “Styles of Causal Thought: An Empirical Investigation.” American Journal of Sociology 119:602–654.Google Scholar
Bertrams, Kenneth, Coupain, Nicolas, and Homburg, Ernst. 2013. Solvay: History of a Multinational Family Firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boudens, Robrecht. 1995. Two Cardinals: John Henry Newman, Désiré Joseph Mercier. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Brants, Victor. 1906. “La part de la méthode de Le Play dans les études sociales en Belgique.” La Réforme Sociale 6:636–652.Google Scholar
Chernilo, Daniel. 2006. “Social Theory's Methodological Nationalism: Myth and Reality.” European Journal of Social Theory 9:5–22.Google Scholar
Clémens, René. 1935. Personnalité morale et personnalité juridique. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
Couttenier, Maarten. 2005. Congo tentoongesteld: Een geschiedenis van de Belgische antropologie en het museum van Tervuren (1882-1925) [Congo Exhibited: A History of Belgian Anthropology and the Museum of Tervuren, 1882-1925]. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Crawford, Elisabeth. 1992. Nationalism and Internationalism in Science, 1880–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crombois, Jean-François. 1994. L'univers de la sociologie en Belgique de 1900 à 1940. Brussels: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
de Bie, Pierre. 1974. La sociologie d’Émile Waxweiler. Brussels: Palais des Académies.Google Scholar
de Bie, Pierre. 1986. “Les débuts de la sociologie en Belgique. III: Les sociétés belges de sociologie et le centre interuniversitaire.” Recherches Sociologiques 17:193–230.Google Scholar
de Bie, Pierre. 1988. Naissance et premiers développements de la sociologie en Belgique. Louvain-la-Neuve: CIACO.Google Scholar
De Bont, Raf. 2008. Darwins kleinkinderen: De evolutietheorie in België 1864–1945 [Darwin's Grandchildren: The Theory of Evolution in Belgium, 1864-1945].” Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar
Deferme, Jo. 2007. Uit de ketens van de vrijheid: Het debat over de sociale politiek in België 1886–1914 [From the Chains of Freedom: The Debate on Social Politics in Belgium, 1886-1914].” Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.Google Scholar
Defourny, Maurice. 1902. La sociologie positiviste: Auguste Comte. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Defourny, Maurice. 1903. “Le rôle de la sociologie dans le positivisme (suite et fin).” Revue Néo-Scolastique 10:245–252.Google Scholar
De Greef, Guillaume. 1886. Introduction à la sociologie. Brussels: Mayolez.Google Scholar
De Greef, Guillaume. 1895. Le transformisme social. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Dejongh, Charles. 1901. Note pour MM. De Greef, Denis et Vandervelde. Brussels: s.n.Google Scholar
Deploige, Simon. 1911. Le conflit de la morale et de la sociologie. Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Deploige, Simon. 1938. The Conflict between Ethics and Sociology. Translated by Miltner, Rev. Charles C.. London: Herder.Google Scholar
Deschamps, Fernand. 1902. “Notes et documents: L'Institut Solvay de Sociologie.” Le Mouvement Sociologique 2:392–404.Google Scholar
Despy-Meyer, Andrée. 1973. Inventaire des archives de l'Université Nouvelle de Bruxelles, 1894–1919. Brussels: Association des Archivistes et Bibliothécaires de Belgique.Google Scholar
Despy-Meyer, Andrée, and Goffin, Pierre. 1976. Liber Memorialis de l'Institut des Hautes Études de Belgique fondé en 1894. Brussels: Université Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Dhont, Pieter. 2011. Un double compromis: Enjeux et débats relatifs à l'enseignement universitaire en Belgique au 19e siècle. Ghent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
Digneffe, Françoise. 1986. La sociologie en Belgique de 1880 à 1914: La naissance des instituts de sociologie. Louvain-la-Neuve: CRID&P.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1886. “Review of Guillaume De Greef, Introduction à la sociologie.” Revue Philosophique 22:658–663.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1912. “Review of Simon Deploige, Le conflit de la morale et de la sociologie.” L'Année Sociologique 12:326–328.Google Scholar
Firsching, Horst. 1995. “Emile Durkheims Religionssoziologie – made in Germany? Zu einer These von Simon Deploige.” In Religionssoziologie um 1900, edited by Krech, Volkhard and Tyrell, Hartmann, 351–363. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.Google Scholar
Fournier, Marcel. 2007. Émile Durkheim: 1858–1917. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Gerard, Emmanuel. 1992. Sociale wetenschappen aan de Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven, 1892–1992 [Social Sciences at the Catholic University of Louvain, 1892–1992]. Leuven: Politica Cahier.Google Scholar
Gerard, Emmanuel, and Wils, Kaat. 1999. “Catholics and Sociology in Leuven from Désiré Mercier to Jacques Leclercq: A Process of Appropriation.” In Sociology and Religions: An Ambiguous Relationship, edited by Voyé, Liliane and Billiet, Jaak, 38–56. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Giddings, Franklin H. 1891. “Sociology as a University Study.” Political Science Quarterly 6:635–655.Google Scholar
Goddijn, Hans P. M. 1983. “De kerkelijke opponenten van Emile Durkheim [The religious opponents of Emile Durkheim].” Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift 10:147–171.Google Scholar
Gülich, Christian. 1992. “Le rôle de la coopération scientifique internationale dans la constitution de la sociologie en Europe.” Communications 54:105–117.Google Scholar
Haesaert, Jean. 1956. Sociologie générale. Bruxelles: Erasme.Google Scholar
Hanssens, Eugène. 1901. Note pour M. Solvay. Brussels: s.n.Google Scholar
Heilbron, Johan. 2014. “The Social Sciences as an Emerging Global Field.” Current Sociology 62:685–703.Google Scholar
Heilbron, Johan. 2015. French Sociology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hellemans, Staf. 1990. Strijd om de moderniteit: Sociale bewegingen en verzuiling in Europa sinds 1800 [Conflict about Modernity: Social Movements and Pillarization in Europe since 1800]. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Jacquart, Camille. 1903. “Rapport sur les travaux de la Société Belge de Sociologie.” Annales de Sociologie et Mouvement Sociologique 1:1–27.Google Scholar
Leemans, Victor. 1938. Inleiding tot de sociologie [Introduction to Sociology]. Antwerpen: Standaard Boekhandel.Google Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, Lucien. 1903. La morale et la science des mœurs. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Louckx, Kaat. 2017. “The Nation-State in its State-istics (Belgium, 1846–1947).” Nations and Nationalism 23:505–523.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1973. Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lyman, Stanford M. 1992. Militarism, Imperialism, and Racial Accommodation: An Analysis and Interpretation of the Early Writings of Robert E. Park. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1909. “Review of Les Balanga / Les Majombe / Les Basongos.” L'Année Sociologique 11:304.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1912. “Review of Les Warega / Les Ababua / Les Mandja.” L'Année Sociologique 12:138–142.Google Scholar
Mosbah-Natanson, Sébastien. 2008. “Internationalisme et tradition nationale: le cas de la constitution de la sociologie française autour de 1900.” Revue d'Histoire des Sciences humaines 18:35–62.Google Scholar
Ollion, Etienne, and Abbott, Andrew. 2016. “French Connections: The Reception of French Sociologists in the USA (1970-2012).” Archives Européennes de Sociologie 57:331–372.Google Scholar
Piette, Valérie. 1994. “Les semaines sociales (universitaires) de l'Institut de Sociologie.” In Laboratoires et réseaux de diffusion des idées en Belgique (XIXe-XXe siècles), edited by Kurgan-van Hentenryk, Ginette, 77–94. Brussels: Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Poncelet, Marc. 2008. L'invention des sciences coloniales belges. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Rol, Cécile. 2012. “Animisme et totemisme: Durkheim vs Wundt.” L'Année Sociologique 62:351–366.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1907. “Review of Emile Waxweiler, Esquisse d'une sociologie.” Economic Journal 17:109–111.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 2008a. Gesamtausgabe, Band 22: Briefe 1880–1911. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 2008b. Gesamtausgabe, Band 23: Briefe 1912–1918, Jugendbriefe. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Small, Albion W. 1906. “Review of Emile Waxweiler, Esquisse d'une sociologie.” American Journal of Sociology 12:424–426.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1873–1881. Descriptive Sociology or Groups of Sociological Facts. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Stichweh, Rudolf. 1996. “Science in the System of World Society.” Social Science Information 35:327–340.Google Scholar
Tarde, Gabriel. 1895. “Le transformisme social.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger 40:26–40.Google Scholar
Thompson, Kenneth. 2002. Emile Durkheim. Revised edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trasenster, Louis. 1884. L'enseignement des sciences sociales et politiques. Liège: Desoer.Google Scholar
Van der Rest, Eugène. 1888. La sociologie: Discours prononcé à la séance de rentrée de l'Université de Bruxelles le 15 octobre 1888. Brussels: Mayolez.Google Scholar
Van der Rest, Eugène. 1889. L'enseignement des sciences sociales: Discours. Brussels: Mayolez.Google Scholar
Vanderstraeten, Raf. 1999. “Versäulung und funktionale Differenzierung: Zur Enttraditionalisierung der katholischen Lebensformen.” Soziale Welt 50:297–314.Google Scholar
Vanderstraeten, Raf. 2002. “Cultural Values and Social Differentiation: The Catholic Pillar and Its Education System in Belgium and the Netherlands.” Compare 32:133–148.Google Scholar
Vanderstraeten, Raf. 2014. “Religious Activism in a Secular World: The Rise and Fall of the Teaching Congregations of the Catholic Church.” Paedagogica Historica 50:494–513.Google Scholar
Vanderstraeten, Raf, and Louckx, Kaat. 2018. Sociology in Belgium: A Sociological History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Van Langenhove, Fernand. 1978. “L'Institut de Sociologie Solvay au temps de Waxweiler.” Revue de l'Institut de Sociologie 51:229–261.Google Scholar
Van Overbergh, Cyrille. 1900. “Les courants sociologiques du XIXe siècle.” Revue Néo-Scolastique 7:173–189.Google Scholar
Van Overbergh, Cyrille. 1910. “Préface.” In Les Kukus (Possessions Anglo-Égyptiennes). Sociologie descriptive, vol. VI, edited by Vanden Plas, Joseph and Van Overbergh, Cyrille, v–xxxviii. Bruxelles: Dewit / Institut International de Bibliographie.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Wim. 1976. “L'agitation étudiante et la fondation de l'Université Nouvelle en 1894.” Revue Belge d'Histoire Contemp oraine 7:197–241.Google Scholar
Vermeersch, Arthur. 1903. “Les catholiques et la sociologie.” Annales de Sociologie et Mouvement Sociologique 1:28–55.Google Scholar
Warnotte, Daniel. 1946. Ernest Solvay et l'Institut de Sociologie: Contribution à l'Histoire de l'Energétique Sociale. Brussels: Emile Bruylant.Google Scholar
Waxweiler, Émile. 1906. Esquisse d'une sociologie. Bruxelles & Leipzig: Misch & Thron.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1924. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Soziologie und Sozialpolitik. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1994. Gesamtausgabe Band 6: Briefe 1909–1910. Frankfurt a.M.: Surhkamp.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2018. Gesamtausgabe Band 12: Verstehende Soziologie und Werturteilsfreiheit, Schriften und Reden 1908–1917. Frankfurt a.M.: Surhkamp.Google Scholar
Wils, Kaat. 1997. “De verleiding van de sociologie: Belgische en Nederlandse katholieken en het positivisme (1880-1914) [The seduction of sociology: Belgian and Dutch Catholics and positivism, 1880-1914].” Trajecta 6:156–173.Google Scholar
Wils, Kaat. 2011. “Everyman His Own Sociologist: Henri Pirenne and Disciplinary Boundaries Around 1900.” Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Nieuwste Geschiedenis 41:355–380.Google Scholar
Wils, Kaat, and Rasmussen, Anne. 2012. “Sociology in a Transnational Perspective: Brussels, 1890–1925.” Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire 90:1273–1296.Google Scholar
Worms, René. 1900. “L'Institut en 1900 et le quatrième Congrès International de Sociologie.” Annales de l'Institut International de Sociologie 7:33–46.Google Scholar